Kamala Harris acknowledged that the Constitution allows gun ownership
Another one of Kamala Harris’s political skeletons emerged from her political closet. An audio recording of Kamala Harris’s speech while she was a district attorney, at an event hosted by Commonwealth Club of California, provided clues of her stance on private gun ownership. She understood back then that disarming wasn’t going to happen immediately… But hinted that this issue could be worked on.
Approximate Transcript:
Kamala Harris: You know, you’ve been talking a lot tonight about guns and the implications for the homicide rate, um, one question is whether in a city like San Francisco with our history
Woman: Uh hum…
Kamala Harris: Uh, is there any justification for anyone to carry a gun except for law enforcement? And why not ban them completely in the city?
Kamala Harris: Well, there’s been a measure on the ballot actually to do that, and it’s currently being challenged. And, um, there is a question about its constitutionality, because, of course, the Constitution of the United States says that, um, we do have a right to legally possess firearms.
So, yeah, I think it’s, it’s, e, you know, and it would be great to end world hunger and a couple of other things too.
Woman: [laughs]
Kamala Harris: Are we going to be able
Woman: [continues laughing]
Kamala Harris: to get rid of people owning and possessing guns? I don’t know, I don’t think where anywhere close to that right now. So I, I, would not, like, put all my effort into that as being the solution, because I think it’s a long way off.
Additional reading and audio:
Goodman, A. (2024, October 22). Kamala Harris once suggested it ‘would be great’ to ban all gun ownership. The Washington Free Beacon. Link.
Category: 2024 Election, Second Amendment
Democrats: Just because the right to bear arms is explicitly written into the Constitution does not mean that it cannot be revoked.
Also Democrats: You cannot revoke a woman’s right to an abortion, it is a Constitutional right.
Can someone explain this to Hack, in terms that a graduate of a New Jersey public High School in the early 1980’s could understand?
“We agree with the constitution when it’s convenient for us.” — Democrats/Leftists
They also like to point to how vague the language in the constitution is (it’s not) as a reason to get around arguments they’re losing, yet are quick to stand by the document if they can use it for a win.
It’s obvious. The founding fathers did not have a dictionary and misspelled bare. It was really ticking them off all those pro British tattoos people were getting. As far as killing babies, well it’s not really in there, the dems just think that someone should have asked your 8 balls great great great grand ball if it was ok. In their minds it would have said “signs point to yes” . So there you have it.
Leftists be like:
“It’s a long way off” sure doesn’t sound like “impossible.”
When the time is right — they’ll try it. But I wouldn’t recommend it…
Michigan’s SOS, Jocelyn Benson, knows that there are many ineligible(phonies, illegals, etc) people on the voter roles. She admitted that last week.
How many? No one really knows, least of all the dems. The figure I’ve heard lately is “around 200,000”. That’s enough to cover the margin of victory that the doddering, delusional fool that got “elected” last time needed to carry Michigan.
Wonder what margin of victory they’ll try for this time?
D-rats also come up with really neat laws that tell people in some States that they have a duty to retreat in the event of a break-in, the polar opposite of “Stand your Ground” laws!
Because they don’t want the actual people they represent to get shot.
Why not? Even if their dead, they’ll still vote for them anyways.
So if I take a step backwards as I fire, I’ve checked the “duty to retreat” box, correct?
That works for this former lawer.
I don’t know how much more obvious it needs to be for We, The People to realize that the reason “They” want to take the gunz away from We, The People is “They” are planning on doing things to We, The People that would make We, The People want to shoot “Them”.
Prepare
If you read the small print on her campaign material it clearly says that any and all statements made prior to July 20th 2024 are null and void.
Or, as one D-rat pol once said, “those facts are no longer operative.”
Amazing that all of a sudden, the DemoRats have themselves shooting outdoors in 2 events trying to get the I bekieve 1 to 2 million gun owners whom do not vote…. A little less than half of the NRA are democrats most likely moderate JFK types. JFK was a member of the NRA.
FKH.
She is a gun owner and has been for decades. So is Biden, but apparently he only has shotguns.
Half of liberals know the constitution protects the right to own firearms. The notion that firearms are only protected as part of a “well regulated militia” is an outlier position and not the majority position.
