IVAW in your hometown
Yesterday, a young soldier home on leave to his hometown for the holiday season found this article in his local newspaper;
Iraq War veterans Aaron Hughes of Chicago, Scott Kimble of Champaign, and Brock McIntosh of Normal spoke about Operation Recovery, which opposes sending troops with PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Military Sexual Trauma back into battle. Operation Recovery insists that traumatized veterans have the right to heal.
“I think it’s morally abhorrent to send mentally traumatized soldiers back to battle where they use heavy weapons and armor,” McIntosh said. “Many of these soldiers are on psychotropic drugs and are a danger to themselves, to fellow soldiers and everyone else.”
Twenty percent of troops deployed repeatedly have PTSD, Hughes said. Suicide rates among active-duty troops are twice as high as that of the civilian population, and veterans with PTSD are six times more likely to attempt suicide, according to the IVAW.
Hughes said that Military Sexual Trauma is a major problem for female soldiers, one third of them suffering sexual assault. Ninety percent of women soldiers seeking help from the Veterans Administration report sexual assault from fellow soldiers, he said.
“Women have to go to their commander to prove their case first,” Hughes explained, and often their complaints are dismissed. “Women are expected to return and serve with the same soldiers who assaulted them,” he said. The actual number of cases of MST is difficult to verify, as many sexual assaults go unreported. According to a 2004 study cited by the Service Women’s Action Network, 71 percent of women veterans seeking help from the VA had been sexually assaulted.
The young trooper, after writing to Blackfive (who forwarded the email to us) fired off this letter to the author of the article;
I hope this email finds you well. I just finished reading your article on the IVAW members who recently visited Springfield. I’m currently serving on active duty in the US Army, and from their description of my Army I would hardly recognize it. I noticed you did attempt to do a little fact checking in the article, but if you did more you would note some more inconsistencies between statements made by Hughes, Kimble, and McIntosh, and actual facts. I think I’m most disturbed by Mr. Hughes unchallenged assertion that sexual assault victims have to go to their commanders first to prove their case, and they are usually brushed off at that level. If you consult the Army’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program information at www.sexualassault.army.mil you would realize this is not the case at all. To allow his assertion to make it to publication, and as a result painting our military as a group that is focused on sweeping rape under the rug, is just plain irresponsible reporting. Another statistic stated by Mr. Hughes is that the suicide rate among the military is twice that of the general population. 2009 was the worst year recorded for suicides in the Army. Unfortunately in 2009 we lost 160 Soldiers to suicide. That is 160 Soldiers out of an Army force of 1,156,616 which translates into a rate of 13.8 per every 100,000. In 2007 according to the National Institute of Mental Health the general population suicide rate was 11.3 per every 100,000. In our worst year on record, we came nowhere close to having a rate double that of the general public, and yet again his false claim goes unresearched, unchallenged, and even worse, published. There are more things in there claims that don’t pass the smell test, but these two are the easiest to show to you this morning. Please, in the future, be a responsible journalist and check claims, facts, and statistics before publishing them.
The author wrote back;
Woops. I will pass this on to my editor. Thanks for responding with this information. Where are you stationed?I appreciate your email.
Ginny
Whoops, indeed Ginny. Her editor responded;
Ginny Lee forwarded to me your letter to her regarding the Veterans Against the War article. We would like to publish this or a similar letter in our print edition next week. To do so we need your town or city, as well as any other credentials you may want to list. I look forward to hearing from you.
Fletcher Farrar
A letter? Really? Do more people read the letter section than the features?
Aaron Hughes has been around IVAW a long time. He served in the Illinois National Guard and he was deployed at one point. However, he’s been back to Iraq twice (once with TJ “Stolen Diploma” Buonomo and once with Geoff “Stolen Valor” Millard) sponsored by US Labor Against War.
Sarah Lazare, who organized the event in her parents’ home, has been beating the same drum for over a year, evidenced by the article she wrote for al Jazeera last year. She’s a project coordinator for Courage to Resist, and organization that helps military members desert and abscond to Canada – so you really have to wonder why she’s so interested in a mental health program. Lazare has never been in the military, but she sure acts like she knows what’s going on, doesn’t she?
I also noticed that IVAW membership is up to 2000 despite the precipitous decline we’ve watched over the last year. I guess it’s harder to quit IVAW than it is to quit the mafia.
Good on this young trooper for embarrassing the author with her editor, shame on the author for not doing her research. I guess it’s up to us veterans to police our local media.
Category: Antiwar crowd, Iraq Veterans Against the War, Media, Military issues, Veterans Issues
Way to go troop.
When will these freakin’ reporters ever learn not to fall for this crap….It’s easily verifiable….friggen’ lazy…
The problem here is that the majority of media is left-leaning, as if I had to remind readers here of that fact.
To that end, they have always been of the opinion that facts should never be allowed to get in the way of a good story, especially one that fits within their political beliefs.
