The two faces of Matthew Alexander

| November 16, 2009

Matthew Alexander published his book last year entitled “How to Break a Terrorist: The U.S. Interrogators Who Used Brains, Not Brutality, to Take Down the Deadliest Man in Iraq”. The book has it’s roots in a Mark Bowden article in the Atlantic. Alexander parlayed the Atlantic article into a book deal. After he wrote it, with some help from a renowned co-author, he went on a book tour making the rounds of all of the farthest Left news programs that would have him. Alexander didn’t use his real name to author the book or do his book tour. According to Alexander, his name was sealed in a court order for his protection. Of course, a puny DC District court order doesn’t affect the crack research staff of This Ain’t Hell. Here’s his DD214;

alexander-dd214-redacted-1

Something I began to notice when I got his DD214 and after reading his book (about 4 times) is that this Matthew Alexander is quite different from the Matthew Alexander I saw in his interviews. This is a very studly record for an Air Force Officer, and the book is an excellent story about an aspect of the war in Iraq that’s not often discussed. I highly recommend the book…from your local library. Unfortunately, any money you pay for the book will go into the pocket of the Matthew Alexander who was on the book tour. That Matthew Alexander is a liar and has an agenda.

He began his book tour circuit with Keith Olbermann;

There are a couple of funny things about this clip. At about 2:40 into the video, Olbermann slips up and calls Alexander by his real name – that’s how our research staff uncovered his real name. After Olbermann’s slip, it was just a process of elimination.

Obviously, Olbermann didn’t read the book, or if he did, he didn’t mind that Alexander lied about what he wrote in the book. In the interview, Alexander said he’d convinced the terrorist to give up Zarqawi in six hours. In the book, he wrote that it took weeks.

In the interview, Alexander says that he used interrogation techniques in Iraq that the military isn’t using, however, throughout the book, he credits his instructors at the “Schoolhouse” (his word) for teaching him these new techniques. But in one brief paragraph he says he talked religion with a terrorist which would have made his instructors at the “Schoolhouse”, to use his phrase, “shit bricks” – so I have to assume that the whole book is about that one little conversation since that’s the only time he deviated from his training by his own admission.

Now, Matthew Alexander tells us to take his book and his story at face value – that we shouldn’t question his methods because he was the man on the ground. But here he interviews again with with Keith Olbermann in April, and based strictly on the general, non-specific information that Olbermann provides, Alexander spends five minutes second-guessing interrogation methods used in operations for which he wasn’t present and he labels them “failures”;

In the first interview, he tells us that he’s looking to the future and not interested in placing blame anywhere – yet here he is, dwelling in the past and placing blame on other interrogators.

In the following video, Alexander tries to make the point that treatment of Guantanamo prisoners influenced foreign fighters to join al Qaeda. That’s just foolish on it’s face. No matter where the prison is located, no matter how our prisoners from this war are treated – if they were held in a Las Vegas hotel THAT would become the excuse for them to join al Qaeda. We’re not talking about a bunch of people who are firmly rooted in reality.

In fact, this MoveOn.org/Soros organization AVAAZ is using Alexander’s words in this series of posters which plaster the walls on the Washington DC Metro subway system;

White House Protest 10-5-2009 (102)

In Alexander’s profile at VetVoice, he notes that he’s a Fellow at the Open Society Institute which is one of the George Soros Foundations.

In this video interview, Alexander tells Jon Stewart that he hides his name, not because he’s scared of terrorists finding out who he is, but rather because he’s afraid of the military.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Matthew Alexander
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Healthcare Protests

Now why would he be afraid of the military, unless he’s not telling the truth? Also in the interview Alexander says that he gives examples of his fellow interrogators using torture. That’s not true – the only thing he mentions in the book is one incident in which a colleague pounds the table with his fists and another story about something he heard another interrogator had done before Alexander got to the unit. Lucky for Alexander no one read his book.

