Firefight in Kabul

| September 13, 2011

Jeff Schogol from Stars & Stripes sends us a video of some the firefight today in Kabul when Taliban attacked the US Embassy there;

The kids burned up some ammo. I sure hope they hit something. A lot of somethings. From Reuters;

At least 9 people were killed and 23 wounded in the four attacks, and a gun battle around a half-built high-rise building raged on into the evening as NATO and Afghan attack helicopters circled overhead.

The fighters had chosen a strategic and heavily fortified main target for the well-coordinated attacks.

Their ability to shower artillery around the diplomatic district was a clear show of strength at a time when NATO-led forces are claiming significant security gains and preparing for their exit by 2014.

Although the Taliban have attacked multiple targets in Kabul in the past, this is the first time they have organized simultaneous assaults on such separate areas.

Funny how the closer we get to the withdrawal, the forces we’re fighting become bolder. Who saw that coming?

Category: Terror War

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Frankly Opinionated

But we’ve been making nice with the Taliban, how can this be happening?

NotSoOldMarine

Echoes of Tet. The media is going to eat this shit up.

Miss Ladybug

Call me an ignorant civilian, but why do I see guys not wearing their helmets during a firefight?

NotSoOldMarine

re #3

The Marine without a helmet is probably a Marine Security Guard which means he ran to the perimeter straight from grabbing a vest and a combat load in the armory if he wasn’t already geared up. The soldier, who knows? Sometimes helmets a pain in the ass and sometimes people are just too cool for school. I couldn’t tell you.

PintoNag

Somebody please tell me that the Administration is paying attention to this.

Yeah, that’s what I thought. The silence is deafening.

/sarc off

Miss Ladybug

Thanks, NSOM

Sporkmaster

I think they are too busy with this.

Major Kong

#4

I doubt whether these were Marine Security Guards, given that this was taken at the ISAF compound, which is basically across the street from the U.S. Embassy. (Or at least was in 2003, the last time I was there). Being that it’s ISAF, that also explains the strange medley of uniforms and weapons.

Those boys were definitely laying down some heat, though.

Tony Ryals

Marines ? I thought the U.S. embassy in Kabul only hired Wachin-Off-Hut’s elite armourguard rent-a-cops just like Logan Airport Boston’s Israeli ICTS International’s Huntleigh rent-a-cops of 9/11/01 infamy.
Only worst,the U.S.Embassy guards in Kabul run or ran slave prostitution rings and love to sip vodka from each others aholes.Or has Hillary ‘Cocaine Rendition Plane’Clinton and Joe ‘I’m an Albino Semite’ Lieberman cleaned all that up by now ? With allies like us,who needs enemies ? Hope none of this interferes with the CIA’s opium trafficking business.

Whistleblowers vs. the 101st Tequila Brigade

By Nathan Hodge September 11, 2009 |

Gordon’s lawsuit

alleges he was shut out of an investigation into the solicitation of

prostitutes at the behest of Armor Group’s London-based parent

company, despite recurring evidence that ArmorGroup employees

continued to solicit prostitutes and perhaps even run their own

prostitution services. A trainee boasted to Gordon “that he could

purchase a girl for $20,000 and turn a profit after a month.”

Lieberman Gave State IG Whistleblower Documents on ArmorGroup in 2007

John Gorman, the former ArmorGroup Kabul project manager turned

whistleblower whose allegations against the company I wrote about

yesterday, met with aides to Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) in 2007

See Also:

Party Ends for Kabul Embassy’s Booze-Soaked Guard Force Mercs Gone

Wild at U.S. Embassy Kabul (Updated, With Photos … U.S. Plans $200

Million Expansion for Kabul Embassy Lethal Cocktail: Vodka, Guns and

Laughing Wolf

Additional thought on why no helmets: unless you have an assault helmet, which has a higher back, it can be hard to operate from the prone position. If you are down, turn your head up to see and shoot, the movement can push the helmet down over your eyes or otherwise make life interesting for you. There are times when troops just do without to avoid those problems. The problem with assault helmets is that having that higher back, they give less protection to the head/neck during all other operations.

Old Trooper

Good thing those sandbags were there. Anyone notice a couple of incoming rounds kicking up a little dust on the bags? That’ll make your sphincter pucker.

Flagwaver

I will say one thing, whenever a gunship comes overhead, it is a pretty sight. Doesn’t matter the make or model, as long as it is laying down a stream of hell against ‘thine mortal enemy’ then it is a beautiful sight.

Anonymous

It doesn’t seem, according to embassy staff that this was a very competent attack. The Structure they assaulted from was 800m away. According to the ambassador and the BBC and a couple DoD Pamphlets predicting this, the rockets careened far off target and wounded a van of children.

trackback

[…] (No Ratings Yet)  Loading … | 0 viewsVia This Ain’t Hell…:And at New York Times, “Militants Attack U.S. Embassy in Kabul.”KABUL, Afghanistan — […]

DaveO

More than likely, the helmet was left back in the hootch because of complacency. Logically, being around the embassy should make one a target – but with the high walls and usually calm day to day life, folks forget.