Sergio Jose Martinez; deported 20 times
Sergio Jose Martinez was arrested this week in Oregon when he sexually assaulted a 65-year-old woman and stole her car. While police were investigating that crime, he attacked another woman with a knife. According to KOIN, his arrest record goes back to 2003 when he went through a drug and alcohol treatment program when he was 15 years old.
Martinez moved to Portland within the last three years. He appears to be transient with no fixed address. He has used a Northwest Portland shelter as his mailing address. Martinez told officials that he picks up construction jobs to make money.
Martinez is a meth and marijuana user and told the sheriff’s office alcohol is his most serious addition. Earlier this year, he told jail staff that he consumes four to six 24 oz. beers per day. In the past, he said he has consumed as much as 10 beers per day.
KGW reports that he’s been deported about 20 times to his native Mexico;
According to court documents filed in March 2017, Martinez has a history of illegal entry into the United States. He has been a transient in the Portland area for more than a year and has been deported 20 times.
Martinez has at least five probation violations for re-entering the United States. His most recent removal was in November 2016, according to the March court documents.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) lodged an immigration detainer against Martinez, asking authorities to notify them before releasing Martinez to allow ICE to take him into custody. The Department of Homeland Security said a detainer was requested for Martinez in December 2016, but he was released into the community and authorities did not notify ICE.
Earlier this year, Multnomah County leaders and Sheriff Mike Reese wrote a letter to the community saying, “The Sheriff’s Office does not hold people in county jails on ICE detainers or conduct any immigration enforcement actions.”
Good for Sheriff Reese taking the side of criminals above his own law-abiding citizenry.
Prior to the July 24 arrest, Martinez’s criminal record shows a felony conviction for burglary and three misdemeanor convictions for battery, theft, and obstructing a public officer. The court document also said he told investigators in March that he has a long history of using methamphetamine and was currently using on a daily basis.
The new charges Martinez is facing include first-degree kidnapping, first-degree robbery (two counts), second-degree assault, first-degree sex abuse, first-degree sodomy and first-degree burglary.
I guess the sheriff won’t be happy until he can add “murder” to Martinez’ personal history.
Category: Illegal Immigrants
Twenty times, but that is not the high score.
Why is that slimey little maggot still breathing? cut his balls off, then hang him slowly!!
What in the fuck is it going to take?
I have heard deporting them in a box greatly reduces the chances of them returning.
Unfortunately, its US Citizens being put in boxes because of shit stains like this Sheriff and City council that are more concerned with creating the liberal utopia of “Illegalstan”.
Spot on. “There is no murder in paradise”…
Flushing the toilet that is the City of Portland and getting responsible leaders in place.
FWIW, the Portland Police Bureau is headed by the Mayor (the mayor and member of the council head the individual bureaus in the city – treating them like little kingdoms). They tend to be concerned with SJW issues while streets are left with potholes and other infrastructure problems.
Probably ICE picking up the tab for the county detaining immigration holds while ICE decided what to do. Assuming they’d have capacity.
Is this sheriff one of those gun-toting ‘guns for me but not for thee’ asswiping asshamsters?
Someone should sue his ass into the ground over his pro-criminal slant. They aren’t misunderstood. This guy is a danger to society. If you asked him, Martinez would probably say ‘O, si, si, muy peligroso’. But that doesn’t matter to morons like this sheriff, does it?
The Chief of Police in Portland is a “revolving door” position:
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-portland-oregon-police-2017-story.html
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/2016/05/24/sheriff-contrary-stories-portland-police-chief-shooting/84842320/
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj5guLYk7HVAhWogFQKHaMHB8oQFgg-MAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.policemag.com%2Fchannel%2Fpatrol%2Fnews%2F2017%2F03%2F27%2Fportland-chief-accused-of-having-lieutenant-falsify-his-training-log.aspx&usg=AFQjCNHsHFvm-dhdC7AaDbRffsNlx3Tcjg
Thanks for the links, Chief. My remark: “People get the government they deserve. Portlandia is a sanctuary city. That’s why criminal immigrants flee there, and not to Northern California or Eastern Oregon.
