OWS pimping out the talent
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ebaf/7ebaffa4aa8515f1bfac9f602c74b1dbbaf0954a" alt="JUSTINA JENSEN"
The above pictured New Hampshire woman was arrested for pimping out 16-year-old talent she found at the local Occupy Wall Street protest according to a link sent by one of my ninjas. It’s fairly obvious tp me why she wasn’t selling her own goods on the street.
Police said the teen’s mother called them Thursday about noon to say her daughter was missing and that her photograph had been posted on a website advertising adult party entertainment.
Court documents show the mother told police she and a friend had used the website to negotiate a deal for the friend to pay for sex with the teen.
So, I guess the longer this ignorant shit continues, the more often we’re going to hear about the 99% taking advantage of each other. When your whole reason to protest is about lawlessness, don’t be surprised when you attract the criminals.
Category: I hate hippies, Occupy
I see from the photo that she’s taking her arrest quite well.
Is that Gilbert Godfried? Wondered what happened to him after he lost the duck gig…
You guys are just being mean to those poor peaceful protestors.
Yeah, I couldn’t keep a straight face saying it either.
In her defense, nobody looks very good in a booking photo, particularly when they’re crying their eyes out.
Why does TAH choose to cover the occupy movement exclusively from the perspective statistically inevitable douchebags associated with any group of people?
I am sure that you have heard the phrase “Guilt by association”?
Why? Because we’re told, from sunup to sundown, that this is the “face” of America, the “real people”.
As for covering “statistically inevitable douchebags”, maybe if those who think they have a valid argument would distance themselves from “statistically inevitable douchebags”, the opportunities wouldn’t be there.
Regardless of whether anyone thinks that the OWS movement is the “face” of America, why do you think that a handful of criminals that the blogosphere has managed to dredge up represent the “face” of OWS?
“Regardless of whether anyone thinks that the OWS movement is the “face” of America, why do you think that a handful of criminals that the blogosphere has managed to dredge up represent the “face” of OWS?”
Y’know, son, your side of the aisle would have LOVED to have had 1/1000th of this stuff happen at a Tea Party event. They wanted to happen so much that they made up stories about racial epithets being thrown at Congressmen.
Our side doesn’t have to dig; it seems that with the Flea Party, criminality is a feature, not a bug.
You made it, you own it. Tough shit if it doesn’t look good.
pointOhtree; Maybe TAH chooses to report that which no one ese is covering. Millions of people don’t read TAH every day…you can always join them.
The use of “son”, “scooter” and other diminutives around here might as well be replaced with “I’m about to miss your point, but I may as well be condescending about it.”
Jonn, so what is the point of covering this “angle”? It seems to me like you’re just filling a void. You want to say something disparaging, but you just don’t have any material… so you point out that a handful of people out of the thousands there are criminals, and mock a kid who got shot in the head with a CS canister.
You know, ‘high brow’ stuff.
“mock a kid who got shot in the head with a CS canister.” Again, prove it. There is NO evidence that Olsen got hit with a “CS canister”. Again, CS canisters are thrown. There’s nothing in the video to prove that he got hit with a thrown canister, or fired CS round. You are one of the dense ones.
“You’re just filling a void”. Well, duh, Where in the LSM has anyone even tried to find out what happened? Other than to take the word of the occuturds.
When you have your own blog, you can join the millions of others who cut and paste from Yahoo News and call themselves “bloggers”, you know “high brow” stuff. While you’re doing that, I’ll be filling a void, which, apparently thousands of people find to be a valuable part of their day.
UpNorth, you seriously think someone hurled something at Scott Olsen with enough force to fracture his skull and cause swelling in the center of his brain, at just the time when the police happened to be firing CS canisters (and yes, you can launch them just like smoke. Were you ever even in the military?) into the crowd?
Is that your serious contention? If it is, I’m sure that guy from Moneyball will be ready to pony up a few million dollars for someone to find the arm that threw it.
Are you aware that the Oakland Chief of Police has visited Olsen in the hospital? Are you aware that the mayor of Oakland has issued an official apology for the incident?
No, of course not. Because you live in ThisAintHell Land
Also, UpNorth, what are your thoughts about the cop who threw the flashbang into the crowd that went to help Scott Olsen? What was the justification for that move, in your mind?
Only the attornies for Oakland and Olsen care who visited him in the hospital.
And yes: we used to call them wrist-rockets – very capable of damaging a human skull. An ordinary ball-peen hammer thrown by a kindergaartner can do damage too.
Or do you believe steel doesn’t melt?