Sensible gun control is not about banning guns. It is about making it harder for people who would use them to harm innocent citizens to get access to them.
No gun laws would stop people from owning guns. Especially not those that would commit crimes to own them.
Most gun deaths are suicide.
Most non suicide deaths are gang related.
Mental health funding and access could reduce suicides. Gang related deaths would need a more systemic approach and not just “gun control.”
However, the deaths that cause the most outrage and shock the conscience of Americans are the deaths that can most be prevented by sensible gun control.
These are mass shootings involving a shooter trying to commit public mass casualty events targeting schools, shopping centers, and public events.
In these cases the shooter usually has a history of mental health issues. They also tend to be under the age of 21. Often these shooters are children.
One sensible measure would be making it illegal give unsupervised access or buy a child a semi-automatic weapon. It would reduce how often school shootings happen.
I proposed this a while back on a firearms forum and was immediately attacked by nitwits talking about “second amendment rights”.
Kids don’t have a 2nd amendment right own firearms. That is why they can’t buy them. Denying kids access to firearms is not a second amendment issue. Not even the most conservative scotus in history would rule children have a right to bear arms.
Yet, many 2A obsessed dipshits think any law trying to reduce gun access is unacceptable.
The result is that the discussion is framed as an all or nothing discussion.
Also, don’t @ me with bullshit about how your father bought you a rifle as a kid and you don’t shoot anyone. Or how you bought your 14 year old an AR and he didn’t shoot anyone.
That is missing the point.
Ok, how about the fact that every pickup in the parking lot of my fathers high school had a rifle or shotgun in it, and no-one shot up the school??? That was in the mid 1950’s just for reference… And bonus points if you can describe the major changes in society since that time..
Same for me in the 80s.
I agree with keeping firearms out of the hands of people that should have them in The first place but then we run into those pesky HIPAA regulations.
Given the facts about the most recent school shooters, we need to bar transgender people from gun ownership. Are you ready to make that call, Commissar? Of course not. Perhaps anyone affiliated with antifa should be barred, after all, they do have a propensity for property damage and mayhem. What say you, Commissar?
Even if it saves just one life. Won’t someone think of the children?
Ummmmm…….what about abortion?
And… those “migrant” putos who rape and kill minors, how ’bout them?
Not to mention the fact that a very small demographic is responsible for the vast majority of gun crime / mass shootings in this country, and almost all of them fall into the dems “favored” groups…
So a semi-auto .22 would be off-limits but a pump 12 gauge would be potentially less harmful?
If you read the above article carefully, she advocates only guns for military/law enforcement – as a DA she was law enforcement. So she is advocating “for me and not for thee”, as well as acknowledging that while a long way off, total bans are on the checklist.
Given that most mass shootings in the category you describe, the high-profile -high count school shootings, are committed with legally purchased firearms, how would proposed laws have helps over what is already on the books? Be specific.
Wait a min David, you want Commissar to “read carefully”… ever the optimist, aren’t you??
Stop trying to find niche comparisons to argue buying 14 year olds semi automatic weapons, dimwit.
And the average 14 year old can cause a lot more casualties with a .22 semi automatic and a high capacity magazine than with a 12 gauge.
Why the hell does the right always feel the need to defend giving guns to children?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
“ And the average 14 year old can cause a lot more casualties with a .22 semi automatic and a high capacity magazine than with a 12 gauge.”
WRONG!!!
Your military and police background should allow you to know better!
Try to Do better!
“Your military and police background should allow you to know better!”
Feeling a little gracious this evening, Blaster?
A little sarcastic maybe.
Legally buying a fourteen-year-old any NFA governed firearm is already illegal. It would be a straw purchase. Several felonies would be committed by any adult doing so.
No no no, bad form! Injecting fact into this discussion is not fair!
Why the hell does the Left always feel the need to defend aborting children?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
It’s the high sacrament of the progressive religion
The fact that the founder of planned parenthood Margaret Sanger advocated for abortion primarily to “cleanse the gene pool” of black babies because she was a raging racist, and pen pal with Adolf Hitler (along with obviously being a democrat)is something they hope that we don’t remember..
