68% of vets: Bergdahl swap was wrong choice

| June 10, 2014

The USAToday published the results of their USA TODAY/Pew Research Center poll and it looks like veterans aren’t in the president’s corner on this one;

Thirty percent of those surveyed have a strong opinion of Bergdahl, whose decision to leave his post in 2009 and subsequent capture by the Taliban is under investigation by the Army. Half of respondents say they were sympathetic, and half say they are angry with Bergdahl.

The 128 veterans included in the poll are much more harsh in their assessment of the 28-year-old sergeant. Only 6% of veterans who responded say they sympathized with him, while 33% say they were angry. By 68%-16%, veterans say Obama made the wrong decision.

“If he was a captured prisoner of war, we wouldn’t be having this discussion,” says Joe Davis, the director of public affairs for the Veterans of Foreign Wars. “He put his teammates in jeopardy, and you absolutely don’t do that in a combat zone.”

Well, there were only 128 veterans included in the sampling, so it’s probably not scientific enough for the wonks in the White House, but, I know from conversations that I’ve had in recent days that 68% is probably a little low. 100% of people I’ve talked to disagree with the decision to swap Bergdahl for five high value Taliban commanders and leaders. I’ll add the caveat that none of the people I talked to had a better idea to recover the young buck, including myself, but we all agree that the way it happened was the wrong way.

Apparently, some Democrats are abandoning the President for the same reason, if you can believe the National Journal;

The email hit my in-box at 9:41 p.m. last Wednesday. From one of the most powerful Democrats in Washington, a close adviser to the White House, the missive amounted to an electronic eye roll. “Even I have had enough.”

Another Democrat had quit on President Obama.

The tipping point for this person was the Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl case—not the soldier-for-Taliban swap itself as much as how the White House mishandled its obligation to communicate effectively and honestly to Congress and the public. More than that, Obama’s team had failed once again to acknowledge its mistakes, preferring to cast blame and seek cover behind talking points.

Don’t get me wrong, this is not me calling for impeachment or anything. Impeachment is boob bait for the bubbas, to borrow from Daniel Patrick Moynihan. It will never happen. But given that this is a long list of failures from this administration – especially in the realm of foreign policy and national security – stuff that’s important to veterans, it should get veterans back into the Conservative fold.

Category: Barack Obama/Joe Biden, Veterans Issues

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2/17 Air Cav

The Emperor and his servants are out of control and some of the largely deaf, dumb, and blind public is just beginning to notice. The Ds and the mamby-pamby Rs are racing of late to get in front of the disgruntled public now that these “public servants” just might be held accountable by their constituencies. A hearty F-You to any and all who voted for Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and Bonehead.

Sparks

2/17 Air Cav Here-Here you hit that nail on the head and countersunk it for good measure!

B Woodman

NNOOOOO!! REEEAALLYY!?!? And it only took a survey from the infamous USA Today to let me know what I already knew. (/snark off)

Ex-344MP

Here I thought My thoughts on the traitor were mine and mine alone. Thank the powers I have a poll now to verify my thoughts.

Good morning TaH.

The Other Whitey

According to FOX News, the terrorists our Glorious Leader just negotiated with just carried out an attack that cost 5 American Servicemen their lives. Nice job on that appeasement, Barry! You slimy worthless ratfuck piece of shit motherfucking son of a bitch!

Sparks

“Well, there were only 128 veterans included in the sampling, so it’s probably not scientific enough for the wonks in the White House.”

Yet 2 interns and Kerry or 4 interns and the secretary can come in the Oval Office with whatever the mental dump they just took “told them” and Obama is all ears (pun intended). So, it depends not on the amount of people speaking or how scientific the opinions gleaned are, it has to do with that tickles Obama’s ears. (pun intended). By the way, off topic, whomever the next president will be, please, please let’s include in our voting decision…ear size! Obama vs Ross Perot. Get my point.

Valerie

I, too, would like to know just exactly what Obama thinks is “his” government, especially the version that came up with the “unanimous” decision to pursue this debacle. We already know that he doesn’t think at least two Agencies of the executive branch (military and intelligence), the House, and the Democratically-held US Senate are not part of the government, as far as he is concerned.

Valerie

The reason you think 68% is low, is because in this country, 70% on on a survey for just about any issue constitutes a consensus. You might hear from the other 32% and discount their views, because they are uninformed, or make no sense, or answer the way they do for reasons that make you understand that they actually agree with you.

royh

Apropos of nothing, really:

“In an exclusive interview with ABC’s Diane Sawyer, Hillary Clinton said she views the criticism over her role in the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate Benghazi, Libya as ‘more of a reason to’ — rather than not to — run for president in 2016.

‘Actually, it’s more of a reason to run, because I do not believe our great country should be playing minor league ball. We ought to be in the majors,’ Clinton said. ‘I view this as really apart from — even a diversion from — the hard work that the Congress should be doing about the problems facing our country and the world.’

Also…don’t blame her. She doesn’t know squat about security.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-calls-benghazi-scrutiny-reason-run-2016/story?id=24062040