Ride on the Yankee Lady

| October 10, 2020

The King of Battle sent me this article about the B-17G “Sentimental Journey” hitting up the Richmond, VA area. We were discussing my ride about a year ago on another of the handful of still airworthy B-17’s and I realized I’d never fully shared that with y’all.

Ride on the Yankee Lady

The Yankee Lady is a Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress, originally of the US Army Air Force, and now owned by the Yankee Air Force out of Willow Run, MI. They fly into a local air show here on a somewhat regular basis.

The plane itself was built late in the war, being delivered to the USAAF on 16 July, 1945 and subsequently went immediately into storage. It did not see combat or overseas duty during the war.

After the war, the plane was one of 16 transferred to the Coast Guard for use in patrol duties. The aircraft was extensively modified, removing all the guns and installing a radar dome in the chin. At one point it carried a wooden lifeboat under the fuselage for dropping to stranded seamen.

In 1959, the aircraft entered civil service. Initially used for aerial surveys, it was later converted to an air tanker for fire fighting duties. Yankee Lady was one of five B-17s to fly to Hawaii and be used for the film Tora! Tora! Tora!

The Yankee Air Force acquired the plane in 1986 and spent nearly a decade restoring it. This required extensive work to re-modify the aircraft back to its wartime configuration.

The first time I got to watch the Lady fly was about six years ago. The gleaming aluminum was magnificent. The four Wright Cyclone 9-cylinder engines roaring drew the attention of everyone any time she came in or out. After taking several photos as it took off and landed, they shut it down for about an hour of crew rest and maintenance. During this time, they allowed people to walk through the plane for a small donation.

We were immediately in line for the walk through. Starting at the forward escape hatch, just behind the nose turret on the bottom of the forward fuselage (open in the photo above), we went through to the main door near the tail on the starboard side. One thing you’re struck with is how small they are. It is definitely a young man’s aircraft. Knocking on 40 with a few dozen extra pounds, I could barely make it through from nose to tail.

I’d have bought a ride then and there but was priced out. Since then, I’ve talked about doing it every year. My wife finally gave in this year and said to go do it. As soon as we got to the show, I didn’t give her a chance to argue, and marched right up to the ticket booth and bought one.

When it came time for our ride, one of the crew (all volunteers by the way) escorted us around the plane. I could see under the engines there were puddles of oil, and streaks of fresh oil on the underside of the wings. Aside from that, the plane looked and sounded like new to me. After a quick brief they asked who wanted to sit where. Several of the 10 people (plus 3 crew) had personal connections to the aircraft (parents or grandparents who’d crewed them during the war) and we deferred to them as to where they wanted to sit.

My assigned seat for takeoff was just inside the rear door, near the starboard waist gun. The flight engineer, who was checking our seatbelts, was surprised I got mine on and adjusted in record time. He asked, “You’ve ridden with us before?” Nope, I was Air Force and apparently they never changed seatbelts, because the belts and even the canvas seat is virtually identical to what you’d find on a modern cargo aircraft like the C-130 or C-17.

The interiors on these planes are spartan, even by military standards. The B-17 is an unpressurized aircraft, so there’s no insulation. Each station has an outlet plug for the crews’ heated jackets. The control cables are all exposed as they run the length of the plane. So you have to be mindful as you move around not to pull on one. It’s not a stop call like on a city bus.

The crew then brought those 1,200HP Cyclones up one by one. Once all four were turning, you could feel the great Flying Fortress beneath rearing to go. Like a caged tiger, she was ready to be let loose once more.

It was a hot day, so once we got out to the runway she took nearly the whole 5,000 foot to lift off. The ride itself is surprisingly smooth. It rattles a bit more than a modern aircraft, and there’s visible gaps in many of the panels. This can be a bit disconcerting, particularly as you walk through the plane during flight. For example, standing on the catwalk through the bomb bay, you can look down at the bomb bay doors and through the cracks see the world go by below you. The catwalk itself is less than a foot wide and all that keeps you from falling off are some railings made of rope.