A few months ago, Alexander changed his story about why he used a pseudonym to write the book. He told an interviewer from the Spy Museum that it was protect his family from al Qaeda. So I guess he was just afraid of the military while the Bush Administration was running it. More accurately, he’s probably afraid that his fellow interrogators will find out his real name.

I made the mistake of watching the interviews before I read the book. When I was about halfway through the book, I wondered if I had the right book because it read nothing like what I heard in the interviews Alexander had done on TV. In the interviews he did, Alexander constantly made the point that he was using techniques that no one else had ever employed in this war, but throughout the book, he compares the techniques he learned from the “Schoolhouse” to those being used by some in his prison. In other words, the military was teaching the methods he used, but a few interrogators weren’t using them. That doesn’t make the military wrong nor does it verify that we had “policy of torture” during the Bush years, it just makes some interrogators untrainable.

In one part of the book, Alexander recounts a story of how he diagnosed a child in South America, while on a “medical operation”, with a flesh-eating disease. Although I found in his records where he’d once been deployed on a medical operation to Bolivia, he was assigned as an administrator not in a medical capacity, so I think that he claims that he was diagnosing patients was a bit of embellishment.

I mention that story because, the main story in his book might be the same sort of embellishment. Alexander claims that he met with the terrorist who gave up Zarqawi in unreported visits to the terrorist’s cell. I say unreported because no one (including Federal investigators) can find evidence that Matthews did indeed meet with the guy. He was awarded a Bronze Star Medal for merit for his service during that time and it doesn’t mention this successful operation specifically. It seems to me that, as important as the results were, if Alexander had something to do with the operation, it would have been detailed instead of being lumped in with “numerous combat operations of national significance”.

alexander-bsm-redacted

Lately, Alexander has allied himself with the ACLU joining The Torture Project to bore through Bush Era documents relating to torture. I suspect that he’s doing it because he needs money (his book did poorly among the Liberals – if you meet a Liberal who said he read the book, he’s probably lying). However, he says it’s because of the Bush Administration’s legacy of torture and abuse. In the Huffington Post, he wrote;

First, VP Cheney said, “This recruitment-tool theory has become something of a mantra lately… it excuses the violent and blames America for the evil that others do.” He further stated, “It is much closer to the truth that terrorists hate this country precisely because of the values we profess and seek to live by, not by some alleged failure to do so.” That is simply untrue. Anyone who served in Iraq, and veterans on both sides of the aisle have made this argument, knows that the foreign fighters did not come to Iraq en masse until after the revelations of torture and abuse at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. I heard this from captured foreign fighters day in and day out when I was supervising interrogations in Iraq.

He heard it from captured foreign fighters who he admits in the book lied to him on a minute-by-minute basis – but they’re telling the truth about this particular subject. He echoed the same sentiment in another Huffington Post article;

If the Obama administration decides to release these memos, then I suggest they also release statistics from Iraq showing the number of foreign fighters that were recruited because of our policy of torture and abuse. It was tracked. I know because I saw the slides and because I heard captured foreign fighters state this day in and day out. The government can also release the statistics that show that 90% of suicide bombers in Iraq were these same foreign fighters.

Abu Ghraib was an anomaly for which several criminals were punished – in fact they were in the process of being punished well before the media got a whiff of the trouble there. So obviously, there wasn’t a “policy of torture”.

Alexander’s problem isn’t with our policy, it’s with his pocketbook. His book was a failure – he only made back a few hundred dollars of his advance from the publisher. It’s not because of the content of the book, but because he made it part of the Liberal electioneering last year and the Left liked his interviews more than the book. The book did little to support their anti-Bush tirade in the last election – but his interviews were jam-packed with BDS. So the book wasn’t a literary failure, it was a public relations failure.

