Obama on Constitutionality of Redistribution of Wealth

| October 27, 2008

From Drudge; Obama says that we still suffer from the the Supreme Court’s inability to bring about redistributive change (at about 1:40).

Michelle Malkin transcribes;

A caller asks The One to explain how he would do “reparative economic work.” Obama gives the legislative route two thumbs up as his preferred method of “breaking free of the constraints” placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution and then burbles about cobbling together the “actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change.”

Gateway Pundit writes;

Hmm. It sounds like those meetings with Marxist Bill Ayers and those sermons by Black Liberation Theologian Jeremiah Wright rubbed off on The One.

I guess he figures he can fix it. It’s never ceased to amaze me that the Left is enamored with the “idea” of the Constitution. They recognize that it’s the closest thing to perfection in the history of a flawed people, but their main goal has always been to change it and the way the way the Constitution gets in the way of their vote buying. The only thing the Constitution is good for is a skirt to hide behind while they plot their nefarious deeds to undo it.

Do you still think he’s not a Socialist?

h/t DefendUSA.

Category: Barack Obama/Joe Biden, Liberals suck, Politics

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
defendUSA

If any trolls come around and try to tell me that Obama doesn’t want to fukk this Country up, I say get the fukk out now!!! I am not supporting your sorry assses because the COW wants to move away from the Founding Fathers beliefs…and any leftist claiming to be Patriotic is absolutely not if they vote for this man. If the Consititution means anything at all to the loser left, they will vote for someone else.

Jungle Mom

He is of course, a Socialist! He even campaigned for his cousin, Odinga, in Kenya. I do not think Americans realize that Odinga was jailed after a failed coup in 1982 where he was backed by the Soviet Union and caused terrible blood shed then as well as last year.
Obama goes to campaign for him in 2006 at taxpayers expense, and no one is bothered. He had to know Odinga’s Marxist past, and he had to know of his violence, and if he did not, what does that say for Obama????

trackback

[…] The Radio Equalizer, 24Ahead, protein wisdom, THE ASTUTE BLOGGERS RADAMISTO  NewsBusters.org, This ain’t Hell …, Right Pundits, Atlas […]

Rurik

No, Obama is not a socialist…he’s a communist. An even more radical thing.

Mike43

Go to this blog and read all about bho.
http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/

ponsdorf

Rurik said in 4: No, Obama is not a socialist…he’s a communist. An even more radical thing.

I’d offer that he’s an outright Marxist/Leninist? More radical yet.

Although he’s closer yet to a Mugabe or a Chavez. There are some real lessons to be learned from Zimbabwe and Venezuela, I think.