Bill reintroduced to make defrauding veterans a federal crime

| February 15, 2023

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nevada, and Senator Marco Rubio, R-Florida, reintroduced a bill in the Senate. This bill, if passed into law, would make it a federal crime to defraud benefits from veterans. Senator Cortez Masto said that this bill would provide additional tools to prosecutors, beyond current crime laws, to go after those who would defraud veterans.

From military.com:

The bill, which Cortez Masto and Rubio formally reintroduced Friday, has been introduced in previous Congresses and has even passed the House several times. Most recently, in 2021, the House overwhelmingly approved the bill in a 416-5 vote. But it has never been taken up by the Senate, meaning the legislative process has to start from scratch again this year.

According to data released by the FTC in February 2022, reports of fraud against veterans, service members and spouses jumped 69% in 2021 compared to the previous year. Within that group, veterans and military retirees reported being targeted the most, with 87,343 fraud reports. The total 110,827 fraud cases reported by military consumers resulted in an estimated $266 million lost.

Concerns have also been raised that scammers could target veterans more in the wake of the passage of the PACT Act, the sweeping legislation that expanded benefits for millions of veterans exposed to toxins.

While fraud is already a crime regardless of whether the target is a veteran, Cortez Masto, who previously served as Nevada’s attorney general, said creating a new offense specifically addressing veterans benefits fraud will give prosecutors more tools to go after criminals. For example, she said, “pension poachers” may escape mail or wire fraud charges if they present themselves as an investment specialist trying to help a veteran.

“If a defendant cloaks themselves as some sort of professional that was just trying to help for a fee, even though their intention all along was to defraud these individuals out of their money and not necessarily help them and still get to a fee, sometimes it’s difficult for prosecutors to use the existing offense,” she said.

While the bill, called the Preventing Crimes Against Veterans Act, has stalled in the Senate in previous years, Cortez Masto vowed to continue pushing until it gets across the finish line.

Military.com provides the rest of the article here.

Category: Veterans in the news, Veterans Issues

21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jason

Most recently, in 2021, the House overwhelmingly approved the Bill in a 416-5 vote.

Who are the five F*cks that voted against it?

ChipNASA

You beat me to it. I went for the full gambit.

Anonymous

D(icks)

ChipNASA

Jason,
My Google Fu is strong….

You wanted to know.

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021174

Aderholt, Republican, Alabama, NOT VOTING

1.) ****Bowman Democratic New York NAY (Oh really??  😡 )

Brady Republican Texas NOT VOTING

Burchett Republican Tennessee NOT VOTING

2.) ****Bush Democratic Missouri NAY (Another D  🖕 )

Davis, Danny K. Democratic Illinois NOT VOTING

Fulcher Republican Idaho NOT VOTING

Hollingsworth Republican Indiana NOT VOTING

Mrvan Democratic Indiana NOT VOTING

3.) ****Ocasio-Cortez Democratic New York NAY (Really Madam Tiddies?!?!?  😠 )

4.) ****Omar Democratic Minnesota NAY (Oh THIS one was a shocker..NOT ….we should air drop her ass back in Somalia.  💩  👹  💀 )

Pingree Democratic Maine NOT VOTING

5.) ****Pressley Democratic Massachusetts NAY (Masshole  💩 )

Salazar Republican Florida NOT VOTING

Hate_me

Correct me if I’m wrong (I try to extend the benefit of the doubt), not voting simply means they weren’t in attendance at the time and doesn’t necessarily imply any support/rejection of a bill, yes?

I mean, if nature calls and that Gettysburger was particularly unkind, one simply might not be in the room, right?

Whether a bill should be voted on without full congressional attendance, or whether representatives should be allowed to miss votes is an entirely different question.

5JC

While I appreciate the sentiment and they may catch a handful; scamming people is now an overseas game from the country of India. Literally hundreds of thousands of Indians in large office buildings in India who call M-Sa from 0600-2000 trying to hook people (especially older people) and take every last penny they have.

They have moved way past fake new car warranties and fake insurance. If they want to do something to help veterans, help ALL elderly people then they need to shut that down.

KoB

Word! Enforce the laws already on the books…with swift and sure meaningful punishment. I’d suggest a return to public flogging.

Virtue signaling and photo op moments. “Look what we’re doing to help our veterans.”

USAF E-5

Stunned to find out there were minimum levels for the current law. 5$k for going to bribes of gov’t officials and 10k$ for everyone else. 18 U.S. Code § 666 – Theft or bribery concerning programs receiving Federal funds.Also, the new “law” adds the term’s veteran’s and veterans beneficiaries to chapter 63 of the wire fraud act. Which actually covers it already… since they’re federal funds. Fricking lawyers. Oddly enough, several states already have laws on the books about it, but you wouldn’t be happy to find out they’re mostly Democrat run. I’d guess it’s because waay back in the day, they used to care. Because those laws are real old.

poetrooper

“Because those laws are real old.”

Probably because they were enacted when those states were run by Republicans…

David

Looks nice…hopefully would not wind up as just one more plea-bargain charge.

Re: India – her’s where the big phone/ internet providers need to be involved. They know damn well where and from whom these kazillioons of calls are coming, but they get paid to complete the calls. Make THEM cooperate.

5JC

The phone company only cares about two things. Money and Government regulation. They tend to spend 5-10X as much on lobbying as they do on direct donations to keep the money flowing unimpeded. Truthfully they don’t give a shit who gets hurt or scammed and they pay the pols to look the other way,

timactual

Do prosecutors really need “more tools” (There is an old saying that a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich.)?

State and local prosecutors do not enforce federal laws. Passing a new federal law just means that US attorneys will need more resources and personnel to prosecute what is already criminal conduct under state laws. What’s the point?

poetrooper

And Tim’s common sense wins the cigar… 👍 

timactual

Thank you. And I would like to thank all the little people who made this award possible. But this isn’t just about me, it’s……………

Green Thumb

The artcile fails to mention that many Veteran’s commit fraud while faking the funk.

5JC

and non-veterans scam the VA too.

MarineDad61

Green Thumb,
Is there a connection, a trend,
between VA approval of the 100% gravy train,
and miraculous recovery and improvement shortly afterwards?

A noticeable beneficiary of VA benevolence…
… is the Harley-Davidson company.

Green Thumb

The False Commander “Phony” Phil Monkress (CEO of All-Points Logistics) is probably sweating balls (as he plays with balls) on this issue.

Carlton

I’m no lawer, and I appreciate the sentiment of the bill, but wouldn’t it violate the “equal protection under the law” clause of the Constitution? I hope it wouldn’t, and that this bill can pass, but I have to ask.

Hate_me

I agree that defrauding anyone should be considered heinous. Veteran status shouldn’t grant us any rights beyond those of every other citizen.