Just preventing future mass shootings 🙄😏
Just curious, but if I remember correctly, don’t you sometimes find niche comparisons?
Dipshit.
You do not now, nor have you ever had, a point.
I was but making a point.
I was expressing an opinion.
Meanwhile smoothbrains like you only ever have an opinion if the rest of the hive mind shares it and that means it is almost always some bullshit right wing propaganda narrative.
I have never once seen you say anything that was not exactly what a right wing propaganda bot would say.
Not saying you are one. Just indistinguishable from one.
No evidence of sentience at all.
I’m asking you to back up your opinion with your idea of “sensible gun control”. Can you do that? Or are you waiting to receive the official talking points on that subject?
I’m gonna make a point.
I’m going to express an opinion.
If you commit a crime with a gun, the punishment should be,
At a minimum insertion of firearm, the rectal cavity. Dry without any anesthetic.
Depending on the severity of the crime, it either gets to stay there or it gets to be Activated whilst in storage.
Welp, SFC D, SPAPOS does have a pointy head and is reputed to be a needle d*ck so there is that.
It’s two, two, two points in one!
Turds are also tapered on one end so ones ass hole doesn’t slam shut.
So, he’s either a needle d*ck or a turd.
He talks like a fish with a paper asshole.
It’s not bullshit. It’s the truth, something you’re unfamiliar with. I got my first .22 for my 12th birthday. My high school was heavily armed during hunting season, students and teachers alike. Most of us had a deer rifle and shotgun in our cars, on school property, during school hours. You can count the number of school shootings on zero fingers. You are blaming accessibility on guns for school shootings. You’re wrong. What changed? People did. No one is required to be responsible for their own actions anymore. We blame society, TikTok, facebook, video games, whatever. You want sensible gun control? Stop passing “feel good” laws and enforce existing gun law. Committing a crime with a firearm should be painful. Stop plea bargaining gun crimes and slam people with the biggest legal hammer available. Make Accountability Great Again. And you’re still a fraud.
“You want sensible gun control? Stop passing “feel good” laws and enforce existing gun law. Committing a crime with a firearm should be painful. Stop plea bargaining gun crimes and slam people with the biggest legal hammer available. Make Accountability Great Again.”
This. All of it.
I was going to write something akin to this, thanks for beating me to it. Not that Commissar will fucking read it anyway…
Surprising isn’t it how in Shotcago, the DA’s always drop the gun charges as part of plea deals, even though the defendant is a convicted felon? Seems like these Soros elected DA’s don’t want to enforce our existing gun laws against real criminals.
That’s the whole reason Soros bought them. To encourage and support the criminal class, so dims can institute more violations of the Constitution, until they finally do away with it, and establish the socialist utopia he’s been working towards since he was a hitler youth… He’s still pissed that we beat the Nazi’s in ’45, and has been working to “correct that mistake” since then. He and his demon spawn both need to stretch a rope for their crimes against humanity!
I would like to buy the fine Russian hemp rope for that project.
I received my first .22, a Colt Frontier Scout, when I was 16. However, that was in the 1960’s when such a gift transfer by an adult parent was perfectly legal. My father also bought me a 1911 .45 when I was in college and 20 years old.
You are correct, he is a fraud.
Hey Commiesar, 18-, 19-, and 21-year-olds are not “children.” State and federal law says so.
Better yet, since you think you can deny people’s 2A rights based on their age as adults, how about a law that says persons under 50 may only possess or own single-shot muzzle loading rifles with 30-inch barrels? Surely, if violation of it had a death penalty, that would really take a bite out of gun crime–since you think gun control laws really prevent gun crime.
I was thinking only people 40 and up could vote but that might be too young.
“Also, don’t @ me with bullshit about how your father bought you a rifle as a kid and you don’t shoot anyone. Or how you bought your 14 year old an AR and he didn’t shoot anyone.
‘That is missing the point.“
My dad bought me a rifle as a kid and I bought my daughter one when she was a child. Neither of us shoots anyone we don’t intend to.
We don’t miss.
He’s got a gun!!
I seem to remember a few years ago a child was suspended form school and arrested(?) for doing that.
