Anti-gun WaPo targets legal gun dealer

| October 24, 2010

While making preparations to spend the day at the range with own handguns, I ran into a Washington Post article in which they try to shame a legal gun dealer in Prince George County, Maryland out of business. The title of the article is “Realco guns tied to 2500 crimes in DC and Maryland” written by David Fallis.

Fallis argues that because Realco, the gun dealer, has been linked to so many gun crimes in the Metro DC Area, it must be doing something wrong. The issue here is “straw purchases” – one buyer who can pass the background check buys a gun and then sells it to someone who can’t pass a background check;

Glenn Ivey said that after he became Prince George’s state’s attorney in 2002, he asked law enforcement colleagues if he could do anything about the flow of guns from Realco, which he said he knew of from his time in the 1990s as a prosecutor in the District.

“I had an eye toward trying to take action,” Ivey said. “The feedback we got was: They are doing it the way they are supposed to. They are following the letter of the law.”

Asked about Realco, ATF spokeswoman Clare Weber said stores with greater numbers of traces are inspected more frequently.

“The number of traces that come back to a [gun dealer] is not a revocable offense if the dealer is found in compliance with record-keeping requirements,” she said.

Prince George County is a high-crime area which borders on DC’s notorious Southeast neighborhood. Criminals routine cross back and forth across the DC-MD boundary. Crime, of course, follows them. In fact, Martin O’Malley, the incumbent governor of Maryland, brags that he’s reduced crime in Maryland, when all he’s done is chase it back to DC. Four years ago, DC’s Police Chief Ramsey bragged that he had reduced crime in DC when all he had accomplished was chasing criminals to Prince George County.

Obviously, the county needs a gun store for law abiding citizens to purchase protection from the scores of criminals, so closing it is not a rational option…well, except to the Washington Post which really doesn’t care about PG County’s residents.

If there’s a high crime rate, and an elevated number of criminals, it makes sense that there would be some illegal purchases. So prosecute the folks who resell their guns to criminals – not the gun store owners who are following the law.

Of course, the Washington Post advocates closing the store for no other reason than it’s in a bad neighborhood. It’s not the gun store’s fault that the gun is resold.

[August, 2007], prosecutor Ivey joined Jesse L. Jackson’s Rainbow/Push Coalition and others outside Realco in a “protest against illegal guns.” Inside the shop, Maryland State Police pored over Realco’s paperwork. Investigators found little of concern.

Yeah, marching with the Rainbow/PUSH coalition really elevates the prosecutor’s character in my estimation. His motivations are more about politics than about concern for the law abiding citizens. He should be protesting outside the homes of straw buyers if he wants to make a valid statement.

Drag the right wingnuts into it;

In a May 2006 straw purchase, a man bought a handgun at Realco for a felon friend who wanted to shoot abortion doctors. The plot was foiled after the felon’s family called authorities weeks later.

Criminals are criminals. Throw them both in jail, just quit dragging the rest of into it.

Once out, [Erik Dixon] met Cathy R. Anderson, 31, and soon asked that she buy a gun for him. In January 2007, the pair visited Realco, where she made a down payment on a Glock .45, signing a form saying she was buying the gun for herself. Dixon was in the store with her, she later told police.

She told investigators she didn’t know of his criminal past. She said she never touched the gun after she picked it up on a return trip to Realco.

“I took it back to Erik’s truck and gave it to him,” she told police.

And yet she’s still walking around’

“That was then; this is now,” she said. “. . . I’m sorry for what happened.”

OK, well, ‘sorry’ makes it all better.

Category: Gun Grabbing Fascists, Media

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tori Lafferty, A Proud Veteran. A Proud Veteran said: Anti-gun WaPo targets legal gun dealer http://bit.ly/9WX4oR Via This Ain't Hell […]

fm2176

I agree, those providing the guns to criminals should be prosecuted, not the law-abiding dealer. Straw purchases were one reason Virginia went to a one handgun a month law years ago. I recall all the uproar about crime in NYC and other northern cities being linked to guns purchased en masse in Virginia.

