Tuesdays with Claymore
When life gets too tough, hey…run away.
Purging the kennel of blue dogs.
I hear Keith is still looking for a job too.
But don’t dare call it a police state.
Boston bombers could have been better at what they did. Say what?
Filthy Republicansess wants to repeal the Preciousss!!
Rich people who fly are more important than everyone else.
Homework, sponsored by Monsanto!
The agro-trader nexus? Say what?
“Real Democrats don’t cut Social Security”
So what you’re saying is you’re a ball carrier and like the double dribble?
Milking a tragic state of affairs.
I bet he’d still have a job if he were gay.
Hey, maybe Uncle Joe will loan you a shotgun to shoot into the air!
First “assault weapons”, now “sniper rifles”.
Category: Tuesdays with Claymore
Why is it the people who post comments on “Tuesday with Claymore” never have their own picture or face? Is this like the SWAT teams hiding their identity? Or do they think they are like them, sound like them, or are them? Come on, we all understand we are all unique and claiming someone else’s picture make you awful lame and really un-credible to start with.
(From: First “assault weapons,” now “sniper rifles.”)
Now it just got personal. No, they CANNOT have my hunting rifle, just because it has a scope on it.
i tried reading these once, i could not believe people are that stupid. not only are they all holding IQs in the single didgets, but they are congregating! ya want to ban something? ban that much stupid in one place
“No one needs a .300 WinMag with a scope to hunt deer!” – this shit almost writes itself.
I think my bloodpressure spiked when they said that since it seemed “too long for self defense,” no one needed a rifle like that in their home. Claymore, I’m surprised you don’t drool or something after putting this thread together every week.
Claymore, I admire youre ability to get past the blithering idiocy in DU, but I think I just lost a few brain cells trying to wade through a few response to two of them. Some of those people think Obama has gone right-wing on them.
My head is going to explode now. Everyone, out of the explosion cone so you don’t get splattered!
“No one needs a .300 WinMag with a scope to hunt deer!”
Funny you should mention that. Over on the other board on which I regularly post, a DU thread linked shows one of the DUmbfucks claiming to have killed a deer in WY at a distance of 848 (and how the fuck did he get EXACTLY that?) yards. I’m not sure how you could even SEE a deer at that range in the brush.
But .300 Win Mag for elk, moose, bear? Fuckin A, Bubba!
Hey I just bought a .303 Enfield…I wonder if they would consider that a scary sniper rifle…