Bingo!
https://tennesseelookout.com/2024/08/26/a-10-year-old-pointed-a-finger-gun-the-principal-kicked-him-out-of-his-tennessee-school-for-a-year/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tennessee-teen-suspended-charged-with-felony-for-pointing-finger-gun-on-school-bus/ar-AA1qpx8g
https://jonathanturley.org/2023/09/12/a-3-22-threat-six-year-old-suspended-for-using-finger-gun-in-game-of-cops-and-robbers/
Common-sense gun control in action.
The problem with “common sense” laws is that they will be enforced by people with no common sense.
True that. Probably by the same people who will touch an object labeled “wet paint” to see if it is indeed wet.
I like to think that those who would touch a “wet paint” area would have more sense than the “common sense” gun law enforcers.
Just sticking up for a friend.
It’s not missing the point. It is strongly contradicting your point. Your point is weak, not backed by… empirical evidence.
Please describe your plan for “sensible gun control”. I’ll just add it to the list of things I’m waiting for from you.
Yes, you’re still a fraud.
Leftists love attritional strategies… “common sense” restrictions will happen over and over again, until firearm ownership is practically unfeasable, as you know.
I don’t disagree with anything in your comment, Lars. I believe negligent access is already an issue in the Colt Gray Georgia high school tragedy.
What you are missing is that even though they understand what the Constitution says, they don’t like it and want to change it. That is pretty much what she said. I like it where it’s at, I don’t want to change it.
Your silly straw man argument about 14-year-old’s has nothing to do with anything under discussion here.
Very few mass shooters are under the age of 18. The last study that was pretty inclusive put it at around 6.8%. When you’re talking about school shootings of course it goes up. But when you cross reference minority age school shooters to those who had legal possession of firearms the number again becomes very small. So really you don’t have much of a point for whatever it was you were trying to say.
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/politifact/2022/05/27/fact-check-most-mass-shooters-ages-18-19-texas-school-shooting-uvalde-robb-elementary/9933032002/
They view the constitution as an impediment to their ideals. And they’re right on that. It is. By design.
I have recently come to the conclusion that the Constitution’s limited and enumerated grant of power to the government protects us not just from evil and malevolent intentions, but also from incompetence. The later may be more important. After all, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions”.
I’ve never heard it put quite like that but I agree!
On any given weekend you have dozens of people fall victim to inner city gang violence. This was last weekend in Chicago. What does Commissar think the over/under for tgis weekend’s shooting/homicide victims. There is no need for the KKK when black on black crime kills more in one year then the entire history of the KKK.
https://abc7chicago.com/live-updates/chicago-shootings-weekend-gun-violence-city-police-department-says/15447206/
So, you’re not doing the “I’m done dealing with you neanderthals, and I’ll never post on this site again” thing anymore?
So who the Return of Lars Pool this round? Winning that is just as rare and prestigious as scoring the First Comment for the weekend Open Thread.
She CLAIMS to be a gun owner.
Moreover, if she is actually a gun owner, she is in violation of the law and would otherwise become ineligible to own a firearm.
Biden is a liar. He CLAIMS to own a shotgun.
Move on dickhead.
“Half of liberals know the constitution protects the right to own firearms. The notion that firearms are only protected as part of a ‘well regulated militia’ is an outlier position and not the majority position.”
Prove it.
“Sensible gun control is not about banning guns. It is about making it harder for people who would use them to harm innocent citizens to get access to them.”
Prove it.
“No gun laws would stop people from owning guns. Especially not those that would commit crimes to own them.”
The right to carry or own a firearm cannot be construed as the right of a person who keeps a firearm to injure another or commit any crime. No rights (or laws) are intended by the Constitution for an unlawful or unjustifiable purpose.
“Most gun deaths are suicide.”
Prove it.
“Most non suicide deaths are gang related.”
Most non-suicide related deaths in the U.S. is heart disease, followed by cancer, accidental accidents, stroke. The list goes on.
“In these cases the shooter usually has a history of mental health issues. They also tend to be under the age of 21. Often these shooters are children.”
Actually, of the mass shootings that occurred in 2024, less than 14% of the shooters were under 18 years old. In fact, the average age of a mass shooter that year was 31 years old.
