Whistle Blower
One of our ninjas forwarded this article on Eric Ciarmella, the purported Ukrainian whistle blower.
Eric Ciaramella: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Eric Ciaramella is a CIA analyst and former National Security Council staffer who has served in both the Obama and Trump administrations as a career intelligence officer. Senator Rand Paul tweeted a link to an article by Real Clear Investigations that named Ciaramella as possibly being the whistleblower who came forward with concerns about President Donald Trump’s interactions with the president of Ukraine, leading to an official impeachment inquiry.
Ciaramella was named on social media in early October and by Real Clear Investigations on October 30, 2019, after weeks of speculation about his identity. According to the conservative-leaning Real Clear Investigations, Ciaramella’s name has been an open secret in Washington D.C. His name has since been spread by conservative pundits and websites, including the Washington Examiner and The Federalist. Senator Paul called for the whistleblower to be subpoenaed to testify under oath. Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz also shared a link to the RCI article on Twitter.
Ciaramella could not be reached for comment by Heavy. The whistleblower’s attorneys issued a statement saying they neither confirm nor deny Ciarmella is the whistleblower. Ciaramella’s father told Real Clear Investigations he doubts his son is the whistleblower, saying, “He didn’t have that kind of access to that kind of information. He’s just a guy going to work every day.”
The rest of the lengthy article, including the five facts, may be found here: Heavy.com
We have the best ninjas.
Category: 2020 Election, Guest Post, Media
That’s TWO DAMN IT AW1Ed
PPPBBHHHTTT!!!!!!!
Blow THIS DEMOCRAPS!!!
https://imgflip.com/i/3ev2nl
This is BS.
Why I cannot post pictures in TAH?
You are violating my constipational rights…!
The only thing that mere mortals can post that everyone can usually see are youtube videos. Admins have to look at your links and if they like a particular photo, they will post it not just the link.
Perry? That you? Cat got your pinkies or something??
FWIW, the above used comment used the whistle graphic with the normal image source tag, the image link location as a URL, and the appropriate “alt”, “height”, and “width” parameters. It didn’t work. One possible explanation is that the “height”, and “width” parameters downsized the original image on the fly. That, or the current settings for TAH Word Press either don’t like images in comments or need additional mark-up.
You have the right to remain silent, too.
I have had the right to remain silent on several occasions,, unfortunately I didn’t have the common sense to do it.
Finally
When this whistle blowjobber first came out
That name was already out as being one of the WH
Leakers no surprise to see this name again
https://imgflip.com/i/3dc6u3
I have multiple mugs
Of that snowflake
And there are so many more
I refuse to swallow either the Blue Pill or the Red Pill, you twinkies!!!
But, but…he sure doesn’t fit the image of a Washington, swamp-dwelling lib, does he? Remember the hot chocolate sipping nerd in the red and black plaid pajamas who became the iconic image of the basement-dwelling beta males of the liberal movement?
This Ciaramella fella may become the icon of liberal swamp rat whistle blowers.
Seriously, the guy is fully plugged into Biden, Brennan and Susan Rice?
Gee, one could almost suspect he was deliberately groomed and specifically selected for the whistle blower mission, couldn’t one?
Oh hell! Here goes ol’ Poe with another damned conspiracy theory, hmm?
Not every conspiracy is a theory.
Not every theory is a conspiracy…?
Theory??? Theory??? (Snnrrrttt!) What theory?
Hah! Ain’t not sech thing, Poetrooper.
My jiffypop popcorn hat is no longer in use thanks to Democrats
Talk about BSC
On the flip side
Why is no one talking about the roll
The DIA players involved with the Russian Hillary bought and payed or
Hoax it wasn’t just the FBI CIA NSA
Nor is anybody taking about the spying
Done under Obama on Congress
It made the news for about 8 seconds and that was it
As Henry the K once said, even paranoids have enemies.
Oh, am I chuckling right now! Just opened a news site and discovered that none other than Rush Limbaugh made the same connection between the Ciaramella fella and Pajama Boy.
What is it they say about great minds running in the same channels?
Do you suppose Rush reads TAH? Heh.
And, NO, Poe did not get it from Rush.
Somebody’s been listening to Rush….
I was wondering when I would read the name of the clown…..
But, Trump is unpresidential!
He have to be removed, no matter the cost, using whatever means necessary.
Everything the whistleblower reported has been substantiated by witnesses under oath.
