Sock Puppet Alert: Cthulhu is Lars
Outed on Donald Trump Mocks Global Warming Alarmists with Record Cold Temperatures Post
Lars given away by writing style, ISP address’.
Comment:
AW1Ed says:
November 22, 2018 at 6:47 pm (Edit)Damn you’re easy. I couldn’t have baited this post more heavily if I had used a trowel. Ya’see, Cthulhu, folks here have petty long memories, and your writing style- self serving, verbose, and argumentative, brings back some. This is coupled with your ISP address’ uncanny similarity to another one from “United States Berkeley University Of California At Berkeley.” Just come clean and ‘fess up, Lars. Or is it better to recognize you as “Major Lars REDACTED, USAR?”
Circumstantial? Sure. But men have gone to the gallows on such evidence.
I’ll postulate that with Jonn’s passing you thought you could weasel your way back in here, and you did. For a while.
I’m a second tier Admin here with limited permissions, so I can’t ban you outright. I can edit your comments or make them disappear, though. If you fess up, I may let you continue to comment until Management returns and deals with you as they will.
They say confession is good for the soul, and besides, it’ll give you an opportunity gloat over how long you have strung us along.
Category: Breaking News
Freakin elephant in the room.
Dancing on the coffee table.
What took so long?
An abundance of caution, 26L.
I figured as much. It was fun to watch.
BANG! YOU GOT ONE!, BWAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAA
Commissar, aka Commissar, aka Cthulhu, we’ve been on to you since you started posting as “Cthulhu”. We just paid out more “rope” for you to hamstring yourself with. Congratulations, you’ve been Donald Trumped.
You were the central topic of a recent email that we had among us post contributors. I noticed that you refused to respond to my arguments, but are quick to argue against others. So, when they cooked up the plan to “ensnare” you, I decided to stay out of the post until you took a bite. Yes, we were laughing our rear ends off when we anticipated what you would do with that post. We knew that that post was going to be posted long before it was actually posted.
We discussed our suspicions, an IP check was done, then agreed upon a plan of action. and, as was mentioned above, we utilized an abundance of caution. Ladies and gentlemen of TAH, here is the link to the “sting” operation to snare our favorite chew toy.
https://valorguardians.com/blog/?p=83021
This seems to be directed at me.
How is any of this remotely relevant to my life?
I have used 5-6 different screen names over the years here.
Even my real name for a time.
I never changed my posting style and never denied who I was.
All of this behind the scenes sleuthing and conspiring might have been entertaining but it was pointless.
You all could have just asked me.
“This seems to be directed at me”
Dawn lights on Marblehead
Hey Lars, guess what? Nobody cares what you have to say. How is that bedwetting coming along?
This dude is truly a fuckwit. Always fun to have a libtard running around with out their adult supervision present. If I ever need a bucket of arrogance, I know to go to him to get it.
I’ve been stating that since his first post. Old news.
“IT” can’t “fess up, “it” would have to have honor and integrity to do that! lol Why doesn’t “IT” just sign in with “shytbird”? 😉
This is my shocked face.
Gee whiz, what a surprise- NOT! At least he wasn’t cussing while yapping some of the CRAP he lets his perfessers put into his head!
That’s because he’s still on some of his psychotropic meds, API. As he convinces himself that he’s “cured”, he’ll dump more of the meds, or sell them on campus. Then he’ll be ranting, raving, cursing and frothing at the mouth, like he did when he got banned on his first trip to TAH.
Shocked face. This.
What a dipshit.
Lars, how can we miss ya if you don’t go away?
Even only dropping in once in a while, I should have seen that was Lars’ old output freshly deposited.
It still smells the same.
Lars – you are an abject idiot. You are not nearly as intelligent as your indoctrination team told you you are. I would not be surprised if your own mother disowned you for intentional stupidity.
I suppose he -could- be just another ProggieParrot reading from the same PlayBook “political education of captive meal audiences at Bourgeois celebrations”
From the same IP area
With similar syntax and hot buttons,
And ego
…
Nah.
What an achievement! Outed as a sockpuppet fraud by a team dedicated to busting frauds.
Way to go Lambchop.
They never see it coming, do they?
Because they are such well trained sock puppies.
I am not a fraud.
I am one of the very few people that ever posted on this blog using my REAL name.
There are a lot of frauds on this blog.
I am not one of them.
“I am one of the very few people that ever posted on this blog using my REAL name”
And then you got all pissy when others
addressed you with it.
I got pissy when people would use my real full name to make false accusations, post libelous nonsense, or pretend to be me and post idiotic crap.
It would piss you off too.
I made trhe mistake of thinking the members of this board were mature and honorable enough to not pull 4Chan behavior like that.
I also incorrectly assumed the moderators would put a stop to nonsense like that.
I was wrong. I regret it and thus stopped posting under my real name.
“It would piss you off too”
Yes, it would. But I have a remedy. Answer each comment with “not me” and then leave.
“I also incorrectly assumed the moderators would put a stop to nonsense like that”
That’s like thinking the teacher will stop the bullying. They won’t. Only you can do that.
Did you complain to your DI in Basic? I’m pretty sure he would tell you the same thing.
I’m still wondering about those supposed “false accusations”.