Of the mass shootings that occurred in 2023, less than 10% of the shooters were under 18 years old. The average age was 36.
Of the mass shootings that occurred in 2022, the average age of the shooter was 29 years old.
Of the mass shootings that occurred from 2022 through 2024, approximately 0.3% were under 18 years old.
A VAST majority of juveniles involved in mass shootings had criminal records, psychological issues, or were accompanied by adults at the time of the offense.
A VAST majority of adults who were involved in a mass shooting were either ineligible to possess a firearm because of previous criminal convictions or had psychological/emotional issues.
“One sensible measure would be making it illegal to give unsupervised access or buy a child a semi-automatic weapon. It would reduce how often school shootings happen.”
It’s already illegal to allow children unauthorized access to firearms. Some state laws are stricter than others.
“Kids don’t have a 2d amendment right own firearms. That is why they can’t buy them. Denying kids access to firearms is not a second amendment issue. Not even the most conservative scotus in history would rule children have a right to bear arms.”
The 2d Amendment has nothing to do with “owning” a gun, but it does apply to “possessing” one for self defense. Minors also can’t buy cigarettes or vote, nor do they have the right to. I guess in your world, minors also don’t have the right to due process and are subject to cruel and unusual punishment.
The right to possess a firearm can’t be construed to mean having a right to injure another or commit any crime. No rights (or laws) are intended by the Constitution for an unlawful or unjustifiable purpose.
Let us hope that Biden and Harris store their firearms more securely than they do their classified documents.
“Take the guns away first. Go the due process afterwards.” – Donald Trump.
That is his political instinct. He had to be talked down from that position by aides. And he only changed it because he was told it would make him unpopular with his base.
He is a dictator at heart and will betray you and discarded your rights the moment you are no longer useful.
Which will be soon after he no longer needs your vote.
He has made it clear he does not want elections moving forward.
“He has made it clear he does not want elections moving forward.”
I know which quote you’re pulling that BS from — and it’s quite a reacH, even for you… you jobless, worthless hack.
Quit stealing our oxygen.
I wasn’t one quote, dipshit.
Actually, what he said was “Or; Mike, take the firearms first, then go to court.”
He was talking specifically about Nicholas Cruz. Cruz should never have been allowed to buy guns because he had depression and attempted suicide previously. He was taking several prescription medications that involve mood alterations.
He also made a number of threats about shooting up schools. The sheriff refused to take any action on it though which is why the sheriff got fired by the governor of the state of Florida.
So yes, I would say if somebody’s making threats to shoot up a school, the police should take their guns away, and then they can go court and explain why they were making threats to shoot up the school. Oh wait, I forgot the police are all evil racists who have been defunded and don’t have time for that, Good job dick head.
Except the capitol police. They are all innocent saints who did nothing to incite the crowd on Jan 6th (like firing tear gas into the BACK of the crowd to drive them forward, INTO police lines), dozens of them died defending democracy, and they feared for their lives to such an extent that one HAD to shoot and kill an unarmed protestor…
Did I get all the talking points in there Lars?
The capital police thoroughly investigated themselves and found that they did nothing wrong. I’m not sure about how a civil jury is going to see that.
Commissary was completely outraged and he and his antifa friends organized a mass protest at the Capitol. The shooting of an unarmed female by the police, who posed no threat to anyone was very triggering. Then they found out the woman didn’t even have any testicles and so they put the protest on hold.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/ashli-babbitt-familys-30-million-wrongful-death-lawsuit-starts-trial-in-july-2026/
Here’s hoping they take them for all of that and more.
I know where you’re pulling it from — you fat unemployed pussy. I know what speech of his you yanked that from. He never said he didn’t want elections held again.
BUT Kamala is better????
I’m not voting FOR TRUMP! I’m voting for AMERICA and our future.
No need to answer back. You’ll forever be a follower of the left- NO MATTER the point, or the common sense it takes to argue against that side. Regardless of how out of touch or just plain stupid they may be on any simple subject.
Yes. Kamala is better.
And thinking Trump is best for the r future of America is an asinine position.
You really have no idea how any of our institutions function, or even how the economy functions… do you?
Even if he wasn’t a grasping wannabe despot, his position on tariffs along would be disqualifying.