YEAH RIGHT, then how come NO GOP Lawmaker has been allowed to ask questions and the “Whistleblower” is only saying what booger-eating pisspants like Schiff let tthem say. Buckle up Snowflake, because this too is going to be an even bigger nothingburger than the Russian Collusion hoax!
Everything the whistleblower reported has been substantiated by witnesses under oath and using the script approved by Adam Schiff.
We’re still only getting one side, and it’s coached, filtered, and edited before being selectively leaked.
My prediction is that this too will turn out to be a 24K nothingburger as soon as both sides of the story come to light while Commissar Seagull and his fellow zealots screech their usual.
MAGA 2020!!!
And rebutted by others.
y the way, what is your definition of “substantiation”? Using the definition below nothing he said has been “substantiated”.
“To prove the truth of or support with proof or evidence: substantiate an accusation.”
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/substantiation
It’s easy to see substantiation when you have a fatal case of confirmation bias.
TDS has so infected him and the rest of the Democrats that they would rather fawn over a dead terrorist than compliment the president. Never thought that would actually happen, but here we are.
Not TDS, COmmissar Seagull has Trump Acceptance Resistance Disorder (TARD) to the point where he lets it run his life thus making him a Trump Acceptance Resistance Disorder Operative , a TARDO!
Lars is a fine example of what a TARDO is even though he’s borderline Really Exceptional Trump Acceptance resistance Disorder Operative, a RETARDO!
Good grief.
Wrong as usual, Lars.
You never get tired of playing the Jackass in the room, do you…
Oh wait. You are not playing.
Plenty more Crow for you to dine upon. Dig in.
LTC Vindman been walking round with a Strzok smirk all week. He and Ciaramella on the DL?
Is it me or does LTC Vindman look like a pole smoker?
Guys, guys, guys!!! Easy does it! You can’t even get Da Troot out of the Vatican any more!!!
We live in strange, strange times… It’s almost as if we’re in… the twilight zone….
I wonder two things. First, how soon will we see Commissar Seagull come here and regurgitate his “Orange Man Bad, Orange Man Bad…” crap du jour and after that I wonder just how quickly this will become the XXXL Nothingburger that past faux scandals manufactured by the left have?
Why do I even have to say it?
If you had any integrity you would admit it.
If you cared about your country more than your partisan identity you would admit it.
HOLY SHIT Commissar Seagull, do you really believe the shit you spew?
I really am starting to think he’s just trolling us in an epic long con.
“If you had any integrity…”
“If you cared about your country more than your partisan identit…”
Smile when you write that, pardner.
Commissar made my shit list when he tried to say that Marines got an award just( like the Army started doing) for graduating boot camp.
I told he it was bad scoop and he got his ass all up in the air and tried to post “proof” .. The Proof he put up was the recognition that the honor man, high PFter and High Shooter each get… I pointed out that they are individual awards given to three members of the platoon, not everyone.
Then he scurried back to his rat hole and came up with a ” Certificate of Acceptance that Poolees get when they are qualified to go to boot camp.
Once again not even an award, and has nothing to do with actually completing boot camp.
Dipshits like Commissar is why I question the intelligence and patriotism of any officer who received a commission during the Clinton and Oba ma era.
Trump needs another term to purge the Military of all the Clintonistas and Obamites
Oblowme, or oba mao….
Fixed it for you…
Just more evidence of the deep state hard at work. My theory is he, along with all of Congress, is a Constipated Conspiracy. This sissy punk swore an oath to defend the Constitution against ALL enemies, foreign AND domestic. And if Joe/Hunter Biden aren’t enemies of this Constitution in someone’s opinion, then again, I have a bridge leading to ocean front property to interest them in. If you look at polesmokers resume’ he was CIA and NSC during that time frame that those organizations were being “weaponized” to use against any of the people the demon rats thought were a threat to their plans to destroy our Republic.
FIRST thing daTrump should have done when he walked into the WH was fire every swinging weenie and scrunt that was left over from oblow me or had ever worked any where near the Klintoons.
A patriot.
Though he is irrelevant moving forward since every single thing he reoriented has proven substantiated by other witnesses under oath and by the president himself.
Like SFC D said, the only “substantiated evidence” has been what has been filtered by the D-rats, it’ll fall apart under real sunlight, you watch!! In the meantime, what do YOU say about Joe Biden’s confessed quid pro quo deal with Ukraine dealing with his son?
