Why newspapers are dying

| December 26, 2008

The Purple Avenger at Ace of Spades wrote a post yesterday about the editorial board of the Connecticut Post telling their readers which subjects they shouldn’t be writing letters to the paper about. PA writes that their number one complaint about the readers is the fact they constantly blame poor Barney Franks and Chris Dodd for the our current economic problems.

Further down the piece, the board complains;

This is a big one — socialism. Really? Did I miss Obama’s plan to nationalize the oil industry?

Is that the only thing that would earmark the Obama Administration as socialists? He did have a policy plank that called for the nationalization of healthcare. That’s not socialism? Taking money from one group of people to fund another group of people’s poor choices isn’t socialism?

The notion that the tens of billions of dollars we spend killing people in Iraq could be better spent on schools and hospitals in this country is not radical. Huge majorities in this country support a robust social safety net, so that people who experience a run of misfortune don’t lose everything. All other industrialized nations on the planet have some form of universal health care. None of this is controversial.

Yeah, well, spending ten of billions of dollars killing “people” is what the Federal government is supposed to be doing. Spending money on schools and hospitals is not something the Constitution says the Federal government should be doing. See the difference? I think if “huge majorities in this country” knew what a “robust social safety net” was going to cost them, they wouldn’t be so huge.

And those “other industrialized nations” really are socialist entities themselves. Some even put it right in the names of their majority political parties. And they’re beginning to realize what the costs of their follies are, and they’ve begun to cut back on their spending. Please pay attention.

And helping people who’ve had a “run of misfortune” is why there are charities, but funding a multi-generational lifestyle of sloth is what a corrupt and lazy government does to buy votes for a particular political party.

Maybe those correspondents who fret about our economic choices are happy with the fact that while this is the richest country in the world, there are 41 nations with lower infant mortality rates. At the same time, most workers in “socialist” Western Europe get four to five weeks vacation to start with. What are we supposed to be scared of again?

Yeah, those countries that have four to five weeks vacation mainly do that as an accounting trick to reach higher employment. All of those nations have near-double-digit unemployment and lower productivity per worker per hour than the US and that’s why we’re the economic powerhouse we are. But that’s the part the Left wants to change.

I suppose the Connecticut Post doesn’t want to discuss reality, and they don’t want their readers to be informed beyond the nuggets that the Post tosses them to keep them ignorant. And no one can figure out why the print news industry is failing.

Category: Media, Society

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rob Johnson

I stopped buying years ago. i think those who can actually read,cant trust the articles to be factual, the papers omsbudsmen are useless (i.e. NY Times, Hartford Courant, etc..) and they are now about 2-3 days behind web based news and opinion. Beside – the bushmonkeyhitler thing got to old to see every single day, over and over even in the same printing…

defendUSA

Yeah, Jonn, being a CT Native,I wouldn’t wipe my ass with any of those rags. I saw an article once about a camp for kids aged 7 and up that promoted atheism…and while people are free to do what they want, I thought it was propaganda, kid style. Barf bucket, please!

SunSetSam

The statement about infant mortality rates is basically dishonest. The US has a very liberal definition of a live birth while many countries don’t define a live birth until a period of time after the baby is born or if the baby meets certain criteria. With the medical technologies that the US has, we try to save many infants that other contries will not incur the expense or effort. See:

http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/articles/060924/2healy.htm

The money quote is

“First, it’s shaky ground to compare U.S. infant mortality with reports from other countries. The United States counts all births as live if they show any sign of life, regardless of prematurity or size. This includes what many other countries report as stillbirths. In Austria and Germany, fetal weight must be at least 500 grams (1 pound) to count as a live birth; in other parts of Europe, such as Switzerland, the fetus must be at least 30 centimeters (12 inches) long. In Belgium and France, births at less than 26 weeks of pregnancy are registered as lifeless.[3] And some countries don’t reliably register babies who die within the first 24 hours of birth. Thus, the United States is sure to report higher infant mortality rates. For this very reason, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which collects the European numbers, warns of head-to-head comparisons by country.”

UpNorth

When I saw the bylines in our daily rag, namely the NYT, AP and Reuters, I cancelled. And I won’t go back. They left me, with their leftist views. So no loss, I’d rather get my news on the net and read the blogs I like.

tankerbabe

Well Jonn…while I agree with you on this point (about why newspapers are a dying breed)…I also am convinced a large part is not so much people not wanting to read the crap they print but rather they are on the internet surfing crap sites. Either way…I believe most American’s only want to see through rose colored glasses or whiskey.

Aw1 Tim

I had once thought of subscribing to a newspaper in order to have material to line the bird cage with. Upon reflection, I realized how redundant that would be.

Skye

AW1 Tim: Why spend good money on trash? Use your local Metro paper. It is free, and the paper makes good material to line bird cages and cat litter boxes.

In the age of Obama, we all need to find ways to hold on to our ‘change’.

ciccio

Socialism encourages young girls to drop out of school and start birthing child after child after child with a succession of unknown unnamed fathers. The more children the more welfare, the taxpayer picks up the tab for housing, education and healthcare. In this way generation after generation of welfare dependent families are raised whose only job is breeding, drugs and crime.
Surely nothing like this is happening in the US, or is it.