Hillary Clinton and Alicia Machado: Sisterhood of the traveling getaway car
Democrats have been high-fiving and deliriously jiving since their candidate introduced the voluptuous Venezuelan vigilante upon Donald Trump during Monday night’s debate. The Dems would have you believe that this luscious Latina was used and abused by that cruel capitalist in a manner that should totally disqualify him from ever serving as president. Apparently as her boss, a business owner who hired her and signed her to a contract that required her to maintain her lovely person in a physical state so as to be able to gracefully and gorgeously represent the public persona of Miss Universe, her mean old plantation master castigated the poor, pretty thing for ignoring those specific terms of her contract and becoming a very non-contractual fatty.
That mean old boss, an investor who’d devoted millions of dollars to a business enterprise only to see it fall on its (her) fat face, was not happy with his increasingly large charge and expressed his disappointment with some really mean words that by now have surely been banned by the thought speech movement. He actually referred to his glamorous grub grazer as Miss Piggy, which currently has liberal panties in spiraling, knotted twists from Berkeley to Boston. Why, how could he be so crass, so cold, so unfeeling toward the sensitive emotions of this tender tendering of Latina loveliness?
Uh, well, since Monday night’s sucker-punching by Hillary and NBC’s Lester Holt, a good deal of information has emerged about the gorgeous gastronomic gorger that would lead us to believe that once again the Democrats have somehow managed to step on their minimally depending appendages by bringing forth a witness so quickly and easily impeached by her extensively sleazy and even murderously criminal background. Just Google Alicia Machado and do a little searching through all those hits, and you’ll quickly see that this Trump accuser is a very suspect source of anything approaching truthful. Her intimate relationship with a Mexican drug cartel leader that reportedly yielded a child should make anyone question her judgment, but it’s her defiant defense of that relationship and other aberrant behaviors that should ban her forever from serving as a credible witness in any legal proceeding and most certainly in an American presidential election.
But if you still have questions about the young woman’s judgment, perhaps her reported live sex fling on a Spanish reality television show could move your thinking along.
But I think I know why Hillary may feel a common bond with this gangster bimbo. Alicia, you see, was accused of driving a getaway car for her gangster boyfriend in a killing in Venezuela but escaped prosecution for lack of witnesses. Don’t you think Hillary must admire Alicia for that? After all, in a symbolic sense, isn’t that what Hillary Clinton has always done for Bill in all his extensive history of sexual predation: drive his getaway car?
Crossposted at American Thinker
Category: Politics
She didn’t make tape, eh?
In context, John D is a PFC (Punster First Class).
Given the Clinton’s opponents’ habits of committing suicide, they may feel a deep bond with each other…
Well, that does it! I’m definitely voting for Trump! Anyone who is smart enough to fire a….
I just had to stop. She’s a slut, a fat slut and a scum.
Why was she hiding under the bed covers? Why not just let all of it hang out?
I thought the thread was about Machado, not Hillary…
This really is machado about nothing..
http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/thefw.com/files/2012/05/scarecrow-meme-puns.jpg
Sluts need love too!
That’s why we have ID-SARC.
Hey, BACK OFF RIGHT NOW!
I saw him first. Him, and that Dave Hardon fellow. They’re mine. So just piss off!
What ever happens to all of that 1960s free love shit?
Ain’t there enough for everyone? Especially with sluts!
Yeah, no wonder hillary likes her. Hillary probably got to see her naked and was turned on. Word is, Huma was quite jealous but too busy trying to find her tongue ring in a dark scary location…
Must you make me gag this early?
Hildabeast says Trump mistreats women. I’ll grant that he’s an asshole, but…Christ, lady, have you met YOUR OWN HUSBAND?
She, apparently, hasn’t looked in a mirror in years, either.
