A Public Message to A One-Time TAH Commenter

It has come to my attention that a recent commenter – using the screen name “Ralph Cinque” – apparently thinks I am someone I am not.

Well, that’s happened before and is nothing new.  But this particular case seems to be a bit different.

“Ralphie-boi” above appears to have a blog – which I’d never heard of until someone told me about it the other day.  Nothing new about that, either.

From a single quick – and first-time – look at his blog after its existence was brought to my attention the other day, “Ralphie-boi” seems to be of the opinion that Oswald was framed for shooting JFK.  Hey, it’s still a free country; everyone is entitled to their opinion.

“Ralphie-boi” also apparently has been having a running argument on his blog with some individual using the screen name or nom de plume “Hondo”.  The argument relates to the JFK assassination in some way; I didn’t bother to read enough of Ralphie-boi’s “scholarly work” to determine the precise details of that argument.

Regardless: “Ralphie-boi” has apparently published a number of rebuttal articles directed at this individual he calls “Hondo” on his blog.  And he also seems to think this other individual is either named or using the screen name “Bpete” as well.

And of course – according to “Ralphie-boi’s” immense intellect and amazing powers of analysis, it’s not possible that TWO DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS might possibly use the same screen name or nom-de-plume. Apparently “Ralphie-boi” has determined that that simply can’t happen.

So there you go: per “Ralphie-boi”, since I use the nom-de-plume “Hondo” here at TAH I must be the same guy with whom he’s been having his running argument regarding the JFK Assassination.

Well, “Ralphie-boi” – I got some bad news for you.   Here’s a news flash fer ya, “Einstein”.

I hate to “burst yer bubble” . . . but it is indeed possible for different individuals to use the same screen name on the Internet.  That’s precisely what has happened here.

I am not the guy you’ve been arguing with on your blog.  Before yesterday, I had no idea you even had a blog.  I’ve never commented there, nor have I ever argued with you about the JFK Assassination.  The sole exchange I’ve ever had with you was my single reply to you that occurred on this blog, regarding the comment I linked above.

Before that, I didn’t know you even existed.

Oh, and your blog articles and use of logic kinda . . . well, IMO they rather suck. I wasted a bit of time looking at a couple of them. For starters, not responding to an argument is decidedly not the same thing, logically, as agreeing your opponent is correct – either tacitly or explicitly.   One has to see the article in question in the first place to respond; secondly, they have to feel the argument even merits a reply.

Your blog articles IMO go rapidly downhill from there.

I will say that at least you’re somewhat more literate than a few of the tools who have been featured here at TAH – you can string a readable sentence or two together, even if the use of logic therein leaves much to be desired.  And you don’t seem to TyPe LiKe An AdOlEsCeNt TeEnAgE GiRl HaViNg A hIsSy FiT after drinking an entire 2-liter Mountain Dew and finding out her boyfriend wants to dump her, either.

Now, how about you take your half-baked ideas and comments back to your insular little JFK-conspiracy-theory-world and leave discussions here relating to military and government matters to rational adults.  And while you’re at it, how about you quit accusing me of being someone I’m not?

Sheesh. I’d expect stuff like this from SoMeOnE eLsE wE kNoW aNd “LoVe”.   Wonder if they know each other, or are possibly related?

Category: "Teh Stoopid", Dumbass Bullshit, General Whackos