NRA News; Colion Noir; Gun Safety?
I read that you guys were missing Colion Noir the other day, and the folks at NRA News sent us his latest video entitled Gun Safety? “In the political world, gun safety doesn’t mean what you think.”
Somewhere between screaming for gun control and then being called out for actually wanting gun confiscation, the anti-gunners decided to change the phrase “gun control” to “gun safety.” I wonder why they would do that. I mean, whether you call it 2G, 4G, or 9G, you’re still screwing me with the same slow ass Internet speeds, the same way anti-gunners are trying to force feed us the “gun safety” placebo….
Listen to the rest;
Category: Guns
Center mass. Like always.
Wait, more crazy gun laws from Calif: Bay Area Gun Laws will Result in Confiscation of Police Gun Magazines On November 19, the San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association (SFVPOA) filed a lawsuit, supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA), in federal court challenging San Francisco’s recent ban on the possession of magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds. A lawsuit is currently being prepared against the City of Sunnyvale, which recently adopted a similar magazine ban. Tens of thousands of law enforcement officers across the country currently possess these common, standard-capacity magazines when they are off duty for self-defense, sport and other lawful purposes. The new magazine confiscation laws will force active police officers in San Francisco and Sunnyvale to surrender their privately-owned magazines – or face criminal liability. In a recent interview, Larry Barsetti, a plaintiff in the San Francisco lawsuit and a member of the SFVPOA, pointed out that law enforcement officers will be in violation of the ban if they possess any prohibited magazines that were not issued to them for official duties. When asked to comment, the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office confirmed that the ordinance “does not prohibit off duty officers from keeping their duty weapons because those weapons are issued to them in connection with their official duties.” Police officers who have any magazines over ten rounds in their personal collections, or any magazines they were authorized to purchase for off-duty use, must dispose of those magazines. If they don’t, the officers will become criminals. The same is true for active law enforcement officials in Sunnyvale. Sunnyvale’s Measure C only exempts police officers who possess magazines over ten rounds “while acting within the course and scope of her or her duties.” Family members of law enforcement officers are also at risk. If an officer leaves the house without locking his or her magazines away, anyone who is present in the home will be in violation of the law. The misguided laws also place thousands of state and federal law enforcement officials who travel through San Francisco in jeopardy. Many off-duty law enforcement… Read more »
Just like with every unpopular leftist program or policy; if you just “rebrand” it, they will buy it. They tried it with global warming, which the people found out wasn’t happening, so they changed the name to “climate change” and started blaming everything on it. They are talking about “rebranding” Obamacare, because they think by changing the name we will suddenly buy it. They have done the same thing here. They “rebranded” the same lame product and expect us to buy it.
Nice try, but it ain’t happening.
I think you are crediting the politicians with more sneaky ability than they have – my call on this is that they rushed a poorly written law into a vote without really looking at all the implications of what they had actually written. They’re not clever – they’re just freakin’ stupid.