“Also, UpNorth, what are your thoughts about the cop who threw the flashbang into the crowd that went to help Scott Olsen? What was the justification for that move, in your mind?”
The crowd was ordered to disperse long before; they clustered right in front of the cops; they got a flash-bang. No problemo.
Question: how do you know they were there to help as opposed to there to help themselves to the contents of his pockets? Just because they claimed they were there to help doesn’t mean they actually were.
So, your counter-argument is that this guy wasn’t hit in the head by one of the CS canisters that were fired into his general vicinity at the exact moment he was injured. No, you’re claiming that a protester decided to fire a “wrist rocket” or a ball-peen hammer.
The evidence that the damage was caused by the CS barrage might be circumstantial, but you have absolutely no evidence that it would have been some other device.
And the fact that you are unaware that the CoP visited him in the hospital sort of reinforces to me that the frequenters of this blog have completely insulated themselves from the outside world if it doesn’t come through the so-called “milblog” filter.
You should really stop calling yourselves “milbloggers”. Your material has fuck-all to do with the military, you spend more time reporting on wing-nut neofascist perspectives than actually spending time on foreign policy and military issues.
@17, yes, I’m sure the police were concerned that a bunch of kids were robbing the guy they just shot in the face. Certainly. THAT must’ve been it.
“The use of “son”, “scooter” and other diminutives around here might as well be replaced with “I’m about to miss your point, but I may as well be condescending about it.””
No, it means that you are an immature punk who has no business lecturing his betters.
“The evidence that the damage was caused by the CS barrage might be circumstantial, but you have absolutely no evidence that it would have been some other device.”
You have no evidence that it was caused by a CS device, either. That cuts both ways at the moment.
you all act as if there is something wrong pimping out a minor. She’s using her 1st Amendment rights, to offer sexual services for someone else. DUH!
“UpNorth, you seriously think someone hurled something at Scott Olsen with enough force to fracture his skull….” If he doesn’t I do. If a thrown baseball can kill a baseball player, a thrown metal canister certainly can. It has happened at the major league level and many times at lessser levels.
Stop trying to play gotcha. You keep losing. But I guess that’s the nature of losers.
No, that’s what “circumstantial evidence” is. At the exact moment that the police fired tear gas into the crowd, a kid standing immediately in front of the police suddenly suffers blunt force trauma consistent with a teargas canister shot to the face.
That’s called “circumstantial evidence”, and in this case it’s pretty strong. Especially considering that at least two officials including the Chief of Police and the Mayor have both apologized for it.
“I am sorry this happened” is not the same as “I am sorry that one of our police officers did this without excuse, justification or mitigation.” Loser.
Cool: pointOhtree claims to have FACTS !!!
OH NOESZ !!1! NOW IMMA GETTA WHUPPIN’ FROM FACTZ!
Go ahead pointOhtree: this’ll be a first. And do get the English language correct when reading what I have written. It will help you with those facts.
Heh
And the people throwing bottles and rocks at the cops couldn’t have possibly hit one of their own who was standing “directly in front of the cops”. What about that bit of circumstance?
No, mommy! That weally, weally is what circumcision ebidence is. Weally!
PointOh3: When you find someone intelligent at this stupid, pointless, cockamamy exercise known as “Occupy Wall Street”, someone who isn’t mentally challenged, criminal or reciting socialist tripe, let us know.
Thanks, sport.
PointOh3: If OWS is so outraged about Scott Olsen allegedly being injured at the hands of police, where is the OWS outrage about a Border Patrol agent that was killed by a gun sold to criminals by the Obama Administration?
Any outrage about the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry?
Selective outrage about Scott Olsen, but nothing for Brian Terry?
PointOh3? Anything? Outrage?
AP: Lower your standards, will ya?
My bad. It’s all that clean living catching up to me.
That rational stuff isn’t good for your BP.
Yes, Teddy, I’m sure someone managed to throw the most amazing curveball ever at the riot police, and it managed to come backward and smash Olsen in the face.
Adirondack Patriot, if you’re so outraged about a Border Patrol Agent that was killed by a gun sold to criminals by “the Obama Administration” (gotta make sure to refer to functionaries as though they’re in the cabinet), where is your outrage about Scott Olsen being injured at the hands of police?
And if you want to find reasonable people on the ground there, try ANY OF THE COVERAGE outside of this ridiculous milblog circle of bullshit.
Because the border patrol who was killed wads doing his job and not trying to be a martyr. The guy at Oakland was doing everything to become one.
But that is just it, there are no reasonable people in the protest. Everyone is actively trying to find excuses or out right lie for Olson’s past and current behavior. The icon must be protected at all cost I guess.