As soon as we were up, the flight engineer gave us the sign to rise up and move about. Those of us in the tail immediately headed forward. The next station forward is the radio room. We’d been forewarned that there is a window on top of the fuselage here that’s wide open. Being that the ceiling is maybe 5’8” from the deck, I had to crouch to avoid losing my hat and/or glasses. Some more intrepid riders stuck their heads out into the slipstream. I stuck my hand out. At about 180 knots it really didn’t feel much different than hanging out of a car.

View of the bomb bay open while taxiing. That wee little platform in the middle is where you walk while in flight.

Forward again, through the narrow passage of the bomb bay, we come to the flight deck. The flight engineer (who also manned the top turret here) sits behind the two pilots, whose cockpit is a step above. We couldn’t sit in the pilots’ seats for obvious reasons, but I stood behind them for a good long while during the flight. I think this was probably my favorite view, in particular because you can pop up into the top turret and get a 360 degree view.

View out of the flight engineer’s top turret, looking aft

To get to the nose of the aircraft you have to go through a small hatch in the floor of the flight deck. Again, this is tiny. It’s maybe 18” across and 24” tall. This drops you all of maybe 20” down onto a narrow walkway into the nose. The forward escape hatch is right next to this, so as you’re maneuvering through the hole you have to stay on the walkway. Too much pressure on that door and it goes flying, likely taking you with it.
There’s a small chair and wooden desk in the nose for the navigator. Which is actually probably one of the most comfortable spots to sit and take in the view. But if you dare, getting into the bombardier’s seat out in the bubble is where it’s all at.

The view from the nose in flight is, in a word, spectacular. It’s also terrifying. The plexiglass bubble gives you an unparalleled view of the world.

View out the nose turret. Bombadier’s seat and Norden bomb sight.

Getting into the seat is tricky, as most movement on the plane is for someone who is not a svelte 19 year old (we’d been told that the allotted crew weight during the war for the 10 man crew was 1,200 pounds, needless to say that four or five of us middle-aged riders would be able to knock that out).

Once in the seat, you are fully in the bubble. As you sit there, you are fully in front of the rest of the plane. It is like being stapled to the nose of the aircraft. I can’t imagine sitting in that seat and looking down through the bomb sight while under fire. There is no way not to feel exposed. Now I can understand why Yossarian went nuts.

Getting out of the nose compartment is easier than getting in.

For the landing, I ended up having to go back through the bomb bay and took the radio operator’s seat. This is right behind the bomb bay and over the wing. It was a great seat for the landing. Luckily the pilots brought it down gently, because the radio equipment is only about three inches away from your face as you sit there. You definitely had to have been short sighted to be a Flying Fortress radio operator.I didn’t take a ton of pictures, because I wanted to be in the moment. I’ve got memories of events where all I remember is getting the perfect shot. Didn’t want to let this be one of those days.

B-17G “Yankee Lady” landing

Only nine B-17’s remain airworthy. From a total production run of 12,731 aircraft, of which 8,680 were the Yankee Lady’s -G model. If you get the chance, it’s not a cheap ticket, but if you’re at all an aviation and/or a World War II history buff, it’s worth it.

As if having such a rare bird flying at the show wasn’t enough, the recently restored B-29 Superfortress “Doc” did a couple of fly-bys. Doc is one of two airworthy B-29’s left in the world (of 3,970 built). Up until Doc’s restoration there had been only one airworthy B-29, FiFi, since the mid-60’s. Doc was rescued from a US Navy bombing range where it had been sitting in the desert and used as a bombing target since 1956!

B-29 “Doc” in flight

B-29 “Doc” in flight

Category: Air Force, Guest Link, We Remember

20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MustangCryppie

I got a chance to fly on Aluminum Overcast a few years back when it came to Frederick, MD. A pricey ticket, and the flight seemed too damn short, but worth every penny. Just sitting in the bombardier seat was worth the price of admission.

26Limabeans

Flew on the 909 with my dad a few times. Sorry to see her gone.
My dad used to tell us kids about having to walk on that
narrow catwalk and release hung bombs by kicking them.

Miss him bad. So much unsaid.

