GOP vs. Limbaugh

| January 27, 2009

The President likes to blame Rush Limbaugh for the opposition he faces in the Senate, but the GOP? Politico’s John Martin reported earlier that after Limbaugh made the point that Obama is more afraid of Limbaugh than he is of Mitch McConnell, another GOP Senator leapt to McConnell’s defense;

“I think that our leadership, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, are taking the right approach,” [Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga.] said. “I mean, it’s easy if you’re Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh or even sometimes Newt Gingrich to stand back and throw bricks. You don’t have to try to do what’s best for your people and your party. You know you’re just on these talk shows and you’re living well and plus you stir up a bit of controversy and gin the base and that sort of that thing. But when it comes to true leadership, not that these people couldn’t be or wouldn’t be good leaders, they’re not in that position of John Boehner or Mitch McConnell.”

No, Limbaugh isn’t in the same position as McConnell. McConnell is supposed to be a position of leadership, not a position of reconciliation. If members of the GOP are turning towards Limbaugh, it’s because those “leaders” in the GOP have failed us. Limbaugh took the helm of conservatism in 1994 because no one in the Republican Party acted like leaders. And when Newt Gingrich finally formulated a plan to win, Limbaugh stepped aside.

Democrats are scared of Limbaugh, as they should be. The Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee has put up a poll to tell Limbaugh to shut up. Like he’ll listen to a stupid spammed poll. But like everything else the Democrats do, it’s form over substance.

The Washington Post asks “Is Limbaugh the new face of the GOP?” He will be if the Republicans that have been elected to their leadership positions don’t show some of that leadership. But that’s not likely. The Post got a quote from a McCain aide who’s afraid the whole GOP will be lumped in with Limbaugh;

John Weaver, a former senior aide to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), said that Republicans must be careful not to allow their Democratic rivals to paint them all with the brush of Limbaugh.

“The Democrats and the far left will do all they can to grab electoral turf,” said Weaver. “And one sure way to do it is take some of the most controversial voices on the extreme right — like Limbaugh and [Alaska Gov. Sarah] Palin — and try to insist they speak for all members of the center/right movement.”

Only a McCain aide would think Limbaugh and Palin are extreme right. If the dwindling number of Republican Party members can’t point their fingers at themselves for their recent electoral failures, then they might as well pack up and leave, too.

To their credit, Boehner and Cantor told rank and file GOP members to vote ‘no’ on the President’s $825 billion stimulous package, but how much influence do they have among the squishies like Snowe, Collins and Voinavich? Republicans have been cruising towards this trainwreck since 2002 when they took their majority for granted.

So if it takes a lowly entertainer to bring conservatives back to the party, so be it. Like I said, it worked in 1992, and if the Congressional GOP caucus can’t pull their heads out of their collective ass in the next year, it might be our only chance to blunt this assault on the Constitution that we’re facing.

Category: Politics

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LT Nixon

I think Michael Steele would make a good RNC chairman. He’s very media savvy and is opposed to this ridiculous bailout bonanza of the last 5 months. So many Republicans are waffled when Bush supported the original TARP, and now it’s become a total feeding frenzy. 10 years down the road, when we’re all living like hobos and chasing pigeons around to eat, we’re going to regret all this.

LT Nixon

Oh wait, aren’t you from Mary-land? What do you think of Steele?

Jonn wrote: I think Steele could be President in 4 years after the Democrats destroy our economy with this silly bail out idea. I think a Steele/Palin ticket would be unbeatable (or Palin/Steele).

PDizzle

Yes, John Weaver knows what he is talking about. He helped Sen McCain get elected Presid… oh, wait. So, I guess the article should read: John Weaver, failed aide to Sen McCain…

rochester_veteran

I am an independent conservative and am not a member of the Republican Party. For the most part, I vote for conservative candidates that happen to be Republican, and I flip the lever on their “Conservative” line in the voting booth.

I did vote for Palin/McCain this past election, but let’s face it, although I respect his service and sacrifice to our country, John McCain is a RINO. He and the other Republicans that feel that they need to be “conciliatory” towards Obama and the lefties are doing nothing but kissing butt and undermining the conservative base of the party. Rush is right when he says that when the Republicans heed their conservative base, they win elections, but when they try to be bipartisan and become “Democrat-lite” they lose elections.

If this shift of being “conciliatory” towards Obama and the lefties continues, perhaps it’s time for conservatives to break from the Republican party and form an independent conservative party that’s committed to a platform of smaller government, lower taxes and more personal freedom and to push back on the socialist Utopia that Obama and the lefties wish to establish here in the US.

Trish

I just signed the petition, commending Rush. I hope that these idiots (read Democrats) read each of the comments, those pompous know-it-alls.

Trish

I just signed the petition, commending Rush. I hope that these idiots (read Democrats) read each of the comments, those pompous know-it-alls.

richard wheeler

Trish There is no bigger (read FAT) pompous know it all than Rush.The Dems.biggest fear should be over confidence.Names like Palin and Steele as future Repub. candidates elicit major yawns.

olga

RW,
Your statement on Palin and Steele shows that you do not know the real conservatives: these names do energize the conservative base. Or you know it too well and are scared s##tless of any of them appearing in 2012…
The Republicans in the Congress make me nauseous…sometimes even more than the Libs…

richard wheeler

HI Olga Energizing the conservative base will win you about 20% of the electorate.Palin does not draw Dem women and Steele won’t bring blacks or latins.Indies and moderates will vote Dem.Best case for Repubs.,I believe,would be 35%-38% total.Landslide.

LT Nixon

Jonn,

Well you probably already know my thoughts on Palin, but I think Steele could really shake things up in Republican land and make the party better. He’s socially liberal too, which is huge points in my book.