Poodle here doesn’t exactly have a great track record for accuracy in his comments. If he’s referring to the incident I think he is, he’s confusing – either through ignorance/lack of intelligence, or willfully – an attack on one of his many weak arguments as a false statement about him. Or he’s deliberately being mendacious.
IMO either would fit in with his apparent superiority complex and his actual level of intelligence (which is considerably lower than he apparently believes it to be).
No. You got pissy about once a month.
28 day cycle? How familiar…
Maybe, maybe not. But you’re demonstrably a pathetic asswipe who used an alias to slither back into a blog that banned him for being obnoxious, ironically while accusing others of “hiding behind anonymity.”
Seriously, Commissar, you should seek help. The amount of time and effort you put into sneaking around your ban is not indicative of sound mental health. It’s not like your life should revolve around access to TAH—a blog on which nobody likes you (because you’re an obnoxious asshole, but that’s been belabored enough) and your participation is not wanted (hence the ban)!
I was not banned. Jonn said “I wish you would just leave” and I honored his request.
And perhaps you should look in the mirror concerning getting help.
You have been angry and attacking me for years. Even posting libelous crap about me sucking dicks at truck stops months after I stopped posting here.
You are pathologically obsessed with anger and hatred for me. Even months after not interacting with me you are still triggered by our last interaction. It is bizarre.
I also know you are a coward because you would not post ANY of that crap if you were not anonymous.
See my comments elsewhere, Poodle.
No, scratch that – you’ve proven yourself in the past to be too lazy to do any amount of meaningful due diligence. So here’s the “short version” for your benefit.
If you’re being completely truthful in your account, you have no way of knowing if Jonn banned you or not. And given your record for being “less than completely accurate” in past commentary here, well, let’s just say I’d rather trust Jonn’s account in the matter – particularly since he’d be in a position to know definitively.
If you were ever put on moderation by Jonn, that means that your comments from that point forward required manual review and approval. Banning simply means that Jonn decided that approval of your comments had become a “not gonna happen” event. (I suspect WordPress may have a more automated means of handing comments from problem commenters, but I don’t think Jonn used one if it exists.)
I seem to recall that you were indeed put on moderation. So if Jonn later decided to ban you, that was simply a decision on his part. And if you never tried to comment again – or never asked him directly again while he was alive – you would have no way of knowing if you’d been banned or not.
So how many people here have to tell you the same before you take the fucking hint, Lars?
You’re an insufferable boor. Go away. There, clear enough for you?
I would happily say the same things to your face Lars. And I’m not particularly hard to find.
I have no particular obsession with you either. I dislike you because you are not only dishonest and an idiot with delusions of genius, but also a tremendously arrogant and insufferable asshole, hence my comments (and everyone else’s) to that effect. But I don’t waste time thinking about you when you’re not around.
But seriously, you were banned. We know this because Jonn said so. And here you are having changed your screen name (again) and slithered around the ban, because your self-worth is apparently so depressingly low that you can’t live without making yourself the center of attention on TAH. If anybody is obsessed, it’s obviously you.
If I were to be banned from a blog, my reaction would be to leave it alone. It would be obvious to me that I was unwanted and I would have nothing to gain by trying to scam my way around it. You? Clearly not so much. So yes, you really should seek professional help.
You say you would meet me face to face, yet when I made the offer to do so you didn’t and continue to hide behind anonymity.
Of the hundred or so regulars you are one of two that remained obsessed with me and continue to post triggered and angry crap for months after I left.
If your behavior is two standard deviations or more from the mean concerning triggered behavior it is likely you need some help.
You being one of two out of a hundred or more regulars and thousands of casuals buts you well above two standard deviations.
Think about it, you were posting about me giving blowjobs at truck stops, a patently libelous statement, and several similar statements… for no reason other than residual triggered anger months after I left. Comments that would have landed you in legal trouble had you not been anonymous and you know it.
Posting libelous statements about someone using their full name also but Jonn at risk of additional legal nonsense that he should not have to deal with.
So you did it because of your petty and childish residual anger and did not care about anyone but yourself.
As for whether I need help, you are right, I did and still do. I am getting it. And have been since 2016.
You should.
” you were posting about me giving blowjobs at truck stops,”
You actually keep a record of insults you have received, and from whom? How sad. I would say that is a bit more than two standard deviations from the mean.
What is this freak? A Voyeur? He talks about peoples posts “months” after he left? obviously he didn’t leave, he LURKED lol…damn boi youse is dumb!!
You want to know why your name was still mentioned after your ban, Commissar? Because you are a meme for TAH. If a subject is absurd, ridiculous, fascist, or just an asswipe, “Commissar” is applicable. You built that, you own it. Besides, you were just crowing about TAH getting less views and being an echo chamber these days, so why the hell should you care what any of us say about you? Your arguments are self-defeating, but it’s pretty evident that we’re all living rent-free in your head.
You’re still dancing around the issue of being banned and slithering around it via an alias. Kinda reminds me of past incidents where you said something absurdly stupid, then denied saying despite it being quoted back to you. Is it really so mysterious why nobody takes you seriously?
“Even posting libelous crap about me sucking dicks at truck stops months after I stopped posting here.” Bwahahahahahahah. If that’s wrong, where do you?