And, oh, all of this expertise that Alexander brings to the discussion is based on three months of practical application. Yes, that is all of the time he spent actually interrogating actual terrorists. He says he supervised over a thousand interrogations – only because he was a team leader of several interrogators. He didn’t directly supervise those interrogations – if you read the book, you’ll notice that he’s hardly aware of what other team members are doing.

I haven’t told you Alexander’s real name because I’m not sure if he’s still in the military. Obviously, he has a talent for interrogating our enemies and I don’t want to be the reason he stops doing that if he’s still in the military. I found a promotion announcement on the internet that reports that he’s on the LTC list and scheduled for promotion next June, yet somehow we got his military records so I have to sort that out. Just by knowing his real name, I was able to find his immediate family in about five minutes, so I’m not going to be the guy that puts his family in danger if any exists.

I will, however, provide his real name and his complete unredacted records to anyone who emails me through my AKO account (where I can verify your identity). If you don’t know what an AKO account is, you don’t have one.

Category: Liberals suck, Media, Military issues, Terror War

31 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TSO

Dude should have stuck to the book truth, he would have had a little more oomph than he does just pandering to the MSNBC intelligencia.

Agent 99

This guy couln’t break an Egg for an Omelet. A lying ‘pu$$y’ With a FORWARD Mark Bowden (who gave us Black Hawk Down) Figures this guy is backed by Soros. How many people get their news from Jon Stewart? Answer way too many.

Agent 99

Some lib idiot at Military DOT Com will post this as truth. If so….I will let you know. The Military does NOT look kindly on anyone that Impersonates a Soldier and/or an Officer. Just looking at the Real Record of the Real person nullifies this puzzy as being the author. OSI indeed. BS. And not just BS but immoral and ILLEGAL! This ‘two-face’ idiot better have some real Military Background. I mean that. Hope the 2-faced pr!ck gets arrested.

Just A Grunt

No doubt he will be called as an “expert” witness during the KSM trial.

Old Tanker

Just a Grunt

Let’s hope he does, then he will have to actually produce real evidence…….

BohicaTwentyTwo

Is this a normal career path for an Air Force officer? I am not calling shennagangs or anything, just claiming ignorance. Maybe the Air Force is filled with interrogators who flew both tankers and special ops helos. I usually scoff at how every officer on Stargate also knows how to fly F-302s, but maybe that’s how it is in the Air Force.

PowerPoint Ranger

I recall the article with the promotion list that you mention, and that is perplexing because I don’t see how he could jump through all the hoops of writing that book (such as having it screened for OPSEC or Classified issues) while still on active duty, much less all of the leave or permissive TDY he would have to get approved for all of those book events, Olbermann appearances etc. On top of all that, any interaction with the media would have to be run through Public Affairs at some point (if he still had any military affiliation). I could be wrong, but I don’t imagine that AFOSI would be too keen on approving a book deal and media tour for an active duty agent with or without an alias.

If he’d only been on MSNBC I could believe that nobody he worked with saw him on TV, but since he was also on the Daily Show I’m sure someone had to have seen that segment and recognized him. It’s just a strange situation all around, and something doesn’t add up to me.

Spade

“In this video interview, Alexander tells Jon Stewart that he hides his name, not because he’s scared of terrorists finding out who he is, but rather because he’s afraid of the military. ”

Yes, because I’m sure the military would have no idea who he was with no way to figure it out.

Karl

He was also interviewed on Laura Ingraham’s show. I recalled he’d been on at least one conservative show, but I had to find this post to remind me which one.

Fred

Wait a minute. Is it your theory that the Matthew Alexander whom wrote the book and the one doing interviews and touring are two completely different people?

Or is it more likely that they are the same guy and this is a guy whom once valued service but turned to the political dark side?

PowerPoint Ranger

Fred,

If you were asking me that question, I don’t think that it’s two different people. I just find the whole sequence of events surrounding this guy to be really odd, thinking back to all of the hoops I would have had to jump through in making any public comment. I wasn’t in a position to make public statements or have anyone care what I thought, and even though Major “Alexander” seems to have some interesting things to say he would be subject to the same rules as me or any military member.

