Damned if you do

| November 2, 2008

Last year, the Army took an undeserved beating in the media for their poor outpatient facilities at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. So, commanders put needles down on medical facilities and forced them to develop the Warrior Transition Units that focused medical and mental attention as well as counseling services to help soldiers get their lives back in order.

The Army fixed it’s medical treatment program. Think we can find someone to congratulate them? Not at the AP. Lolita Saldor writes “Too many soldiers in new program

According to interviews and data provided to the AP, the number of patients admitted to the 36 Warrior Transition Units and nine other community-based units jumped from about 5,000 in June 2007, when they began, to a peak of nearly 12,500 in June 2008.

[…]

Just 12 percent of the soldiers in the units had battlefield injuries while thousands of others had minor problems that did not require the complex new network of case managers, nurses and doctors, according to Brig. Gen. Gary H. Cheek, the director of the Army’s warrior care office.

Um, Ms. Saldor, not just battlefield injuries require the kind of treatment you’ve described. Many more soldiers get injured in their day-to-day activities than in any other profession.

Of course, the AP can’t do a story about soldiers without quoting Jon Soltz, the combat motor pool hangar queen;

Jon Soltz, an Iraq war veteran and chairman of VoteVets.org, said the Pentagon is making a fair argument. He acknowledged that some soldiers with less serious injuries might not need the units’ services.

But he said commanders need to be able to move their soldiers who cannot deploy due to an injury to the units because that is the only way they can get a replacement before going to war. Otherwise, the brigade goes to battle without the forces needed.

“The larger concern here is that the problem that is driving this is the manpower problem,” said Soltz. “The Army is overextended. We don’t have enough guys.”

How that relates to the story, I have no idea, other than Soltz uses the opportunity to take another swipe at the Bush Administration based on Soltz’ four months of dispatching vehicles and filing 2404’s more than four years ago.

But the thing is this; the media drags out the Walter Reed story everytime they want to bash military leadership (just so you know, generals are “the troops”, too, guys) but Congress and the media stand athwart any real improvement.

The Army decided long before the dust-up last year that the current facilities in the crowded and crappy neighborhood on Georgia Avenue needed to be moved to a more spacious and clean new structure in Bethesda, MD. In order to expedite the move, they asked Congress to skip the usual bureaucratic redtape and allow them to begin building without an environmental impact study.

My congressman, the Far Left partisan Chris Von Hollen, blocked that…even though he was the loudest critic of the current facilities on Georgia Avenue.

Brigadier General Gary Cheek demonstrated exactly what the mission should be of the WTUs, despite what Soltz and the AP thinks;

“We don’t really care about the source of the wound, illness or injury. We really care about the severity of the wound, illness or injury,” said Cheek. “So if it’s a severe, very acute condition that needs rehabilitation and a lot of management and oversight, regardless of where it comes form, that soldier needs to be in this program.”

An injury is an injury and the soldier must be treated the best way the Army knows how. And since when is it a sin to do your job so well that too many people get treatment?

Here’s a screen shot of part of the article in case it disappears.

Category: Politics

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
defendUSA

Typical. Just find another way to make it look like we aren’t doing what we need for our soldiers. This stuff makes me see red.

Raoul

What happened to the media’s “Nothing’s too good for our troops” bandwagon?

Raoul

[Just 12 percent of the soldiers in the units had battlefield injuries while thousands of others had minor problems that did not require the complex new network of case managers, nurses and doctors, according to Brig. Gen. Gary H. Cheek, the director of the Army’s warrior care office.]

This just reinforces my conclusion, “The media only loves dead Soldiers.”

They’re the only ones that are useful in their campaign against America.

Skye

Jon Soltz, the combat motor pool hangar queen;

I thought that was Army Sergeant?

ArmySergeant

No, Skye, I’m the intel queen, and I’ve never claimed that it equates to the danger of combat. If you want to insult me about how my service is somehow not good enough for not being an 11B, get it right. From, you know, your position as a civilian and all.

Jonn:

Media sucks. I have heard good things overall about the WTUs, and I think maybe they are good things, that commanders are sending their soldiers there is a good change in culture, not a bad one.

Ray

Hey AS, Skye can call em as she sees em. She’s put her money where her mouth is by tirelessly supporting the troops. She has nothing to apologize for with her comments. It’s not your MOS we question, it’s your actions and attitude. Of course you wouldn’t understand that, from, you know, your position as a backstabbing buddy fucker. Go ahead, question MY service. I have more time on a Navy shitter than you have in the Army.

ArmySergeant

Ray:

Sure, Skye can call them how she sees them. I serve to give her that right. I can still call her out on what she’s doing. None of you know what my military service is or has been like. You seem to think I’m a blue falcon. That’s your right, but I’d point out that no one I’ve actually served with has considered me that. Also, I don’t question fellow veteran’s service, no matter what I think of squids and their uniform peculiarities.