CCO

I walked through Aluminum Overcast a few years ago for the price of showing my DD-214. I can’t believe you walked through the bomb bay in flight! Y’all, it’s maybe eight inches wide.

Showed my kid a picture of the plane; kid asked why’d they put four engines on a plane that small??!!

CCO

And they added gallons of oil to each engine before they flew out that afternoon.

The Other Whitey

The Wright Cyclone, as I understand it, was actually designed to leak oil. Supposedly it helps with cooling, which I guess makes sense on an air-cooled radial.

26Limabeans

Just watching them start all four, one at time is a thrill.
The first one started uses it’s generator to assist starting the next one and so forth.
The farts, coughs, smoke and wheezes coupled with occasional flames is something to behold.
Takes a while until they all sound smooth and the blocks are removed for taxi.

David

Have seen Fifi, good to hear Doc joined her.

Totally agree on the camera comment, after acquiring one of the popular handi-cams I took in an air show at Biggs. Realized afterwards my entire view of the show was about an inch and a quarter square… haven’t taken a separate camera to an event since. Rather have the good memory.

The Other Whitey

Gorgeous! I get my ass over to Gillespie Field every time CAF shows up, and have done so for years, but a ride has always been outside my budget. I love seeing B-17s in the air, though, as they are graceful in flight—it’s easy to see why Great-Uncle Ollie (ground crew, 97th BG (H), 8th/12 AF) called the B-17 the Queen of the Sky. The kids enjoy it, too. My wife and I once took our then-4-year-old niece to check out Sentimental Journey. After I took her through the interior, she noticed the .50-cals sticking out of the ball turret, naturally assumed they were monkey bars, and started swinging accordingly. Some of you may recall a WOT four years ago with pictures of my infant son aboard Nine-O-Nine (RIP). Last year I took him and his big sister to see Sentimental Journey again, as soon as we finished inside, my daughter decided the tail guns and right horizontal stabilizer made the perfect backdrop for an impromptu music video, so I recorded her singing and dancing beside the bomber, which the CAF guys agreed was cute as all hell. “Flying Fortress” by Edward Jablonski is more or less the definitive history of the B-17 in US service, from the initial design work of the Boeing 299, throughout the war, to air/sea rescue duty in Korea (unfortunately it doesn’t cover the Israeli Air Force’s Forts; that’s a hell of a story by itself). It covers every operational theater of the war, and is an entertaining read. It’s available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble. On a side note, Yankee Lady wears the markings of the 381st Bombardment Group (Heavy), 8th Air Force, based at Ridgewell, Essex, UK. http://www.americanairmuseum.com/unit/326 http://www.381stbg.org/index.php The 381st lives on today as the 381st Training Group at Vandenburg AFB, though they switched from bombers to ICBMs back in the 50s, which unfortunately meant they gave up their cool old motto of “Triumphant we fly!” The 1/48 B-17 I’m going to build for my wife will be in bare-aluminum silver with the 381st’s colors (she likes red and her name… Read more »

Skippy

My son I believe helped with the restoration of Doc
If that’s the one that was restored in Wichita Ks
I’m not for sure what he did but he’s help with a few other Aircraft also at a Air Museum there

5th/77th FA

Cool as all hell, Mason…You da man! You do real good for an Air Force Puke. Thanks for sharing the story of your flight on Yankee Lady. And Thanks to everyone else for sharing their Aerial Artillery Platform Stories. I do love big things that go Ka-BOOM!!!

To insure equal time, y’all check out the linkys on the CAF (FKA Confederate Air Force) Sentimental Journey. And the linkys embedded in that article. Good stuff there too. And the 38FIRST that TOW gave us.

Many of you have made mention whenever I post a linky to the Museum of Aviation In Warner Robins GA. They have, among others, a B-29, and are in the process of restoring a B-17. If you ever get a chance, you would enjoy a visit to MoA. Mighty 8th has a nice facility outside of Pooler GA. Also well worth the trip!

https://museumofaviation.org/category/aircraft-restoration/

Messkit

I love to tell the story, of when “Nine-0-Nine” came to town, and a bunch of Dad’s former Boy Scouts from the 60’s and 70’s, pitched in to give him a ride on her. He could not have been more appreciative, nor have loved his old boys more than that day. However..