I’ve been waiting for a politics post to link to this essay:
http://www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/after-the-republic/
I really can’t recommend it highly enough. I read it two days ago and then reread it yesterday because it took me a couple of times to digest it. It’s fairly long, but if you want to understand what has gone wrong with our politics and what that likely means for our nation going forward this is the best thing I have seen.
It’s a great read, synthesizing what we know and providing a one-stop shopping place for those of us who see what he sees. I was hoping he would suggest a remedy, how this horrible tide toward greater tyranny can be stopped and reversed. He didn’t. Is a reversal possible w/o bloodletting? I don’t know. What do you think?
I think our best hope is an Article V Constitutional Convention that would enact the Amendments proposed by Gov. Greg Abbott: http://gov.texas.gov/news/press-release/21829
But it’s a long shot and I’m sure the proggies would fight like hell against it.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/tennessee-becomes-5th-state-pass-resolution-calling-article-v
I’m not completely in favor of Abbott’s proposed amendments but they’re a start. Has Texas even voted in favor of a convention?
I’ll tell you what sickens me, the sell-out of the states of their own power. There is as much surrender of state power in our history as there is Supreme Ct decision making that has imposed upon the states those things that were, bt design, imposed solely on the federal gov’t.
I don’t think Texas has voted in favor of an Article V convention. I agree with you both in that too many states have surrendered power to D.C. and that Abbott’s proposals are mostly a good start. However, I see no other way forward.
I don’t remember it as a public referendum in my 44 years of voting in Texas.
What has gone on in Austin is another question… but we have another session coming in 2017…
It’s not a referendum issue. The Texas House passed it last year (HJR77) and the Senate version (SJR63) has been collecting dust. It can’t get out of Joan Huffman’s State Affairs Committee.
OK, thanks. Perhaps we can get some heat on our state senators and get that puppy moving.
Cav, do not forget that much of that selling out has come as the result of federal extortion, with the feds threatening to withhold huge blocks of funding unless the states knuckle under. Highway funding and education come to mind.
No question about that. In fact, that was in the forefront of my thinking. It takes balls of the sort Nevada had way back when it told the feds FY rather than reduce statewide speed limit to 55 mph. Pols who make a career of being pols want nothing to do with telling their constituents that they said no to federal money. And that raises another issue–career politicians.
Absolutely nailed it. The most profound, revealing statement within:
“Electing Donald Trump would result in an administration far less predictable than any Democratic one. In fact, what Trump would or would not do, could or could not do, pales into insignificance next to the certainty of what any Democrat would do. That is what might elect Trump.”
There is no doubt what wideload and her minions will do, and it will not bode well for working Americans who love their country and who contribute to its survival. Trump is largely an unknown, often firing from the hip, rude/crude/socially unacceptable, but there is no way his election can be considered as dangerous as a wideload presidency.
IMO
Trump could be accused of all sorts of things every day from now until the election and I will still vote for him because I know what Wide Load has actually done and mere accusations can’t hold a candle to her behavior. She is wedded to all that we loathe about oBaMa and then there’s her own independent, despicable, loathsome, and detestable actions. I hope she goes semi-comatose the day before the election, with just enough consciousness to hear the results. Then, she can croak.
I get what you’re saying, but the folks thinking like you aren’t enough to win the election. That’s a reality.
Trump needs to court those other undecideds or he will get blown out of this election. He won’t win the undecideds by talking about the old shit in his past because his past isn’t very lily white either. Dropping into the gutter with a pig only gets you dirty because the pig’s already used to living there and enjoying it.
Yes, my hope is that the bratlenials stay the hell home sucking their thumbs. The problem is that the Old Commie is waking up from his third nap of the day and mumbling support for Wide Load. I wonder what HE was promised.
Alicia sure does like those “bad boy” types… she’s probably got a real short temper and isn’t afraid to call her “friends” if things don’t go her way.
Remember kids, as Drunk Ted the Murderer once daid, it’s not about the nature of the evidence, but the seriousness of the charge!
