Enlisting Fish to Spy for Us?

| April 2, 2019

Symbiotic relationship, just passing, or dinner served? (Jeff Milisen/CATERS)

One of the “telltale” signs that there could be “something” lurking in the bush, containing birds, are a bunch of birds suddenly “jumping into flight”.  A more famous event came in advance of the tsunami of 2004. There were reports that before the tsunami hit, most the animals had escaped the area.

The animals detected the sounds and vibrations associated with the waves. Naturally, the got out of the way and moved to safer grounds.

Now, the military is going forward with researching a similar concept. In this case, using sea animals to detect submarine and underwater drone activity.  Certain animals react to sound, vibrations, and other changes in the environment. One idea is to leverage this ability via how sea animals would react to detecting underwater underwater activity. Success would mean that we’d cheaply extend our search area by tracking sea animal behaviors.

From Fox News:

“The U.S. Navy’s current approach to detecting and monitoring underwater vehicles is hardware-centric and resource intensive. As a result, the capability is mostly used at the tactical level to protect high-value assets like aircraft carriers, and less so at the broader strategic level,” PALS program manager Lori Adornato said in a statement. “If we can tap into the innate sensing capabilities of living organisms that are ubiquitous in the oceans, we can extend our ability to track adversary activity and do so discreetly, on a persistent basis, and with enough precision to characterize the size and type of adversary vehicles.”

If successful, fish could potentially serve as cost-effective detectives in hard-to-reach places as well as in protecting critical American assets; and have the capacity to navigate far more freely than any human being.

You could read details here.

Category: Navy

12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff LPH 3, 63-66

I hope there is nothing fishy about this story. I’ll fish around for more info.

AW1Ed

As a result, the capability is mostly used at the tactical level to protect high-value assets like aircraft carriers, and less so at the broader strategic level,” PALS program manager Lori Adornato said in a statement.

Umm, no. But thanks for playing.

Former EM1/SS

Paging Mr. Limpet……

11B-Mailclerk

Beat me to it….

5th/77th FA

Does this mean that Chuntilooli could actually be worth something after all? It has some experience in the spying it’s done on this site. Just by having its name above a comment warns us not to read that dangerous comment.

I like to catch fish….I ‘specially like to eat fish…with hush puppies…and cheese grits…and homemade real taters fried.

Using them for an early warning system…not so much.

AW1Ed

I’ve seen quite a few Larry Lightbulb ideas on how to better perform the ASW mission. Worked with ONR on a couple of the more promising ones, and watched others fail where the hardest part was me keeping my mouth shut, and not pointing and laughing.

So to follow Lori’s ideas of a biometric system, first we’ll need to identify which critters react, and how, when a submarine motors on by.

Given that, some sort of surveillance system capable of monitoring our fishy friends must be deployed and operated, be it by a computer algorithm or human. Scientists love their algorithms, but unfortunately this brings up the dreaded False Alarm Rate. Think of the boy who cried wolf, and you’ll get it. It alerts so often the operators just ignore it.

So now we have a system that monitors the critters of interest (COI) with sufficient fidelity to trust the output, and it gets a valid detection- now what?

Now we go back to ASW as we know it today, with air and sea assets searching a high probability area, with active and passive sensors and a human operator to make the call.

All of these ideas have one thing in common. They need funding, and the program manager’s job one is to find it.

David

Dated yesterday, too…hmmm….

Dwight Schwarz

Aren’t those the ones that glow in the dark.

Synloy un

We already have seals some are even real

David Murphy

Laugh now at the prospect of recalling Mr Limpet to active duty. Many millions of us said the futuristic weapons and gadgets used on the original Star Trek series were just that, futuristic and would never materialize into real objects. The communicator became the cell phone…..

Mike W.

The world renowned Trouser Trout has been going in dark places for soldiers since the beginning of time……

Outcast

You mean she’s still around, last time I think I saw her, she was out trolling the beach at CRB 50+ years ago. Won’t mention what she was rumored to give you if you were to “date” her but if rhymes with slap.