Are you saying only the Democrats are leaking from the hearings? Because contrary to the message they’re pushing, and what you said above, Republicans are in those hearings, and are asking questions.
I’m inclined to think that whoever leaked Morrison’s comment that he doesn’t feel a crime was committed is a Republican, not a Democrat. Likewise, the leak where Morrison said there was a quid pro quo was likely a Democrat.
As for things falling apart in real sunlight, I’ll take that bet. We’ve had POTUS and Republicans insisting on ‘no quid pro quo’, but the latest reporting is that Republicans are about to change tactics and say there was a quid pro quo, but it isn’t impeachable. If anything seems to be falling apart, it seems to be the ‘no quid pro quo’ defense.
And while I can’t speak for Lars, there’s a vast difference between Biden, with the full backing of the US, the EU, and the IMF, asking a foreign country to deal with corruption by firing their own prosecutor who wasn’t doing his job and a President asking that same foreign country to investigate his political rival, and doing it through his questionable ‘second channel’ diplomacy of Giuliani. I’m real interested in seeing what the counterintelligence investigation on that turns up.
LC, you and Lars were oh so confidant that Mueller’s investigation was going to be Trump’s undoing. So how did that work out for you? Your wishful thinking is clouding your judgment once again.
Schiff paraphrased the transcript of the call in the worst possible terms for Trump that he thought he (Schiff) could get away with and then still had to re-characterize his “facts” as “parody.”
Do you seriously believe that if a headline hog like Schiff was now in possession of information to exonerate himself of that national embarrassment he wouldn’t have leaked it to a friendly media source?
C’mon, man…
So far there’s been nothing but accusations there was a quid pro quo, and those accusations have been weak at best.
Quid pro quos are part and parcel of international relations. Of course we demand things from countries we’re sending millions or billions of dollars to. We’d be rank idiots not to!
If there was a quid pro quo, which so far is a pretty sizable if, it was in regards to fighting corruption. Which, since it looks like Burisma hired Hunter only for his connection to his father who was running point on Ukraine, makes Hunter and Joe Biden’s activities with Ukraine fully part of that. We should be investigating it from our end, but Ukraine most definitely should be as well. We, the United States, have a vested interest in making sure that money given to Ukraine isn’t going to be used to line the pockets of oligarchs there.
“…there’s a vast difference between Biden, with the full backing of the US, the EU, and the IMF, asking a foreign country to deal with corruption by firing their own prosecutor who wasn’t doing his job and a President asking that same foreign country to investigate his political rival…”
Convenient that you left out the reality that Joe asked Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating a company that was questionably employing Joe’s son at a baseless, exorbitant salary? Funny how you overlooked that small detail isn’t it, old boy?
Biden also admitted on camera his own Ukraine quid pro quo: Fire that effing prosecutor before I leave in six hours or you are not going to get that billion. (And that is almost a direct quote.)
Isn’t it amazing that the proglodyte crypto-commie supported deep-staters never deviate from that fundamental rule from Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals:” When it serves your goal, accuse your opponents of doing the improper or unlawful things that you have been doing. (Somewhat paraphrased, but that is the rule.) But then the whole 0bama regime was full of Anlinskyites.
” If anything seems to be falling apart, it seems to be the ‘no quid pro quo’ defense.”
And it deserves to. There is nothing wrong with a “quid pro quo”. Joe Biden, an alleged victim, himself bragged about using one. It is a normal procedure; a contract is a QPQ, as is a treaty or trade agreement or…. Over the years I have heard many Democrats criticizing Republicans for *not* engaging in a QPQ; not requiring aid recipients to clean up corruption, for instance. Or not requiring Israel to close down settlements in return for our support.
Just what were the Ukrainians going to get for this alleged QPQ that they were not already gong to get?
patriot noun
pa·tri·ot | \ ˈpā-trē-ət , -ˌät, chiefly British ˈpa-trē-ət\
: one who loves and supports his or her country
Care to look at that definition, contemplate the actions of this jackwagon, the masters he serves, and their technocrat/nepotistic/deep state/warmongering actions, then have a conversation or are you just going to continue to be, well, you.
I don’t think you know what a patriot is anymore. Your head is so far up Trump’s ass that you are saluting his colon.
And when your ‘whistleblowers’ turn out to be partisan hack liars, what then?
The above for-mentioned all ready opted out and his lawyers have clammed up.
You think Orangeman did bad things to make him no talk?!
And you can FOAD, I serve no master.
Everything the whistleblower reported has been substantiated under oath by other witnesses.