Just ask the pederast Harry Reid about that when he accused Mitt Romney of being a tax cheat. No evidence, mind you; not a bit. But hey, it’s a serious allegation so you better run with it!
This is just more bait for Donald, and unfortunately Poe he took the bait.
No matter what her life was/is/could have been Trump should never have engaged in this stupidity. He should have said simply, “Like your husband’s infidelity, this was a long time ago. I’d like to continue to focus on today’s issues Madame Secretary unless you’d prefer to continue discussing the past, I’m sure we both would prefer to get down to the business of the American people as opposed to rehashing old news.”
Because his current tactic is a fail, he can’t win. If what he says about the girl is true why did he allow her to compete? What does it say about him that he allowed someone of her character or lack thereof to become part of his brand? Trump had better stop playing fucking checkers and better wise up to one simple reality, he can’t win by pretending that all the stupid shit he did in the past can be dismissed with some idiotic tweets. He can win by pointing out the Clinton continues to be obsessed with the past while he has always focused on the future. On what’s next. Clinton is the past, she’s the failure. If Trump would like to be the future he’d be wise to stop fucking around and talking about stupid shit like calling a woman “Miss Piggy” and thinking that sending malicious tweets today will somehow wrangle the suburban female voter into walking away from Hillary Rodham Clinton.
If Trump could ever let his massive, pretentious fucking ego step aside he might actually be president.
One thing that Trump has been pretty consistent about- when he says or does something stupid, he usually doubles down on it. It’s like he’s trying to lose.
VOV, I do believe you are being a bit too ethnocentric in measuring every voter’s view from your own, um, aged perspective. There are tens of millions of young American voters out there who are too young to have been exposed to all the Clinton sleaze of the 90’s and Hillary’s role in it. If Trump doesn’t counter punch with that information when he’s being attacked as a sexist, he’s missing an opportunity to perhaps disillusion a significant number of those younger voters enough to abandon Clinton for a third party or to simply not vote.
You ask why Trump invested in Machado in the first place? Well, it’s fairly obvious that all her sleazy behavior came after Trump made her Miss Universe, rather like Bill Clinton was reportedly a good kid until he went off to college at about the same age.
I appreciate your desire to keep the process clean but you have to ask yourself just how well that’s worked for Republicans the past two presidential elections when our candidates took the high road. One of the reasons for Trump’s success has been his willingness to take the gloves off and bloody his opponents.
Trump already has his issues positions out there for all to see. He continues to talk jobs, trade and rebuilding the country but he needs to fight back when attacked. And by raising this sexist issue using Machado, the Clinton campaign has stepped all over its crank, demonstrating their ongoing ineptitude. They’d been laying this trap for months and hadn’t even bothered to see if their bait was rotten. That’s not leaving a smell on Donald but Hillary. Presidential politics ain’t chum fishing.
And, VOV, headlines like these can’t be hurting Trump too much:
http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-debate-beauty-queen-alicia-machado-miss-universe-shady-past/
Wide Load went after her hubby’s accusers, intent on destroying them. She plotted a deliberate and purposeful attack plan against the women. One needn’t go back to her days as an atty when she defended a child rapist successfully. Sure, she was doing her job but seeking a court order to have the 12-year old victim psychologically evauated was legitimately questioned. “I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing … [and] that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body,” according to an affidavit filed by Clinton in support of her motion. The source was the rapist himself. He pleaded to a lesser charge, BTW.
Great headline! Linked:
http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/2016/09/headline-du-jour_30.html
[…] Charged The Political Hat: When The Republic Is Over The Quinton Report: This Ain’t Hell: Hillary Clinton And Alicia Machado – The Sisterhood Of The Traveling Getaway Car, also, Wait Lines To Get Out Of VA Weasel Zippers: Gary Johnson Asks “Who’s Harriet […]
Wow, Poe, another article with ample amount of alliteration- you never disappoint.