Sorry, SENIOR Chief.
The victims should SUE EVERYONE responsible for this maggot being freed and released, TWENTY TIMES THE JUDGMENT!!
Sadly, suing the city and SD sounds nice, but it isn’t the answer. Even if forced to pay out, insurance usually covers that, and the policies that allow this guy to walk free never change.
Oh, no, not ‘sue the city’. Sue that idiot sheriff. He should cost the city more than just his salary and bennies.
I don’t think suing will work because they will hide behind “policies” like the lying federal government does.
The only way it will start to change is when it affects the SJW clowns more then the peons.
You can’t make an omelet without cracking a few eggs. The women will be instructed they were raped for the “greater good” of their community and then ordered to shut up and be good proggies…
Deport him, from an airplane, no parachute.
You are saying he should make a HANO qualification jump?
Preferably into the ocean, 1000 miles off the coast. Wouldn’t want trash like that washing up on the beaches, or muddying up the landscape if dropped inland. The little fishies and crabbies gotta eat too.
Convicted felon? Three-peet?
Jet-A is expensive, JP-8 even more so.
Build trebuchets! They are easily made from simple and inexpensive materials, reusable, ecologically freindly, and almost infallibly reliable.
Position near the border, or coast, load the sling, and yank the lanyard.
Sane folks see the function of government as a means to discourage bad behavior. Lefties use government to reward bad behavior.
Meanwhile, you betcha – sue everyone who purposefully ignores the law of the land. Wrongful death come to mind, but there must be variations of that concept which would apply to other crimes which result from the willful dereliction of duty and such.
Disgusting. That a single American (or anyone else) should suffer in this country because officials charged with enforcing the law refuse to do so is beyond the imagination of most people.
Is it coincidence that those same officials blame the rest of us of bias when it is their refusing to enforce the law which disproportionately affects a minority population?
I suggest putting this guy on house arrest, with an ankle monitor…. And since he doesn’t have a permanent address, have him serve it living a month at a time, with the sheriff, and each member of county and state govt that has come out in favor of such sanctuary policies…Then they can see first hand how their policies effect law abiding citizens…
well at least that way he could rape their families!
Is Portland officially a “sanctuary” city? It would certainly fit with their reputation.
This guy is a world-class shitbag, of which we have plenty of our own. We don’t need to be letting more in. Twenty deportations? Can anyone give a good reason why he wasn’t shot on number three, at least? I suppose we should be glad he gets to continue to pursue his American dream of raping old ladies and stealing shit to feed his drug habit?
OREGON is a sanctuary state.
The Govt. needs a stealth program that would secretely take these peeps out somewhere and bury them. A Viet-Nam Phoenix style program could also be utilized out on Long Island NY to take care of the gang problem.
The only thing that would make this a better story is if the female victim was an SJW and had been protesting ICE and all things liberal in the past few years.
I would bet she becomes a conservative quite soon if that is the case…
Wow.
Just wow.
I wonder if he will be allowed to vote without an ID?
Or if he will be able to take refuge in a sanctuary city?
Probably voted for Shillary 20 times.
He’ll probably be elected in the next city council election.
Maybe the next Mayor?
Liberals, progressives, socialists and communists want to kill us all and replace us with submissive people that depend upon the government to provide their every need.
A bureaucrat’s wet dream, no doubt.
It is the right that wants to submit to the government and let it protect them and cater to every fear and paranoia.
And it’s the left that believes that government is the cure all for society’s ills.
I don’t want a technocrat telling me how to live my life – I want government out of my life as much as many here at TAH… contrary to your “opinion”, Commissar.
Oh, and BTW Lars, when you don’t ask immigration status, this is what you get.
Now play Hide and Go Fuck Yourself.
They knew his immigration status. And unlike most of you on this board I have caught, detained, and turned over to Border Patrol illegal entrants. Dozens of them. Sometimes van loads at a time.
So acting like an asshole because you hold a different position on this issue is a little bullshit. My position on this issue is consistent with what is in the best interest of communities and state and local government.