That’s the second time he has mentioned that. Must have hit a nerve.
Makes me wonder why I still bother paying for a mortgage, since I appear to have a rent-free residence in Commissar’s head.
I bet he even drives a beat-up old used Volvo as well! 😀
Lars, under any name, you are still the whiny, pissy, attention-demanding brat you always were. You can paint a turd gold, it’s still a turd. Somehow, someone convinced you that spewing recirculated liberal talking points, acting like a superior being, and being a fucking know-it-all passes as an educated viewpoint. Bad news boyo, you’re wrong. Something has seriously gone awry if your chosen career field decided you had the ability and character to promote you to Major. You sir, are a walking talking clusterfuck and general failure as a human being. It is to weep.
Own it. Just breath in and take it.
What? shytwholou is the only one that uses its real name lol roflmao! wadda freaking yoyo!
Ahem. Traditions must be upheld.
…
Sockpuppet in the wire!
Hit the foogas!
Well I’ll be a Monkeys Uncle.
Uncle Jeff, I came here to help these guys out of this echo chamber, and this is the “thanks” that I get? Really? I have to admit, I was going through Soylent withdrawals. But, my niece recently restored my soy privileges due to good behavior. This is why I am more reasonable today than what I was the days before.
The best attack is to ignore him. He wants the interaction of a ‘fight’, where he has nothing meaningful to lose. Once identified, he should be shunned, without reply.
It is exceedingly hard to distinguish one NPC from another since the only thing they know is last nights talking points from their great pumpkin, SorobloomsteyColberillary.
The rhetoric was the same between Commissar/Commissar/Cuntboy… had a feeling when “Cuntboy” started showing up on the political posts that it was our resident SJW.
Save everyone the hassle and ban him before he starts in with his bullshit again.
I was not hiding it. Used the same arguments and style. Even had the same frequent spelling erros and malapropisms.
I am a little surprised you feel the need to “out” me on the main page. People were already often responding to me as “Lars” and Ex clearly knew it was me.
Not hiding by flying a ‘false flag’ with a new name, email, and ISP address? Bullshit. Just making it official, Lars. I wouldn’t want to make a false accusation after all, but I do want max exposure.
Ex indeed had you nailed some time ago, as did a couple others who are shall we say are ‘THA Staff’ or maintainers of the place until Management returns. I felt the same but needed a bit more evidence; the ISP’s gave us that.
Then it was just a matter of waiting for the evidence to build, which you provided. After all, how could you possibly not respond to a Trump/Climate Change post?
I do appreciate you coming clean right off the bat.
What happens next is currently TBD, but will depend on the recommendations of TAH Staff to Management, and their final decision.
I did not change my IP.
If it is different my ISP changed it which I think is normal for consumer internet accounts.
Couldn’t stay away, couldja? Do you crave attention that badly that you just HAVE to keep coming back like a vase of herpes?
Make that one of three ToW. I forgot about Infidel.
At least you didn’t go off on your Zika Virus doomsday rants!
” Even had the same frequent spelling erros and malapropisms.”
Seems to be proud of his inability to learn. Interesting. I have never seen that before.
I dunno, the Khmer Rouge were big fans of illiteracy…
As for the “banning”; you have no accounts and really can’t ban anyone. If it mattered enough I could proxy in.
It does not matter enough so if you want to ban my IP then have at it.
As for wether I could “weasel” my way in. That is nonsense because despite the claims on this board I was never actually “banned”.
I am sure you have access to Jonn’s admin email. See for yourself.
He is what happened…
I started pointing out that this blog is highly partisan and questioned its credibility and motives.
That pissed Jonn off. He denied it was partisan.
The next time I posted it was Jonn edited the post.
I called him our for editing my post and he then set my posting permission (tied to Commissar/email) such that he could screen my posts before they were visible on the site.
This was ENTIRELY to keep me from claiming the site was partisan because that seemed to be the only kinds of posts he ever filtered.
It was also annoying to both of us. I was a fairly prolific poster so he had to screen several posts a day. I also had a hard time responding to arguments in threads because the delay between submission and posting could be more than a half hour at times.
Eventually, Jonn wrote “I wish you would just leave”.
I responded “you got it Jonn”.
And left. I did not post again until he passed.
I did see him say he banned me in a thread latter. It was true enough in that he asked me to leave and his request was why I left. But he did not actually “ban” me and that is not what he said to me when he asked me to leave. It was a request that I leave and since it was his blog I honored it.
Thats all it took?
Excellent.
I wish you would just leave.
Bye.
+1
Assuming that his dubious account is actually true, Jonn was concerned about the blog and us, not himself. In fact, Jonn allowed the idiot to remain when all of us would have ejected his stinking sorry butt much sooner. The commie did not grasp this and, consequently, thought it safe to return after Jonn died. The commie was, as usual, wrong. He didn’t get it then, and he doesn’t get it now.
Here’s a competing theory about Lars’ welcome absence. He repeatedly called us a fascists and Nazis, something he has avoided since his return under a new screen name. Jonn didn’t appreciate having his blog repeatedly called a haven for fascists and Nazis and either told Lars he could leave or be banned or he banned him after multiple warnings.
