Me? I’ll vote for any Republican.

| May 3, 2007

I’ve heard, and read, so many Republicans complain about certain members of the Republican field of candidates and declare “I wouldn’t vote for that guy under any circumstances!” Well, I “feel” the same way sometimes. There are none of the top three or four that excite me to action. But the alternative is frightening.

Reading the websites of the Democrat candidates is like looking through a tear in time and space.

Apparently Barack Obama has been busy during his two years as a Senator;

Reaching across the aisle, Obama has tackled problems such as preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction and stopping the genocide in Darfur.

I’m sure the folks in Darfur are grateful that Obama has stopped the genocide being inflicted on their population. I suppose they all live on peaceful cul de sacs now that the genocide has ended. And I suppose Obama personally went to Libya and disarmed Gaddafi – what a brave soul.

As far on the war against terror goes, Obama, apparently had intelligence that no one in the federal government had;

In 2002, then Illinois State Senator Obama said Saddam Hussein posed no imminent threat to the United States and that invasion would lead to an occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.

How did that youngster know about the status of Hussein’s weapons when the entire world thought he had weapons? And President Bush said the same thing about the length of time and the cost, didn’t he?

Energy? Obama is a “leader”;

Senator Obama has been a leader in the Senate in pushing for a comprehensive national energy policy and has introduced a number of bills to get us closer to the goal of energy independence.

Does that mean that he’s for drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf or opening the reserves in Alaska? Of course not;

By putting aside partisan battles, he has found common ground on CAFE, renewable fuels, and clean coal.

Yep, that’s the ticket – half-assed, feel good, “progressive” non-solutions. A fine candidate , indeed.

But, try to find out what Hillary Clinton’s issues are. You have to slog through through her biography to find…nothing;

Hillary has not wavered in her work to expand quality affordable health care to more Americans…

Her strong advocacy for children continues in the Senate…

Hillary has been a powerful advocate for women in the Senate…

Hillary is strongly committed to making sure that every American has the right to vote in fair, accessible, and credible elections….

Nothing disagreeable there. So she’s a bland candidate with nothing to offer Americans except bland platitudes – and don’t forget to sign up to have a Hillary Party in your home or hand over some cash – these webs sites ain’t free ya know.

And my personal favorite, John Edwards – I’d vote for him in a primary because he’s so fricken transparent in his hypocrisy.

On his web site Edwards claims he wants to end our dependence on foreign oil – no, not by drilling our own oil, by;

…investing in clean, renewable energies like wind, solar, and biofuels to create a new energy economy, developing a new generation of efficient cars and trucks, and putting new energy-saving technologies to work in buildings, transportation, and industry.

Of course if we don’t drill our own oil, we’ll still be buying foreign oil for those “efficient cars and trucks”, won’t we? But not to worry, Edwards will be leading us to energy independence because his mega-mansion and his campaign are “energy neutral“. Apparently just by declaring that in public makes it so.

But that ain’t all! Edwards is going to eliminate poverty;

Every day, 37 million Americans wake in poverty.

Yeah, they wake up about noon, roll over and turn on “The View” and grab the “Cheetos” bag next to the bed from the night before. Do any of these 37 million people have families that can start haranguing them about looking for work? Nope, but they’ve got John Edwards;

We can reach that goal by creating and rewarding work, strengthening families, helping workers save and get ahead, transforming our schools, expanding access to college, breaking up areas of concentrated poverty, reaching overlooked rural areas, and expecting people to help themselves by working whenever they are able.

It’s just that simple – just expect people to do better, and they will. Why hasn’t anyone else thought of this?

And on the overarching issue of our time, our war against terrorism? Well, Edwards wants to restore our moral leadership in the world. How you ask? By surrendering and pulling our troops out of the war;

…immediately withdrawing 40,000-50,000 troops from Iraq, with the complete withdrawal of all combat troops from Iraq within 12-18 months — allowing the Iraqis to assume greater responsibility for rebuilding their own country. It also means working to restore our legitimacy by leading on the great challenges before us like the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the genocide in Darfur, extreme poverty, and living up to our ideals in the fight against terrorism.

I guess Edwards didn’t hear that Obama already ended genocide in Darfur.

I’ll grant that none of the Republicans look particularly vote-worthy, but compared to what’s on the other side, they look like gems to me. For the best liveblogging of the Republican debate last night, see Sister Toldjah, for the best wrap-up see Rick Moran at the Rightwing Nuthouse.

Category: Economy, Foreign Policy, Politics, Society, Terror War

Comments are closed.