Canadian Crusade Against Handguns
Canadian PM Justin Trudeau in a Lighthearted Moment
Canada has moved to make the sale of handguns illegal under a sweeping new bill introduced in the wake of the Uvalde, Texas school shooting.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a “national freeze” on firearms in the country as he referenced increasing homicides in Canada and alluded to recent mass shootings south of the border.
“It will no longer be possible to buy, sell, transfer or import handguns anywhere in Canada. In other words, we’re capping the market for handguns,” Trudeau said.
Poetrooper sends.
Guns Must Not Be Used For Self-Defense, Canada’s Trudeau Insists
By Greg Wilson
Guns are for hunting and target practice, but never for self defense, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said this week, continuing his crusade against firearms.
Trudeau, who is pushing a sweeping measure aimed at freezing the sale, purchase, or transfer of handguns in Canada, told the Pod Save America podcast his country takes a completely different view of firearms than its southern neighbor. No one in Canada has a right to defend themselves, their family or their property with a firearm, Trudeau declared.
“We have a culture where the difference is: Guns can be used for hunting or for sport shooting in Canada – and there are lots of gun owners, and they’re mostly law-respecting and law-abiding – but you can’t use a gun for self-protection in Canada,” Trudeau said. “That’s not a right that you have in the Constitution or anywhere else.”
Sure, as soon as the affluent and the political royalty give up their bodyguards. OK, I lied. I’ll be keeping mine no matter what they do.
Thanks, Poe. Fuck Justin Trudeau.
Category: "Teh Stoopid", Guest Link, Gun Grabbing Fascists
Next comes the gun cofiscation, so as the old adage goes, always fear the govt that fears guns. nufffffff said
We share thousands of miles of unfenced border with Canada. As they slide further into “unfree”, they may find that their prohibition is as pointless as our go at it a near century ago.
The Canadians didn’t exactly rush to comply with their prior MSR rules. The police-state maltreatment of harmless protestors is still a fresh memory. I wonder how much more that idiot has to do to provoke his own folks into a “time for a change” vote, or even a Romanian Christmas Present.
Had a guy in one of my units from a Indian rez that straddled the boarder. Told me that more than just cheap cigs flowed both ways across the water.
I had a Mohawk who said the entire nation had dual citizenship. Their reservation was on both sides of the border,,,, NY State, Ontario.
The Charter of Rights is just missing one right…
They just had to stay with England…
Don’t kid yourself into thinking that this isn’t also the goal of the American Democrats. They’re just not as stupid as Trudeau as to actually admit it.
Spot on Ol’ Poe, ya nailed it
From my cold stiff fingers. :arandammo:
I see economic opportunity! If the cartels can do it so can we.
I assert the theory there has been no greater smuggler as metriced by moneymade than the Yankee Rebel.
IDGAF if we need to trebuchet 80%ers over, my Canadian Brothers and Sisters will not be deprived.
This is what happens when you don’t have a Bill of Rights. As Wireman 611 and 11B-Mailclerk are saying that enterprising folks from the US will be more than happy to accomodate those in Canada who want a firearm.
Trade. FJT didn’t mention “trade”.
“Say. Nice gun. Can I trade you half a side of beef, grass fed, cut and wrapped, for that pistol?”
The same can apply to ammunition.
And it’s virtually untraceable.
“Where’d you get that gun?”
“Dunno. I traded some dude a side of beef for it, all perfectly legal.”
The libs want to ban private sales. Ha ha ha ha…..and ha.
No form 4473…ha ha ha ha ha and double ha.
Nobody’s fucking business.
You can always say that you sold/traded it BEFORE the confiscation lists were created.
As well as a boat or quicksand mishap where the guns were all lost! 😁😎
It’s what Canada voted for
I’m fucking confused. If guns are not allowed for self defense then why do the police have them? The only reason supposedly for police to have them is for self defense. What other reason could there be? Targeted assassination? Intimidation? Some other nefarious purpose?
No reason, comrade– why do you ask?
“Terror wasn’t confined to those who defied Lenin. “We must execute not only the guilty. Execution of the innocent will impress the masses even more,” wrote Lenin’s commissar for justice, according to historian Brian Crozier in his 1999 “The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire.””
Thank God we’re not there…yet.
I must be really old. I remember when Canada was a free country.
Need to build a wall between The Peoples’ Republik of Kanada and the USA?
Or just invade the blasted place?
Don’t want it. People who vote this way can stay the fuck over there. If they choose to throw off their shackles, that’s another story altogether but as long as they keep putting “leaders” like this in place, they can get fucked.
“Inside every progressive is a totalitarian screaming to get out.” –David Horowitz.
3D printer go wiizzclickpsssstlclickwaaaaaaaaat
https://rumble.com/embed/vsxv6n/?pub=4
Let’s take a look at the wonderful world of Gun Control here in the USA: In Chicago one must jump through a ton of hoops to legally own a firearm while a criminal merely needs to hook up with the right person in some abandoned shop or back alley and they have a gun, ditto in places like NJ and others. History teaches us that every time a population gets disarmed, the Government then does things that an armed populace would not allow, just look at the fascist controls they forced on the Australian populace in the name of China Virus control!