The Sky Is Not Falling
Daydreams are nice, aren’t they? But they don’t pay the bills or put food on the table, or make sure that your home is clean and free of unwanted other species.
There’s a huge push from many sides to transfer everyone to what is commonly referred to as “green energy” resources. This includes solar and wind energies as resources, with a large portion of it being politically motivated with no thought to the consequences.
In Australia, because they’ve shut down coal-fired plants and have only wind and solar facilities for generating electricity, with gas-fired plants as backup, electricity charges for residents are apparently spectacular and in some cases, enough to make it unaffordable, period. Angela Merkel has been harping on wind energy during her reign as the EU’s head, with disastrous results including the deaths of thousands of ordinary citizens from cold exposure in the winter, when those people could not pay their utility bills. Some had resorted to trying to stay warm by candlelight. It is a disgraceful thing to do to put your personal daydreams ahead of the welfare of people who voted you in, and Merkel is losing her job because of her insistence on using “green power” instead of reliable gas and/or coal. Germany is now, in fact, building new coal-fired power plants because Angela screwed up so badly. France has nuclear-powered plants, so all those protests have been partly over Macron’s plan to raise fuel taxes and partly over his reducing taxes on wealthy people.
China only gave a crap about coal-fired pollution when the air in Beijing got so smog-ridden, it made both Los Angeles and New York City in the 1960s look like pikers by comparison. Coal-fired plants in the USA have scrubbers to remove particulates from their exhausts, and gas-fired plants are replacing coal in some areas because natural gas is cheaper than coal.
In the daydream world of the greenbeans, solar and wind energy are freebies. There are no consequences involved. In the real world, however, you have $500 million in government subsidies given to companies like Solyndra who start the business and then go belly-up, leaving behind the detritus of their scam in the form of empty facilities and unemployed people whose livelihoods disappeared while they were watching.
There’s also the cost to the environment, in the matter of solar farms like the Ivanpah solar facility in the Mojave Desert, which has a record of incinerating migrating birds because the mirrors that focus sunlight toward the three towers embrace the routes of migrating birds.
“As many as 28,000 birds are killed each year — that’s one every two minutes — by the Ivanpah solar plant in the Mojave Desert, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service . Ivanpah focuses more than 300,000 mirrors on three 459-foot towers, generating heat of up to 800 degrees — enough to fry birds that happen to fly by. “ – from the article That’s just that solar furnace in particular. There are other solar facilities that endanger wildlife as well.
But this isn’t just about birds, in case you’re wondering. These winged migrants are part of the control species that eat pests like bugs that destroy crops. It’s the food on your plate that’s at stake, not some abstract concept. Birds and bats are natural pest control. Migrating birds feed on the local pests while they are on their way north or south.
“Estimates for bird deaths by wind turbine run from 100,000 a year (the National Research Council) to 300,000 (American Bird Conservancy). Bloomberg News puts the toll at 573,000 birds in 2012. At the high end of the estimates, that’s well more than 1,000 birds chopped to death each day.” – Article
These numbers are not remotely matched by the deaths of 161 birds in a 2015 oil spill off the coast of California, or the 2,303 that died during the 2010 BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The worst portion of this is that the majority of birds killed by wind turbines are raptors, which includes hawks, vultures and eagles. These are apex avian predators that prey on pests both large and small, and dispose of carcasses as well.
Yes, cats, feral or domestic, allowed to run around outdoors, are also responsible for preying on birds. And so are squirrels. They will rob nests and eat the young when they think the coast is clear. My cat is, therefore, an indoor kitty.
The cost of so-called green energy is considerably higher than it should be. You, the customer who decides to use that, have to pay for the construction, equipment and delivery, which you chose to use. And it is not cheap, either, especially when a company that made big promises goes belly up and unemployment lines lengthen.
So you can understand my curiosity when an offer to switch “green” and “sustainable” energy (meaning wind and solar) arrived, and I read through the offer as outlined, finding that the per KwH charge is $0.095/KwH, never mind the delivery charges and taxes. This is a 50% rise in my usual charge, which is $0.065/KwH, plus delivery and taxes. I did the simple math, based on my current month’s usage compared to last year, because the furnace is running now, which runs up the bill. Whereas my normal winter usage runs around $52.00/month, this 50% hike in the KwH rate will boost my charges to well over $80.00/month, just to have a furnace running, plus a couple of appliances, and a few lights in my little house. The offering also says that rates are variable and may rise as needed. And this source of this power is to come from wind and solar energy farms in my area. Since there are no such things within 250 miles of where I live, it means that wherever it originates, the possibility of breakdowns and outages increases with distance, never mind storm damage to the “farm” itself.
The offering for this marvel of modernity comes from some group located in Washington, DC.
It would be far more constructive to start building more nuclear power plants in this country.
Category: "The Floggings Will Continue Until Morale Improves", "Your Tax Dollars At Work", Economy, Global Warming, Politics
Dear God, I could go on for days about what a scam solar and wind really are, but it makes people “feel good”.
