Digital evidence points to Russian Military as being behind the Bucha killings
Analyzing photo, video, cell phone use, and other data, the New York Times analyzed and reconstructed the killings that occurred on one of Bucha’s streets, down to the minute. The New York Times analysis pointed to a single military unit, and to a single commander, as being the main culprits behind the killings.
The main unit responsible was the 234th Air Assault Regiment, a Russian paratrooper unit. Lieutenant Colonel Artyom Gorodilov led this regiment. The killings targeted unarmed men of war fighting age, children, locals, and other individuals going about their own business. The New York Times concluded that these killings were not a result of crossfire between the Russians and the Ukrainians.
From the New York Times:
Phone Records as Digital Fingerprints
Residents in Bucha said that when Russian soldiers interrogated them, they often seized their phones. Suspecting the soldiers may also have taken the phones of victims, our reporters obtained from Ukrainian authorities a database of all calls and messages placed from the Bucha region to Russia during March. As we interviewed victims’ relatives, we collected their phone numbers and checked if they were in the database. A chilling pattern emerged: soldiers routinely used the phones of victims to call home to Russia, often only hours after they were killed.
By analyzing the phone numbers dialed by Russian soldiers and uncovering social media profiles associated with their family members, The Times confirmed the identity of two dozen paratroopers as members of the 234th Regiment. In many cases, we interviewed their relatives and spoke to some of the soldiers themselves, two of whom confirmed they were in the 234th and served in Bucha. We cross-referenced our findings with personal data sourced from leaked and official Russian databases provided by the Center for Advanced Defense Studies, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit group focused on global security.
Mothers, Fathers, Children: Ordinary Citizens as Victims
The Times identified — for the first time — three dozen people who were killed along Yablunska Street in March. We reviewed death certificates for most of these victims, and the predominant cause of death was gunshot wounds.
The victims were residents of Bucha or neighboring towns, from all ages and professions. Among the victims killed by Russian paratroopers were 52-year-old Tamila Mishchenko and her 14-year-old daughter, Anna, on March 5. They were among four women fleeing Bucha when Russian soldiers fired on their blue minivan.
Nearly all the victims we identified on Yablunska Street were civilians or Ukrainian P.O.W.s. Killing them could be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court and deemed war crimes under international humanitarian law. Because of their systematic and widespread nature, the killings in Bucha could also amount to crimes against humanity. Russia has not joined the I.C.C. and is unlikely to cooperate on any potential future cases that involve Russian soldiers.
The Killings Were Not Random Acts of Violence
The victims on Yablunska Street did not die in the crossfire between Russian and Ukrainian forces, nor were they mistakenly shot in the fog of war. Our investigation shows that Russian troops intentionally killed them, apparently as part of a systematic “clearing” operation to secure the path to the capital. Dozens of civilians were shot dead. In other cases, men suspected of links to the Ukrainian military were rounded up and executed.
The New York Times has additional information on the story, including additional photos.
I tried to find another article talking about this topic, in case the New York Times link is restricted. Here is a video documentary associated with the article:
Everywhere they go they do this, no one is really surprised are they?
Yeah, there’s definitely a historic pattern.
Russkies gonna Russky:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/russian-military-commanders-ordered-soldiers-144255788.html
Wagner Group doing a bang-up job, too:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/russias-infamous-wagner-group-throwing-183201929.html
Russkies easy to fool, too:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/russias-military-easy-fool-makes-225100053.html
And then there’s the Russians’ frickin’ retarded nuclear threats:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/putins-nuclear-threats-stirring-fears-123000929.html
Example #3428 why I have no problems with the US giving Ukraine money to kill Russians. Someone has got to do it. We are ultimately removing one of our two main strategic threats (despite what Obama had to say) at relatively little cost. Unfortunately it will again set up Europe to smugly continue to live their liberal lifestyle at America’s expense while complaining about us. But maybe their cold winter will help them be a bit more reflective this time.
This land is my land
That land is my land
This land was made for CCCP
Wait?!……….WHAT!!!!?
The NYSlime reporting actual investigative NEWS instead of propaganda?!
(was this on purpose, or an accident?)
had to be an accident. the reporter will likely be canned next week for going off the reservation. MIguel Almaguer treatment at the least.