Several witnesses at this point.
Once again you’re full of shit, Commissar Poodledick!
Yes, and nobody lies under oath to Congress.
When you’re sitting in front of a panel chaired by a serial and unrepentant liar, there’s little faith I have that people will think they’ll be held accountable if they lie.
Remember when Schiff got caught on the phone trying to get dirt on Trump from some Russian nationals? You could practically hear him drooling.
I have empiric data that shows all of you that I am a cuck for Bernie and AOC! My talisman (the FLACCID MICROMINIPENIS OF TRUTH) is all I need to prove to you that ORANGE. MAN. BAD.
Or not.
https://twitter.com/Jim_Hickman13/status/1190077852680634368
*single thing he reported (not reoriented).
Do you ever contemplate anything other than that which your harebrained idiot commie UC Berzerkely Professors feed you? Wow, you are one very easily deluded impetuous 24K zealot!
You can repeat that line all you want, but that still does not make it true.
Sounds like Vindman might be a role model for Lars.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Jim_Hickman13/status/1190077852680634368
Wow! That is just devastating to the Dems.
LC, Lars, Steeley, you guys trying so desperately to cling to hope need to check this out.
I’ve been busy and unable to keep up with the replies, but this one just had me utterly shocked. Here’s the thing – I don’t care what Vindman’s politics are. I care if his testimony is corroborated, as that surely will lead to more investigation, and then I care what that finds.
I don’t care if a witness is a vegan transgendered communist who thinks AOC is too far to the right or the reincarnated soul of Ronald Reagan himself. It’s about facts, not parties. The fact that you don’t get that is telling.
That’s exactly the point I’ve been trying to make. I want facts. Good, bad, or ugly. Not what Adam Schiff tells me the facts are. Liberal Democrats like him feel I’m too stupid to separate the facts from the bullshit, so I get fed straight bullshit. Enough.
Ok-here are some facts:
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2019/10/a-top-national-security-council-nsc.html?m=1
The irony is that many people above are claiming the facts that are leaking out that support the Democrats aren’t ‘facts’ since they’re leaks. Yet this is also a leak – there are no official transcripts yet. Doesn’t this illustrate a political bias?
I do take it as face value (for now), simply because I don’t believe people are going to make up lies that will be proven false in the short-term, but his comment on legality is of less interest to me than the fact that he backed up the so-called ‘quid pro quo’. Why? Because he’s really not qualified to comment on the legality of it. Yes, he has a JD from Georgetown, but this is a highly specialized area of law – which in itself is a diverse field.
I want to hear what he said happened, when it happened, how it corroborates with other testimony, and then let the legal experts weigh in. All of which is rather moot at this point anyway, since the Democrats are almost certainly going to vote to impeach, and the Republicans are almost certainly going to vote against removal from office.
So, your position is that an attorney, who is a top official at the NSC. Is not competent to speak to the legality of what he heard in a conversation between the President and a foreign leader, but some unnamed other might be competent to speak to such a legal issue? Tie yourself in whatever knots you like, but that one seems unlikely to bear much weight when pulled upon (sort of the point of knots, to continue the analogy). Meanwhile, Morrison also testified that he believed that the Ukrainians were unaware that any aid had been discontinued, and weren’t aware until after Schiff coordinated with the “whistleblower”, which would seem to be an element of any “quid pro quo”. Believe whatever you like, but when all of this testimony gets out in the open, it’s going to be very hard to make a compelling case for any wrongdoing. BTW, why is Schiff, from.the Intelligence committee running this instead of Nadler from the Judiciary? I mean, that’s who normally handles such matters, given the legal nature of the proceedings. Could it be that it provides a convenient excuse to keep the matter “secret” while leaking anything damaging to their media allies? More than one can play that game. I don’t think you’re going to see any open vote on impeachment in the House, just an effort to try and drag this out until the election in the hopes that some of it will stick-good luck with that.
Should be a comma after “NSC” in the first sentence.
Yes on Morrison. And not to split hairs, but he’s not an attorney – to the best of my knowledge, he never took the bar and thus isn’t a practicing lawyer.
And no on Vindman – I never said anything about legality, one way or another. He testified to what he heard and saw, and it was corroborated by other witnesses. That fuels an investigation, that’s it.
And once again, you’re talking about ‘damaging leaks’ from Schiff, but ignoring that if Schiff were being partisan (a good possibility), why would he leak that Morrison said nothing illegal happened? He wouldn’t, which means that was probably leaked by some of the Republicans there. So the leaking of damaging things is happening on both sides.