Every dealer I know takes straw purchases very seriously. A few years ago my Platoon Sergeant and I went to Quantico Arms to buy a Glock 26 as a gift for our departing 1SG. We were using company funds but my PSG mentioned it was for our 1SG to the guy behind the counter. Even though we could legally buy it as a gift, the dealer ended up denying our purchase; we paid for it and had the 1SG come fill out the paperwork. I should have taken the lead in that purchase as I know a bit about buying firearms. My PSG wasn’t a “gun guy” and I guess he didn’t explain the intent of the purchase properly. Regardless, I can’t blame Quantico Arms for erring on the side of caution.

AW1 Tim

Thing is, unless the law specifically requires otherwise, I can sell any gun I own to anyone I want to, provided they are of legal age and have cash in hand. Once I own a gun, it’s MY property, and the state can damn well go to hell if they think they are going to tell me how and when and where I can dispose of it.

If this DA has a problem, perhaps he ought to be talking to judges who hand out lenient sentences. Maybe he ought to just STFU and stop prancing around like some frikken martinet.

Personally, I want ALL firearms laws retracted. ANY citizen ought to be able to purchase ANY forearm they wish without ANY oversight or restrictions by ANY government authority at ANY level. An armed populace is a polite populace. If there are to be any firearms laws, then they ought to be laws which REQUIRE forearms ownership and training to proficiency standards.

Others MMV, of course, but that’s my view. Firearms ownership is a right, and anyone who tries to restrict such ownership is the one needing to be prosecuted, not the gun owner.

NHSparky

Amazing how libs have never made the connection that places with strict gun laws also have the highest crime (particularly violent crime) rates. Then again, who was the asshat WaPo columnist who was all down on gun owners despite having a gun himself?

Ah, freedom for me, but not for thee.

OldSoldier54

“So prosecute the folks who resell their guns to criminals …”

But that requires logic and critical thinking, Jonn. Those genes appear to get deleted in Liberals’ DNA. Mores the pity.

I’m completely with AW1 TIM.

B Woodman

Suggestion:
Accuse the WaPo of sedition and treason against the Gubbment.
What? You say that they’re doing everything they’re supposed to within the law?
PROVE IT!
Since WaPo’s attitude is “guilty until proven innocent”, let’s apply the same standard to them.

Old Trooper

It must be karma that I stumble upon this thread a mere 12 hours after finishing a nice afternoon of killing pumpkins, squash, jugs filled with water, and sheets of paper with circles and writing on them.

When it comes to guns, it seems that even people we consider very rational become illogical in their thought process. In some cases just the sight of a gun turns some into fearful puddles. Why? Because they have been indoctrinated into believing that the gun is evil, the gun sneaks out in the middle of the night and goes on a killing spree. It’s the gun that turns normal people into mass murderers, just by them holding it. It’s never the person, but rather the gun. If little Jimmy hadn’t had a gun, he wouldn’t have turned into a murdering psycho.

Everyone concentrates on Harris and Kleebold (sp?) having guns, when they shot up Columbine, but they forget to mention that they had pipe bombs as well.They don’t mention that the girl that purchased the handguns they had, were purchased legally by the woman, but then given to them.

I can legally walk down a street in my state open carrying a gun, I have the permit that allows me to do that. However, I would probably quickly have police stopping me and asking questions, since I’m sure someone would call the police. A prosecutor that doesn’t like guns could easily charge me with disturbing the peace, since I created an uncomfortable atmosphere in the neighborhood simply by exercising my right.

We have to get over our mis-guided thought that we have the “right to feel safe”, because that right doesn’t exist. If you take issue with someone carrying a gun, that’s your problem, not theirs. As long as they are carrying legally and aren’t committing any crime, they aren’t harming you, so get over yourself.

fm2176

AW1 Tim is right to an extent, firearms are like almost any other property and private transfers are nobody’s business but the seller and buyer. That said, we are restricted by a few laws designed to try to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. For example, so far as I know, it is illegal to sell a firearm to anyone known by the seller to be unqualified to buy one. If I sell a rifle to a close friend whom I know is a felon I am opening myself up to prosecution. Straw purchases are different than private sales, though. If my friend gives me money to buy him a rifle it is a straw purchase. If I buy a rifle with my own money, decide I don’t like it or need money a few days later and sell it to another person it is not a straw purchase.

Lawrence Person

Yes, demography and geography explain pretty much all the reasons behind Realco sticking out so.

Dong

If you wish for to grow your know-how simply keep visiting this
web page and be updated with the most up-to-date gossip posted here.