Code Pink’s mixed message
My weekly update from the handsome women at Code Pink tells me that they’re “occupying” Wall Street this week for some reason;
We are the 99 percent —the vast majority who will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1% who hold all the wealth. CODEPINK has been in Wall Street camping out with other activists in Liberty Plaza because we know real change begins with direct action to challenge corporate greed and endless war. Though we face serious obstacles, we are committed to disarming the military industrial complex with humor and positive energy, both at this vibrant “American Tahrir Square” to Freedom Plaza in Washington DC starting Oct 6 for the tenth anniversary of the Afghan War to denounce war and demand funding for housing, jobs, healthcare, and education.
i think I’m in tha 99% they’re talking about, but I’d like them to leave Wall Street alone – I have hundreds of thousands of dollars working for me on Wall Street and I’m taking part in capitalism. I’m pretty sure that the ingrates of Code Pink are taking part in the Wall Street experience, too. Everyone with a mutual fund or a money market account is happily watching “evil” Wall Street grow our money. And what does their protest on Wall Street have to do with their anti-war message, anyway? I guess the protest on Wall STreet looked more lucrative than complaining about the war.
I guess they realized that, too, when they were writing the letter, because they switched gears to the Afghanistan War;
The recent uptick in violence in Kabul provides a chilling reminder of the truth we’ve known all along: violence begets violence. The U.S. must stop propping up drug lords and war lords and bring our war $$ home. The international community must support real peace negotiations in Afghanistan, which includes women’s equal involvement in the process. Let’s stop pretending men with weapons represent the will of the people; we support real democracy.
Violence begets violence, huh? I guess that’s why we’re over there in the first place because of the violence that was committed against us. “Real peace negotiations”? With who? Those guys who throw acid in the face of school girls? Do you really think that the taliban is interested in hearing what women have to say in the future of Afghanistan? Now Code Pink asks if we really think that men wih guns represent the will of the people in Afghanistan…who are you talking about? The Taliban? They’re the ones who ruled the country from the barrel of their guns, numbnuts. How can you think that the Taliban are honest brokers for the people of Afghanistan? The same folks who are committing that “recent uptick in violence” against the people of Afghanistan.
Category: Code Pink
Spot-on, as usual, Jonn.
And,Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for not posting any pictures.
I agree with Pinto, I have enough issues with my gut, I would need an ER stay if pictures were posted!
Well, by their logic, since they represent the 99% here the Taliban must represent the 99% over there.
Oh and lets not forget the latest suicide turban attack that was under the guise of wanting to talk snout peace.
I for one would love to see members of Code Pink go to northeastern Afghanistan and dole out some of that “humor and positive energy” to the Taliban warlords there. No balls to give 10 terrorists hugz and kisses.
Sporkmaster– snout peace?
@5 If they did go they wouldn’t be going to talk to the Taliban peacefully. They’d do the same thing Fonda did in North Vietnamn, telling them what they are doing is right and then give them all their money to buy more weapons.
The words Peace and Taliban are NOT now and NEVER will be associated with eachother
Phone post error, look under the newest post with the tag rethink Afghastan.
#9– I thought it was pretty funny, perhaps an apropos Freudian slip talking about islamic terrorism. 🙂
Guess I’m one of those “violence begets violence” chicks after all. I freely admit that anyone attempting violence against me can expect a violent response as long as I am still able to muster it. But, I will try to limit my expense to a single bullet.
Well, I don’t think Code Pink has ever sent a mixed message… really.
Isn’t their message quite consistent and clear?
Existential question of the day: if Code Pink succeeds in taking down the 1% who owns all the money, who’ll pay their salary?