I’ll also point out that other lawyers have said that Morrison saying nothing illegal happened makes sense, because otherwise he opens himself up to an obstruction cause. Is that true? I’m not a lawyer either, so I don’t know.
But I’ll take that bet on the open vote on impeachment. It’s definitely going to happen. If you don’t believe me, I’m more than happy to make a wager on that.
Name he stakes of whatever bet you like-I think I know what game the Dems are playing.
And I freely admitted above that the Republicans are doing some of the leaking. That’s why I said “more than one can play that game”. The only question is who is leaking what to damage whom? When leaks are the way forward you play the leak game. I don’t really have any problem with it.
Small donation to a charity of the other’s choosing? Nothing big; this could be $20, and on an honor code, since I like to keep my anonymity.
Here’s why I see an open vote coming – for starters, the Democratic base wants impeachment, and if they don’t get a vote the anger currently directed at President Trump will be directed at their representatives that didn’t push for it. Second, the Republicans have 23 Senate seats up for election in 2020, and the Democrats have only 12 – they want the R’s on the record with opposing impeachment. Granted, this is a dangerous game since Trump supporters will love it when they do, but the vulnerable Senators are in more of a bind. I expect that as the public becomes more aware of all the other stuff in the Ukraine orbit, like the Giuliani/Parnas/Fruman/Firtash angle, public sentiment is going to shift further against Trump, and that’ll put some of those Senate races more in play.
These are only small-scale adjustments, but at the end of the day it’s like counting cards – it doesn’t guarantee you win, but it pushes the odds towards you. Democrats want this to be in the Senate, and for a Senate vote, well before the next election.
Very well, I accept. The terms are a vote by the whole house for or against impeaching President Trump before the 2020 election and nothing short of that.
Jeez.So the folks who actually heard the phone call and say there was nothing illegal are either
1) incompetent to speak on that issue, or
2) guilty of obstructing justice.
On the other hand, those who say it was illegal are fine, upstanding, heroic patriots.
“I’m not a lawyer either, so I don’t know.”
But it sure is fun to spread rumors and insinuations, eh?
Let’s say someone says you did something illegal – who is best able to judge your legal jeopardy? A guy who was there with you, but knows nothing about the law. A guy who was there, and graduated law school, but hasn’t practiced in the highly specialized area this involves, or a guy who is a practicing lawyer specialized in this area?
Or to move it to a different field, if some guy is shot in a bar, who should he ask about his medical condition? A guy who was there with him but has no medical training, a guy who was there and went to med school, but never practiced medicine, or a trauma surgeon focused on gun-shot wounds?
I’m going to go with the experts, yes.
Beware LC, this is where the “three felonies a day” bunch comes in. Essentially this attitude is one where we all must have an attorney on retainer and consult with him about the smallest act. The law should be so simple and transparent that it can be understood by a layman, because laymen must obey it at their peril, if your guilt relies on the interpretation of experts you might find yourself in trouble for having essentially done nothing wrong. And if you want to know why there is opposition to “the deep state” this is as good a reason as any, because interpreting and enforcing arcane regulations is the bread and butter of the faceless bureaucracy. Far too many of us have had to deal with the whim of the bureaucrat who makes you jump through hoops for no other reason then his own amusement. If you’re going to ask the average American that the judgment of an “expert” ought to trump (if you’ll forgive the pun) his or her own reading of the President’s words in the transcript that may play out differently than you think.
Then let’s get the impeachment process moving instead of this political theater bullshit. End the charade.
Looks like you’ll get your wish soon. Though I’d argue the stuns the Republicans are pulling, like storming the SCIF (even if it wasn’t needed for the hearings) is as much a stunt as anything the Democrats are doing. Some of those guys had access to the hearings to begin with!
Political theater everywhere.
STORMING??? A peaceful protest conducted in a gentlemanly manner and you resort to CNN hysterics to describe the event? Here’s video from a hostile source–you care to describe for us here at TAH the outrageous activity implied in your term “storming.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t-KsMD3fkA
LC, you’ve previously stated you only want the truth. You know what I think the truth is, LC? I believe the truth is that you’re not telling the truth, which is that you really are a NeverTrumper.
You can protest your neutrality on this forum till the cows come home, LC, but this is one TAH regular who’s calling bullshit on your self-proclaimed neutrality.