He has no clue how tariffs work and he made them a central part of his campaign. I expect because he know idiots like you have no idea how tariffs work either.
Um, yes I do!! But I don’t think that you do!!!
By the way, I’ll remind you again – 8 years of 0bama, 4 years of Trump and 4 years of whomever the hell was running the country while Bidumb was drooling on and shitting himself, – and none of the BS happened under Trump, but it most certainly did under the Dems.
Gaslighting is just lies. Believe what you will, but you don’t get to tell me I’m wrong when I have had both leaders for 4 years each! Piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining???No thanks! I’ll judge based on my own experiences and what I SEE!!!
Better at word salad…
How is Kamala better? Convince me. What is her platform? What are her policies? Her economic agenda? You say I’m wrong, tell me what’s right. I triple-dog dare you. Trump is not my ideal candidate. Kamala is a walking, cackling violation of the democratic process. Never a single vote for candidacy, yet there she is. The chosen one. Selected by “The Party”. Because they know what’s best for you.
Fuck that. I’ll take Trump over that, every time.
Well let’s see if I can sum up some of her key policy initiatives.
She wants to give away money to people to start more meat packing companies. She believes if there are more meatpacking companies then the price of meat will drop. This ignores a number of economic realities, like where are we going to get me more meat from? She is kind of an expert in packing meat though so maybe?
She wants to increase regulation on grocery stores. Apparently grocery stores cause high prices and government regulations cause prices to go lower. This is one area where Trump and Harris disagre quite a lot. Trump believe that regulations actually increase costs. I’m going to have to agree with Trump on this one.
She quite wrongly believes that most first time home buyers buy new houses. The plan here is to give away $25,000 to every first time home buyer in hopes of stimulating new home builds. It will also give lots of jobs to the new immigrants that we have, that like working construction. You might wonder where that money is going to come from? I would say taxes but, they are just going to print it. You might think printing a bunch of money will create inflation, probably everybody not named commissary believes that. If you believe that you are correct It will create a lot of inflation.
She wants to give more money to baby makers, the $6k tax credit that comes and goes like election cycles.
That is all ahe is selling, could be more.
Commie-Tsar would vote for a steaming pile of shit if it had a D after it.. He calls us cultists, but he ignores every fact for the good of the party. Talk about pissing on your oath…
All you have to do is watch the things that the Ho has said in the past, she’s told you clearly what her intentions are, no stealth or creative editing needed (what he ALWAYS does with President Trump… Ok, to be fair, he doesn’t do it, he just regurgitates talking points given to him by those that do the above)
One thing you can say for Commies/Marxists, they are loyal to the party, and they always push “the party-line.” They never forget that Communism is the goal.
But it’ll work this time!
Of course it will, the “right” people will be in charge, finally!!
For the lolz/memes/irony of it all, if they try that Red October bullshit here I’m going out swinging a Mosin.
Might even be shwasted on potato rocket fuel too.
StavoyBlagtomaroVreeItchMoklahavonStaaaa!
“they are loyal to the party,”
Because they put quite a bit more effort into enforcing party discipline than Capitalist parties. The methods used vary a bit from country to country.
Well let’s see, Trump was president for 4 years, The world failed to end and Trump failed to conquer all of Asia like he had promised for his thousand year rule. Tough times all around, but it was still better than having Joe Biden.
Digging through my couch cushions, I found 38 cents, which I will put up against your knowledge of the government and how it works versus Trump’s. Seeing how he was president and you weren’t, you’re really going to have to work for this 38 cents. I mean I would raise the bet to a hundred billion dollars but I know you would welch on it.
Fact is, I would put my knowledge on how the economy functions versus yours any day of the week. If you are as ignorant about the economy as you are but everything else then that is an easy win for me.
Anyone who grew up watching “Schoolhouse Rock” has a far better grasp on how our institutions work than you do.
Yes. Kamala is better.
Which policies of Kamala do you find her strongest asset? Is it resolving runaway inflation by reminiscing about growing up in a middle class neighborhood?
I’ve heard her pucker power to be her strongest asset, but anybody with first hand knowledge won’t go on the record to confirm.
Perhaps Diddy has the tapes?
