Out of the Mouths of Libidiots . . .
. . . on rare occasion comes God’s honest truth – either by accident or design.
This past Sunday Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-CA, appeared on multiple national news shows. She was promoting new Federal legislation banning “bump stocks”.
During that appearance, subject of the recent Las Vegas mass shooting came up. Feinstein was asked if there might “have been any law passed that would’ve stopped” that recent massacre.
Her answer, rephrased in simple English: “No”.
And that wasn’t a slip of the tongue, either. Feinstein reiterated essentially the same answer on another news program later in the day.
Gee. So Feinstein is promoting yet another gun control law that she knows won’t have any significant effect when it comes to preventing gun crimes. No surprise there.
No, what shocks me is that Feinstein – who never met a gun control measure she didn’t like – actually admitted something anyone with common sense already knows. To wit: gun control laws . . . don’t prevent gun crimes. All they do is limit the rights of law-abiding citizens.
There’s simply no way to anticipate and prevent the actions of a loon – or a terrorist – if they keep a low profile and act within the law while planning their criminal acts. The Las Vegas shooter did exactly that.
Libidiot politicians telling God’s honest truth. Perhaps the Millennium truly is at hand! (smile)
Category: Gun Grabbing Fascists, Guns, Politics
While ‘explaining’ why her comments aren’t important, CNN made sure to tell us ignorant idiots her age, how she’s the longest serving senator and she clearly Pelosi-ing quickly (read: going senile) by not towing the line on gun laws, specifically how they’ll be effective.
CNN is Pravda and it’s cancer.
“Wine Stain”! You know what you do with a stain? cut it out and replace it!!
Commiefornia politics has swung so far left that DiFi here is now considered a “Moderate Heretic” that needs to be primaried and replaced by an even harder-core marxist. All one can do is shake his head and pass along the popcorn…
She’s running for 2018. Imma crossing my fingers; we make it that long, someone does run to her left, and all of this is right before the San Andres fault sends a newly seceded United Soviet State of California into the ocean.
Not so much California politics as those of LA and the gay bay. But, of course, they make sure through numerous dishonest means that they always get their way and to hell with everyone else in the state.
For Senator Feinstein this is yet another glaring example of her hypocrisy on the gun control issue, and who should be allowed to own/process them.
While working as a police officer in Oakland, CA, in the 1970’s, then San Francisco Mayor Feinstein adamantly opposed any attempt by the California Legislature to lesson the restrictions for canceled carry licenses.
In California at this time, only the sheriff of a county, or a chief of police were authorized to issue a CCW permit for a non-LEO. Unless you knew the sheriff or a chief personally, your chances of obtaining a CCW for self defense were nil.
The hypocrisy mentioned above was that then Mayor Feinstein had a CCW permit, even though she was not a LEO. And, she was protected by her armed security detail from the SFPD 24/7.
But she had the connections to make sure she, a patrician was protected and she could defend herself if necessary. But it was not good enough for the surfs.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The carry permit was issued after Harvey Milk and Mr. Moscone were capped in the Frisco city hall I believe. Like I mentioned in a previous post, I wonder if she would like to install a butt stock on her wheel gun so she now can send 5 rounds down range really fast if it has a deuce and a half inch barrel.
Best policy to have any chance of curbing “gun crime”: shoot back.
Preach it, Brother!
Can I get an AMEN!!??
Tripped over her own fabrications, huh?
Good. Keep it up, DiFi. No matter how much they try to bury it, someone has it somewhere, so just keep it up. 😉
Feinstein might be thinking she needs to keep banging the gun-control drum as a matter of continuity. It’s the thing that launched her in the national public eye following the shooting of George Moscone and Harvey Milk in 1978. She’s also going to apparently have a harder time this next election due to both her age and her recent comments that maybe, just maybe, it might be reasonable to cut President Trump some slack.
There have also been noises that Feinstein might face in the primary current California Senate President Pro Tempore Kevin “Bullets” de Leon made YouTube famous with his instructions on clip-fed “Ghost Guns” firing 30,000 rounds per second or whatever. He’s due to term out next year.
An interesting sidebar is also that De Leon sponsored California’s so-called “Sanctuary State” legislation recently signed into law by Governor Jerry “Choo-Choo” Brown. Such legislation puts them in direct conflict with a current White House proposal to Congress that would allow compromise on the illegal alien “Dreamer” issue in return for a border wall and crackdown on sanctuaries, among other things.
Feinstein said there is no gun control laws that would have stopped this criminal because she wants a TOTAL and COMPLETE ban of all firearms. That’s her agenda.
This is what I took from that. She wants to change the law to no guns for thee. Her statements also say that all 40 million Californians are against ccw reciprocity.
This Californian wants CCW reciprocity, as do many others who get denied CCWs based on the arbitrary “may-issue” horseshit, which is *a lot.*
40 million Californians want it, huh?