JustSomeVet

I think it would still be a bad idea to deliver his real name, identity, etc. to anyone with an AKO account. Major Hasan at Fort Hood had an AKO account too. Does anyone think that there is no one else in the military like him?

And yeah, I know that AQ could piece this info together too, just like John did. But putting it all in one neatly wrapped package sure does make their job a whole lot easier.

always right

I am sorry, but my understanding is that in the military, if you saw something was not right, you report to your superior right away.

How come this ‘USAF Major Matthew Alexander’ saw illegal interogation techniques use by others (but not himself and his team), yet kept quiet and only rat out after writing a book and on various shows?

Some thing smells fishy to me here. Even for a civilian.
/reposted by me from B5

Mark Ducharme

This “alexander” dink ought to move to Mass. He could be a Senator for life there.

Old Tanker

Couple of quick questions. His DD214 says he was discharged. I only served one enlistment so I just don’t know but is this what happens when you re-enlist? Do you get discharged and then re-enlisted or did he ETS from the Air Force to move to another branch to become an interrogator?

Leatherneck

BohicaTwentyTwo Says:
November 16th, 2009 at 10:24 am

“Is this a normal career path for an Air Force officer? I am not calling shennagangs or anything, just claiming ignorance. Maybe the Air Force is filled with interrogators who flew both tankers and special ops helos. I usually scoff at how every officer on Stargate also knows how to fly F-302s, but maybe that’s how it is in the Air Force.”

Most Air Force flight crew members go through SERE school.

I can see how he would distort the experience of others and create a world of his own based on his training. It would take a monumental and concerted effort (premeditated)to pull something like this off.

Shit happens, maybe it’s happening here.

Nice dissection This Ain’t Hell.

Jake the Snake

Haven’t read the book. Won’t.
Haven’t seen the videos. Won’t (Can’t stand Oberman).
But, Zarqawi was killed on June 8, so in less than 60 days BOG the young Major supposedly contributes so significantly to the intel pkg. against AMZ that he gets a BZ? Hmmmm…
Just sayin’.
Maybe the “Major” should become some sort of medium and start solving milk carton missing persons cases.

Fuzzy

I just don’t understand the obsession libs have to know what our military is doing to protect us. I don’t mean Congress or the president, obviously, but why does Sunshine Goofy Drawers need to know what our secret ops are, who’s doing what to whom and when. So they can publish it on the front page of the NYT (this may not seem that important as no one with a brain reads that rag, but I’m betting terrorists are)? I trust our military far more than I trust this administration, and if you guys (and girls) think that something needs to be done, then do it. I’m not there, I’m not trained as you are, I’m not in the thick of it, so I’ve got no way to judge your actions. I mean, sure we were all upset about Abu Ghraib, but honestly, that was just stupid stuff that obviously didn’t come from the White House or even from a company commander (or whatever).

What they say about ACORN, for instance, has an element of truth, low level employees might have been acting out of line with the company policy. It happens. But in that case, while they *rush* to defend that corrupt organization and explain that rogue employees are not the norm, there is an enormous pile of evidence of all sorts of wrong-doing from voter fraud to numerous offices across the country scrambling to set up houses of prostitution for child sex slavers. How many Abu Ghraib incidents are there?

setnaffa

I met all types while in the USAF. Some were fine, upstanding folks; others were mad as a hatter. This goon appears to have been one who probably drank himself into believing he was a hero… Or maybe just went nuts afterwards… Kerry, Murtha, and Rangel have medals so a Bronze Star does not mean little red riding hood loves America any more…

BTW, are the “juicy bars” outside Kunsan (where the Major was discharged) still staffed with Russian “hostesses”?

Ellie

Aside from all of the fishiness in this story, I find something about this guy just plain ol CREEPY. He gave me the heebee jeebes. How much is he getting paid by Soros?