Where in the world is Miguel Almaguer?
Trump’s fault! If he hadn’t colluded with the Russians, none of this would of happened! We were informed by our betters that Trump would start another war…and here we are.
Does anybody need me to insert the /s/ here?
“Red Dawn” anyone???
https://youtu.be/MVqK6wNkSxA?t=113
For those who do not know, William Smith — the Russian colonel — was a USAF veteran and graduate of DLI. He was fluent in Russian, French, German, and Serbo-Croatian. No kidding! I always thought he was just a meat-head.
As the Ruski-colonel:
https://youtu.be/BzYphEVgFF8?t=48
From Wiki:
More propaganda from the NYT. Here’s an analysis from an independent journalist whose boots are on the ground. Bucha Massacre False Flag: Reporter Exposes the Truth Behind Ukrainian War Atrocities (rumble.com) I search for independent analysts and this guy, Michael de la Broc, has consistently been balanced.
Alex Jones? Info Wars? In other instances, I would agree that the NYT is pushing propaganda. However, there are a few times when they get it right. This is one of those times. The above NYT conclusion is consistent with conclusions reached by both Ukraine and by other governments. The NYT substantiated the detailed conclusions that Ukrainian intelligence reached.
Your reference, as well as Michael de la Broc, themselves are pushing propaganda. In fact, Newsweek issued a thorough rebuttal of the claims that this was a “false flag”… Fact Check: Russia Claims Massacre in Bucha ‘Staged’ by Ukraine. Even the United Nations suspects that Russia committed war crimes/crimes against humanity. Russia has a history of committing atrocities in war zones. I remember reading news articles describing similar Soviet atrocities in Afghanistan.
You are a good writer and I often enjoy your non-Ukraine articles. However, your fanatical support of Western/Ukraine propaganda and what appears to be a deep hatred of Russia is bizarre to me. You are usually balanced in your articles, but not in regard to Ukraine.
I look at most pro-Russia stuff with a jaundiced eye. I do the same for pro-Ukraine stuff. Sometimes one side or the other presents compelling evidence; far too often there is no compelling evidence. In the former case, I make a logical judgement – Occam’s razor and all that. In the latter case I may seek further information, but sometimes the propaganda is so obvious, I reject it outright.
PS: to save you some writing, don’t bother hitting me with some fact-checker outfit. I learned a long time ago that there are none worth a damn. I never look at them.
My Ukraine blog articles are consistent with the other articles that I post. I’ve followed events in Ukraine, intensely, since the Russians invaded additional Ukrainian territory earlier this year. This war falls under one of my main interests which involve geopolitical, geostrategic, geoeconomic, etc., topics. No, I’m not being “fanatical” with support for “propaganda”, the change did not happen on my end, but on your end. So far, your arguments, and references, demonstrate anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia propaganda. You insinuate that you are being objective, and that you dismiss both pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian narratives, but your comments do not show this. However, your actions do not support that. On one of my threads, you referenced a statement about Ukrainians fighting from trenches littered with Ukrainian dead. However, when I found your source, I found that it was more balance in reporting, and that your comment was anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia. Nope, there was no “jaundiced eye” about that statement, or about the other one where you asked LC a question, then zeroed in on one statement he made at the expense of the others, as that specific statement supported what you wanted to believe regarding the intercepts done on Russians calling their families. These Russians provided a narrative that contradicted what you wanted to believe. Occam’s razor is absent from your posts. When the Russian Military has a track record of committing war crimes, as they did in Afghanistan, Chechnya, Syria, and elsewhere, and I read and see countless reports of Russian atrocities in Ukraine, Occam’s Razor should indicate that the Russians indeed have done what the New York Times, and Western governments, have concluded that the Russian Military has done. No, when you reject something outright, you’re doing so because it harms your argument, like what you did on my thread involving the communication intercepts. I also remember providing you with links on another thread where you could keep updated with what is happening in Ukraine, you said something about “interest being lost in the thread”. If you do not want me to bother with rebutting you with a fact-check article,… Read more »
The entire war is a war crime. Look up Wars of Aggression, which this is the very definition of.