…While standing alongside the plane, and telling him that we got him the next ride on board, he quite vehemently stated; “I hated being in there when I had to, no damn way am I going to volunteer to fly in that piece of shit again!”

rgr769

I have ridden in both a B-17G and a B-24. The B-17 was painted as Fuddy Duddy; the B-24 was the Collings Foundation’s Witchcraft. Interesting experience in the B-24 ride last year; we had an engine malfunction shortly after take-off and had to return to the airport. The fellow sitting next to me claimed to be a Viet of the Nam Huey crewman. I asked him a few questions about his tour and his answers convinced me he was not aircrew. Our engine problem seemed to rattle him and he did not arrange to get a re-ride the following day, as I did. I think the malfunction made him too nervous for a re-ride. Anyway, that is my assessment, since he had to kiss off a $385 ticket for about eight minutes in the air.

The B-24 had a much lower survival rate, especially if the aircraft had to ditch in the sea. The B-17 had a much stronger airframe and structural design.

CCO

And the high wing of the B-24 was not as conducive to ditching; someone (I forget where/who) pointed out that the B-24 was a later, war-time design so it was built lighter—less rugged, but with a longer range.

rgr769

It carried a substantially larger bomb load, as well. It has a two section bomb bay; whereas, the B- 17 has a single section bomb bay. The 24’s much higher wing loading made it much more likely to experience structural failure from battle damage. The B-24 was designed about four years after the B-17.

The Other Whitey

Both were 1930s peacetime designs. The B-17 was mid-30s while the -24 was late-30s. Interestingly enough, the B-17 was originally conceived as a “strategic defense” bomber that would hit enemy warships at sea with high-altitude level bombing, an idea that was both completely asinine (as proved during the war*) and made the Navy do everything they could to prevent it from being funded in the mid- to late-30s**. The B-24, on the other hand, was designed from the ground up for the long-range strategic bombardment role. Neither plane originally came with powered gun turrets (or that many guns), armor, self-sealing fuel tanks, or turbochargers. All of the above were added to new variants of both designs (B-17E and B-24D) shortly before the US entered the war. The B-17 had a higher maximum speed, higher altitude ceiling, higher cruising altitude, and heavier theoretical maximum bomb load. The B-24 was slower at max throttle, but had a faster cruising speed, longer range, a larger and heavier internal bomb load (the B-17 could only reach its maximum load with the use of external pylons under the wing roots), and lost less range per pound of ordnance carried than a B-17 (i.e. it could carry a larger load farther, despite a lower theoretical maximum weight capacity). Both aircraft were highly versatile, mechanically reliable, and resilient to battle damage, though the B-17 was indeed tougher than the B-24. The B-17 was a “pilot’s aircraft” said to handle just like a Piper Cub, only bigger. The B-24 is reputed to have been a harder plane to fly, but the B-24 vets I have talked to said this reputation is overblown and that the Liberator handled almost as well as a B-17. The final takeaway is that both aircraft had strengths and weaknesses, and the two types complemented eachother in the grand scheme of things. Even as the B-24 became the standard long-range bomber in the Pacific, Kenney and other commanders still held on to the B-17s they started with for the duration of the war, using them for armed recon, anti-ship interdiction (via skip-bombing, see below),… Read more »

Steve 1371

Mason,
thanks for bringing us along for that ride. Enjoyed it very much.

CCO

Yes, well written.

rgr769

I would strongly recommend taking a ride in one of these WWII aircraft if one can afford the almost $400 price tag for about a 25 minute ride. Once you are in the air, they let the passengers crawl around the aircraft. One can get into every crew position except on the flight deck and the tail gunner position in the B-17. They even have the passengers pull the props through four turns before engines start, if it is the 1st flight of the day.

It is the experience of a lifetime if you are interested in WWII aircraft. You can even book a back seat ride in a P-51 if you can handle over $2K for the ride.