Fort Riley Soldier Charged with Murder Conspiracy
Junction City Post photo.
Remember that Fort Riley Soldier that got arrested after trying to meet a 16-year-old? This is the same guy who, while in custody, had the bad luck of someone using his car as a battering ram.
We have another case involving a Fort Riley Soldier, this time on suspicions of murder. If he’s guilty, SFC Jeremiah Joseph Grubb threw away a good career… Doing something he may have told others not to do during safety briefs.
From Junction City Post:
Junction City police have arrested Jeremiah Joseph Grubb, 33, Junction City, on suspicion of Conspiracy to Commit Capital Murder in connection with the death of Jenna Schafer, 31, Junction City in December. Grubb is an active duty soldier at Fort Riley and holds the rank of E-7 in the Army.
Police also said after a search warrant was conducted in the 600 block of West 5th Street, Grubb, along with Julia M. Ridenour, 20, Junction City were arrested on suspicion of Possession of a Hallucinogenic, Possession of a Stimulant and Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
According to the Topeka Capital Journal, Jenna Schafer was pregnant, and was a victim of an alleged contract killing.
You can read more from the Junction City Post and from the Topeka Capital-Journal.
Category: "Teh Stoopid", Dumbass Bullshit
Lot more to this than any of these articles indicated. We will wait patiently for the “rest of the story.”
Either way, the Sarge has f’ed up royally. Sex, drugs, and rock & roll?
Agree ^^^^
Unfortunately, stupid and evil are not confined to any one group or class of people.
First, he isn’t charged with murder so you might want to correct that. Second, who gives a shit about his career if he’s guilty. The woman killed was pregnant and had two daughters, motherless since Christmas Day.
2/17 Air Cav: First, he isn’t charged with murder so you might want to correct that.
Wrong. He was charged with conspiracy to commit murder, you might want to correct that:
2/17 Air Cav: Second, who gives a shit about his career if he’s guilty.
Not him obviously. But it’s good to get this kind of information out for those who may be contemplating doing stupid shit… Hopefully to deter them from doing that or other kinds of stupid shit.
Veterans aren’t the only ones reading this site. Those who are still serving, who are reading this, can use this and other similar articles here as examples when talking to their troops.
2/17 Air Cav: The woman killed was pregnant and had two daughters, motherless since Christmas Day.
The above post didn’t diminish that in any way, shape or form. The above post was catered to a veteran/military audience who would be able to see the negative impacts that murder had not just on the victim, but on the victim’s family and friends.
“Wrong. He was charged with conspiracy to commit murder, you might want to correct that.”
What language care we communicating in? You (or someone) changed the title of your article to reflect the correct charge, so what’s up with that “Wrong” business? As for the rest of your explanation, I know that your skin is transparent but, man, that explanation sucked. I can hear it now, ‘Well, I was going to contract to kill my wife, but after reading thebesig’s piece, I’ve reconsidered.’
2/17 Air Cav: What language care we communicating in? We’re speaking in the same language. The problem is that you’re not understanding what you’re reading. More on that as this reply goes on. 2/17 Air Cav: You (or someone) changed the title of your article to reflect the correct charge, so what’s up with that “Wrong” business? [projecting your traits] Wrong. Your argument was that he wasn’t charged; in this case with murder. It doesn’t matter if he was the one that pulled the trigger, or was a part of an act that was intended to get someone killed, that person was arrested in association with getting someone killed. Your argument was that he wasn’t charged with murder, which is incorrect. Absent any clarification beyond that statement, you’re arguing that there were no charges against him. No charges is what I read from that. If he wasn’t charged with murder, he wasn’t involved with any activity that lead to a murder. If he wasn’t charged, then he’s waiting to be charged. 2/17 Air Cav: As for the rest of your explanation, I know that your skin is transparent but, man, that explanation sucked. PROJECTING YOUR TRAITS Wrong again. First, no, my skin isn’t thin or transparent. The way I generated my response has everything to do with the profile that you’ve slotted yourself into. I’ve seen you react to others, as well as to me, in a way that puts you into one of the psychological profiles I’ve put people, that I’ve argued against, in. In your response to me on the memorial thread, as well as to the first line of your response above, you demonstrated narcissism and control issues. Your follow on sentences demonstrated not just narcissism and control issues, but anger and stress issues. You’re not that different from Commissar or the others that I’ve debated against. I’ve been arguing against people, online, for over 15 years. I’ve used the psychological profiles formed, during this time, to craft my replies in a way that I’d know would get the opposition to react a certain way. So far,… Read more »
Look, if you don’t know that a charge of murder and a charge of conspiracy to commit murder are different, that they are not the same thing, then there’s nothing more I can say about that. As for the rest of your tome, I’ve caught your act m,any times with others previously. Now, it’s my turn. You cannot take any criticism, let alone correction, and you wear the other party out with your ramblings. So, have at it. This one ought to be worth another 2,000 words. Oh, and congratulations on pushing a pencil for so long. Your dick is certainly bigger than mine.
