Is Matthis Chiroux really just a trained bird?
Everytime this mental midget grabs a microphone I half expect him to ask the crowd if Polly wants a cracker. But I will give this to him, he’s a friggin gold mine for bloggers looking for something to bloviate about.
In his latest bit of media whoring he gave an interview with Digital Journal, who are also apparently retarded because Matthis and the interviewer talk about his up coming “court-marshall.” Um. Are you kidding me? It’s “Court Martial” jackasses.
Anyway, Matthis is being defended by some poor bastard JAG named Thomas M. Roughneen and will also have “Marjerie Conn, president of the National Lawyers Guild on hand to offer constitutional testimony.” They might want to start by telling Matthis to stop citing to Article 6, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution when he clearly has NO EFFEN CLUE what he is talking about.
SD: Are there legal precedents for your actions?
Chiroux: Sure. The Nuremberg Trials come to mind. However, many have decided International Law should not apply, despite Art. 6 Para. 2 of the Constitution. I don’t think anyone’s outright won a war resistance case in the U.S., but there’s a first time for everything.
OK dipshit, let’s go through this one more time. And I will use small words, that you might understand it. The paragraph in question reads:
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
Presumably you are trying to draw attention to the treaties portion thereof. Fine. The Nuremberg Trials were not a treaty. Further, the only thing (long lasting) to come out of the Nuremberg Trials was the International Criminal Court and the United States has never ratified anything with regard to it.
I for one CAN NOT FRIGGIN WAIT to hear what Constitutional basis you have for refusing to honor your contractual obligation. Unfortunately, we likely won’t get to find out since no one gives two shits what your activist Constitutional “expert” has to say.
Matthis closes by assuring us:
That war resisters are not criminals. We are not cowards. We are the best, brightest, most dedicated and conscientious folks America has to offer. It’s time for the conscience of our nation to stir. We are so intelligent, yet we are serving ignorance, and there are few more pathetic sights to behold. Rise up my people rise up!
Your people? Um. Ok.
Category: Politics
National lawyers Guild is the legal arm that the Communist Party USA established in the late 1930s.
‘nuf said. Matthis = commie stooge.
We need to enter Matthis in that “Men Who Look Like Old Lesbians” contest.
They are the best, brightest, most dedicated and conscientious folks America has to offer? Two questions; if you were a woman being physically assaulted, and you saw one of these bright, dedicated and conscientious Americans walking your way, would you 1) ask the would be assailant to hold on a second while you went ahead and put the Rape Crisis Line on speed dial, or 2) try to make the case that you’ll actually attempt to resist the attack, as opposed to the very compliant and androgynous male walking near-by.
“That war resisters are not criminals. We are not cowards.”
Methinks that ol’ pothead’s statement below confirms his chicken-chit coward status, esp. if he terminated out of the Eighty-Deuce:
”I also trained for the 82nd Airborne in North Carolina, but I chose not continue that training, because the 82nd Airborne has a reputation for mindless brutality, both to their own and to the “enemy.”
Chicken-roux, the more we learn about you & the more you run your mouth, looks like your “Chickens are comin’ home to roossttt” pretty soon. Can’t wait for the women he’s been swindling to start piping in about him, nothing like the wrath of a woman scorned. Plus, your average woman has more balls than Chicken-roux does.
This is rich:
Chiroux: “I was in Strasbourg for the anti-NATO summit in response to the NATO summit taking place just a few miles away. Before the first day of the planned demonstrations, police attacked young demonstrators with tear gas, grenades, batons and even rocks.
In response, those kids not only didn’t go home, they burnt down half the city including a police station not but half a kilometer away from where Obama was speaking. I’ve never seen that kind of thing in the states before…well not yet anyway. U.S. politicians should prevent this type of uprising in the U.S. by protecting the peoples’ right to demonstrate and shutting down their imperialist agendas now.”
M’kay, let’s try to understand Chicken-roux’s convoluted logic. The destruction of war is BAD-BAD-BAD, but when left winged marxist-anarchists burn down half a city (ie. property of working stiffs), it’s GOOD-GOOD-GOOD.
WTF is this ass-clown smoking?
Not enough blanket parties in the world for this ass clown.
Precisely. I would like to see fairyboy say that shit in Fayettenam and see how long he lasts…
hi Raoul!
– u’ve reached me before via email re “follow the money”. i am totally down with posting a critique/blog post/story. as i mentioned, no editing, interference, etc. – free 2 let u have yr say! i’m being totally sincere and on the level here.
Unreal. A deserter will try to get over with it, and the Obamanazi supporters are helping him. Nice.
What ever happened to UA? He is absent without leave, and over 30 days, that is desertion! If he actually DID show up, and not leave, that is a direct disobedience of a lawful order!
His refusal to deploy is the equivalent of DESERTION! His unit went, he refused to go! HE IS A DESERTER!
To clarify a rather critical point: The Supremacy Clause puts any TREATY Obligation on a par with a Congressionally-passed federal law, nothing more. It does not, and cannot preempt the Constitution itself.
Turning, then, to the Constitution, let us look at Art. I, Section 8 (perhaps prophetically applicable to Matthis), clause 14. “Congress shall have the power to … make rules for the Government and regulation of the land and naval forces.” Hmm, Matthis, I think this applies to you, and your court martial.
DAMN!! I just HAVE to speak on this, even if the Dips**t in question never reads it. My blood is BOILING!
That war resisters are not criminals. We are not cowards. We are the best, brightest, most dedicated and conscientious folks America has to offer. It’s time for the conscience of our nation to stir. We are so intelligent, yet we are serving ignorance, and there are few more pathetic sights to behold. Rise up my people rise up!
YES, you ARE criminals and cowards. You voluntarily joined the Armed Forces, and signed a contract! No one forced you, the draft has been gone for, lo, these many years now. You raised your right hand and took an Oath, and placed yourself under the UCMJ. And in your active war resistance, you broke that Oath. You disobeyed the “orders of the officers appointed over” you. And now you want to bitch and moan about how unfair it all is? You are what Thomas Paine wrote of when he penned about “Sunshine soldiers and summer patriots”, who are eager to join when life is good and the pay is easy, but find any excuse to run at the first sign of conflict. If you are so upset by fighting, why didn’t you apply for Conscientious Objector status to begin with? Or if you’re upset by the Iraq War in particular, quit your contract, THEN do your protesting. Not very intelligent, allowing yourself to get into this legal prediciment, are you?
Desertion, Unauthorized Absence, Sedition, Treason in time of War. I think that will do for a start.
If it were up to me (thank God for you it isn’t), I’d throw you into the deepest cell and allow sunshine on alternate Tuesdays. F***kin’ bastard, you are a waste of skin & air.
And now you’re calling for your fellow knuckle-dragging mouth-breathers to rise up?! Damn Trotskyite! Lenninist! Marxist! Damn!
Unfortunately Matthis background will not hold up under scrutiny and he will be the downfall of IVAW. If the mainstream media catches on and investigates him, crash and burn. 6 days in stan, 0 in iraq, living off of legal defense money, serious juve history. He is scamming the war resistance movement and we don’t even see it. He is using us and when he is done he will throw us away and never look back.
Oh, you’ll see it. People are starting to see it very quickly. All it takes is opening one’s eyes and calling the bluff. One after the other after the other. Come on guys. We’re the only ones who can stop this insanity from spreading. As for Matthis being self-dubbed “bright?” Pfff-fft… Rrr-ii-gg-hhttt… I could tell you stories upon stories disproving that factor. What he IS good at is being a liar. In the words of Abraham Lincoln, “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”
It’s time.