Manning gets a job
Yes, according to Politico, Bradley Manning now works for the UK’s Guardian. I guess they have a pretty liberal telework policy;
Manning, previously known as Bradley Manning, was an Army private who was convicted in 2013 and is serving a 35-year term for leaking national security materials to WikiLeaks. She will write “occasionally from Fort Leavenworth prison on the subjects of war, gender, and freedom of information” for the British newspaper’s American site, Viner wrote in a staff memo. Manning will not be paid.
Of course, the Guardian was the UK’s news source that benefited greatly from the document dump from Wikileaks, so it’s probably a quid pro quo because that’s how those people roll.
Category: Shitbags
Bitch.
“she” my ass…that dilbert pervert is still a basic man, not much of one, I admit..but still has the male dna…..sorry lil bas-ard!
Meanwhile I’m getting laid off. Sometimes I think there’s no justice in this universe…
Well, he is working for free, so I guess there’s that.
This has Libtard written all over it.
What the hell does liberals have to do with this?
I am absolutely certain that there is a strong empirically measurable statistical correlation with the use of the term “libtard” and sub-average intelligence.
Ironic, considering intellectual disability (mental retardation) is defined as significantly sub average scores on a standardized intelligence quotient.
She will write “occasionally from Fort Leavenworth prison on the subjects of war, gender, and freedom of information”.
I’m sure the insights about “war” the Guardian will get from an E-1 in the Disciplinary Barracks will be as useful as the insights about war the New Republic got from Scott Beauchamp.
She will write “occasionally from Fort Leavenworth prison on the subjects of cooking with ham and cheese, cell block decoration, and creating imitation flower arrangements with disgarded court documents.”
I think Martha Stewart covered most of those subjects during her Federal vacation, didn’t she?
…..and occasionally how to properly “smoke a pole” but I doubt if he/she/it can even do that properly.
Oh goodie. It will no doubt use this undeserved opportunity to write about the degrading and inhumane conditions in the prison. The job won’t last long. I can’t imagine the Guardian’s readership cares any more about used-to-be-a-Man-ning-by-virtue-of-a-dick-only than we do. It’s yesterday’s news, so to speak.
MCPO,
Wouldn’t that be deflowering?
one suspects the bloom is well off that rose long since
How in the wide, wide world of sports is this fucktard being allowed to “contribute” to this “news source”. I guess my idea of being an inmate at the Disciplinary Barracks and real life just don’t jibe. I would have thought his incarceration would be a bit more rigorous, what with all of that turning big rocks into little rocks. And running his man pleaser up and down Bubba’s unit.
MGySgtRet…I agree. Disciplinary Confinement shout be limited, very limited. The fuckers aren’t there to have fun, win friends and influence people. They are there for confinement from society and PUNISHMENT. If they want to make wallets out of cigarette packs to trade or sell for whatever, okay but that’s it. This “it” can give blow jobs for a quarter of it wants but who in the fuck wants to here its opinion about shit. It wasn’t in the military long enough to speak of that experience. It knows nothing about gender because it can’t even figure out what in hell it is or is suppose to be. As far as freedom of information, it was a lousy, traitorous, treasonous turn coat who passed classified info to the public and thereby our enemies. That doesn’t take any insight into freedom of information. Just the larcenous heart of a whining, little bitchy, “I wasn’t happy in the Army” traitor who decided to purposely harm and damage its own nation. Yea, its country, the one who is and will end up paying for all of its “gender fucking yourself up to the nth degree” medications and surgeries. (I wrote about wallets because I have a wallet made by a military prisoner at an Army Disciplinary Barracks from when my father was in service. They used old cigarette packs like, Camels, Lucky Strikes, Pall Malls and L&Ms, the old short non filters, and somehow took them apart, folded them, then wove them into wallets with the cellophane still shining on the outside of each folded piece. They sold them for a quarter and my dad bought one for my brother and me. They used the money to buy more smokes or a 6oz. Coke at the prison canteen. Mine is 50+ years old now and still opens and works.) Lastly, the is no “man” in Manning. Its just a queer bait, truckers truck stop restroom, wet dream. It didn’t like the Army so instead of just getting out or God forbid, serving out its stint then getting out and writing all the anti military… Read more »
Inmates here make, among other things, woven horse hair bridles. They’re expensive — and worth every penny.
http://www.marchinmontana.com/lots/Prison_Made_Hitched_Horsehair_Bridle_798
When I saw the title, the first thought was that “it took this long for him to become the cell block whore?”
