Guess what I have in my hot little hands?

| February 8, 2010

This will come out in sections.  I have not been authorized to release it, but the email attached claimed it had already been “filed.”

MCMANUS was previously convicted in U.S. Federal Court in California in 2002, arising out of federal criminal charges originating in Louisiana, for impersonating a U.S. “Air Marshal” and also impersonating a U.S. Army Major, both in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 912, He received a sentence of two years probation, which was later revoked for violations. At the time of his offense relating to those criminal charges, MCMANUS had been wearing an unauthorized U.S. Army Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) of the unearned rank of Major (and with fraudulent U.S. Army identification papers naming him as an Army Captain) with attached unearned patches, insignia, and awards, on board a commercial aircraft in New Orleans and also falsely represented himself to the flight crew as a current member of the U.S. military and an “Air Marshal”, and where he attempted to gain access to the plane’s cockpit. Due to the suspicious nature of his uniform and his suspicious claims to the flight crew, he was not permitted by the flight crew to remain on the flight. He was later arrested in California and convicted of these charges there.

Official U.S. military records, which include MCMANUS’ form DD-214, indicate MCMANUS entered on Active Duty with the United States Army on November 11, 1984 and separated on March 31, 1987. During this period, MCMANUS attained the rank of Private First Class and a pay grade of E-1. The form DD-214 further indicates MCMANUS was awarded or authorized to wear only the following awards: an Army Service Ribbon; Overseas Service Ribbon; Expert Marksmanship Badge – Rifle; and Marksman Marksmanship Badge – Pistol. MCMANUS’ type of separation is Defined on the DD-214 as “Discharge” and the character of service is defined as “Under Honorable Conditions”, which is not the same as an “Honorable Discharge”.

HERE IS THE BEST PART (after jump):

Attorney CF admitted that MCMANUS was the person in the subject photographs and that MCMANUS told him he had discarded or destroyed all the evidence (i.e., the uniform, medals, insignia, etc.) allegedly because MCMANUS had become “afraid” when his photograph wearing the unauthorized military uniform and unauthorized military awards was posted on the internet and he became the subject of angry bloggers. At present, I have no way of verifying the truth of attorney CF’s claim regarding MCMANUS purported destruction of all the evidence.

Full Complaint (Thanks to: A Soldier’s Perspective’s Marcus):

Category: Politics

22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Old Tanker

How does one attain the rank of PFC and pay grade of E-1? The turd has done this before eh?

OldTrooper

Yep, I believe you are correct, TSO, he got his worthless ass busted down to Private E-nothing.

Wyatt Earp

Can we still hang people like this?

BohicaTwentyTwo

If he received a General Under Honorable Conditions discharge, it means he screwed up. You just don’t get a general discharge for no reason. It may not be from a court martial and it may not be bad enough to deserve a dishonorable discharge, or general under other than honorable conditions dischage, but he did something to piss off his chain of command enough that they went through the extra paperwork not to give him an honorable discharge.

Ray

He asked for a discharge after the Army left a bad taste in his mouth.

Mr. Chips

Some quick math says that McManus left the Army after (roughly) 2 years and 7 months. Last I checked, enlistments were for complete years. Even if he never took leave, he would not have 5 months built up for terminal leave.
I was a student at DLI during the McManus era (I was there from July 84-July 85). The shortest course at DLI was 6 months (Russian, the largest dept at that time, was roughly a year course). So, between basic, DLI and an AIT school (enlistees attended DLI first, then AIT), McManus would probably have spent over half of his active duty time in (expensive) schools, then was booted out. I would be interested in what he did to get a general discharge.

Jonn Lilyea

I guess he thought the General Discharge referred to his rank.

Old Tanker

Last I checked, enlistments were for complete years.

Not necesarily, I was enlisted in a cohort unit for 3 years 4 months. This was to cover 4 months of basic and AIT, 1 year CONUS, and 2 in Germany….. I was stop lossed for an additional 2 months as well.

Sean

Likely got caught smuggling a Habitrail and Mr. Lemmiwinks into the Kaserne

Marcus

Thank you for the h/t my friend, but you did the hard work of getting the info for us. I just put it up on the web for all of us to use.

Mr. Mark

You would think the prior convictions would have gotten this out of his system.

Now, not the he ever seemed the model of sanity, I think he’s just completely off-the-planet nuts. It’s one thing if somebody is doing to this to pick up chicks, or seek some sort of financial or professional benefit and another if they are genuinely fruit-loops. If I were this guy’s lawyer, I would be looking to see if that can established.

trackback

[…] This is not the first time is pathetic excuse for a man got in trouble for impersonating a military officer and federal law enforcement employee. […]

OldAdmin

Uh guys, this is starting to look more and more like a case of mental illness rather than willful misconduct.

Organic mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and the like) tends to strike males between 16 and 26 (the sweet spot for military service). In civilian life onset can be triggered by death of a parent, going off to college and personal problems. Boot camp and overseas service are the usually stressors in military life.

The person involved tends to insist that they are NOT having mental problems or won’t admit symptoms. They thus tend to get sent to the brig instead of a hospital.

McManus’ behavior on the aircraft could mean he is working up to a full blown case of schizophrenia.

If that is the case, then we should consider him a comrade whose mind is broken rather than someone who is trying to fake valor.

UpNorth

Sorry, OldAdmin, the fact that he did it twice just shows that he’s an asshat and didn’t learn from his first experience. And he wasn’t trying to fake valor, he stole it. Not a comrade of mine.
If he was “ill”, I doubt that he would destroy the evidence, as he wouldn’t know that what he did was wrong. He would probably resist getting rid of anything, just to prove that he was “right”.

Haha

Well, his domestic partner Alvin Chan says the ballduster mcmanus wears tickles him pink, have fun in jail 🙂

trackback

[…] being a General wasn’t enough for this moron. He’s previously been arrested for impersonating a US Air […]

Joe

How does a dude rucking a desk not shoot expert with a pistol?

Anonymous

Guy was a PFC/E3, got busted to PVT/E1 and discharged with “under honorable conditions” for screwing-up AND not packin’ the gear to be worthwhile (about screwing-up or just in general, take your pick) most likely.

Anonymous

Or, as R. Lee Ermey (as former drill instructor playin’ one) put it: “Private Pyle, you climb obstacles like old people f*ck!”

former prison shrink

You can’t get out of federal criminal charges just for having a mental diagnosis. The law says the person must be unable to appreciate the nature and wrongfulness of the criminal act in order to be found not responsible due to mental illness. See 18 USC 4242 for details. As a general rule, planning an illegal act makes it extremely difficult to prove an inability to appreciate the nature and wrongfulness of a criminal act. His prior conviction will make such an argument impossible: if convicted once, then he KNEW it was against the law, therefore, no insanity defense to this second offense. Look for the US Attorney to plead this one out instead of a trial, and defense counsel will recommend he take an offered plea. Proving this crime doesn’t require criminal intent: unauthorized wear of the decorations is a violation of federal law. Read Sec 701, 702, and 704 in the FBI affidavit to see why. Only Sec 703 requires “intent to deceive”; other sections do not require criminal intent.

MandMmom

Diagnostically, someone with schizophrenia is not going to be near this organized. They hear voices and have difficulty telling what we all can hear vs. what only they can hear. They don’t forge papers. They don’t play dress up. If they think they are something that they aren’t, its usually an angel, or a demon, or an alien. This looks more like a someone who is intentionally lying (though it is pitiful, I admit) to try to gain attention, admiration, and a visit to the cockpit to meet the pilot. Schizophrenia is highly treatable with medication–problems like he demonstrates, not so much.