Newsflash–they’re okay for (very) limited loads off the grid, etc, but they won’t replace baseline generation in my lifetime, my children’s, or my grandchildren, unless someone ponies up the several TENS of TRILLIONS of dollars to make a truly worldwide grid (uh, no.)
Hell, you can’t even get a decent medium-sized substation transformer without a 12-18 month lead time.
If people understood just how complex the grid is now, even they’d be amazed their lights work at any given point.
Finally, no, microgrids are not the answer either. Go ahead and tell me they are until it’s YOUR generation, inverter, rectifier, battery storage, etc., etc., etc., that goes tits up and you’re told, “Sorry, hell of a backlog for that part you need, but I can expedite one to you in, say, six months?”
Thank you, Sparky.
I didn’t look for a count of current nuclear plants in the USA, but wouldn’t adding new plants be a better deal than either gas or coal?
I don’t know how many nuclear plants France has but that is the entire source of their power supply. That’s the reason I’m asking. It just seems to be that it would be cheaper and more reliable than hydro, and last longer than gas or goal.
Thanks for your feedback on this.
Nuclear is great, but the problem is all the NIMBY people.
The industry certainly hasn’t helped their own cause.
Adding a load of new nuclear plants would indeed be the way to go for the US power grid. Ask the enviro-whackos why they won’t let us use the safest, least-polluting, reliable proven technology and want us to cause more damage to the environment and kill protected species instead.
For reference: since the first plant opened more than 60 years ago, more people died in Ted Kennedy’s car than have died in all US commercial nuclear power plant accidents combined.
Convince a utility to invest $12 billion on a 40-50 year ROI.
Under a regulated system, sure. Not now. Utilities are loathe to invest in any project not mandated (and paid for) by either the state PUC or feds that has more than a 5-year ROI.
Nobody wants to get stuck holding the bill. Just ask PG&E, SCE, Northeast Utilities, PSNH, etc.
Nuclear in America is dying, and the wounds are largely self-inflicted.
Fear of nukes, fed by TMI, Chernobyl, Fukushima, et al, certainly haven’t helped, either.
But consider in a utility that is increasingly unregulated, all but the largest market cap utilities even want to consider nukes. A typical 1500-MW plant now costs about $15 billion to bring online, not including the costs due to delays, environmental factors, etc. Oh, and timeline? Yeah-8 to 12 years, minimum.
Compare that to the $2 billion or so to build the same MW generation capacity in a gas plant. And for a gas plant to be competitive charging $0.06/kWh, gas prices would have to be <$1.77 per therm (100k BTU's.) Current commercial price is about 0.46 per therm, or just under $9 per 1000 cubic feet.
Nukes simply cannot compete with gas prices at current levels. Combine this with the over-regulation (thanks, INPO!) of the industry, and you understand why they're simply not being replaced.
Georgia Power/The Southern Company is catching hell over the nuc plant they’re building/trying to build in east GA near the existing Augusta Plant. Overruns, enviros, Westinghouse Bankruptcy, cost more to stop building than it would take to complete, the list goes on.
A gas fired plant about 50 miles west got derailed by the NIMBY people.
Guess we do need to hook The Arrnuuuldnator up with Prof Brown and his Delorean.
Environmentalists make nuclear power insanely expensive, then complain about it costing too much.
A fatal problem with EXISTING nuclear plants is storage of spent (but still highly radioactive) fuel. Your local utility does this on site because there is nowhere else to do it. And one of the criticalities at Fuku was in the spent fuel stored on site. That could just as easily happen at a CA plant.
No, it could not. The nuclear industry went out of their way to address this, with separate cooling pump power generation located above grade.
Now, as for why the fuel is stuck there? Blame Harry Reid stopping Yucca Mountain
Here’s a little link to a very deep philosophical question:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2018/05/23/if-solar-panels-are-so-clean-why-do-they-produce-so-much-toxic-waste/#66d53798121c
Gotta get that clean energy… at the expense of poisoning Mother Earth!!!
All the tree hugging granola crunchers care about is the nice clean electricity that solar panels produce, they willfully ignore all the nasty crap that goes into producing the panels. It’s a “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain” type of ignorance. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.
I always like asking the greenies with their fancy electric tesla cars where they think they’re saving the world?
The power? Most if not all is not a green source.
The car? Made with tons of rare earth’s mined in China that wear out after a few years and are hard to recycle.
A Hummer H2 has a far lower environmental impact than any of those electrics or hybrids. Hell, my 1947 Willys CJ2A is likely more environmentally friendly than their shit – you know, reduce, reuse, recycle?
I have a ’55 CJ3B, I never thought of it as environmentally friendly, but I guess the fact that it’s still ticking like a sewing machine and isn’t in a landfill makes it green compliant. Thanks for that, API!
Not to mention it is nearly 100% recyclable!
Quick note Ex – Coal-fired power plants haven’t been shut down – thank God. They’re still up and running.
