Prysner and Diliberto on Hillary
Hillary Clinton has allocated a half-billion dollars for bribing the Pakistanis, and planning to do the same for the Taliban to switch sides – of course anyone who has any experience in Afghanistan knows that it’s only rent money because you can’t buy an Afghan’s loyalty.
But our buddy, communist hero founder of ANSWER’s March Forward veteran group of mannequins Mike Prysner sees it as evidence that the US is losing in Afghanistan (Russia Today link);
“This can be seen as a move of desperation on behalf of the United States,” said Prysner.
The Taliban is winning, he argued. There is no need for the Taliban to negotiate with the US because they are winning the war and an offer to pay off the enemy is merely an admission the US cannot win militarily.
Regarding Vice President Joe Biden’s remarks, which essentially said a drawdown to the war in 2011 could be very small, Prysner said the US was losing and they would not willingly withdraw in any manner that would resemble a defeat.
“We can expect to see in another year more US casualties, more Afghan casualties and while the leaders in Washington and generals in the Pentagon still finding justifications to continue to fight there,” said Prysner.
So says the E-4 radar operator who served in Iraq.
Our own Jake Diliberto chimes in;
“I think it’s all crazy talk,” said Diliberto. “Nobody has any clue how we are going to bring peace or stability to this whole thing if we don’t negotiate with the Taliban.”
I guess Russia Times was just fishing for commentary they had already typed into the story why else would they talk to these two on statecraft. I’m no Hillary supporter (except in the Democrat primaries in 2012), but after the ass-kicking the Left took during the Iraq surge, I’d think there’s no one on the Left willing tomake wild-ass statements about the future of a military operation.
Thanks to Ranger Off-Spring (ROS) for the link.
Category: Antiwar crowd, March Forward
Paying the Taliban to switch sides?
So they can, say, buy more explosives and better weapons to fight our troops with?
Please tell me if I’m missing something here.
Nope, Pinto, you have it just about right.
I’m absolutely dumbfounded by the continued and increased stupidity displayed by this administration.
Wtf would this even remotely seem like a good idea?!
Now, now, this is the Religion of Peace, folks. Why would they take money from us and buy explosives n shit like that? They are a kind and loving bunch of bare handed ass wipers. They wouldn’t harm a flea, unless of course it is female, and then they’d commit some labia loppin’, clit clippin, and other genital mutilation.
Religion of peace my ass. I believe that this administration is dumb enough to do something that damned stupid.
Like Newt says:
“As an American, I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name. America gave him the White House based on the same credentials.”
There are actually lots of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to carry up. I supply the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you deliver up where an important thing can be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged around issues like that, however I’m certain that your job is clearly recognized as a good game. Each boys and girls really feel the influence of only a second’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.