There’s also another rather large hole in Poodle’s version of events, 2/17.
Per Der Commisar’s account, he strongly implies that never commented again here between the time that Jonn asked him to leave and the time Jonn died. And per his own version of events, Jonn indicated he’d banned Poodle here after their (apparent) email exchange in which Jonn asked him to leave.
So tell me: how does Poodle here know whether or not Jonn actually did ban him?
Seems to me there are two possibilities. First: either Poodle here in fact never posted again while Jonn was alive. In that case, he would have no way to know whether or not Jonn had actually banned him – and is therefore is asserting something as fact that he cannot possibly know to be fact. In other words, he’s being mendacious if not outright lying.
The second possibility is that he did in fact try to post again and found out for certain whether or not he’d been banned. In that case, it means he’s being intentionally misleading about whether he indeed departed when Jonn asked him to leave.
In contrast, Jonn would have been in a position to know definitively whether or not he’d banned Poodle. But conveniently for Poodle, Jonn’s no longer around to give us the ground truth here.
In any case: I would not trust Der Commisar’s account regarding whether or not Jonn banned him. If he’s being completely truthful, he has no way to know whether or not Jonn did in fact ban him. And if he’s not being completely truthful, well, . . . .
Logic, Poodle. Assuming you’re mentally capable of it, you should try it sometimes – before hitting the “Post Comment” button.
Hat tip, Hondo. Excellent reasoning.
This pathetic clown was supposed to be a major? Crap, he sounds like a raw, base, high school drop out first week recruit!! imo
Wouldnt he be able to know if he was banned by ‘reading’ the posts? Not posting himself, but lurking as it were…
No. Lurking would let him know that Jonn said he’d banned him, but would not prove whether or not Jonn had actually done it. He’d have to attempt a subsequent post to know whether or not Jonn had in fact implemented the ban.
Asserting something =/= proving something. Proof requires more than mere assertion.
AW1Ed is clearly triggered that I disagreed with him on his climate change blog post.
This blog simply cannot tolerate dissenting views.
You claim it is not my views it is just my personality.
Bullshit.
I have watched you all attack and drive off dozens of dissenting views over the years.
LC had one of the most patient, reasonable, and professional posting styles I have ever seen on the internet.
He became a chew toy just like every other dissenter.
This blog went from approximately 76,000 ranked in the world to ranked under 430,000 in just a few years…
A blog with healthy discourse and useful information INCREASES in popularity over time.
Your rabid protectiveness of your echo chamber is causing the blog to become irrelevant.
Yet, here you are. Hmmm….
“This blog went from approximately 76,000 ranked in the world to ranked under 430,000 in just a few years…” You repeat yourself so I will, too. There are about a billion websites worldwide so assuming that what you wrote is true, that puts TAH in the 95th percentile.
“A blog with healthy discourse and useful information INCREASES in popularity over time.” If that is true, and your preceding sentence is also true, then how did this site increase in popularity annually when, all along, you made the same tired comments about this being an echo chamber, intolerant of contrary views? Even you must see the problem, jerkwad.
Please, you are not talking to your komaraden. Diversity is a BS con job your ideological masters use to keep you agitated.
Web sites grow when find social or economic value from them, not because there is some free flow of ideas. Of course, you won’t learn that in a sophistry course at Berkeley, you have to learn that by, ahem, working in the field.
Not that this matters for you, because in your world, only those ideas delivered to you from your ideological masters have merit, Freedom of speech and conscience are threats that indicate a failure to accept the message and of course, all who do not accept the message and think for themselves are evil and in need of “reprogramming”.
I will go so far as to assert that you likely are not a supporter of using a gulag, but love it when those who disagree with you are deplatformed from all social media. After all, their failure to comply is so dangerous to your goals.
You have what we call a moral deficit. Symptomatically, it appears as an intellectual deficit, but in reality you just don’t have the moral strength to actually like freedom. It scares the hell out of you that people you consider to be morons are free to do things you don’t like or approve of.
Which is why you support any candidate who advocates tyranny, all policies that remove choice, and ultimately, you think a police state is the only possible solution.
We, do not hate who you are Lars, we fundamentally disagree with your failed concepts of social value and love of tyrannical government.
But, fear not. In your Marxist dream world of next Tuesday, you would still be the one with a problem. After all, as is proven daily, the left eats its own first.
Geez, give it up and go away, I was somewhat forced to go read your statements on global warming and now you have changed your strategy. You charged the site with posting nonsense which having read you and O’s posts seems that was the source of a lot of it. So now you try a new tactic in that ” If you cannot dazzle them with diligence, baffle them with bull shit”. Some of us here don’t have one of those college edmucation degrees and survive from our school of hard knocks and experience that did not come from books that others believe is the true reality. Reality is now and always has been stepping out the door and experiencing life that lies out there and not the image painted by some one who thinks he is a know it all (yeah one is your best buddy Al), that he had published or read in books. As to any one being Rabid here it seems that is you so go to veterinarian and get a shot. Me, I’m tempted to also get a shot but the bars are still closed here and I quit drinking several years ago. You might aught to lay off the sauce there though.
I doubt he drinks, DS, IMHO he babbles like he’s toked up on some really crappy back alley weed!