Ahh, I bet Willie Brown would corroborate…
“Which policies of Kamala do you find her strongest asset?”
I think it must be her middle-class upbringing by a working mother.
Which is a flat out lie.. though facts aren’t commissar’s strong suit
Welcome back my Conservative friend with your socialist Shtik act, you got a great turnout today with your act.
Didn’t you say you were done coming here? Dude — you’re a fraud and a failure. Go pour your shithead professors coffee and restock the lavatories.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
He has said that before, so maybe he is really a politician whose promises are never kept, and forgotten after being sworn in. It must be all the excitement from the pageantry that causes this to happen.
Or maybe a celebrity like the ones that promise to leave the country when someone they don’t like gets elected, but then they NEVER do.. ( yeah, they’re liars, but we already knew that)
Pop quiz, hotshot:
Well, Lars has been unemployed and useless for some time. I’d say in four years not much has changed for him aside from his fashion sense — he looks like the poster boy for men who enjoy being pegged.
Ah, the Commie Fuck-Stick reappears forgetting that Trump WAS President and the economy worked better with low inflation and growing wages. He used tariffs and Biden used the same tariffs as well. Damn, all those Camel-a farts he’s inhaling are ruining they/thems memory.
“You really have no idea how any of our institutions function, or even how the economy functions… do you?”
Right back at ya, slick.
Okay Lars, please indulge us and answer the following questions:
Question 1: Does Donald Trump pose an existential threat to our Democracy/Constitutional Republic?
Question 2: If you answered yes, if Donald Trump won enough of the electoral college to win the race, would you prevent Donald Trump from being sworn in to save our Democracy/Constitutional Republic?
Question 3: If you answered no to the previous question, then you do not believe that Donald Trump pose an existential threat to our Democracy/Constitutional Republic. If you answered yes, would that make you an election denier who is overriding the will of the American voters?
Donald Trump poses an existential threat to the Democrat establishment.
And their globalist masters.
As well as all of the DC Insider RINOs!
From your lips to God’s ear.
You know Lars and his Democrats brethren will refuse to certify a Trump win and will riot and burn things– not “insurrection,” just political speech, when they do it.
It will happen. And the D’s will call it “democracy in action” and “peaceable assembly”. Kamal and Hillary will go on a speaking tour of college campuses, bitching and moaning about how they were robbed, all the while charging obscene amounts of money to cry about racism and misogyny. The fact that they were very possibly two of the worst presidential candidates ever will be ignored.
Let them bring that crap to my neighborhood… PLEASE let them.. the number of firearms, backhoe’s and yes, flamethrowers out hear would result in.. “unexpected” outcomes.. at least from their perspectives..
“Take the guns away first. Go the due process afterwards.”
I believe that is already the law in most states. For example, a “Red Flag” law? I think domestic violence complaints can also result in seizure of firearms. Taking guns is due process.
Ok, a bit off topic but relevant, at least in my mind.. given who’s posting to this thread, I predict it goes over 100 comments before supper ( 4 hrs from now)
So close! Just finished dinner, but only 82 comments.. C’mon all, we can get 18 more!
Here’s your girl, Commissar. Live, uncut, unedited. May your chains rest lightly on your shoulders.
https://hotair.com/headlines/2024/10/27/thatll-leave-a-mark-the-most-brutal-anti-harris-ad-ive-seen-so-far-n3796327
He loves her and hates this country. I’m sure he’s David Carradine-ing himself nightly to the sound of her cackles — while wearing his newsie hat.
Not a good look, Lars.
Yeah, dumbasses like Commie-czar will call this extremist propaganda while choking on the shit they feed him.
Choke, commie. Just fucking choke.
Speaking of, has LC ever gotten back with his list on why kamala is a better choice than Trump? I didn’t see it on the weekend open thread last I looked.
He said he was too busy to answer us dumbasses who just do not get it.
Yes, indeed (direct on Twitter/X):
https://x.com/robbystarbuck/status/1850210241255772667
I am so heartbroken. I just found out Fuknuts Spielberg was not involved in Jaws 2.
That was always my favorite Jaws movie.
Anyway.
The only good thing in Jaws 1 was Robert Shaw. Memorable until this day.