“Adirondack Patriot, if you’re so outraged about a Border Patrol Agent that was killed by a gun sold to criminals by “the Obama Administration” (gotta make sure to refer to functionaries as though they’re in the cabinet)”
Attorney General Eric Holder IS in the Cabinet, fucktard.
And “Gunwalker” was a program that originated within the ATF. Eric Holder had about as much to do with it as Bob Gates has to do with FOB operations, “fucktard”.
Goddamn, is ANYONE on this site even remotely familiar with civics?
PointOh3: Idiots usually answer questions with another question. Thank you for your question.
By the way, does OWS plan a vigil for Brian Terry?
His death was real an indisputable. I guess you when you’re OWS, you can pick and choose your standards. It’s good to remain flexible like that.
Oh, and by the way, I have no sympathy for Olsen. He chose to affiliate with IVAW and OWS, and that affiliation resulted in his hospitalization. Brian Terry served his country when he lost his life. I’m not sure why Olsen was where he was when he was injured.
So your new criteria for OWS is that unless they incorporate the death of an ATF officer killed in a wholly unrelated incident into their protest about economic issues, they are illegitimate.
Is that about right?
LOL, man, John, you’ve cultured yourself a steaming jar of geniuses here. Man oh man…. how did you ever win an award for this site.
Good ol’ point–always missing it.
“And “Gunwalker” was a program that originated within the ATF. Eric Holder had about as much to do with it as Bob Gates has to do with FOB operations, “fucktard”.”
He was briefed on it throughout its lifespan. He kept it alive when common sense would indicate that it was not even remotely having its desired effects and was directly responsible for the deaths of Mexican citizens. He has stonewalled Congress repeatedly when they attempted to exercise oversight.
“Goddamn, is ANYONE on this site even remotely familiar with civics?”
Far more than you, obviously, unless you are seriously claiming that when government is big enough, Cabinet officers no longer bear responsibility for the official acts of the departments they’re responsible for overseeing.
PointOh3: Just sitting here laughing our asses off at you. You are the true definition of a troll. You incite, but never answer.
You are the voice of the failed OWS movement.
An idiot savant, sans savant.
So the defense of this pimp has something to do with a CS canister on the opposite coast???
It is that bit of sheer lunacy that proves why most of us consider libtards to be less desireable than pond scum on the cuddly meter. Now, on the point-and-laugh scale, this one ranks right up there as an inviting target.
Way to go, libtard! Thanks for the laugh.
Why is it that the other side always think they have the market cornered on big foreheads? Their Hatred spewing vitriol, they throw out as much big words that us poor knuckle draggers know not where of they speak.
Further more why is it that we seem to have the market cornered on both rationality and common sense?
.03: you may think you rhetorical irony is something that will somehow have an effect, but is is actually laughable in the extreme.
“At just the time when the police happened to be firing CS canisters (and yes, you can launch them just like smoke. Were you ever even in the military?) into the crowd?” Yeah, I was, matter of fact, here’s a 3fer for you, .03. I was in the military, I was a cop and I was also one who used the CS launcher.
Yet again, go watch the video, there is absolutely nothing there to show that he was hit by a projectile, not a canister. And, “Are you aware that the Oakland Chief of Police has visited Olsen in the hospital? Are you aware that the mayor of Oakland has issued an official apology for the incident?” So what? She’s a dem, who was willing to let the occuturds stay there indefinitely until actual taxpayers bitched about the stink and lawlessness. The acting Chief visited him? BFD, means nothing, except to the occuturds.
Oooh, oooh, call on me, .03. ““Also, UpNorth, what are your thoughts about the cop who threw the flashbang into the crowd that went to help Scott Olsen?”. I’m assuming he was within department guidelines, as to the distance “peaceful protesters” were allowed to approach police lines. After all, I can do that, I’ve been there, and done it. You’ve assumed that Olsen was struck in the bean by the cops, even though you have absolutely no proof of that, at all. Matter of fact, you’ve gone out on the factual limb that, because the cops were there, and CS was being fired, he must have been hit by a cop, even though the rocks, bottles and assorted debris outnumbered whatever the cops put in the air.
With the “discipline” shown by the occutards, I do believe that Olsen has a bigger bitch with his homies than he does the cops.
It’s not the left doesn’t lie to support their fantasies. Just ask Scott Thomas Beauchamp.
I’ve reviewed the Raleigh Latham tape and there is absolutley no evidence that Olsen was hit with anything. Nothing.
PointOh3 is to OWS like that 16-year-old is to Justina Jensen.