Right on Cue

| June 22, 2011

As soon as I read Jonn’s post about the draw down I knew that Rethink Afghanistan would not pass on it.

NOT GOOD ENOUGH: President to announce withdrawal of fewer than 10 percent of troops from Afghanistan this year. According to various news reports, President Obama plans to withdraw fewer than 10 percent of U.S. troops from Afghanistan this year, despite promises to make this drawdown “significant.”

So I figured that I would hear something about concern about the troops or the families of those deployed. But what do they open up with?

Under this plan, the U.S. would continue to charge taxpayers roughly $2 billion per week for this war for years. That’s unacceptable.

So that is what it comes down to, money. The same theme that it has always been. It cost too much and that all our woes are the results of the conflicts abroad despite evidence suggesting otherwise. But lets move on.

This war isn’t making us safer, and it’s not worth the human or economic costs.

Even when they try to sound sympathetic those that are affected in Afghanistan or even Iraq it still comes back to money. The reason why I think that the first two statements are token is because it is the exact same phrase over and over like a planned script. Then they expect people to believe this is real concern since they are more then happy to speak for the fallen who have died since the SEAL mission. Really I mean do you know the views of each and everyone on that list? But hey why need to know that when using them in your articles. I know that if something happened to me and you used my name like that I would be pissed. But don’t worry because you mentioned the “Human Cost” totally means that you “care”.

Facing a war-weary public, President Barack Obama is expected to call for a major withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan Wednesday night, with roughly 10,000 coming home to the U.S. in less than a year.

Yea, were are so “War Wary” as a population that the we are shunning anything to do with War in our daily lives. Oh wait were not? Or those tough rationing and products restrictions, oh wait not that ether. Or it must be having to deal with being called up at any time to got to war. No, not that too. So exactly what is the reason that entire country outside the military community is affected? Really I mean how is the conflicts have drastically changed the daily lives of the general community of this country? I can wait.

We need those troops and those dollars home, now.

Like is said, all about the money.

Oh Rethink Afghastan still thinks that those in Command who question or complain about the President should be fired. Unless that they agree with your own view point.

Category: Antiwar crowd, Economy, Foreign Policy, Politics

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NotSoOldMarine

Rethink Afghanistan isn’t really an organization intended to “rethink Afghanistan”, it’s an organization designed to precipitate a total withdraw in order to advance a wider political agenda. It’s not money, it’s not troops, it’s not geopolitical strategy or national interest.

It’s their wider political interests.

Right now the economy and the deficit is on the top of Americans minds so that’s the drum they’re going to beat. Politics man.

UpNorth

NSOM, they’re beating the If Only drum. If only we weren’t fighting in the Stan, if only the economy hadn’t been tanked by President Present, if only they hadn’t lost the House last election, if only the government had spent more in the Stimulus, yada yada.

Cedo Alteram

2# Yep, Exactly.