Holy crap, maybe I better set up some cameras in my alley as there seems to be a lot of folks wandering in and out of it at all hours of day and night and now wonder if he is one. Oh well, what ever floats your boat,
Now, THAT is funny!!!
“This blog simply cannot tolerate dissenting views.”
No, you’re the one that cannot tolerate dissenting views – they call that “being a bigot”.
“Your rabid protectiveness of your echo chamber is causing the blog to become irrelevant.”
Then if this blog is so irrelevant, why do you still come here to post?
Why don’t you take your bigotry and SJW beliefs to some other part of the blogshpere? You’re not like LC, who can come here at post in a respectful manner and listens to others – you go all Antifa when you get called out for your bullshit and can’t convince anyone that your point of view if gospel.
Go away, Lars… just go the fuck away.
Problems is Lars, healthy discourse is not your strong suit. You take someone else’s opinion, shit on it, and proclaim “Behold! A Golden Egg! I am a superior being!”
That’s not how it works.
“This blog simply cannot tolerate dissenting views.”
You confuse toleration with agreement. Evidently you posted here for quite a while without being banned. I call that tolerance.
You can claim BS all you want. It is your personality. You just can’t admit to yourself that you are not wonderful, wise, and on the side of truth.
Why are you here? why don’t you go find an antifa blog somewhere, those airheaded commies should be right up your alley? imo
Am I surprised? No.
I find it telling that an insignificant, arrogant twit with delusions of both adequacy and infallibility and an apparent superiority complex – and without the intellectual ability or desire to either research adequately or reason logically – would choose as his new screen name a purportedly powerful and dangerous mythical being. It’s entirely in character; ditto his willful blindness concerning his own shortcomings and his apparent inability to be truthful.
The Army was right to kick you to the curb, Poodle. So was Jonn.
AW1Ed, since you are one of the folks somewhat running the site, just was on other site and was called upon by that site and recommended to include a fellow into my world. Kinda reminds me of a S/V beached whale type. Just letting you know.
Be careful about that, Dwight, because it sounds kind of dicey to me. Proceed with extreme caution.
DS, I copy up until the “…my world.” part. A new Book of the Face friend, add to your LinkedIn contacts- like that?
If I don’t actually know the person wanting in, I ignore the request and move on. There is little to gain and much to risk from accepting such a request.
JMHO,
AW1
AW1Ed, yes was where it was and have no intention of accepting despite one of my friends has, just weird as claims he retired as a Captain(?) and his jowls are larger then my butt cheeks. Most Navy people I know are still in somewhat good shape. No am not worried about friend, deputy in another much larger populated county and very good at his job as an investigator. 22 folks on my list is more than enough to keep up with.
Reason I mentioned it is said to have attended several dive schools in that group and was also port Captain. Sorry but stank to me.
Your First Alert Bullshit Detector is working to spec, then. When it lights off- believe it.
For our music fans.https://youtu.be/lDstqHkWF6Y
Healthy discourse and useful information, hmm, wonder when that is going to happen, guess I just sit and wait as doesn’t seem to have happened in the past, just a bunch of useless agitation and drivel to piss off others. Oh Lars or who ever you are, I’ve used my real name since the start of joining here and yeah some of the folks here stir my shit up but I eventually get over it and move on.
First of all, Taylor, you can fabricate all the stupid crap you want to since Jonn Lilyea is no longer around to refute your twaddle self-defense.
And you were banned, whether you want to admit it or not. He told me that when I asked him. He did NOT ask you to leave, so quit making shit up.
Second, as you have been told more than 50 times, this is not YOUR blog, and trying to run it YOUR way is NOT YOUR PRIVILEGE OR RIGHT. You do NOT get to tell anyone what to do here.
If you want to run things – which you don’t know how to do – then start your own blog. it takes time to build an audience, as I know well.
I’ve blocked people on my own blog. WE can block you here. Just keep being an asshole and you’ll get the ban hammer dropped all over again.
Its Ex-PH2 coming up the center to take the shitbird out at the knees….*crowd goes wild*
And as Paul Harvey would say, “Now we know the rest of the story”.
I just get tired of his desperate need for attention, and his notion that he has the right to lecture us about anything at all.
People should just tell him to piss off.
This mope was an intelligence officer? My God, I hope no one ever got bushwhacked because of him.
Intelligence officer, in this case isn’t that an oxymoron.
No. It’s a fucking lie. There is no intelligence in that “officer”.
Trolls are gonna troll. It’s what they have chosen to do. Every time someone responds to the inanity of a troll, the response contributes to the aim of the troll. Their intention is to contribute nothing positive and to be as disruptive as possible in the process.
Sure, I get that sometimes we just can’t help ourselves and will engage (yes, me, too), but it is the worst way to treat a troll. Ignore them, refuse to give them what they want, and they will eventually go away.
Feed the trolls and you are responsible for them remaining among us. It might be fun for those doing it, but it wastes the time of those of us trying to ignore the trolls. Who is to say whether your time or mine is more valuable?
Ok I’m stopping now on this waste of time.
