Does anyone else find this curious?
Here is the CNN article in question, it talks about the Binghamton, NY (Home of the world famous Speedie Sauce) killer at the Immigration center.
It states:
“There’s several things in there that indicate to myself and the district attorney that suggest mental health issues as well as there may be some religious connotation,” Binghamton Police Chief Joseph Zikuski told 10 News Now, “but until we get a chance to have mental health professionals, have some religious people look at it to determine what it really means, I’m really not going to comment on it any further at this time.”
And then it goes on to talk about his whole mental illness etc. But what the hell does he mean by “have some religious people look at it to determine what it really means…” You aren’t going to write a doctoral thesis on it, how about just letting us know in whose name he claimed to be doing the killing?
I’m guessing it was Spongebob, but I have been wrong before.
Category: Politics
And there it is! Mental illness.
Just like the Virignia Tech shooting, here’s a guy who EVERYONE SEEMS TO KNOW IS UNSTABLE. But, being the polite society that we are, we allow the mentally ill great latitude in everyday activities.
Ditto Columbine. And Simon’s Rock shooting in Vermont.
How did this guy continue to hold a Pistol Permit if he was mentally ill? The police and mental health officials have a lot of explaining to do.
And to the anti-gun crowd, I only have this to say: Don’t worry about controlling my guns and violating my rights. Control the insane who you let out of the institutions in the 1980s because the liberals screamed it was a violation of their rights.
What are they talking about? I hope they don’t mean to equate mental illness with being religious. (Or perhaps they found an altar to satan and they want to know how to talk about it without offending the satanist community.)
Jonn wrote: I think they’re wondering how to break it to us that the Religion of Peace is out to get us.
Hey, while we’re pondering all the religious aspects of this horrible attack, can someone pray me up an answer as to why the friggin’ SWAT team waited an hour before they engaged this loony-toon? I’m unfamiliar with current tactics that include “stand next to the dude with the bullhorn for and hour, with my Rem 700 parked on safe, while some jackass murders 13 people”.
because they do not want to get sued by some hostages who might have PTSD or physical traumas after the SWAT stormed the place.
In a different article, they were saying that since there were no more shots by the time SWAT came in, there was no reason to hurry – the assumption was he was already dead so their ROE did not call for an immediate entry…
Word on the street is, he was an Obama worshipper who sacrificed these people in an effort to appease all the world’s mooslims for our country’s offenses against them by ever harming tangoes, and for wearing American flag lapel pins.
BTW – I’m sure everyone here has already thought about it, but – if ONE of the staff in there had had a sidearm, this whole thing would have ground to a halt much sooner. Murderers seem to always choose kill zones where they know their victims have already been disarmed by the nanny state!
Mental Illness-read fanatic terrorist
Religion-read Mulsim