Ok. Jaws 1 was better than 2.
I still prefer 2.
Robert Shaw at his best:
Damn shame he died right after, his career had just taken off.
Have you seen the late comedian Richard Jenni doing his Jaws: The Revenge bit. Killer material there.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=22BcaJf8g90&pp=ygUSUmljaGFyZCBqZW5uaSBqYXdz
I mean, who could resist Michael Caine…?
[NSFW]:
Edit: thumbnail is even a bit too much for postin’ (here).
By all accounts, the sinking of the Indianapolis is pretty much exactly the way Robert Shaw described it in the film. 890 men went into the water and only 316 came out, the sharks got the rest. I’d probably never get on a boat again if that happened to me.
Shaw served in the RAF near the end of WWII. A good guy, just had a 50 year ticker.
The drinking helped.
“My candle burns at both ends;
It will not last the night:
But ah, my foes, and oh, my friends—
It gives a lovely light!”
Edna St. Vincent Millay
Harris wants to reinstitute the Clinton Assault Weapon Ban. That ban is the exact reason I left NYS.
If it ever becomes national policy again, it will be the reason I leave the US. I’ll take my training and my pension with me.
Not sure exactly where you will go that they don’t have an assault weapon ban. I mean you could go to Greece because it’s a lot safer there, they have the lowest murder rate in the world, But still no AK or AR for you.
There aren’t any other places. The 2A is the main reason I’m still in the US in my retirement; without it, I might as well go somewhere where at least my pension goes a bit farther.
That Clintoon ban was a joke. The US companies just removed some features like the flash hiders and bayonet studs and kept selling AR-15’s. The only firearms really impacted were the imported semi-auto only AK variants.
That’s the perfect example of “feel good” gun laws that I referred to. Absolutely nothing accomplished, but congress gets to brag that “they did something”. And the liberal public genuflects and asks for more.
Yes, but NYS made it permanent and continued to add to it – gradually leading to more infringements.
The next one will be more thoughtful.
Kamala has decided to one-up Hillary.
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/10/28/you-are-no-longer-deplorable-you-are-a-nazi-n3796375
Mark my words, if he wins (which I doubt, sadly..) the left will lash out and make January 6th look like Woodstock. Difference is they’ll have the support of the leftists in government and the media and it will likely be extremely violent. In 2016 they smashed and burned businesses IN THEIR OWN CITIES, OWNED BY HILLARY SUPPORTERS. I’d not put it past them to just beat/kill on sight anyone who just stands in their way even as a casual observer.
Lars — stock up on bricks and bike chains/locks. It’ll be open season on the innocent for your stank loser ass.
If they do go berserk as soon as their herders order it, I’m certain that they’ll stick to blue state local because their top echelons know that those of us in Red State America won’t put up with them and their shit. In my neck of the woods, I have friends and neighbors who own excavators, they’ll never find what’s left of the little shits!
Yeah, they MIGHT come to my county, but it’d be a MIRACLE if any of them made it back..
I’d not put it past them TRY to just beat/kill on sight anyone .. FIFY.. depending on where you’re at..
Shortly after Hillary said that I had a T-shirt made with ‘DEPLORABLE” on it. Although I am tempted, I think I’ll pass on a “NAZI” T-shirt.
Yeahhhh I had pretty much the same thought. Only Mel Brooks can make Nazis funny.
And The Blues Brothers
I hate Illinois Nazis..
Put them in a pinto wagon and drop em.
Okay, which one of you Deplorables told the Harris-Walz Campaign to call Hack Stone Kate? This shit stopped being funny weeks ago.
Don’t forget your MAGA hat and American flag.
Tehehehehe.
Come and see.
This pic would cause kamala to go apoplectic
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjEkvSMqavYfaW1PNlGrqOA95-xcJMWJKUBR5DeRu0HGyxUBkvQSAO8guIDQU3QAZPRxYDQCq3rb50-DbDgtexXsLI0SgWmC0rax7xcl32mw8f9gFWMblzSbTQRsUZ9zkn9jHlv-OEByw5M6OV2SZuMMkWzq9D4ISc0XuSO_sbDH9RbnApct5JnQbN62uE=w651-h1140
HEAVEN!