Reclassification of Ft Hood
I wrote this for my paying gig, but since it seems to be the topic de jure today, I thought I would share here as well.
We’ve been talking about the classification of the Ft Hood shootings since roughly the day after the shootings happened. The DoD and the President chose to classify them as “workplace violence” as opposed to terrorism. I took a lot of heat in the comments for agreeing with them in doing that. My fear was that if the President or the DoD called it terrorism and didn’t charge Hasan with a terrorism charge that it would be looked at as “unlawful command influence.” Further, I felt that if they did charge Hasan with terrorism that it would give him the opportunity to put the “War on Terrorism” itself on trial. I envisioned a scenario where Hasan (representing himself) dragged the case out for months and months introducing evidence and testimony from “Muslim Scholars” and others that would seek to basically turn him into a martyr for his cause. It was pretty clear he was getting the death penalty for the murders either way, so why muddy up the waters was my thinking.
But, I also agreed that it was in fact Terrorism. About a year ago now I said:
Again, I think this was Terrorism, but in labeling it that, the Pentagon would create a bunch of immediate problems. It’s easier from the standpoint of the Pentagon to wait until after the conviction, and then declare it terroristic. You can’t be accused of unlawfully influencing something that has already transpired, so there won’t be the problems after the judgment has already been reached.
So, we are now at that point. And thankfully some Senators and Representatives from the great Republic state of Texas are pushing that now:
Members of Congress said this week they’ll renew a push to designate the November 2009 Fort Hood shootings as part of the battle against terrorism, which would make the victims eligible for Purple Hearts and open up more benefits for those killed or wounded…
The bill’s co-authors, Texas Republicans Reps. John R. Carter and Roger Williams, said that they plan to introduce the “Honoring the Fort Hood Heroes Act” as soon as Congress returns to Washington next week. They announced the bill in Texas on Monday with Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican who is introducing a companion bill in the Senate.
My own former Congressman is joining them:
And they’ve already won support from outside their home state, with Rep. Frank R. Wolf, Virginia Republican, saying Tuesday he’ll sign onto the bill.
“This was a terrorist attack, this was not workplace violence. To call it workplace violence is a form of political correctness gone awry,” Mr. Wolf said.
Hasan was convicted last month of killing 13 and wounding more than 30 when he went on a shooting spree in 2009 on the base near Killeen, Texas, shouting “Allahu akbar,” Arabic for “God is great,” before opening fire. He was sentenced to the death penalty on Aug. 28, though it’s expected the appeals process will last years if not decades.
And another Senator is making similar points:
Sen. James M. Inhofe, Oklahoma Republican, also voiced his support for the victims of the attack, sending a letter to Army Secretary John McHugh on Tuesday to request a review of the attack to determine if victims are eligible for the Purple Heart.
“The evidence presented during the court-martial established beyond any doubt that this was not ‘workplace violence’; it was a terrorist attack,” Mr. Inhofe wrote in the letter. “The tragic deaths and injuries were conducted with premeditation by Major Hasan who publicly declared he had ‘switched sides’ in the ongoing conflict and joined the enemies of the United States.”
Resolutions passed at Convention provide the positions we take on any given issue. Whatever my own personal opinion is on them, they are what I will argue here on the blog and elsewhere. With that said, this is probably my favorite resolution passed in years, which we passed last week:
WHEREAS, On November 5, 2009, Nadil Hasan entered the Fort Hood Soldier Readiness Processing Center, took a seat at an empty table, bowed his head for several seconds then suddenly stood up, shouted “Allah Akbar” and opened fire, spraying bullets at soldiers in a fanlike motion before taking aim at individual soldiers; and
WHEREAS, During the course of the shooting, 12 soldiers and 1 Army civilian employee were killed and 32 other individuals were wounded in the incident; and
WHEREAS, Nidal Hasan targeted soldiers in uniform and it is the worst shooting to have taken place on an American military base; and
WHEREAS, Investigation before and after the shooting discovered e-mail communications between Nidal Hasan and an al-Qaida leader, Anwar al-Awlaki, who had been monitored by the NSA as a security threat….
RESOLVED, By The American Legion in National Convention assembled in Houston, Texas, August 27, 28, 29, 2013, That The American Legion urge that the Fort Hood massacre should be re-classified as an act of terrorism and the soldiers killed and wounded on November 5, 2009 should be awarded all honors and benefits due to battlefield combat; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That the Fort Hood Shooting be re-classified to that of an Act of Terrorism against an American military base; and, be it finally
RESOLVED, That The American Legion supports legislation that provides victims and families of the Fort Hood shooting with the same benefits that are afforded to Americans who have been injured in overseas combat zones and families of those who have been killed in action.
So, now is the time to push this one through Congress. You can contact your Senators and Representative through the Capitol HIll switchboard at (202) 224-3121. Be sure to send a note of thanks to the Sponsors of the bills as well.
Category: Politics
Have asked all along what possible difference it makes if terrorist murders which occur in the workplace are termed “workplace violence” for the purposes of statistical analysis? Yes, the murders were in a workplace. So what?
I certainly understand (and agree with) your logic concerning the charges filed. It’s murder. The motivation of the murderer, and the place the murders occurred, really doesn’t matter. Whether the accused did it or did not is all you need to establish guilt or innocence. Aggravating circumstances certainly can and should be considered for sentencing.
All that said – since the Army wants to make a distinction between workplace violence and terrorism for purposes of compensation and medical care for the victims, then it certainly does matter. I still do not understand why, but whatever correction must be done to get some justice for the victims, let’s get on it. Like yesterday, or last year.
This is so the right thing to do. I just wished they would have explained the reasoning up front to save everybody a lot of grief. Sending my dues in to the American Legion again today…
I think it is telling that the Army is currently training, in one of its wonderful online anti-terrorism classes, this exact scenario as a terrorist event.
But hey, they had a blue ribbon panel and and investigation, so I may be wrong.
From their lips to God’s ears. I hope it happens. The victims deserve it as do the survivors.
I hope all the benefits and awards are backdated to the time of the shooting.
So do we do the same with Hasan Akbar? John Russell? William Kreutzer?
I wonder if this is why The American Legion is now under scrutiny of the IRS?? Certainly hope not, but with this Administration, who knows?
Meanwhile, our active shooter training tells us to run if we can, lock ourselves in a closet if we can’t. Some of the Ft. Hood victims were shot while trying to attack MAJ Hassan with furniture. I have a pretty hefty Thermos…
#7, why yes, it is.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/23/irs-is-targeting-the-american-legion-with-audit-new-set-of-guidelines/