Walz: No more electoral college

| October 12, 2024 | 5 Comments

Must be almost boring by now, reading about the issues around this guy. Does no one vet a candidate any more? Or do they just not care? Rhetorical questions at best, I suppose – seems like the true controllers of the parties like their candidates as they are, warts and all. Must make them easier to control.

Walz did indeed say the Electoral College is something we should do without – popular vote all the way, baby! – not just once but twice at two different campaign stops.

“I think all of us know, the Electoral College needs to go. We need a — we need national popular vote,” he said. “But that’s not the world we live in. So, we need to win Beaver County, Pa. We need to be able to go into York, Pa., and win. We need to be in western Wisconsin and win. We need to be in Reno, Nev., and win. The Hill

Actually, on a winner-take-all basis, to get PINO Joe’s 80 million people, you only need 10 counties in the entire COUNTRY: and Reno isn’t one of them (but Las Vegas is.) In order of population, we have LA, Cook, Harris (Houston), Maricopa (Phoenix) San Diego, Orange, Miami-Dade, Dallas, Kings (Brooklyn, NY) and Riverside. Just over 80 million population there as of 2023.

Now, if they want to get rid of the Electoral Collage, they will also have to dump the winner-take-all (the REALLY disenfranchising system beloved by pols*) system. So then to get to 80 million they have to add Clark (Las Vegas) King (Seattle King (Seattle), San Bernadino and Tarrant (Ft. Worth) if you postulate a 50% voting population.  This also presupposes that everyone in those counties is a registered voter, and in the real world you have underage, felons, illegals, in Cook county the dead…it ain’t as simple as that “only 10 counties would win the country’ trope folks like to bandy about. But a popular vote would allow those 15 counties disproportionate influence, wouldn’t you say?

Luckily that would take a Constitutional amendment and party action no one wants to sign up for. But it tells you something that Wal-tze airs that to riotous applause.

Since Tuesday, however,  he has been walking that back like a bandit – initial response from outside his rallies was immediate and forceful. Now he is saying things like “I support what the campaign wants (which I think translated from Chinese to German means “I vill be a gut soldiare and obey orders!”) or this word salad below.

“The point I’m saying is: I’m in five states in two days, we’re out there making the case that – the campaign’s position is clear, that that’s not their position. Their position and my position is – is to make sure that everybody understands their vote, no matter what state they’re in, matters.” CNN

Keeps leading me back to my constant thought, and source of no small number of headaches: “Are these four idiots the best we can do? Seriously?

*Winner-take-all states – if a candidate gets just ONE more vote than the other, they get ALL the electoral votes. If you are a Republican in Chicago, possibly a Democrat in TX – your Presidential vote is nullified and you, my friend, are a non-person. Me, I’d love to see something more representational – maybe splitting a state’s electoral votes based on the popular vote? It will be interesting to see what the results of the last several elections would be on that basis. Given the concentration of Dem voters in big cities, I am not all that sure Bush or Trump would have presumably lost. Just a thought.

Category: "Teh Stoopid", 2024 Election

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5JC

They are unconventional, you would think if anyone would back electors over the general voting population it would be them. Zero people voted for either of them in the primary but here they are on their party ballot while the selected candidate lies under a bus or in a dumpster behind the Chicago Convention Center somewhere.

If zero people vote for them will they still be president and VEEP?

KoB

“They” may control the Ballot Box and even the Jury Box, but there is another Box that will be needed if we are to “vote” our way back into being a Representative Constitutional Republic.

Pay attention, Patriots…even your domestic enemies are telling you that you had better…Prepare

Anonymous

Just like in a workers “soviet,” you know…

comment image

Last edited 1 hour ago by Anonymous
MSG Eric

They found someone who is actually worse at speaking than Harris. She needs a teleprompter to talk, but he just talks and says anything that pops into his brain.

He might actually be a worthwhile reason why she doesn’t get elected. Though VPs usually don’t have an impact on the election.

Just for the fact he is a coward that abandoned his unit before they deployed, I wouldn’t vote for that ticket. Especially since I’ve seen too often leaders in the Reserve and NG “get out of” deploying when their unit was called up. He’s not special in that case, because it happened more than anyone would care to admit, but it still makes him a coward that ran away when it was time to step up.

He’s also the epitome of why 20% of high school graduates are functionally illiterate. There should be 0% of graduates that are illiterate.

The teacher’s union is supporting horrible curriculum and education, with standards continually being lessened or ignored. To the point that we have young people too stupid to realize WHY there is an electoral college.

In 8th grade I had to take a test on the Constitution to be eligible for the 9th grade. If kids can’t read when they finish 12th grade, how are they passing that test? Or are they not even requiring that anymore?

Old tanker

He is just postulating the same drivel that killary did when she lost.

The only thing I can think of to replace the college is that the candidate must win 26 or more of the states. Then again DC Puerto Rico and Guam kind of muddy the waters there too. Not based on pure population numbers but a majority of the states. Quite frankly the EC just proves how much genius there was in the Founding Fathers.