“Was” is the operative word. Also, he transferred or was transferred out of MI branch to Civil Affairs branch where the officers are just about the remfyest of REMFs (they are supposed to teach the occupied peeps who want to be politicians how to set up a civil government). I don’t want to trigger the Commie Cuttlefish to come back here with his tales of daring do, so I will concede he rode in a vehicle outside the wire a time or few in the sandbox.
I keep waiting for Lars to exercise his inherent right to emigrate, but he always disappoints me. Still here poodkedik? Pardon those of us who do not embrace the party of demonstrably rigging primary elections. And then, fuck off.
“inherent right to emigrate”
Is there an internet version of a wonderful workers paradise, such as Venezuela?
Oh, yes there is, Democrat Underground.
If rights are inalienable then people have a right to migrate since it is one of the earliest human behaviors and absolutely necessary for human survival.
If governments drawing lines on a map make it so you no longer have the right to migrate than human rights are not inalienable. Governments decide who has what rights with lines on a map and rights only exist as long as a government says they do and chooses to honor them.
I have long know most of you leaned toward autocratic theories and the fact that you do not think rights are inalienable is a cornerstone of autocratic ideologies.
In the world you want to live in governments grant rights and governments decide which rights they will honor.
Which is largely how the world works.
Because of people like you.
The issue is you, whatever you’re calling yourself since you slithered back in here. No one wants to read your opines about anything, you misguided miscreant.
Do you truly believe “the right to migrate” should apply everywhere? In your world we should allow everyone, even if they don’t have the ability or skills to contribute to our country, to freely come and go?
Just like throwing a huge pile of birdseed out, you will soon find your yard overrun with freeloaders who will take and take. Countries have borders for a reason.
I don’t mind reading your screeds, but you always have to throw in some snark like your last line. How angry and unhappy you must be. I pity you.
It’s in our nature to not shit where we eat as well but Big Toilet says we need special rooms for that. Fucking capitalist dogs
Soooo… using your logic, If I migrate into your home, I am now family? Thanksgiving is gonna rock!
Governments do not grant rights. They grant privileges. Governments should protect the rights of its citizens. Sometimes this fails. Hence, we have the 2A to keep the government honest. Nobody, in any country, has any “right” to just decide they’re going to go live in another country. Why? Because unchecked, illegal immigration infringes upon the rights of the citizens of that country. And no one has the right to do that.
Lars locks his doors at night, to keep Dave Hardin from “migrating” into his home. Dave “migrated” into Lars’s head and Lars has been scared ever since.
I wonder if he’s been trying to evict me as well, it’s obvious that I’ve been living rent-free in Lars’s head for a while. I bet he still drives a beat-up old rusty Volvo!
B O R I N G. As well as incorrect lars.
Commissar: If rights are inalienable then people have a right to migrate since it is one of the earliest human behaviors and absolutely necessary for human survival. Inalienable rights are best explained by the two main concepts. The first one involves what occurs naturally in nature. Ergo, what are “the laws of nature” with regards to migration, movement, and the degree that this movement could take place in? Yes, movement from one point to another is part of what is needed for survival. Animals go from one point to another in order to find food. They also do it to find water. They do it to migrate. Likewise, humans have been involved with movements for similar reasons. However, guess what else is a constant throughout nature? Animals, and humans, staking their territories. Predator animals will stake their hunting territories, and guard this territory against other predator animals. This isn’t absolute. But, animals are known to have marked their territory. Humans have done the same thing. A look at our past history, our distant history, shows conflicts that take place with regards to preserving one’s territorial integrity. Hence, one group’s right to movement is limited by another groups right to defend their own area. Defense can be in the form of barricades, or the willingness to fight to repel boarders. The second main concept involves the laws of God. Stealing commonly occurs out in nature, whether that is one animal stealing from another, or a person stealing from another. Since stealing commonly occurs, and has commonly occurred in the past, your logic would indicate that stealing would be and “inalienable” right. The “laws of God” determine what our inalienable rights are. Stealing commonly occurred in the past, and commonly occurs now. But, the “laws of God” prohibits us from doing so. This could be traced to the 10 Commandments. Every single one of them includes a prohibition against stealing… Not just the commandment demanding that stealing not occur. We do not have an inalienable right to steal, just as we do not have an inalienable right to just go anywhere we… Read more »
Commissar: If governments drawing lines on a map make it so you no longer have the right to migrate than human rights are not inalienable. Governments decide who has what rights with lines on a map and rights only exist as long as a government says they do and chooses to honor them. Again, “boundaries” that limit unlimited migration, ergo not trespassing, do not limit our inalienable rights. We do not have an inalienable right to go to what belongs to somebody else. A complete stranger has absolutely no right to have freedom of movement that ends in your living room. If you invite that stranger in, that’s one thing. But if that stranger walked right in through your open door, and makes himself at home, without your invitation, you rightfully would attempt to remove him. Now, take that from your home, and extend that to your homeowner’s association, or to your landlord’s rental property if you’re a renter. My homeowner’s association has posted signs, at the neighborhood entrance and elsewhere, making it clear that people who are not residents or guests, who aren’t cleared to come at the neighborhood, who aren’t authorized by one of the residents to enter the neighborhood, are not authorized or allowed into the neighborhood. If they come in without those requirements, they are trespassing. The nation state is a larger geographic area extension of this concept. Except, it is much more formal. The United States does not belong to non-Americans. It belongs to Americans. The people coming over here understand the concept of personal property. This is a universal concept. Since the United States belongs to us, and not to foreigners, we have a right to protect what is ours, and to prohibit “trespassers”, a.k.a., illegal aliens. Setting up territory, and protecting boundaries, is an inalienable right. It can be traced to “the laws of God”. The official position, of the United States, is that those wanting to come must do so through proper channels. Those attempting to circumvent that, and who intend come in illegally, are essentially stealing. They are stealing a position… Read more »