Immigration is ENTIRELY under federal law enforcement jurisdiction. States and not funded or reimbursed for their collaboration in immigration enforcement and when they participate their officers are acting OUTSIDE THEIR JURISDICTION and essentially have the same law enforcement authority as a private citizen.
Participating in immigration enforcement activities diverts vital and VERY LIMITED local law enforcement funds and manpower away from more pressing law enforcement priorities.
It exposes officers and departments to unlawful detention lawsuits resulting from misunderstandings, miscommunications, or often the case; border patrol never showing up to take custody often causing the officer to detain the subject beyond what is regarded as “reasonable”. Since an officer cannot verify a persons citizenship in these cases if the officer detains a US citizen inadvertently for longer than “reasonable” the cost to the municipality or country can be significant.
Most of the communities are majority hispanic. The first town I worked in was 97% hispanic. There are a significant number of locals without adequate identification even if they are US citizens. And illegal residents are sizable part of the community. Collaborating with ICE runs the risk of deterring cooperating from the community. We lose witnesses, people are less likely to communicate with local law enforcement and report crimes; worse the distrust and fear it fosters in the local community means that a percentage of the community is vulnerable to criminal victimization and exploitation because they have nobody to turn to for help. Or worse the community develops clannish protective behavior and retaliates vigilante style rather than involve law enforcement.
The main thing ICE asks for is to HONOR our detainers. ICE agents go to all local jails usually daily, and places holds on suspected illegals. If their original booking charges are dropped and they remain on our detainer, WE pick up the cost of keeping them there. Many Many times I have seen local DA’s find out that there is an ICE detainer and immediately clear them off their calendar by dropping charges. this results in (S)’s never being actually convicted of crimes just because it is easier for the DA to see them deported.
And Lars, as I have stated to you in the past, you are WRONG about local law enforcement acting outside their jurisdiction. I worked for ICE, we trained MANY local officers in the 287(G) program at FLETC, they are then given federal authority to enforce immigration laws. According to reports
“Vetted crime statistics from USDOJ, the U.S. Sentencing Commission and the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) are both clear and demonstrative that illegal immigrants who comprise only 3.5 percent of our nation’s population, are convicted and sentenced for the crime of murder at a rate of three times that of their American citizen and legal immigrant counterparts.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/crime/329589-the-truth-about-crime-illegal-immigrants-and-sanctuary-cities
No, dickhead.
Immigration isn’t solely a federal issue.
Run along.
“In the past, he said he has consumed as much as 10 beers per day.”
Piker.
As the fella said:
“24 hours in a day. 24 beers in a case. Coincidence?”
The Sheriff should have detained him so he could be deported again… However, there are a few things that should be noted about this issue… 1. State and local governments DO NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAW. 2. Participation in these collaborative agreements with ICE and the Federal government is entirely VOLUNTARY on behalf of states and localities. Because THEY DO NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAW. 3. States and localities accept LIABILITY when they make a mistake in a detainer. Meaning; if they detained someone who was not the same “Sergio Martinez” as the detainer requested or there is some other mistake in the detention then the city or country pays the unlawful detention lawsuit. These mistakes are generally aggravated when the state detains someone entirely based on immigration status because THEY DO NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAW. 4. The federal government does not reimburse the cost of detention in the vast majority of cases, and in the cases where a specific detention might fall under a grant program the grants often to not cover the expenses of collaboration with ICE. The government does not fund state and local government immigration enforcement activities because; THEY DO NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAW. 5. Municipalities and counties operate on limited budgets for every dollar spent collaborating with ICE they lose a dollar that could be used for other local and often MORE consequential law enforcement priorities and usually consider diverting funds toward immigration enforcement as a poor location of resources because THEY DO NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAW. In most cases the illegal immigrant is just that; unlawfully in the US and does not pose a risk to the community (other than to low skilled jerbs – though that is not generally true). So the municipalities divert funds, manpower, and resources participating in these collaborative agreements that could be used more directly to actually enforce crimes in the community. That being said some of these asshats should be detained and turned over. Though I am not sure that a 20 time deportee should… Read more »
Sigh. Honoring OUR DETAINER is not enforcing immigration law. It means, they call us and say, “Jose Cuervo has been adjudicated on his local charges, come pick him up or we will release him”
I worked local law enforcement for 22 years and then ICE, I’ve seen both sides. The illegals that get booked are not in for unpaid parking tickets.
