A Few Thoughts From Chairman Mao
Suppressed AK AW1
Someone dropped a vague reference elsewhere about Chairman Mao’s observations about guns. I never read anything he ever said. Never had any reason to, but since everything is now preserved online somewhere, even in some obscure place that hasn’t been hit by the Self-Appointed PC crowds, I took the time to look up a few things he was recorded as saying.
This one was interesting: To read too many books is harmful.
This quote might explain some of the ridiculous things that show up in the various places of the internet: Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.
This next quote is interesting, because he said it twice, in 1927 and again in 1938: Every Communist must grasp the truth: Political power grows out of the barrel of the gun.
The Communist party must control the guns.
Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party.
Taking those quotes into consideration, it explains a lot of nonsensical hysterics generated by the media and the various reasons masking the real reason politicians want to get rid of common ownership of guns.
If you have a bunch of pants-wetting political animals who want control but really have none, they will find some way to get it and use it against you in every way possible, including incendiary language in the media. This is both the advantage and disadvantage of the current form of media communications. They don’t really control it. They just make use of it. Mao controlled the media, as did Stalin and his successors.
Aren’t we seeing this next quote everywhere now? All that PC stuff by the media is taking its directives right out of Chairman Mao’s mouth. No wonder they seem like they haven’t had an original idea since they were hatched. Now we know it’s true. It’s quoted almost daily, one way or another, by our current crop of media mavens. If you include the other race-baiting stuff they like to throw in, as well as their obsession with sex and sexuality, it’s their basic source of info. Also, since they’re all spoiling for a fight, it’s a reason for them to get right into a tantrum and stay there.
Here we go: “Racial discrimination in the United States is a product of the colonialist and imperialist system. The contradiction between the Black masses in the United States and the U.S. ruling circles is a class contradiction. Only by overthrowing the reactionary rule of the U.S. monopoly capitalist class and destroying the colonialist and imperialist system can the Black people in the United States win complete emancipation. The Black masses and the masses of white working people in the United States have common interests and common objectives to struggle for. Therefore, the Afro-American struggle is winning sympathy and support from increasing numbers of white working people and progressives in the United States. The struggle of the Black people in the United States is bound to merge with the American workers’ movement, and this will eventually end the criminal rule of the U.S. monopoly capitalist class.” “A New Storm Against Imperialism” (1968)
So there you have it, big as life, and this stuff is constantly paraphrased by anyone who has a bone to pick or a hair up his backside about something. Mao did say something negative about Liberals, but that general term doesn’t really fit what’s in place as “Liberal” right now. The current crop of Alinskyites and whatever other names they give themselves are all just harking back to Chairman Mao’s speeches and written presentations, big time. They haven’ t had an original idea since they were hatched, and never will.
Just as an observation, Mao viewed the atom bomb as rather useless. It may kill a large number of people in one detonation, but otherwise, he saw it as an ineffective weapon. Considering what we have now, he may have had more foresight than the people who got their undies in a bunch over nuclear this and that. Nuclear power is much more useful as a generator of electricity.
Peace out.
Category: "The Floggings Will Continue Until Morale Improves", China, Gun Grabbing Fascists, Guns
It looks like those ducks in the pic are waiting for their milk and quackers.
Geese, man. Those are Canada geese. Ducks are half to a third that size.
Thanks Ex, I guess I can’t duck out of this one. I’m glad I didn’t say they were waiting for duck in donuts
At least the most obnoxious, boring, self-involved numbskull on the planet has not ducked into share his “wisdom” with us. There are some things to be thankful for.
*SShhhh*, let’s not conjure the goblin!!!!
Fuck that guy.
Maybe he got scared when someone/several people posted comments that he was violating security protocols by insisting that he ‘knows for a fact” things about stuff that is upper level classified.
Haven’t heard from him since, have we? It’s been so – well, pleasant, hasn’t it?
M R Ducks..
MR not…
O S A R 2 Ducks!
“To read too many books is harmful.” Bite me Mao! Prolly read most everything but your little Red Book…and Mein Kaupht…and Larsie boi’s drivel. and anything by the Bitch of Benghazi…and blow job willie…and oblowme/mooshele…well….y’all get the idea.
Damn a bunch of demon cats/socialistic/communistic destroyers of freedom. My guns? Molon Labe!
This line speaks to me; “To read too many books is harmful.”
I think this might be why we have an electorate who thinks they are highly educated, when in fact they have never thought critically about anything.
We have a highly literate population who thinks that their being literate means they’re intelligent. They further believe that anyone who writes a book is above them in intelligence and/or knowledge and that said book is thus authoritative and reliable.
So I think you can reach a point of diminishing returns. Where a person has read so many books they are overly confident of their subject knowledge without ever looking at anything they’ve read with a skeptical mind. People are trained by our education system to just memorize and regurgitate things in books. I think this is why you see so much “red pilling” where people are given the least bit of challenge to actually think about what their positions are and they suddenly realize they’ve been wrong all along.
