Fired F-35 pilot speaks out

| April 3, 2025 | 30 Comments

 

2023, an F-35 made the news when the pilot ejected from it in North Carolina and the plane flew pilotless for another 12 miles. You might be interested in the final outcome.

COL Charles “Tre” Del Pizzo was flying the fighter, familiarizing in preparation to take command of  VMX-1 squadron in Yuma, Arizona, starting to make an instruments-only landing in the midst of a raging storm.

“Contributing factors to the mishap included an electrical event during flight, which induced failures of both primary radios, the transponder, the tactical air navigation system, and the instrument landing system; and the probability that the helmet-mounted display and panoramic cockpit display were not operational for at least three distinct periods,” the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing (MAW) stated last year in a press release announcing the results of the third and final investigation into the incident. “This caused the pilot to become disoriented in challenging instrument and meteorological conditions.”

“The investigation concluded that the mishap occurred due to pilot error,” the release continued. “The pilot incorrectly diagnosed an out-of-controlled flight emergency and ejected from a flyable aircraft, albeit during a heavy rainstorm compounded with aircraft electrical and display malfunctions.”

Sounds damning…but note this was the third investigation into the same incident.  Now for Del Pizzo’s story, from an interview with “Post and Courier’s Tony Bareleme.

Del Pizzo said he had no choice but to eject. Starting suddenly shortly after 1:30 p.m., the helmet failed three times in 41 seconds, the now-retired Marine pilot stated.

At first, he said his helmet flickered, then “the visor erupted in flashes of alerts,” Bartelme wrote. “Failures in flight control systems, avionics, cooling, navigation, GPS, communications. Audio alerts sounded: whoop, whoop, whoop. Then the helmet and main displays went dark; the audio alerts stopped. About 15 seconds had passed.”

About 15 seconds later, the helmet failed for a second time as the jet was in clouds about 750 feet off the ground and descending in vertical mode at about 800 feet per minute. He opted to execute a “missed approach procedure” and get away from the ground.

Del Pizzo “pulled back the stick to climb, pushed the throttle forward for thrust,” Bartelme wrote. “Raised the landing gear. Pressed a button that converts the jet from vertical mode to conventional. Then the helmet display went dark again, as if rebooting. He tried to radio his wingman, the control tower. Nothing. Coms out. Then it flashed on, along with another thunderstorm of alerts, more than 25 messages telling him that the jet was in deep trouble and getting worse. Whoop, whoop, whoop.”

Just 11 seconds later, the equipment failed again, Del Pizzo stated to Bartelme.  The War Zone

Quick side note – this helmet is no ordinary helmet. Costs $400,000, has to be hand fitted in a two-day session,  and the pilot can’t gain weight or significantly alter his hair style.

The F-35 helmet is a technological marvel. It can display night vision, thermal imagery and video from below the jet, letting pilots effectively see through the airframe and track targets without having to look back and forth from their cockpit screens.

“The pilot can look down through a portion of their wing and see what’s below,” said Tech. Sgt. William Vass of the 419th OSS. “When they look toward the cameras embedded on the F-35, that image projects onto their helmet display.”   Task and Purpose

Very expensive, very touchy, and an integral part of the program. Back to Del Pizzo’s account:

“Instruments gone, a sea of gray outside his window. Is the plane responding? He pulled the throttle back. He glanced at the small backup panel between his legs. He heard what sounded like a motor spooling down. The engine? He felt the nose of the aircraft tilt upward. He felt a falling sensation. He still couldn’t see the ground. Was he still over the base? Over the trees?”

“Forty-one seconds. Decide, act: The jet’s going into the trees, and I’m going with it. In one quick motion, he reached between his legs for the yellow handle, put his left hand over his right wrist. And pulled.”  The War Zone

Two prior investigation cleared COL Del Pizzo. Why have a third?

Del Pizzo was injured by the ejection as shards of metal dug into his neck from the canopy blown open by explosives. He was hurt some more when his helmet and face mask were ripped off by the force of the wind. He also broke his back.The War Zone

Gonna make it tough to do any analysis on that Lamborghini helmet he was wearing.

Despite the two prior exonerating reviews, the Marines did a third investigation and relieved Del Pizzo of command last October, the usual “loss of confidence” reason. Based on the information presented in the article, my guess is that someone wanted to divert attention from an embarrassing equipment failure in the most expensive air procurement program in history. Read the War Zone article, see what you think.

Category: Marines, Pentagon, Science and Technology

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2000


30 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous

Somebody’s CYA-ing and it ain’t the pilot.

Slow Joe

I don’t know about that.
That pilot seems to be covering his ass.
A little panicky, if you ask me.
I wouldn’t want him in my foxhole when the shit hits the fan.
Loss of confidence justified, IMO.

5JC

I have doubts he bailed out of a $100,000,000 plane just for giggles. I don’t know about the helmet being “touchy”. If it were, there would be more incidents like this.

Old tanker

Anything mechanical can fail at any time and that goes double for electronics. If they didn’t have a set of what pilots call steam gauges, meaning the old analogue tyle instruments, he had no reliable method of flying the plane in IFR conditions. Especially when you consider it’s “fly by wire”.

To me it sounds a bit like they have some electronics shielding work ahead and or water intrusion prevention of the sparky bits.

