What They Mean – Combat Action Ribbon
In the grab-bag of ribbons that a Stolen Valor participant would be putting on his uniform, if he were to be representing a Marine or Sailor, the Combat Action Ribbon is a must have. Why this one? Why this modest ribbon of blue, gold and red? It isn’t even a medal after all.
First a bit about it.
The Combat Action Ribbon, affectionately called the CAR was authorized under SECNAVNOTE 1650 of 17 February 1969 (If you are searching for it, it is important to include the date). It was awarded to members of the Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard (until the Coast Guard created their own in 2008), or units falling under the control of the Navy. It also retroactively awarded it to those who who had met the requirements in prior engagements.
This ribbon was awarded to those who had seen ground combat, and performed satisfactorily. That is the beginning of why this ribbon is so special to those who have earned it. It is the base of all higher awards for valor in combat, and is not even a requirement to receive the Purple Heart. An individual can receive the Purple Heart but not the CAR.
The CAR signifies not only that a person was sent to war, but they had the opportunity to fight. And they did. At least satisfactorily, which is all anyone can ask. It isn’t glamorous, it isn’t publicized, but it is coveted. I was too young when I first got mine, none of my Senior Marines had theirs before I did. But that was early on in Iraq. Since no one had it around us there was no one to be envious of.
I remember my Sergeant Major talking to several young Marines and myself when I first arrived at my unit. I had been in for just over six months at the time, he over 22 years. He told us that he had never had the opportunity to see combat, and here we were just showing up and getting the chance. 22 years before he had the opportunity to try. That was what this ribbon meant to him. It is the culmination of everything we did at home. All the training, all the sweat and time in the field. It was preparation for the opportunity to be under enemy fire, and to perform satisfactorily. That is what it is all about after all. If we aren’t in combat it is just practice.
That is what the CAR is, a simple ribbon of fabric to say that we were tested, and our “performance under fire was satisfactory.”
That is why someone who hasn’t earned this ribbon, wears it, they disrespect it. They didn’t pass the test, they didn’t even show up. But that is also why, if they are going to grab some ribbons and medals to throw on their chest, the Combat Action Ribbon is a must have.
Category: Politics
Also awarded for surface combat (that being the primary action source for ships/subs). Members of ships and afloat staffs can be awarded the ribbon for surface combat action against an agressor force.
Unfortunately, although there are specific periods of operations in which it has been awarded, there isn’t a public list of those units or individuals who’ve been awarded the CAR. Almost no way to prove that someone didn’t receive it. Some Sailor involved in convoy ops in Iraq that came under fire and returned fire satisfies the requirement. Also includes cases where IEDs were detonated in proximity to the Sailor/Marine/Coastie.
You are right, I wasn’t feeling like restating the entire SECNAVNOTE. It has a lot of cool provisions to recognize guys. Even the continuous indirect fire as long as someone was returning fire.
Though you must be recommended for it by your CO
I was in the Corps during the late 70’s and a lot of our Staff NCOs had the CAR. That is a badge of honor, not quite what the CIB is to Army Infantry but it says that you have seen the Elephant. It means a lot to Sailors and Marines.
I’ll be doing one on the CIB. I think the reason the USN doesn’t distinguish, and the USMC has never pushed it is the “Every Marine is a Rifleman” concept.
I think I know how Marines feel about the CAR. One of the proudest moments of my life is when I had my CIB pinned on.
Same concept. You know exactly how they feel, CIB does look better though.
Nice write-up, Adam.
One minor addition: although the CAR was created in 1969, in
20102000 DoN made eligibility for the CAR retroactive to 7 December 1941. Previously, DoN had made the CAR retroactive to 1 March 1961.http://www.marines.mil/News/Messages/MessagesDisplay/tabid/13286/Article/115121/mcbul-1650-retroactive-combat-action-ribbon.aspx
Very cool, it is great to recognize those guys.
CAR = Honor.
That is why some people don’t receive it even if they were there. They didn’t meet expectations.
I can’t think of a single instance where a Marine that was in a unit that was involved in combat and was present was singled out as not being worthy of being awarded a CAR.
My Brother in Law was in Grenada with the Marines. He was “provisional infantry”. Not that it was a long campaign, but he said there were a few Marines in his unit that shirked at the slightest opportunity to aviod as much as going out on Patrol, yet recieved a CAR.
In Desert Storm there was a HQ Battery commander who lost his shit when incoming hit near the CP and had to be relieved. The fucker still got a CAR.
Thanks for the explanation. Being Army, I never knew about this until I saw them mentioned here and then didn’t understand the eligibility requirements.
CIB is way sexier
During my time (1980-2000) The CAR wasn’t a HUGE Deal unless you were a Vietnam Vet. Grenada and Desert Storm were basicialy week long fire exercises at most.
Beruit was sitting in a craphole with an occasional mortar launched in your general direction ( of course the bombing happened but that was over in a day.) Same with Somolia.
Marines that got their CARs in IRAQ early on saw some shit, same with Afhganistan.
Did you earn one ?
I hate garrison minded but suckers like you. I served ln Beirut and unless you were actually ln land with us what the hell do you know about what went down. While we were over there , getting shot at, bombed And So many men of true honor gave all that they had (there lives). you probably did everything you could to stay out of harmed way. I don’t give a dam if you spent 100 years in the corps. Nothing gives you the right to degrade any fighting man. If l were you I wouldn’t call myself a marine. I was awarded a CAR, and am dam proud of it.do yourself and the marine corps a favor, quit representing yourself as one of the few and the proud, the world is watching.
I’m also proud of it! It’s earned never given.
I take exception to your comment “Beirut was sitting in a craphole with an occasional mortar launched in your general direction” as if you are minimizing that action. We lost over two hundred and fifty fine sailors and Marines there, including two friends of mine so get over yourself.
May i suggest that the “Just an Old Dog” do some research in respect in Beirut. Here I did the research for you:
http://www.marines.mil/Portals/59/Publications/US%20Marines%20In%20Lebanon%201982-1984%20PCN%2019000309800_1.pdf
CAR has been cheapened over the years. They are tossed out like candy the majority of the time. Infantry should have it’s own award like the US Army.
lol @ every marine a rifleman bullshit.
Truth lol
I’m sure the Marines who were attacked at Camp Bastion in 2012 would disagree with you both.
My Dad, USMC, received his CAR retroactive from combat during WWII, pacific theater. A very proud moment for him.
Mine was earned in Vietnam nearly 30 years later.
It was just one more thing Dad and I proudly shared.
Hope this link helps in verifying whether a poser has a CAR, you can search usmc car checker to find the link
Semper fi
Don
https://www.manpower.usmc.mil/pls/apex/f?p=102:1:1239305278167013:SEARCH_PI:NO:RP:P1_SEARCH_PI_VALUE:YES
I received the CAR (it is on my DD-214 along with my other decorations) and I’m not on that website. I had a 7 digit service serial number when I was in, not a Social Security number.
That site is not a reliable reference.
I’ve always liked that it is just a ribbon. It’s like saying “no big deal… We are Marines.. Combat is just part of what we do.” No need to look like a Christmas tree in uniform or wear all kinds of crap to distinguish ourselves amongst one another. Semper
EdUSMCLeg: I actually wish the Army had adopted a variant of the CAR vice creating the CAB. You are correct: if you’re in the military, combat is simply part of the job if/when required. That’s true of all specialties.
I have no problem with combat infantry or medics getting special recognition. But I really didn’t see the need for a new badge.
I was in the USN and received my CAR in Vietnam while in the rivers (Brown water Navy)in 1969-70