Move on From Impeachment-Unless it’s a Republican
Jerry Nadler opposed impeaching then-President Clinton. His philosophy regarding impeachment may be different today. (Hard Media/The Federalist)
I remember following the impeachment proceedings against then-President Clinton. The mainstream media went into overdrive trying to make it sound “trivial”.
I even remember Jerry Nadler putting up a passionate argument against impeachment. In fact, he argued that if they wanted to hold him [the president] accountable, that they could do it with a censure. He mentioned something about “stamping with a censure”.
Around this time, a website gained traction. The goal of the website was to argue against impeachment and then simply “move on”. This site was “moveon.org”.
Where are the mainstream media, Jerry Nadler, and Moveon today? Advancing a different argument that they advanced a couple of decades ago.
From Breitbart:
Potential participants are instructed that there will be follow-up plans after the one day event is over. Organizers describe reasons for impeachment moves on a FAQ page that discusses why they support impeachment despite odds it will stall in the U.S. Senate, whether Vice President Mike Pence is a greater threat as next in line to replace the president, and why they continue to herald claims against the president in relation to Russia and the 2016 election.
Modern Family Executive Producer Danny Zuker called for marchers to celebrate the president’s birthday by marching on Saturday for impeachment.
MoveOn lists the following organizations on the event website as partners: Need to Impeach, CREDO, FreeSpeachforPeople.org, Indivisible, By the People, Liberty Tree, Women’s March, March for Truth, AGN, Mainers for Accountable Leadership, Saratoga Progressive Action, Stand Up America, blue future, Daily Kos, Alameda4Impeachment, Indivisible East Bay, Courage Campaign, Progressive Democrats of America, Democracy for America, Move to Amend, resistbot, act.tv, and United Native America.
People with rational minds reading the Mueller report would “shake their heads” at the argument behind such a move. But, we are not dealing with people with rational minds. Just folks driven by emotion, desire for power, desire to have their way, etc.
You can read more here. Media Hard provides a detailed argument on Jerry Nadler’s inconsistency.
Jerry Nadler singing a different tune:
Category: Politics
Fat, ugly and stupid is no way to go through life Nadler.
All of us were born stupid, but some like this spawn enjoyed it so much he stayed there LOL
New York Democrat? Of course; this explains much.
The SAME crowd that howled and screeched against “Blowjob Willie” Clinton being impeached is the same one screaming for the impeachment of President Trump when all he’s done so far is make them bawl, further proof to me of what a huge whorehouse Washington DC truly is!
I see no difference between this hogwash and what the libertards following the GND are promoting.
See this link at WUWT.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/06/16/green-new-deal-advocates-pipeline-and-resource-development-leads-to-man-camps-human-trafficking-and-child-porn-rings/
No real difference. And the Pope is part of the Big Lie Scam, too. They will stoop to any low level to get what they want.
Fortunately, the internet can’t stop their stuff from reaching us. Nothing is better than knowing what they are up to.
The left will never cease to perpetually prove via their deeds and words that liberalism is a mental disorder.
The vaunted “Move On” movement was started by guess who. That’s right, the omnipresent Bitch of Ben Ghazi, done on behalf of her poon-hound husband.
Heavily funded by none other than George Soros and hyped by many a gasbag moonbat celebrity as well.
Mike Farrell was their TV ad spokesman.
Between him and Alda I stopped watching Mash re runs when they dropped their masks.
ON AND ON AND ON AND ON AND ON AND ON AND ON with these A HOLE LIBERALS. Wonders never seem to cease.
Postmodernisms finale, obscurantism, doesn’t just devour truth, like a giant oak filled with the hanged righteous, it blotts out all of God’s light.
We are Borg…Resistance is futile…You will be assimilated…We know what is best. /s/
If this fat bastard has been around since Blow Job Willie was screwing the public and Monica, then he is part of the problem. eff him!
Ole Jerry most likely has a Control Issue Personality Disorder…Heck, if HRC had been a Republican, he probably would have gone after her if she was elected…(Sarc On)..
He even tried to impeach George W. Bush…
Wait a minute. I take that back about him having Control Issues…Ole Jerry did not lose weight naturally by cutting back on calories or exercising…ever heard of gastric by-past surgery?
Probably Liposuction as well…Nah, no way…Dude still has a Big Head (“Hey , Everyone, Look At Me, the FatHead…I’m Better Than Anyone!”)