Commissar: I have long know most of you leaned toward autocratic theories and the fact that you do not think rights are inalienable is a cornerstone of autocratic ideologies. False. Conservatives prefer limited government. They prefer government officials who understand that they are servants of the people. They prefer representative governments; hence, governments that have mechanisms in place for governing via representation… Governing with the consent of the governed. Conservative beliefs, in what constitutes “inalienable” rights is based on the “laws of God”. For example, God gave us freedom, we have an amiable right to freedom. God gave us life, we have an inalienable right to life. Arbitrary definitions of what is “inalienable” with regards to what rights people have, don’t constitute what is inalienable. Commissar: In the world you want to live in governments grant rights and governments decide which rights they will honor. False. Conservatives, as a group, don’t believe that the government grants rights, nor do they believe that governments decide which rights will be honored. Instead, these conservatives believe that it is God that gave us our rights, and that it is the government’s job that these rights are insured: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” — Declaration of Independence It’s the governments job to ensure that we have our God-given rights. Not the government’s job to issue those rights, or to decide what rights we have. Commissar: Which is largely how the world works. Because of people like you. Actually, autocratic governments, that believe that it is the government’s job to grant people’s rights, and to decide what rights they have, exist because of people like you. Not because of conservatives. Those on the left… Who are trying to undermine the Christian philosophy that our Founders used to support the arguments the founders made when laying down… Read more »
THERE you go with facts and logic, I can already picture Lars putting his hands over his ears and saying “LALALALALALALA, my Perfesser always right, Orange Man bad, Orange Man bad,…”
@thebesig,
Outstanding reply and discussion.
Also, US citizens HAVE the inalienable right to travel to and reside in any of the 50 US states. Remember, it is the Constitution of the United States, not the world.
The thing is, we know what Lars believes… and he has the inalienable right to believe it. But, true to form, he wants OTHERS to exercise that right. His privileged punk-white-ass WON’T emigrate to the perceived land of milk and honey (or even to another “board”). Instead, he chooses to shit in our well.
Kinda makes you wonder what kind of an officer he was, huh. Leading by example must not have been his strong suit.
He SAID he made it to the Rank of Major and I wonder if it wasn’t one of his Units promoting him just to get rid of him? I’ve seen it done in the past with Officers and NCO’s.
I recall a Major Linville that could be this guys clone.
Larry Linville.
Might have been Medical Corps circa Korea.
OK Lars, the TAH Staff has reached an accord. By unanimous decision (which surprised me), you are free to comment on TAH’s posts with the following constraints.
You will be under moderation; your every comment will be screened. If in the Staff Member’s opinion your comment is not satisfactory it will be either edited or deleted in its entirety. You have no recourse; the Staff Member’s screening result is final. However, the reason for the edit or deletion will be provided on the comment in question.
These constraints will remain in place until a final decision on your status is made by Management.
If these constrains are too onerous for you to bear, fine. I’m sure you will find a like-minded group over at the DU, or some such.
That this places an additional burden on the Staff is a given. If it becomes necessary to edit your every comment, these constraints will be revisited.
I think this is pretty generous, considering. I for one will not touch your political comments- I’ll take an interest if things get too personal.
Ball’s in your court, Lars, and the choice is clear.
AW1, lars should like that, given that he lives in Kalifornia, well, what is left of Kalifornia, and is a leftist. Don’t they thrive on censorship, being limited, controlled, and all that nifty stuff?
I think I favor just ignoring the ignoramus leftist.
I haven’t posted a comment on this topic, because I don’t care to feed the troll. But……….;)
Describes Lars aka Cthulhu….perfectly.
http://www.cthulhu.org/cimages/loathes.gif
I picked the name to reflect the perception the regulars have of me. Much like “Commissar”.
You really overshot on that. You’re not evil. Well, I guess in the way that a hemorrhoid is evil.
So your next screen name will be “Liberal NPC”?
“I picked the name to reflect the perception the regulars have of me.”
I searched high and low but see no posts from the handle “Football Bat”.
Narcy Cist would have been a better choice….
In that case, you should have picked “Simple Jack.”
Hey Cthulhu (LT)
Are we still on for that bet we made almost two years ago?
(I donate $100 to TAH if Trump doesn’t finish his first term and you donate $100 to TAH if he does.) 🙂
Yep. Was it only $100?
Tick tock. Time is running out for Trump.
I intended to honor it whether I came back or not.
Just checking. Thanks.
President Trump will not only finish his first term, he will finish his SECOND term! lol
Even though I’m not as frequent here as I once was, me, myself and I suspected it was him. So, with that said I will carry on while y’all make admin your decisions.