2/17 Air Cav: Look, if you don’t know that a charge of murder and a charge of conspiracy to commit murder are different, that they are not the same thing, First, you can’t figure out that both could lead to someone losing their life. You don’t have a leg to stand on telling people what they do know, or don’t know, especially since they failed to read what the other said with the intention of understanding what they said. Second, your point isn’t the point of this article. The point of this article is that a Fort Riley Soldier was arrested for being involved with actions that lead to a woman’s murder. You, having control issues, crafted your post in a way that called for an action to be done rather than attempt to understand what’s being argued. 2/17 Air Cav: then there’s nothing more I can say about that. This has been the case since before you made your first post. I would expect you, of all people, to know how to understand what you’re reading, and to resist the urge to call for action to be taken based on that lack of understanding. 2/17 Air Cav: As for the rest of your tome, Just like what the others have done, dismiss an argument that dismantled your own argument, as nothing but a tome, or other description of something long, rather than what it is, instead of attempting to defend an argument you appeared to have pulled out of thin air. 2/17 Air Cav: I’ve caught your act m,any times with others previously. What you’ve caught me doing many times before is what others here have caught me doing numerous times before, taking the opposition’s argument apart point by point. You’re not the first one to say, “Oh yeah, well you [repeat of what I said regarding them].” Yes, do keep showing me that you have control, anger, narcissistic, and stress issues. 2/17 Air Cav: Now, it’s my turn. Imitation is the best form of flattery. Do continue. You’re not the first one to do this in response to… Read more »
Congrats 2/17. With every reply you get free psychoanalysis!
Sorry, GDC. I didn’t read all of that crap but I saw just enough to hold my nose and turn away.
Been there, done that.
Said a couple of minutes after a post that essentially proves this statement wrong. When I read this quoted statement, I knew that you were full of it. If you “just saw enough to hold your nose and turn”, you wouldn’t have replied to me. But you did, as I expected. You have too much of the issues, that I pointed out above, to do otherwise.
Blah, blah, and blah. I read enough, as I said. You think otherwise. Okay. That’s fine. Stick with what you’re good at: global warming and weather reports.
2/17 Air Cav: Blah, blah, and blah.
Just like kid on the recess playground, putting his hands on his ears, and saying, “Na, na, na, na, I can’t hear you, na, na, na.” Your need for control is such that you have to, in frustration/anger, start your response with “blah, blah, and blah.”
Still think you don’t have control issues?
2/17 Air Cav: I read enough, as I said.
You said that you read enough to cover your nose and turn away. The comparison was clear. Usually when someone covers their nose and turns away, they’re doing it rapidly. If that analogy was accurate, then you wouldn’t have read enough to generate your last reply.
2/17 Air Cav: You think otherwise. Okay. That’s fine.
Because I go by your actions rather than your words. You claimed that you “turned away”, but your actions show that you didn’t turn away. Your response right after that showed that you didn’t “cover your nose and turn away,” catching only a glimpse or a short phrase.
Simply put, your actions contradicted your words.
2/17 Air Cav: Stick with what you’re good at: global warming and weather reports.
If those were the only two things that I was good at, then that would be two more than what you’re good at.
Make that one more… You’re good at chasing your tail. I’m enjoying this exchange.
Hey, I haven’t read this one at all. I’m sure it’s your usual excellent work. You can call me a liar again. It’s okay. I know it makes you feel better. Any word on the polar vortex?
2/17 Air Cav: Hey, I haven’t read this one at all.
Given that you have a propensity to not fully understand what’s being argued, the accuracy of your response would still be poor either way.
2/17 Air Cav: I’m sure it’s your usual excellent work.