😉
BTW, for those who had that procedure, it is no bad reflection on you. It’s just IMHO, Jerry is a Hypocritical DoucheBag who wants his cake and eat it too…well, at one time, too many cakes…
His hypocrisy is gonna backfire on him one of these days…
Luke 18, Verses 9-14.
The man can really fill out a suit though.
Fills it out right up to his nipples.
😂🤣😅😆!!!!!!!!!!!!
That picture needs to be in AW1Ed’s FGS….
😉😎
eyebleachplease
That lying tub of guts should have pulled rope long ago.
What do you call that part of the anatomy?
A buckle rest?
Food Blister although Gunt may apply as well.
“Bring the Wookie to me!”
– Jabba the Hut
Good God in heaven the early version of him had more chins than a Hong Kong phone book – all you can buffets must have had his picture up with NO SERVICE in red. He can join the rest of the children in DC on the poster for term limits (and in his case prophylactics…). Would someone please do us all a favor and write fatboy some new material? Or better yet take him out to eat, let him wipe out a species or two he can’t run his mouth if he’s eating. Personally, I’d like to see him stuck somewhere like Pizza the Hutt get hungry and eat himself to death, but he has staff so I don’t think that will happen.
I notice they leave out a significant difference also when contrasting these two cases. Starr returned seven counts of criminal conduct while Mueller returned ZERO. But sure keep explaining why this time it really is criminal.
All Clinton had to do was go on TV and instead of saying what he did simply say, ” I want you to listen to me, I did in fact have sex with that young woman….you’ve met my wife haven’t you? How’d you like to see that in bed every night…so this young woman paid me some attention and i responded inappropriately. I am deeply sorry to the American people and to Ms. Lewinski and my family for this breach of faith. ”
Then the best case for Republicans is getting all worked up over a young intern sucking the President’s dick instead of wasting a lot of money over the president’s lies about a young intern sucking the president’s dick.
Lies never get smaller as time passes, we the people tell ourselves ever more lies with each passing day. So you move on from a serial adulterer piece of crap to another serial adulterer piece of crap. The difference is this serial adulterer is the other sides piece of crap so you watch the argument’s switch sides…with that one significant difference of course in what the two reports returned in their findings. The first one with indictments, the current one without indictments….that is of course significant. It doesn’t change the fact both men are lying serial adultering sacks of shit it just means one of them wasn’t also a criminal while doing it.
At the end of the day neither of these men are honorable, decent Americans but only one of them has currently been found to be lying under oath.
Gee, is one of the lies “we” tell ourselves “ever more” the one you pitched the other day that “In God We Trust” was “never on our money until the 1950’s? Because that is an atheist/prog lie you apparently believe and perpetuate.
And by the way, Clinton was subject to articles of impeachment not becuase of his sexual activities in the Oval Office, but becuase he committed perjury in front of a federal judge in his deposition and during his voluntary testimony before a grand jury. He also had his flunkies suborn perjury from several other persons, including Lewinsky. He was also disbarred becuase of those lies under oath.
rgr769, both you and VOV are partially correct. From Wikipedia:
The capitalized form “IN GOD WE TRUST” first appeared on the two-cent piece in 1864[6] and has appeared on paper currency since 1957. A law passed in a Joint Resolution by the 84th Congress (P.L. 84-140) and approved by President Dwight Eisenhower on July 30, 1956, declared “In God We Trust” must appear on American currency. This phrase was first used on paper money in 1957, when it appeared on the one-dollar silver certificate. The first paper currency bearing the phrase entered circulation on October 1, 1957.[6] The 84th Congress later passed legislation (P.L. 84-851), also signed by President Eisenhower on July 30, 1956, declaring the phrase to be the national motto.
My mistake was not clarifying currency versus money which includes coinage…clearly we will dissect the issue all day long to find the side of the coin we prefer I suspect. Unlike you I choose not to accuse someone of being a liar without understanding fully the context of the commentary, you are more than welcome to assume I’m a lying heathen you won’t be the first nor I suspect the last. Which works fine for me.
I’ve seen your Christians good sir, they are very unlike your Christ.
The pledge worked fine without under God for 175 years….perhaps it’s time to consider taking God out again and keeping him private as was the intent of the founders.
No doubt you will disagree, as is your right…
This should have appeared as a reply to rgr769, once again proving I should never try and reply on my damn phone..
Uh, according to Webster’s currency also includes coinage. And the point you were making is that putting the motto on U.S. money was something that was done for the first time ever in the “1950’s” because of some “red scare,” because the country was unreasonably suffering from some Christian fostered “fear the Commie” campaign.