Commissar is an insignificant shit. I busted him out on at least one occasion for spreading misinformation and the cunt face failed to man the fuck up and admit he was wrong.
The way I look at it he was BANNED from here, and he just snuck around it.
Fuck him.
Lars suffers from Histrionic Personality Disorder, also known as Attention Whore Syndrome. Be a good little girl Lars or you will be permanently banned.
Oh by the way Lars,
Don’t fear the commie.
Lars hates this place. He thinks that we are all a bunch of fascists and Nazis. Yet, he can’t stay away. He thinks that we have fashioned an alternate reality here. Yet, he can’t stay away. He thinks we merely echo one another and engage in no real discussion. Yet, he can’t stay away. He was banned or invited to leave by Jonn. Yet, he can’t stay away. He deluded himself into believing that our collective revulsion and disgust of him is some sort of rejection of his contrary views of most matters. Yet, when he assumed a new screen name, it took no time at all for that screen name to become “Cunthulu” for a number of us. Was that because of his contrary views? Hell no. A well reasoned and lucid argument is always welcome. So what was it? Him. There’s no changing him. He’s an asshole and that’s that.
Commissar is free to start his own blog at this location: https://wordpress.com/
It is free, meaning it costs the blog owner nothing but his/her time and energy.
However, it does take time to build an audience, as I know quite well, and paying attention to it is the same as paying attention to what your kids are doing. That’s probably too much work for someone who expects everyone he sees to kowtow to him, but that’s tough bananas.
But this is why I don’t post a link to my own blog most of the time: I don’t want that asshole – er, blowhard – blowhard showing up and making me block him. I already had to do that with Bernath and his drunken curb-sleeping buddy, becuase they couldnt’ behave like civilized people.
So those are your choices, Commissar. Either have some respect for the people who post articles and comments here and stop trying to seize control of something that is NOT yours, or pay the penalty – or start your own blog.
He is not seeking to build anything. His worldview is too self centered and his intellectual musings too lazy to be of actual value in a competitive marketplace. After all, he is so smart, so virtuous, so wonderful that the world should adore him without any effort on his own part.
That we do not drives him (and likely his friends) absolutely bat shit crazy. Which is why ad hominem responses to him are spot on.
Build his own blog? Do the hard work? Nah.
And if I am wrong, let’s see how tolerant he is of dissent.
When you reject history, reject logic, and reject your nation, you left with——Lars. He is by no means alone in his bubble. A bubble built on his privilege and refusal to believe that the primary right of free speech is not just the ability to speak your beliefs but to hold them at all.
You see my friends, all collectivists start with the concept that what is yours should be theirs. They have the right to your private property. This starts with your intellectual property and your speech.
This is why he is supportive of tyranny supporting policies like TPP and mass migration. He doesn’t care that inviting people in like we do destroys not only our own nation, but the nation they flee. He doesn’t see their exploitation as a problem as long as he has the notion that he is going to be the exploiter.
All American leftists start from that privileged vantage point and everything flows from there. This is why he cannot accept that your opinions hold the same merit as his own. Not because he thinks that he is correct in some intrinsic way, but because he doesn’t believe you ever had any right to disagree with him.
I’m sure that idiotic concept is reinforced daily at the modern concentration camp we used to call university.
Until you understand that his dislike of conservatives is not an idea based perspective, but a quasi-religious perspective, you cannot fathom him. He is the righteous holder of the secret flame while anyone who disagrees is evil. Not mistaken, not people with different perspectives, evil.
There is really no point in arguing the substance with people like him because he just changes the topic. Which is really so obvious that no one does and the entire outcome is frivolity.
But he wants it, so he gets it.
Great detective work. I am sure Jonn is smiling down on all who participated. Outing Lars, that great threat to freedom and democracy that his is, is a shining example of, well, something.
Where’s Dave Hardin? Did somebody make him go away like Elaine went away?
Oh, that’s right. The hosts do tolerate different opinions, as you occasionally demonstrate. Oh snap, squiggy is wrong again.
Lars is a social moron with delusions of how he’s been told things ought to be.
You aren’t far behind him. But, if you want to join his Marxist/Commie commune, I’m QUITE sure there are plenty of places available for stooges like you.
Now now, W2 is often curmudgeonly, but usually at least civil.
Supposedly, the Russian had him tied up and is “interrogating” him…
I hope he survives the interrogation. Those Soviets can be brutal.
As as the sleuthing for Lars, who really gives two shits who Lars, or whatever his stoopid nom de guere is, or not? If he was smart he’d spend a couple of sheckels, sign up for a VPN, and then really drive you mugs crazy. He ain’t that smart though.
#savedavehardin
W2, other than recognizing that lars is a leftard, and thus is what is wrong with this country, and apparently proud of that, he is nothing at all. He doesn’t bother me, because he is of no value, other than to be serve as a bad example to others. Some folks may have sterner opinions of him, but I don’t mind him because he don’t matter. I do find it somewhat dismaying that a former officer of some sort, assuming we can believe anything of what he says is true, would willingly buy off on that bankrupt liberal dogma, then come here, where we try to get away from those retarded fucks, to shit all over the place with that tired old crap they seem so intent to spew. The fake moral superiority is also very tiring.