Smarts and intelligence are vastly different animals.
Just finished a “critical thinking” class for my degree, while I didn’t always agree with the conclusions in my book, it was a good class, in that it made the way the MSM, and the left (but I repeat myself) fail to critically think about most anything even more painfully obvious that it had been. And yeah Mason, i think it makes clear the fact that very few people actually take such classes.
The best class I took at SDSU was a Rhetoric and Writing class taught by a Dr. Little. Woman was miles left of Lenin, but she was an actual educator, not an indoctrinator. She told us right from the getgo that “You are not here to agree with me. You’re here to convince *me* to agree with you.”
God bless her, she lived up to that. There were a few kids in that class who thought they could skate by toeing her party line. She told them, nicely but no less firmly, that their arguments were pathetic and easily refuted. Those of us on the right generally did better, because we (all four of us) presented evidence and argued based on logic (or as close to logic as a bunch of 18-19 year-olds are likely to get anyway). She challenged our arguments not to convince us to change our beliefs, but to get us to come up with better arguments, and she welcomed the improvement. She was also a wonderfully sweet gal.
I wonder if she still teaches there, and if so, I wonder what it’s like for her. She wouldn’t abide an echo chamber.
Good deal TOW. I was too stupid and girl crazy to focus on college right after high school, so I’m a dinosaur going back late in life. With that in mind, I’m only doing online classes. First because i live 45 miles from the nearest Community College, let alone a 4 year college, second because Columbia Southern has a great program, and third because if I had to sit in a classroom with a bunch of little leftist punks, I’d probably end up in jail.
That being said, my sociology class was very interesting, and my professor, who I can only assume was a lefty, due to the subject matter, never once critiqued my assignments on a political level. He challenged me when I didn’t hit the parameters, or did sloppy work, and praised me when I did above average work.
The Red Chinese-backed Khmer Rouge didn’t put my Father-In-Law in a camp, murder his son, and force him to watch his wife get raped because he was anti-communist (though he is), or because he was a US-trained veteran of the Royal Cambodian Army (though he was), or because he fought against them (though he did). They did it because he was fluent and literate in two languages (Khmer and French—he hadn’t learned English yet) and worse, he committed the horrible and unforgivable Crime Against the Socialist Revolution of teaching others to read and write in those languages as well.
And for all the shit commies have talked about racism over the years, their regimes tend to be extremely racist. The Khmer Rouge also singled him out for being half-Chinese.
Regarding the short, fat pedophile Mao Tse Tung (or Ze Dong or however the fuck they’re spelling it this week), piss be upon him, as with the desert pedophile cult leader. Pol Pot as well.
I recall my Mother, God rest her soul, born in 1934, telling me that they called that sorry buggerer “Mousey-dung.” I was just a little kid, maybe five, but I got the idea that educated and schooled were vastly different, and that that creature was not highly respected in my home.
The “black masses” rising up? 13% of the population is to rise up and overthrow the government? Some brown and some white folks might object.
Plus, if we’re being honest, the bulk of that population is overweight and without any ability to rise off their fat ass from the sofa, never mind starting a revolution. 70% of black males and 82% of black females qualify as overweight….
Not to mention the leftist idiots, namely Antifa who SAY they’re going to start a revolution while at least 98% of them can’t even start a lawnmower or figure out which restroom to use!
I can well remember Chairman Mao’s little red book. It became a bone of contention in our place. My sister was young enough to know every thing about Politics and all the right things which needed fixing in the late 60’s and early 70’s. Socialism and Freedom were the big things then. I was in Vietnam and that was totally wrong then.
To-day I am retired and a capitalist with my own home some investment properties and a lovely wife who also busted her guts helping to make our future retirement comfortable. I am a keen hunter and target shooter. My sister and her husband are still waiting for the distribution of the wealth from those of us who worked for a living. life is so unfair when your a socialist and others will not bow to your demands.
Funny how a number of fools still refuse to learn, ain’t it? I have a younger sibling with a Masters Degree paid for by our Parents and she’s a Bernie-head, education does NOT make one smart in a lot of cases!
I’ve got a sister that sounds like almost a twin of yours API.. she did manage to get fellowships or something to cover some of hers, but otherwise, that describes her perfectly!
Yep, said sibling was a Bernie-head, then a Hillarrhoid and likely one who was bawling and screaming the night President Trump got elected alongside all the other snowflakes. Anytime I am officially asked “Does Mental Illness exist anywhere in your Immediate Family?” I will have to answer “Yes, my younger Sister is liberal and a registered D-rat.”
Hahaha, I say almost the same things.. Mine was definitely one of them that night, then she was one of the ones knitting pink hats for the whiner parades.. Haven’t talked to her or another sister since we had a blow-up during the campaign, because I wouldn’t see their “logic” no matter how much they yelled… go figure.
Nice Ak with silencer. They are still pretty loud, even with a muffler.
The left has to ban guns because armed citizens cant be forced to do anything.
They have to be reasoned with.
Unarmed subjects are much more easily oppressed