Pentagon Dumps SHARP, Replaces It With Spay/Neuter Program

| February 6, 2017

After receiving complaints numbering in the hundreds of thousands by military personnel in all branches, the Pentagon has decided to replace the completely ineffective and annoying SHARP program with a less boring and much quicker spay/neuter clinic for all personnel.

The most common complaints are that Power Point programs leave people bored to death, asleep and snoring, or terrified of even looking at their fellow soldiers, Marines, airmen, or shipmates.

One Marine complained bitterly about not even being glanced at sideways by the women in his unit, thanks to SHARP.  “It deflated my sense of who I was,” LCPL Brandon Perkshire said. “I always thought I was a hunk. I mean, look at these guns, willya? Since attending SHARP, I’ve spent more time in the company of stray dogs and pizza delivery men than I do with women. I have regular conversations with my trouser trumpet because it’s so lonely, but I’m getting no joy out of it. Pep talks aren’t working too well, either. Seriously, if I want some pussy, I have to go to a no-kill cat shelter.”

He sounded somewhat bitter, however, when asked if he thought his social life might pick up with this program, he brightened up considerably. “Geez, I sure hope so,” LCPL Perkshire said. “I’d feel more like going back to Hooters to watch the games with my buddies.”

Navy PO2 Laura Boatman’s response to the change was welcoming. “I like the idea,” she said. “It makes it so much easier to do family planning if I can store my eggs in cryo and choose the baby daddy from a list of healthy prospects, with photos included. It will really take a load off my mind.”

The proposed change will allow service members to avail themselves of low-cost spay and neuter services at $75 a pop through a local large animal veterinarian if the service is not available where they are based. For example, NAVSTAGLAKES in northeastern Illinois can accommodate all of the service personnel in the Midwest, or refer active duty personnel to the large animal vet clinic at the University of Illinois in Urbana if the distance to NSGreat Lakes is too great.

“What the Pentagon has noticed is that in the Military Working Dog Corps, the female dogs don’t come in heat and the male dogs are not even remotely interested in them,” an unidentified spokesman said. “The only real concern is that female service members might become overly interested in chasing squirrels or digging under cabinets for lost items, and the male service members may start demanding their own kong toys and biscuit breaks. And they’ll probably all want walkies after work, too.”

Category: WTF?

32 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wilted Willy

If I had to ever sit thru one of those slide shows, I’m sure my Heat Seeking Moisture Missle, would never get off the pad!

Forest Green

I’m sure if you hunch over and rapidly pound the bottom of the table top, you would be excused.

HMCS(FMF) ret

Heat Seeking Moisture Missile = Throbbing Python of Love

h/t Robin Williams

Silentium Est Aureum

You need to send that to Duffelblog.

Green Thumb

I know some folks that should apply for this procedure.

It would make the world a better place.

What they ought to do is “correct” anyone separating from service with a substandard discharge.

David

PH2 – never knew you knew my wife… this explains so much.

Anonymous

Don’t give the SHARP/EO folk ideas… some of ’em might do the job with a paper-cutter.

Jay

Sadly enough, this is more believeable than some of the posers we see on here.

Andy11M

Comments not realizing what this story is in 3,2….

borderbill (a NIMBY/BANANA)

Okay, I got my Honorable Discharge in “73. What is SHARP? (it don’t sound good)

Jay

Considering the subsection of the military that needs it (read: field grade and above) are the ones that usually exempt themselves from it.

swormy

I wouldn’t necessarily object to SHARP training if units would accurately account for who took it at required times.

I have now been through the class nine times in less than three years.

I know that at times I’m thick headed, but come on!

19D2OR4 - Smitty

It is required quarterly in the Army as per AR 350-1. So in three years, thats 12 SHARP briefs we go through. With a sign in roster and make up dates. Units have to be as close to 100% as possible. That is in addition to quarterly EO and MRT briefs.

19D2OR4 - Smitty

It is actually, Sexual Harrassment, Assault, Response and Prevention.

Dav

Think of it as a sexual version of CDAAC and HREO.

Rutter

I am not sure what it is either being a Brit. I guess it’s similar to the treatment the woofter Mr Bradley Manning is after, testicles chopped off, and so on.

ex-OS2

Wait, this isn’t real?

Cocksuckers.

Wilted Willy

Oh yes! One of the funniest movies ever!

timactual

One of the great scenes of all time. Thanks, I can always use a good laugh.

SFC D

SHARP always was nothing but a CYA item for the Pentagon. The dumbasses that are going to cause problems are gonna do it regardless of SHARP training, SHARP just gives the brass the chance to say “see, we told them not to do that! It’s not our fault!”

Some Guy

Ding! Ding! Ding! Thank you, finally someone else said it. This, along with EO, TARP, IA, and Resilience training, needs to go and stop wasting valuable man hours. Either you get it or you don’t. No amount of power point slides are gonna dissuade a determined rapist.

trackback

[…] Make It So Hard To Defend Him The Political Hat: Trump’s Useful Idiots This Ain’t Hell: Pentagon Dumps SHARP, Replaces It With Spay/Neuter Program, also, New SecNav Is Inheriting A Mess War Is Boring: Belarus Prepares For “Hybrid War” […]

Flagwaver

Most of the cases of sexual harassment and sexual assault I’ve heard of in the military are coming from the SHARP reps and trainers.

jonp

“look at these guns”? I said that to my wife last night

timactual

“gunS”? Plural? Hmmmm.

Pinto Nag

Geez. See if I ever mention breeding anything in front of you ever again! *eyeroll*