Listen, his only ‘jobs’ in those barracks are polishing soap, and testing the mints in the urinals. Oh, and occasionally checking for shadows in cell toilets.
Writing? Not so much…
He/She/It will write occasionally from Fort Leavenworth prison on the subjects of war, gender, and freedom of information. Three subject He/She/It they know nothing about. I see a replacement for Brian Willaims being hired.
Damn. I can’t wait to see what horse shit this snowflake writes.
How does this work? Manning gets to profit from the notoriety of his crime? That does not sound right. So, what happens to his pay? That belongs in trust to whoever has been harmed by his foolishness, or society in general.
Charles Manson tried this cr@p, too.
Yeah, I am no respecter of “sex-reassignment” “surgery.” Butchering a boy does not make him a girl.
This shitstick is getting paid to do this?
Fine. I think his after-tax ‘income’ should be rerouted to a fund for art materials in the OT department at the nearest VA hospital. Out of the goodness of his heart, of course.
I know I beat this dead horse every time it comes up, but STOP CALLING HIM “SHE!” He is not a woman! No matter what cosmetic surgery he gets, he still won’t be a woman! He possess a dick and balls (tiny, but still present), scrotum, and prostate. He lacks ovaries, uterus, and Fallopian tubes. His glands produce testosterone (not enough, but still), not estrogen. “Gender reassignment” surgery is purely cosmetic and only removes the external parts that are visibly male. It does not give them lady parts, nor does it give any female reproductive functionality. At best, he will be no more than a eunuch. The closest he will ever get to femininity is being the “woman” in his prison relationships–rumor has it he loves ass-to-mouth!
If we were discussing an honorable and productive person, I might be sensitive to their preferred self-identification. Bradley Manning is a traitor, a coward, and a little bitch. He had no ideological motivation, he just wanted to punish the army because he’d been jilted by his boyfriend. He got lots of people killed. I don’t give a fuck what he wants, and neither should anyone else.
Again, if he wants his dick removed so bad, I recommend tossing a pair of rusty scissors and a Bic lighter into his cell and saying, “Here ya go, fucknuts. Knock yourself out.”
^^^YEAH^^^
He STILL — and ALWAYS will — have XY chromosomes.
Couldn’t have said it better, brother.
One small correction. The surgeries can include vaginal construction for the trans-women. They do not, at this time, make any attempt to place ovaries, tubes, or uterus. Possibly in the future that might be an option, since there have been several successful experimental uterine transplants in women.
If the Guardian really wants someone who can “write occasionally… on the subjects of war, gender, and freedom of information” I think that they can select any random poster here who knows more about those topics than Manning does.
I second that.
That would assume that they want ‘accurate’ information. From what I have seen of the Guardian, accuracy isn’t part of their repertoire.
…and the way WE would phrase it would be SOOOO much more interesting! 😉
If they want someone to write on war, gender and freedom of information, I suggest that they look no further than the author of Weekend With Rita, S. Cio Burrell.
#BringElaineRicciHome
Word.
This is a non-story story.
It’s also an example of how Politico and the twittertards might, on a good day, be able to remember as far back as last week. Maybe.
Manning, the little knob, has written for the Guardian in the past under the same unpaid contributor arrangement. Nothing has changed. There is no story.
All the Guardian is apparently doing here, in its own coy way, and as part of its ongoing cage match with the New York Times, is reminding everyone who is the more faithful follower of Karl Marx, and how far superior things are in jolly olde England.
WTF? Is the Guardian trying to “out-stupid” everyone else in all media?
Yeah… it would seem that way. 🙂
So, I’ve been doing a warfighter here at Camp Atterbury. Our O/Cs are from Leavenworth and as part of the exercise we have to publish a casualty tracker. One if the wounded? You guessed it-Chealsea Manning.
Good Lord. Just the name you wanted to see, and be reminded of… right?
I wish “it” would just fade away forever. It did a lot of damage to us. And here’s an effing Brit “newspaper” making it into an occasional columnist.
The Guardian is good for nothing more than lining the bottom of a birdcage. For a good Brit paper and news site, turn to the Daily Mail. They are very good at covering news stories from America that the media here tries to ignore.