I have given up reading the two newspapers that service my area of Maine, as both are so far left that, no matter the story, the facts are shaded and sentences carefully nuanced so as to push the leftist view of virtually every situation.
Those two papers are no more than a mouthpiece for the DNC.
The ONLY way that all of this gets changed is by having Conservatives begin to publish their own newspapers.
A letter? Really? Do more people read the letter section than the features?
=========
Yeah, this is how the MF-ing media handles issues that go against their agenda. They front-page their lies and then ‘correct’ them with a Page Z-99 blurb that no one will ever read.
As they say over on the Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler (http://www.nicedoggie.net): Rope, Tree, Journalist. Some assembly required.
I am not mechanically inclined, Smokey, but let’s see…
1. Cut rope in half.
2. Tie Journalist to tree.
3. Cut down tree.
4. Use other half of rope to drag tree down logging road.
How’s that? 🙂
Without a counterpoint there can be no truth.
[…] IVAW in your hometown – This Ain’t Hell […]
Yes, I know I should be cheerfully drinking Sangria right now. This is really me, don’t let the Spanish IP throw you off. I’m on vacation but still have to defend this.
Women have the option of going to the SARC, but the real truth is that the SARC is absolutely powerless to get anything done about dealing with the perp. I have heard this from SARCs themselves and I remember personally battles that I’ve seen. The SARC can’t do shit. You do have to go to the commander if you want to get switched out of the same squad as the guy who assaulted you, or to get a restraining order so the soldier can’t contact you anymore. And a lot of times, the commander blows you off.
I went to my commander about an actual death threat, and he said, and I quote, “If he were going to kill you he would have done it already, you don’t need any protection.”
So forgive me if I think that that soldier is a little misinformed about the realities of sexual and domestic assault in the military.
‘”Women have to go to their commander to prove their case first,” Hughes explained’
“Women have the option of going to the SARC”
‘Nuff said. Hughes lied, no matter how you slice it.
Also it is listed in the inside of every bathroom on how to make a unrestricted and restricted report and the many people they can contact to help get it started.
ArmySergeant,
Your command told you that, and you didn’t use the open door policy to go to the next higher command for action? Call me crazy, but if someone is threatening to kill me, and my commander says it’s no big deal, I’d say roger got it, and go to the BC’s office. I’m the guy that wrote the letter. My former supervisor is in jail awaiting first degree murder trial for having his wife killed. If I had a Soldier tell me the command told them that, I’d be beating down doors until the situation was remedied. Are you saying that it is correct that generally sexual assault is swept under the rug as Mr. Hughes infers?
GV:
Yeah, I didn’t push it higher, and maybe I should have. However, from what I knew of the command, I didn’t have a lot of faith that going higher would help. It was the same command I had dealt with on the soldier, and it was the battalion commander that had gotten ticked off about the restraining order for my soldier.
I’m saying that generally domestic sexual assault is swept under the rug, or sexual assault where the circumstances are unclear. If you as a soldier come forward and say “This other soldier who I barely know violently raped me”, I think that you generally get a good response. If you as a soldier come forward and say “My soldier boyfriend/husband raped me” or “This guy in my squad who was my friend raped me” or “This guy raped me while we were drinking”, or “This guy did something to me, it wasn’t rape, but I still feel violated.” I do think it usually gets swept under the rug and not taken seriously. I think it’s a major cultural problem in our military and something we really need to work on. I think part of the problem is that the military is twenty years behind the civilian world on how to define rape and sexual assault. Higher ups are working on it, but the trickle down is really slow.
I have only heard about one assault while I was in. In that case the Joe was in cuffs faster than you can say “At EASE”. It was later proven that he was trying to be a good Samaritan and get her to a bed, but. . . well she woke up in a strange bed half dressed. . . you get the picture. He had actually pulled her off another guy she was making bedroom eyes at but was WAY too drunk.
Shit canned his career anyway. that’s the closest I’ve ever actually heard of an assault. The rest of the cases it was some PFC that always liked to stand at parade pretty, made a pass at an NCO to get a promotion and got turned down, or thought the Sergeant was really really MEAN cuz he was yelling at her. Well lets just say I’ve seen more Guilty till proven innocent than the other way around.
“Yeah, I didn’t push it higher, and maybe I should have”?
Really, maybe you should have pushed it? So, being a leader, what good did you do to anyone under your leadership, by kicking the can down the road? So, “from what you knew” you had little faith?
“Sexual assault where the circumstances are unclear”? That is, in most jurisdictions, not a crime, unless you can “clear” up the circumstances. But, being a feminist, you’re perfectly content with screwing up someone’s life, where the circumstances aren’t clear, and a crime probably was not committed.
Your post, #12, is full of a lot of “I think”‘s and “I feel”‘s. Or, in other words, you provide anecdotal stories, but very few actual facts to back up your feelings and thoughts.