Ironic how, in your sarcasm, you came closer to reality than when you weren’t sarcastic.
2/17 Air Cav: You can call me a liar again. It’s okay.
Well, when you claim one thing and do something else, I have to go by your actions. Your actions called you out. All I did was serve as the scribe with informing you of the validity of your statement.
Given your track record, I’d say that you read the above response. Your actions suggest that’s what happened. I did mention how your actions contradicted your words in the post that you replied to.
2/17 Air Cav: I know it makes you feel better.
I enjoy watching how the opposition responds. It’s fun.
2/17 Air Cav: Arf, arf, snap, arf, arf, snap, arf, arf,
That tail doesn’t want to be caught, doesn’t it.
It’s not that you are a liar. It’s just that you have anger issues and control issues and you’re a narcissist. Just like anyone else that’s ever tried to have a discussion with him.
GDContractor: It’s not that you are a liar.
His actions do contradict his words, I pointed that out above.
GDContractor: It’s just that you have anger issues and control issues and you’re a narcissist.
As I mentioned above, I recognize these patterns, and could see people slotting themselves into the profile that emerges on them as the debate goes on. When I could use this information to say things in my post to get an expected response, this isn’t a description that one could throw up out of thin air.
When I identify someone with those issues, I’m dead accurate. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve seen this verified in the real world, either though someone jumping onto a thread I’m on and backing what I say based on what they know of the person first hand, as well as the attitudes of the leftists on the streets.
The attacks on the MAGA kids, and the insistence that the drummer was a “victim” fits the profile that I have on the leftist that I’ve argued against online.
GDContractor: Just like anyone else that’s ever tried to have a discussion with him.
Everyone that has had a debate against me attempted to get me to see things their way without them taking an inch towards seeing things my way. As I’ve mentioned on numerous times, I don’t debate to change the opposition’s mind, likewise I haven’t changed my position on anything that the opposition says.
There are requirements that I use before I debate against someone. When those requirements are met, the opposition lends itself to slotting into psychological profiles.
Not one of the people hat I’ve argued against were trying to engage in a “discussion” with me. It was always the other side trying to get me to see and believe things that they wanted me to see and believe.
True to form.
As the mother of the victim, I hope this piece of shit rots in hell!! The pain, the loss, the emptiness, the heartache that engulfs our family is overwhelming and if he gave 2 shits about his career, he wouldn’t of been AWOL and maybe just maybe had he stayed on the straight and narrow my daughter would be here and my precious grandchildren wouldn’t of lost their mom!!! The depths of hell are not even good enough for him!! An eye for an eye!!
Must be a slow day. And the site ran out of blue pixels.
Wow, part of taking a hit out on a pregnant woman? Classy. There’s much more to this story, so I look forward to hearing it.
Rae Carruth could not be reached for comment.
Just my .02 worth.
Let’s see, 33 year old man, 20 year old woman, drugs. What could possibly go wrong. I recognize I’m old school but what ever happened to getting a little mutual strange without anything more involved than an adult beverage if candy was not dandy. We live in a scary world.
124 miles from Junction City to Fort Leavenworth. If guilty, I hope the ex-Sarge enjoys is last road trip.
Aside, it looks like Fort Riley became Fort Stewart’s dumping ground for problem childs.
He may not be going to Leavenworth. Kansas may try him on state charges and send him to El Dorado instead.
He could end up in Lansing as well.
Possibly, if he gets less than a death sentence. It’s my understanding that all Kansas inmates who receive a death sentence go to El Dorado.
I wonder who will claim Primary Jurisdiction, the Military or the State of Kansas? He could end up getting tried and convicted by both and have to serve time in the USDB at Leavenworth followed by time served in a Kansas Prison just like when someone in the Service gets a DUI and not only pays for it in Civilian Court, they get punishment from their CoC.
I suspect if he’s convicted in state court of conspiracy to commit murder, he may well get a very long sentence or possibly the death penalty. If that happens I kinda doubt the military will waste its time trying him. My guess is that in that scenario they’ll simply Chapter 14 him, give him a UOTH, and let Kansas have him.
If he’s guilty of being involved in the murder of a pregnant woman (no matter if she was a druggy skank endangering her unborn child), then all he deserves is a bullet to the base of the skull, and a shallow grave..(coyotes gotta eat too!)