al-Qaeda discovers kidnapping pays
The LA Times reports that al-Qaeda cells have found that kidnapping westerners is a good source of money, thanks to European governments that ignore the fact that paying the terrorists only leads to more kidnapping;
Over the last two years, AQAP, as Western officials refer to the group, has extorted $20 million in ransom money, according to an estimate by Alistair Burt, who until this month was the top British diplomatic official for the Middle East.
If those payments continue, “AQAP’s attack capability in Yemen and against its friends and neighbors will only strengthen,” he said at a recent diplomatic meeting in New York. Kidnapping has become the group’s single largest source of funds, U.S. and European officials say.
Much of the money comes with the complicity of Western governments that have rebuffed British and American exhortations not to pay ransoms, the officials allege. The governments of Finland and Austria said they did not provide ransom money to terrorists. But two Western officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to avoid publicly criticizing allied governments, said that those denials are for public consumption and that the size of the ransoms shows government involvement.
The examples in the article refer to a particular kidnapping in Yemen, but al-Qaeda is finding kidnapping lucrative business in northern Africa, too. I have to wonder why people would be putting themselves in the position to be kidnapped in the first place. Who travels to Yemen or Mali without understanding the danger, and accepting the fact that they may be killed? And if they willingly put themselves in danger, what reasonable person would expect their government to bail them out and finance worldwide criminal activities?
How can the Times call these governments “allies” when they’re obviously supporting terrorists?
Category: Terror War
Who travels to Yemen or Mali without understanding the danger, and accepting the fact that they may be killed? And if they willingly put themselves in danger, what reasonable person would expect their government to bail them out and finance worldwide criminal activities?
Rich f@ckers who think they are above it all Jonn, world citizens…we have some in the US and they are more dangerous to our nation’s stability than AQ is as these world citizens feel no inherent loyalty to any particular nation only to their own selfish desires for more capital to play with….doing business in a deadly, dangerous place is quite lucrative and a lot of these 4ssholes are looking to profiteer off their interactions….losing a few of these rich c0cks#ckers to graphic be-headings might be the start of something useful in fighting these muslim sh1tbags…what these people don’t understand is that AQ hates us all and business means nothing to a religious idealist who would rather starve than associate with infidels…
Who you gonna call? The Stunning Agency!
Who travels to Yemen or Mali without understanding the danger?
I was thinking the same thing about Mexico, Detroit, and Chicago.
Remember all those folks that got kidnapped in Lebanon? Terry Anderson, Terry Waite, et al? Never understood the mindset that believed the status of journalist, academic, cleric or whatever would protect them. Then the families get involved wanting to know what the US is going to do about it.
Remember all those folks that got kidnapped in Lebanon? Terry Anderson, Terry Waite, et al? Never understood the mindset that believed the status of journalist, academic, cleric or whatever would protect them. Then the families get involved wanting to know what the US is going to do about it.
@5 Regarding everyone wanting the US to help when sh1t goes south….
As Al Pacino’s character in “Sea of Love” says; ” they get robbed, they get raped and suddenly I’m their daddy, come the wet ass hour I’m everybody’s daddy…”
I’m really missing Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan right now.
Terrorists commit crimes for financial gain and/or political advantage?
Shocking!