You make a good point about millennials not bing exposed to the Clinton’s 90’s sleaze, but you are missing the point that millennial have been exposed to millennial sleaze from everyone. They don’t see a sex tape or a (alleged) relationship with a drug lord as a big deal. One of their favorite celebrities launched her career of being famous for being famous with a deliberately leaked sex tape.
However, VoV is right on this one. VoV is right on this one. Clinton’s team is pretty smart, but there is no way that they foresaw Trumps’ meltdown over this issue. She intended to make a point about what a jerk he is, and he went about proving her right. What’s up with the 3 a.m. tweeting? That is kind of crazy. Seriously, Trumps’ Tweeting Team (see what I did there?) should disable the wifi in his hotel room or lock his electronics up somewhere safe before they go to bed.
I know, ‘this proves he’ll be up at 3 a.m. when the call comes’. Can you imagine? We’ll be facing Russia down over their actions in the Baltic and Trump will send a mean tweet about Putin being bald and how the KGB was overrated,
Please. Face it, Trump handled this in exactly the wrong way, and he still doesn’t understand why. He should have just shut up and moved on, and no one would be talking about this today.
Red, you missed MY point. If you will notice, I said the millenials were unexposed to the Clinton’s sleaze, not Machado’s. So while you are correct about them giving a rat’s ass about Machado’s background, you are way off when it comes to the Clinton scandals because they go beyond mere extra-marital sex, into non-consensual sex, sexual assault, rape and attacking the word and character of the female victims, all of which can be lumped into the category of sexism, which IS a very hot topic with millenials.
I agree with you completely on Trump’s stupid behavior. I spent most of the debate yelling at him when he kept missing opportunities to body slam that bitch. As for the tweeting, I said a long time ago that his campaign manager should take his damned phone away from him.
Finally, the alliteration comes from my reading the novels of James Ellroy, most of which depict the seamier side of Los Angeles from the 30’s thru the 60’s. One of the recurring characters is the editor of a Hollywood tabloid called Hush-Hush whose articles about sleaze are replete with alliteration. In fact, in the editor’s obituary, one of his reporters notes that the editor, “Alliterated alluringly.”
So I’m just having some fun when I write these pieces, always very self-aware that I’m no serious writer, just an ordinary guy who can manage to string a few words together to express his observations and opinions. And you Red, with your repeated objections to my alliteration, have added a new word to my lexicon:
Alliteraphobia: an irrational reader reaction to unreasonably repetitive written sounds.
That’s you, Red–an alliteraphobe.
I love James Ellroy’s work, and a little alliteration is always alright.
I wish I had read L.A. Confidential before I saw the movie (you know the books is always better).
We should set up a watch on the Donald’s Twitter tonight; SNL just opened with their take on the debate and he did not look so good. I think it will be too much for him to stay quiet on this one.
Red, if you lurk here without commenting but rarely, as I suspect you do, you then know that I pound the drum for Trump votes constantly, not because I admire the guy but because the alternative is unthinkable. Elect him to keep that woman’s claws from the controls of our national government? You bet. Impeach him and let Pence take the reins the first time the Donald oversteps his powers? I’d have no problem with that either. I think Pence would provide a wise steady hand on the helm just as he’s done in Indiana.
However, I’d rather see this undisciplined businessman/celebrity, Trump, grow into the leader needed to manage both the powers and the limits of his office and serve both his term and his country well.
POE…are the millenials so blind they don’t want to realize history is a story of one’s true past? Do they not want to admit believing anything written about the Clintoons? One question in my mind would be…how many of the millenials who support Shillery have served their country? There has to be a reason we prefer Trump, and it can not simply be the fact that we served, but I do believe that service plays some part of our decision; simply due to our realizing the value and importance of making sacrifices for the freedom this country understands. If nothing else, the millenials HAVE to be aware of Benghazi. Yet they don’t care??? That incident, along with a lack of having served the country adds up to a group which would vote for Shillery even if she were a prostitute today.