That’s strange. There are, per the census count, only 39.25 million Californians.
Is she counting the Dead Voters? I thought they all lived in Chicago. But what do I know?
What a senile old gasbag she is.
Yeah, that’s what I got out of that too. No laws would have prevented that, so let’s just get rid of all firearms.
Which won’t actually get rid of all firearms, just those owned by people who don’t want to break the law.
She plainly wants an outright and total ban just like her idols Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Castro,…
With regard to all semi-auto rifles, let’s not forget Di-Fi has stated she would like to have the power to go to every “Mr. and Mrs. America” and confiscate every such firearm.
Since you can achieve a similar effect with a piece of shoelace (the ATF ruled on a shoelace back in 1998) it’s pretty clear that “bump stocks” aren’t all that particularly unique…
You can do the same thing with a heavy duty rubber band. It’s all smoke and mirrors, y’know.
I watched your video and was amazed how effective that rubber band was in making a semi-auto fire in full auto mode. So for progtards, mass confiscation is there final solution. Except it will be as effective in preventing gun crime as banning heroin is in preventing people from taking heroin.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/10/06/nancy-pelosi-hopes-ban-bump-stocks-slippery-slope-more-gun-control
More truth…just a passing comment, but an important one.
There are enough domestic enemies to the US Constitution these days she can openly admit their goal without much backlash. Term limits need to happen. These swamp things are a threat to the republic.
Eff this I’m buying more guns.
Anything particularly catching your eye at the moment?
I fell off my bar stool when I first heard about this.
And I was nowhere near a bar, nor was I sitting on a bar stool.
Reminds me of a comment Truman made about Nixon: “He is such a huge liar that if by chance he ever did tell the truth, he would have to quick make up a lie just to stay in practice.” Think DiFi accidentally let one drop.
An interesting quote from a weasel that ought to have known about bullshitting and fucking up by the numbers. Truman was nothing more than a stubby punk.
To be clear: the right to keep and bear arms simply means that US citizens can possess whatever they think is necessary to neutralize the threat from a bad guy. Or own firearms just because they want them.
No one is required to own any firearms. You don’t even have to like them. If you don’t want to be around them, then don’t threaten other folks.
This issue really isn’t that different from all the other rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. You don’t have to like my form of religion, or lack thereof. You can call me all sorts of names, and I can return your childish behavior in kind, or ignore it. Vote, don’t vote – it’s not required.
Meanwhile, it is some comfort to hear the usual suspects finally being almost honest about their plan to disarm the law abiding citizens of this country.
She’s just being honest. It’s about CONTROL not guns.
Apparently most conservatives were saying bump stocks made the Las Vegas murderer Paddock less accurate, therefore killing less people than he would have without it. So why would anyone care if Feinstein bans bump stocks? They’re useless “novelties” right? Let her ban them, it won’t hurt you.
Take your meds, lily. You might make more sense.
Maybe not.
Ad Hominem attacks on me from you says you need to take your meds first.
Right. Meanwhile your display of immaturity in the name calling and finger pointing department deserve soooo much respect from the rest of us.
A lot of things appear useless to some people that are considered useful to others.
I see golf as a useless activity, personally. But why, then, ought golf clubs be banned?
The imposition of another persons rights is always a threat to the rights of all people. You are failing to see the principles at stake in this discussion.
As usual, lily fails to acknowledge that the so-called controversy about bump stocks is a non sequitur that can easily be refuted, as in the observations at this link: http://valorguardians.com/blog/?p=75254&cpage=1#comment-3045805
Rubber bands or shoelaces, anyone?
Because we have -rights-, you do not yhave a veto over them.
Rights means that I do not need to justify the peaceful exercise of them.
Rights means I do not need your permission to exercise them.
Rights means you do not get to decide who, what, how much, etc.
The reality is that you say you just want to put the tip in, and what will that hurt?
No. And if you insist, then go pound sand. We are -done- trusting liars and idiots who want to assert some sort of veto over -rights-. Because we know where it ends, and you aint foolin nobody no more.
What would it hurt for you and your willfully-ignorant opinions to just go away and leave others alone? Give it a try!
Readers of TAH may be amazed as I was when I found out that California has a law that the 2 top vote getters in the primaries are the only candidates.
That means she will be running against a Democrat
There will be no Republican candidate on the ballot, even if the Republicans have nominated someone
They have perverted the 2 party system into a one party system
Well, Californicate perverts just about everything, so…
[With due acknowledgement that there are areas of California that still have and use their brains.]
Isn’t stacking the cards illegal, or something?
Depends upon whose doing the stacking.
At least in California.
Can’t the Republicans just do a write-in?
“There’s simply no way to anticipate and prevent the actions of a loon – or a terrorist – if they keep a low profile and act within the law while planning their criminal acts.” Well at least you finally admit the whole “better mental health screening” thing is red herring bullshit.