Yet More About That “IRS Thing”
Remember that “IRS thing” Doc Baily and I have each written about previously here at TAH? You know, where private advocacy groups were apparently targeted for “special attention” by the IRS based on political philosophy, ethnicity, or because they “contradict the Administration’s public policies”?
Well, it’s possible that’s not all that was going on. According to an article at the Daily Caller yesterday, it appears that information might have also been “leaked” by a person or persons at the IRS for partisan political purposes. Specifically, it appears that paperwork showing a donation made by GOP Presidential candidate Mitt Romney to the National Organization for Marriage (which received a large amount of airplay during the last Presidential campaign) may have been leaked by the IRS.
If you’re thinking that’s illegal – you’re correct. See the Daily Caller article for details.
Separately, in a book written well before this latest IRS brouhaha became public, former SECDEF Donald Rumsfeld indicated that corporate executives often refrain from public criticism of the President or his policies out of fear of possible future retaliation by government agencies. He indicates that corporate executives often considered possible actions by the IRS, SEC, congressional committees, and other government agencies before voicing public opposition.
Rumsfeld does not come out and state that he has knowledge of such abuse. However, the implication is reasonably clear: corporate executives have seen enough “temporal coincidences” between public statements against Presidential positions or polices and additional regulatory scrutiny to notice – and to be wary.
Stay tuned. This looks to be getting “curioser and curioser” with each passing day.
Category: "Your Tax Dollars At Work", Crime, Politics
The slope is negative on this curve.
Going to be a hell of a week.
Awesome.
Again, while we want to hope that someone in the White House will be taking the fall over this, there are so many layers of people willing to fall on their swords for Teh Wun that it’ll never get close to the administration.
Not for lack of trying, however.
Just think of this though… President Biden… unless of course his finger prints are on this as well, which is not entirely unlikely.
The idea that this agency (or any other, for that matter) should be the repository of all financial AND medical records on American citizens should be chilling to all of us. Is there any more personal information about us than our health and our wealth? And we are going to give it all to a single group?
While the percentage of incompetents and/or the devious may be small, we still should be protecting ourselves from them. It only takes one to destroy American lives.
@#4, exactly, OWB. We’re going to put all of our info in one place, under the control of political hacks, beholden not to their bosses, the American people, but to their bosses.
And Carney is up there justifying still more delays in deciding what to do about it all! Maybe they will conclude that the IRS made an unfounded apology and will fire someone for that, but not for abuse of power?
This just keeps getting uglier and uglier, doesn’t it? What’s next? I’ve tried to come up with something scummy, but this exceeds even my ideas.
Here’s a little update re: Holder.
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/14/18253923-holder-recuses-himself-from-leaks-investigation?lite
Frankly, I don’t believe anything that anyone representing this administration says any more.
Yeah, his presser was almost as agonizing as the Carney briefing.
This is infinitely more entertaining than the Watergate hearings already. Back then, the sides were well drawn. This is more like watching a train wreck in slow motion, with some folks jumping off the train while others are jumping on it as still others are hanging out the windows declaring that the train WILL not wreck. Weird.
If this is true, huge: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/14/Progressive-Group-Says-IRS-Gave-Them-Confidential-Docs-On-Conservative-Groups