There’s certainly no shortage of kooks and morons who’d like them to all be shut down, but they haven’t taken hold here yet.
You don’t need to have a PHD or be an energy industry expert to figure out that wind and solar can’t supply the country….you just need elementary school arithmetic.
^^^^^In Australia, I mean
Oh, I think I did see something about new(?) coal-fired plants in Australia a couple of days ago. Thanks for the reminder.
The biggest complaint I ran across from Australia was the cost of gas-powered electricity, which must be much higher than it is here.
The cola-fired plant north of the state line shut down last summer because it was being replaced by a gas-fired plant, because gas (here in USA) is cheaper than coal.
Plus coal plants really are massive pollution sources. The average coal plant emits enough radioactive material that it would be shut down if it was a nuke plant. Old coal plants are the worst.
Solar and wind farms have likely killed more birds than DDT but since it’s what the greenie-weenies want, they plug their ears and yell “YAYAYAYAYAYA…” like some UC Berzerkely moonbat we know of.
Solar panels have a finite lifespan. When they wear out, they get scrapped out. Recycling them is very, very difficult. The total waste produced for th total energy delivered is rather high.
The manufacture of solar panels involves a whole bunch of nasty chemicals and materials, especially the latest higher-efficiency ones.
But no one counts any of that when they declare solar power to be “free”.
If you live near a fossil-fuel-fired power plant, that is the power. Ring delivered over the wire to your home. Even if you subscribe to solar or “renewable” from elsewhere, simple physics dictates that what you are getting is the CO2- originated stuff local to you.
But the power companies – love- to $ubscribe folks to boutique power.
Birds deaths by turbines? OMG…that needs to be added to the “Exploding Varmints” video series.
hahahahahahahaha!
They don’t just get hit by the blades. The lower pressure near the turbine causes their lungs to explode.
Do what? Their lungs to explode?
The true cost of green energy is in the raping of the land to get the minerals that build the solar panels, high energy batteries and so much more of the green energy revolution.
If you have never seen what a strip mine looks like or what a deep open pit mine does to anywhere, go to the Kennecott Copper Mine just outside of Salt Lake City in the Oquirrh Mountains.
I remember what that mountain looked like before they started the mine
It’s so big that the biggest Caterpillar trucks and P&H Shovels look like toys when you view them from the top…
I couldn’t imagine what a Chinese open pit or strip mine looks like…
Those mines don’t affect the environment, they destroy it…
All that copper goes into the smartphones of all these snowflakes that have no fucking idea of how stupid they really are…
Enjoying your articles Ex;
Keep it up
Opps, that doesn’t sound quite right
I know what you meant, Mr. Pete, and thank you, I will keep it up.
Someone mentioned Georgia Power & Southern Companies above. Read a P/R thingy a while back telling us that SoCo & GP are heavily invested in building solar farms down in rural South Georgia. Same parent company, SoCo is also heavily invested in wind and has money sunk into an offshore wind farm as well.
They are. Along with the EMCs are turning former cotton/peanut fields. peach orchards and even residential (former) areas into solar farms. Lots of tax credits for them in it.
I’m going to leave this here, because it does have to do with my article, but is in regard to forest management in Finland, which is very similar to what goes on in my county.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/12/12/trump-was-right-about-raking-finnish-forests/
Georgia has a “Best Practice Policy” that requires a similar clean up and/or a controlled burn for private and corporate landowners.
The smarter loggers chip a lot of the stuff up & sell it for mulch or for making particle board.
Others have a dozer with a chipper/grinder attachment that spreads it out for ground cover.
I’ve been telling people for years about
How much damage stand alone Solor fields
Cause. The above article backs up what I’ve been saying for years
I think Tesla has a huge battery installation in Australia that backs up the solar. (I guess they can get the power factor & frequency right.)
Germany had several nuclear plants, but freaked out after Fukishima (or someone was waiting for an excuse) and closed them all (or scheduled them all for closure).
And the sun is heading into (or has entered) a minimum in its grand cycle, from all indications. Stephanie Osborne discusses the model here: https://accordingtohoyt.com/2018/12/12/the-latest-on-the-double-dynamo-solar-model-and-dr-zharkovas-predictions-of-a-grand-minimum/.
(And ideas have been thrown around to make more reasonable costing nuke plants.)
I think that the minimum started 2006 when the Sun stopped having sunspots for months, scared some solar physicists, and also did not flip its magnetic fields the way it normally does.
So if we are in a solar minimum, it is going to be ver-r-r-ry interesting.
Yeah, I was thinking that the output of Sol doesn’t drop much, but the article pointed out that the lesser solar outflow offers less cosmic ray protection. Atmosphere absorbs the cosmic rays, mostly, more or less, so no radiation issue; but the cosmic rays cause more clouds. Illustration offered in the blog: the first cosmic radiation detectors were cloud chambers. Oh, snap!
It is important to remember the scale of the sun. A “tiny” reduction in net output has a significant impact on our tiny-in-comparison planet.