Personally, I’d prefer DJT ease up on some of his actions and remarks, but I’d still vote for him even if he a tranny with a history. There is little short of NOTHING the press can do to change my mind. The lesser of two evils is always a good bet. Period!
Again, who are Trump’s biggest detractors other than the uninformed, the millenials, and above all…those who have been sucking on and living off the government teat for a lifetime who don’t want accountability to interrupt their life of ease. If Trump were to win, I’d be pleased to see him reduce EVERY check to EVERYBODY from Uncle by 10% straight across the board. That, and eliminating 10-15% of big gub employees should be enough to jump start the economy.
It is painfully obvious that Trump is a completely unhinged loser. It’s fascinating watching your guys brains squirm and wiggle, trying to defend the indefensible. Great entertainment…..
Yes, it’s THAT Joe, for those of you who have been around that long.
Sorry to burst you hermetically sealed echo-chamber bubble John…
He hasn’t fallen off his rock yet?
Holy Christ, the janitor speaks again!
“Unhinged” in the sense of bashing your own driver/bodyguard in the head with a book, while said person is bodyguarding and driving?
And that is far from being a unique example of demonstrably irrational violent outbursts.
“loser” in the sense of having made a fortune from business and investment, as opposed to having accepting millions in “donations” from foreign powers, while Secretary of State?
“indefensible” Like a 30 year history of defending and enabling a sexual predator husband? Like helping to run Arkansas like a cross between a banana republic and a crime syndicate?
I hear some Joe echoing the leftist talking points. Not even a very high fidelity echo. Our Zampolit here is more thoughtful and entertaining.
Trump denies saying what they said he said, and nobody yet has come up with proof. They have come up with a press conference and news articles at the time.
In 1997, Trump publicly discussed Alicia Machado’s weight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpXsAoXZIMg&feature=youtu.be
Donald Trump in fact defended her and saved her job. CNN said said she was the size of the Universe.
Ms. Machado now claims that Trump caused her weight control issues, but a Washington Post article that tells a different story, namely that she struggled with her weight (both up and down) long before Trump came into the picture.
http://usalibertynews.com/breaking-fox-unearths-19-year-old-newspaper-proves-miss-universe-lying/
This story, which was brought up by the moderator of the first debate, was an obvious and outrageous lie.
However, there is a candidate for President who has not hesitated to use harsh language, even make war on, women.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WiQRBN8igE&feature=youtu.be
Now, what I want to know is, since Howard Dean accused DJT of using cocaine, which is likely also an outrageous lie because DJT is a teetotaler, who it the Democrat that would be hurt if it came out that he or she uses cocaine?
I don’t want the filthy Clintons back in the WH, so thin skinned Donald better wise up & quit taking the cheese laid out by the Hillary campaign…the guy can’t stay on message.
I have heard that a number of “central american” (or related) air operations flew in and out of Arkansas airstrips in the the era of Clinton control of that state…
This is the most current guesstimate on electoral votes now. Gary Johnson(L) has 5 EVs.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-the-craziest-end-to-the-2016-campaign-runs-through-new-mexico/
Frankly, I think Trump needs to stop letting that Bitch On Wheels bait him and be prepared for her dirty tricks, because she has a bagful off them up her sleeve. His rather flabby responses to her jabs and gouges are disappointing, but he should have been better prepared for that kind of dirty tricks bullying. It’s part of the package with her.
Remember, with shrillary, it’s all about power and cash, nothing else. She doesn’t give a crap about the country or the people (us) unless she can get something out of it to fee that empty, imploding black hole she has where a soul should be.
Tomorrow will be a big news day. Assange was going to release a batch of stuff but understandably had some personal safety concerns. So, at 3 a.m. EST he’ll be doing his thang from Berlin. Today comes word a side deal with two of Clinton’s people called for their very laptops to be destroyed by the FBI. This shit is getting very hot.