Libs of TikTok’s Twitter account locked again
Libs of TikTok received notification that their account was locked due to violating Twitter Rules. They did not specify which of the posts violated the rules. Libs of TikTok previously got locked in June based on a post that Twitter felt threatened those who take children to drag shows.
From Fox News:
“Hi Libs of TikTok, your account, @libsoftiktok has been locked for violating the Twitter rules,” reads an email reportedly sent to the account’s owner. The email goes on to allege that the user had violated rules against “hateful conduct.”
“You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease,” the statement reads. “Please note that repeated violations may lead to a permanent suspension of your account. Proceed to Twitter now to fix the issue with your account.”
It is unclear which of the account’s posts Twitter found to be offensive. The social media platform often requires users to delete offending tweets before regaining access to their account, but Libs of TikTok does not appear to have done so.
While the account focuses on a variety of topics, Libs of TikTok features transgender activists most prominently, particularly if they are teachers.
Fox News has more details.
Category: Liberals suck, Society
I was so ANGRRRRRRYYYY with them that I complained to Twitter! There is so much HATE SPEECH and ORANGE MAN BAD propaganda online that it triggers me to “massage my empiric data”.
So, which 3-letter government agency asked Twitter to silence her?
Or, are they so obedient they know what to do without being told.
Twitter is many 3-letter agency’s, 5 and a Half Eyes smiles too as the rise of SkyNet comes into focus.
Soon, The Libs of the FBI.
“Libs of TikTok previously got locked in June based on a post that Twitter felt threatened those who take children to drag shows.”
Let that sink in. Never has a Twitter account, never will.
Twitter and most — if not all social media is pro groomer/child rapist.
Whatever it takes to push the agenda along.
What needs to be banned is sick/perverted mofos that are grooming children to be molested. Banning these mofos from stealing oxygen would be a good start.
I concur. If I had a Daughter and some adult male “self-identifying” as a Woman followed her into the Ladie’s Room, I would suddenly self-identify as a Viking Berserker and have no mercy on him.
And yet LibsOf TicToc only copies and holds up for well deserved ridicule posts that have already been posted by others.
If the LibsOf posts are so “hateful”, then why isn’t DickDock banning the original posts?
There you go, Pres, trying to apply logic to dealings with liberals.
Is Musk gonna buy and tear down that fascist platform or what?
There seems a problem with how many real users there really are. I can’t wrap my mind around how many billions they think it is worth.
Oh and fux the thought police!
Yeah, all the kids are on Snapchat and TikTok, so…
Undoubtedly, some trannies or some other of the 57 flavors of the alphabet people felt “unsafe” after reading one the subject posts.
Ah, so the truth comes out. The hateful conduct was merely reporting that Children’s Hospital performs “gender affirming” surgery on 0 through 21 year-old children such as hysterectomies. This is advertised on their website but LOTT also conducted an interview with a worker that confirmed this to be true.
Not sure how reporting things that are facts and then verifying the facts with the Hospital is “hateful conduct” but the lunatics long ago took over that particular asylum.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/wapo-blames-libs-tiktok-exposing-hospital-providing-erroneous-information-child-hysterectomies
The hospital has since said; nope we totally didn’t mean that and the employee must have been lying because that would be disgusting. Just kidding… they simply lied about everything.
Since Libs of Tik Tok simply recycles libtard screeds, I wonder if Twatter suspended the account(s) of the original poster(s) who “promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.”
Yeah…..I didn’t think so.
But there were threats of violence due to the LOTT exposure of their policies.
I told Ed I was surprised, i commented on an article about renaming monkeypox to something less potentially offensive, and they allowed ‘faqqotpox’.
Just got notified that a separate comment which had the term ‘jerk’ was rejected.
Buttmonkeypox?