Cass

Just curious, but is it common practice for a Gen like McChrystal to sign off on a Bronze Star and then have the awardee go after him for his stance on torture?

http://washingtonindependent.com/45193/former-interrogator-presses-for-mcchrystals-stance-on-abuse

Also on Sean Hannity’s blog, a guy has him as part of TF 145
http://forums.hannity.com/showpost.php?s=fca41729ac51ebf63c5ff73507c77910&p=53798121&postcount=2

but McChrystal helmed TF 6-26, and Alexander reported problems at Camp Nama. Same TF, different number? I know they played around with numbers a bit. But the dates match.

This guy sounds like a fake to me, DD214 notwithstanding. Something isn’t adding up.

A Heros Friend

Jonn…for some asswipe who is trying to be all “secret” and stuff,he sure has his face out there in public.Must not want to hide out that badly…but of course that would interfere with his 15 minutes of fame!

WOTN Editor

If anyone, including AQ wants to know what the US Military does, let them stop by our site. The bad guys and anti-military types will be disappointed and disheartened to know that Our Troops are saving the kids AQ blows up.

As to who Alexander is, long ago every Troop that ever worked with him recognized his face on TV. Those that didn’t catch it on the first go round, got emails from those that did. That’s just what happens when some super-spook happens to go on TV. I didn’t even get an email and I know his boss did, if not a phone call when he showed up on TV, if not when the book hit the shelves, or perhaps when it became known that it was at the publishers.

As I recall, he’s a reservist, so yes he got a 214 when he was released from AD.

As to him taking terrorists out for ice cream? I just can’t imagine a SO Pilot interacting with detainees. Claiming the glory after a lower enlisted broke the guy? sure, but not actually walking into a cell with the bad guy who had already been released once and caught again.

Of course, I’m not trained in the arts of interrogation, but the zoomies I’ve met would have been upset they didn’t have rooms at the Hilton, and they were enlisted, not even NCO’s.

Colleen Uchiyama

Hi. I’m hoping you can help me. My husband is an O4 in the USAF. He is currently serving as a Deputy Provost Marshal. He is also a naturalized US citizen, originally from Japan. He wrote an autobiography (in Japanese), and he went through the appropriate channels here, which is the public Affairs Office. His former CO and the PAOffice gave him the green light, and he had his book published. But since then, he has been having trouble (to put it mildly) with his (now fromer) command, which culminated in some shady orders and an investigation by the general on base. I have been looking in vain for any and all AF/DoD regs that can help him. His editor wants to remit him a very modest fee for the book(3K), and he is afraid to publish any more editions. Can you help me and direct me to the proper avenues? I would really appreciate it.
Thanks so much.
Sincerely,
Colleen Uchiyama

trackback

[…] of the building of the Cordoba House is the greenlight they need to weigh-in on the issue. First Tony Camerino, VoteVets member who blogs at VetsVoice writes in the Huffington Post; Imagine an al Qaeda […]

RollTide

Ignorantly written and wildly inaccurate “analysis” written by someone who clearly has very little knowledge about the military.
I’ve met “Matthew” and I can guarantee you that he’s legit. I’m sorry for you that you are not intelligent enough or cultured enough to see beyond your own blinders.
Half of what YOU said in this blog was wrong. Good luck bashing American heroes for your own political gain.

Scott

I’m guessing somebody was listening to NPR today and doing some googling:

http://www.npr.org/2011/02/14/133497869/one-man-says-no-to-harsh-interrogation-techniques?sc=fb&cc=fp

trackback

[…] enterprises as VoteVets, MoveOn.org, and employs arrogant interrogator and smelly shitbag Matthew Alexander/Tony Camerino for anti-American […]

CT

He should be sitting right next to Bradley Manning for all the OPSEC he gave away in that book.

The man is nothing more than an agenda driven liar.