Political theater, indeed.
Storming wasn’t used in the literal sense – they didn’t charge in, guns blazing, waving American flags and defeating the evil Democrats. They just entered when (most) weren’t welcome, though ironically some were and were just fully invested in the showmanship.
And yes, I want the truth. And I also think President Trump is an embarrassment to the country. I’ve held the opinion that he’s a conman for year, even before his Presidential run, and made no secret of that here. It doesn’t mean he’s always wrong, but it does mean I generally attribute his successes to chance, not ability.
And I also hated Hillary with a passion, and am independent in my politics. Had the Republicans run Huntsman or Kasich, I’d have been pretty happy to vote for them easily. I’ve voted for plenty of Republicans in my life, and will continue to do so. But Donald Trump is an idiot, and unless your ego refuses to let you admit that, some day I think you’ll agree.
Reminds me of Winston Churchill’s characterization of submarine warfare—
“The dastardly Nazi U-boats who attack and destroy defenseless merchant ships without warning, leaving the civilian crews to freeze and drown in the icy waters of the North Atlantic”.
vs. “Gallant Allied submariners who risk their lives to cut the flow of war materials to the Nazi war machine”.
Or something like that.
I suspect all three are paid trolls. Based on their verbosity, they are likely paid by the word count.
And LC is the most treacherous because he tries to worm his way in to the discussions here by making us believe he’s neutral.
He’s a fucking weasel.
Word! ($1, one Soros buck if you are one of the three amigos)
It’s all starting to come out finally
SO Vindman turns out to be YET another sniveling D-rat party hack, wotta surprise! HEY LARS, would you like an extra-large serving of CROW to go with your nothingburger? By the way, how are the rolling blackouts in the PRoCA going? I bet it’s a lot like Venezuela!
Where is a spare shocked face when you need one? I totally did not see this coming! /s/
Yeah, but facts mean absolutely nothing to ignorant fanatical zealots like Lars and his ilk!
That is why I have commented here for years that it is a waste of effort to engage with a zealot.
“No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot.” – Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain)
How many more are there like this crapweasel in the Pentagon and the White House????
TROLLING, TROLLING, ACROSS THE BOUNDING SEA.
An interesting article on the “Whistleblower”, written by Jeffrey Lord:
“Eric Ciaramella Reelects the President? Whistleblower Allegedly Revealed by RealClearInvestigations: Time For Him To Face the Music”
https://spectator.org/eric-ciaramella-reelects-the-president/
“Ciaramella, we learn, was allegedly dismissed from his job in the White House because, yes indeed “He was accused of working against Trump and leaking against Trump,” said a former NSC official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.”
“If all of this is true — if ex-Obama aide and CIA guy Eric Ciaramella is in fact the whistleblower — then look no further for the man who may have single-handedly reelected President Trump.”
“Because if Ciaramella is the whistleblower as alleged, he will join the cast of Washington elitists who have already made plain their utter contempt not merely for the duly elected president of the United States — but also for the 63 million Americans who elected him. And this will decidedly not go down well with them.”
What deep state? There’s no deep state. Then when the deep state strikes, we get “Thank God for the deep state.”
https://www.oann.com/former-cia-director-mclaughlin-thank-god-for-the-deep-state/
der Kommie has already gottn fed penitentiary preclearance for visitation of that douche and Clapper.
Rumor is he’s learning how to keister metal files for his commie homies.
Check out this 14 minute video published on 23 October 2019 reference the “Whistleblower AKA Eric Ciaramella, who has ties to Adam Schiff, Susan Rice, General McMasters, the Bidens, etc. etc.
Well Worth The Watch:
Aww GEE WHIZ, the “whistleblower” is also a D-rat party hack? Wotta surprise and another boost in the polls for President Trump, MAGA 2020!!!
Wow! The whole conspiracy and the parties involved is pretty well laid out.
Another partisan leftist Democrat shitbag from the same ol’ crowd of partisan leftist Democrats shitbags.
The more I see of this, the more sure I am that his will blow up in the D-rat party’s collective face. The more it does the more I wonder how big of an effort the D-rat/Soros lackeys in the mainstream media will make to spin and censor the truth?
The word whistleblower really doesn’t mean what some would have us believe that it means. It certainly isn’t someone who gets all offended by a story he hears about something somebody else heard happened over there. There are several terms appropriate to describe that behavior, none of which are protected by law or particularly revered by most of society.
What a complete waste of time and money.