Once again, if they stay in jail because of our detainer, WE PAY the local municipality. It was part of my job to determine reimbursements!
Remember, Commissar knows everything. Even if you worked in the field in question professionally dealing with the topic at hand on a daily basis for decades and he never heard of it before today, Commissar still knows more about it than you do and will happily tell you about it in the most condescending terms possible.
He has one of those commie lawer degrees from the Peeple’s Democratic Socialist School of Law of Berzerkeley. He’s almost as qualified as that Bernutz guy of the DRG.
He does not seem to know shit about the law and spews a lot of misunderstandings. It would be nightmare to work with him.
Not one person is arguing that the local police have the authority to enforce immigration law and he has created this giant straw man argument about it.
Weird.
Of course he doesn’t “know shit about the law.” He hasn’t spent three or four years in an accredited law school, he never passed a bar exam, and he has impaired reading comprehension. All he can do is regurgitate the crypto-commie propaganda he has learned from his Berzerkeley perfessors. He gets off coming on here because reading the posts and comments gets his panties in a wad in his sandy mangina; and it is an opportunity to spew his progtard agitprop.
You can deported around after a DUI arrest. It happens quite a lot actually.
Doesn’t matter though.
[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjMffHG1V_Q[/YouTube]
The only real weirdness I am getting out of all this is that when Obama says he wants to Federalize all law enforcement it is all a big globalist UN plot. When Trump says he wants to federalize local law enforcement it is either treated dismissively or given lukewarm support by those who just opposed it last year? This is pretty baffling to me.
Fisking time!
1) Honoring a detainer is not “enforcing immigration law” anymore than honoring a detainer request from another state that has a warrant out for a person is enforcing the law in the other state.
2) See #1 above. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
3) Nope. Not even close. Qualified immunity would apply. In that the local officials are not acting contrary to the law but within it, there is no chance a suit goes forward.
4) I see you are still having comprehension issues. See #1 above. Again.
5) I want to get this straight because the lack of logic is astounding. Are you really trying to say that local police would rather release a known criminal back into the community where his actions would cost more harm to citizens and property meaning more money spent on investigations rather than honoring the detainer and getting the guy out of the city and state? Are you trying to say that investigations of crimes committed by illegal aliens are cheaper than a cot and a bologna sandwich? If you don’t see the problem with your thinking, there is no help for you.
In most cases the illegal immigrant is just that; …..
Then why is he in your JAIL? Which is it? Are you arresting people for not being in the country legally? Or are you arresting people for crimes?
There are times when I really suspect that your hatred of people and ideas that you oppose takes over you and you start pounding the keyboard in some maniacal stream of thought.
Frankly, if you were in law enforcement, that’s a scary thought that someone who can be so unhinged ever interacted with people and had a gun attached to their hip.
I would think that the lawdogs that post here could rather easily validate prior LEO service, and once validated, ask some co-workers their opinions.
One would have to be a complete imbecille to post bullshit stories on a -stolen valor- forum.
Hmmm I bet your panties are all in a twist, what with being proven wrong AGAIN! and the fact that 18 county Sheriffs just signed up for the 287-G program, which trains and allows them to do EVERYTHING you claim that can’t above… It must hurt being wrong as much as you are…
Sorry, I failed to clarify that my post was directed to “Lars the all knowing”
Clarification was only necessary for Lars. Everyone else read and comprehended your post.
Thanks SFC D, I figured that, just didn’t want to give him any wiggle room
JUST BECAUSE YOU TYPE IT IN ALL CAPS DOESN’T MAKE IT A FACT OR TRUE.
/douchecanoe.
Repeat after me Commissar, under the 287-G program, THEY DO HAVE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAW!
See, I knew you could do it…..