I agree, this looks like the puzzle palace making sure their toy source continues to look good. Damn shame to blame the pilot for the failure of the heavily electronic controlled aircraft. Some of those birds cannot fly without the computers. Think F17 and B2.

Tallywhagger

It can be ever so helpful to have a magnetic compass, altimeter and airspeed indicator when you cannot see outside of the aircraft.

FuzeVT

“Extry! Extry! Read all about it! $100,000,000 aircraft saved due to pilot having a $79 Garmin in cockpit”

Tallywhagger

Sounds almost Bernathian with his iPhone or iPad and some “app”.

Hack Stone

You forgot to say “Over”, over.

rgr769

yes, too bad the Col. didn’t have his Ipad like Bernasty. Though, there is no way to get airspeed without a connection to the aircraft’s pitot tube.

rgr769

I can’t believe there is not back-up of the six instrument gauges one needs to fly IFR in this state-of-the-art fighter. Even the newest civilian aircraft with glass panel instrument panels have these back-up “steam” gauges.

Tallywhagger

Amen. That pilot knows how to fly and he made the best decision he could.

I can think of a couple of things that I might have tried, given the power of the aircraft, just to bust out of the weather–but you just can’t go doing that stuff when there are other aircraft in that airspace. Sorry to learn of his injuries in the bailout. Would love to hear him tell the story, though!

KoB

One would thing that a $400K helmet would work like it’s supposed to. But then again, one would think that a $100 million aircraft would too. After all, $600 hammers will drive a nail, right?

Yeah, Imma gonna go out on a limb here and say that the pilot is the “Sacrificial Lamb”. YMMV

timactual

I am no pilot, but everything I have ever read about flying said that pilots should avoid nasty weather, particularly when flying an aircraft you are unfamiliar with.

Slow Joe

Absolutely. Poor mission planning.

rgr769

I am just a lowly private pilot, but I would never fly into hard IFR conditions to shoot an instrument approach in an aircraft I hadn’t flown before.

Odie

And I thought IFR in pilot speak meant I follow roads 😏

SFC D

I thought that referred to Army helo pilots. And VFR means visually follow roads.

timactual

My late father-in-law, who flew B-19s among other types, “navigated” like that as a routine matter. They called it “pilotage” back then. It was, literally, “I follow roads”.

“What is pilotage in aviation?

Pilotage is navigation by reference to landmarks or checkpoints. It is a method of navigation that can be used on any course that has adequate checkpoints, but it is more commonly used in conjunction with dead reckoning and VFR radio navigation.”

tavern knight

Always thought it was, “IFR” means “I Follow Rudolf (Red-nosed Reindeer)… 😀

Tallywhagger

A wing leveler is worth its weight in gold but not nearly so valuable as having another pilot to handle the charts, plates and radio while the other pilot flys the aircraft.

In real life, ATC often becomes an extension of CRM, everything works the way it was planned and we chalk it up to life, learning and experience.

I cannot imagine flying into an Oklahoma/Texas/Tennessee thunderstorm, at night, single handed, but if that ever happened, the fundamentals of flying will still be the same.

Ice is even worse.

Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH Neanderthal

“Ve vill continue to haf trials und hearings until ve getz de results ve vants!”

Last edited 2 days ago by Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH Neanderthal
Hack Stone

Was there any Red Hat Software on the aircraft? Inquiring minds want to know.

Green Thumb

Yet another All-Points Logistics contract failure….

26Limabeans

“the pilot can’t gain weight or significantly alter his hair style”

For some reason this article reminds me of helmet head
herself, Anna Wintour.

timactual

Speaking of “helmet head”, I have seen a few people who couldn’t alter their “hairstyle” without a hammer and chisel. Kind of fun to watch them turn their heads, as the inertia of their hair helmets causes them to rotate separately from their heads.

timactual

“the now-retired Marine pilot”

Purely coincidence, I’m sure.

“he was learning its strengths and weaknesses…”

“…attempting an instrument landing in the F-35B’s vertical mode in zero-visibility conditions during a raging storm.”

Intentionally flying an unfamiliar aircraft in nasty weather? Sounds like extremely poor judgement to me.

Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH Neanderthal

Sounds like extremely poor judgement to me.”
On whose part?
The pilot who went up there?
Or the command that told the pilot to go up there?

timactual

I doubt if anyone told the Colonel to “go up there”. And if he was, he should have declined.

Mike B

Sounds like his mask wasn’t fully connected (Meaning hanging to one side). We had a F-15 pilot punch, it was a high speed, low altitude ejection, after a GLOC incident and he lost his helmet and mask due to the mask hanging to one side. In his case it saved his life, as he was floating in the Gulf of Mexico for two hours or so before being rescued. Unlike Navy and Marine Corps the Air Force doesn’t have a automatic release system on their masks for over water ejections.

I’m sure the Aircrew Life Support/Aircrew Flight Equipment shop got inspected hard after the incident. I know we did after the one I mentioned, we came out golden in the end.

Makes me wonder if the helmet issues, was due to the helmet or aircraft. Guess we’ll never know.

Yeah I’m a retired Air Force Aircrew Life Support/Aircrew Flight Equipment Technician. I’ve had equipment I inspected, installed, QCed, etc used in 3 ejections and all the pilots survived.

Mike
USAF Retired

Odie

From back when pilots depended on flying skills and not a computer.

https://hmstypicallydefiant.blogspot.com/2025/03/courage.html