Emails: Soros regrets backing Obama
Our buddy, Kristina Wong at The Hill reports that the Democrat Party boogey-man, George Soros told Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden that he regrets giving Obama $5 million for his campaign during the 2008 campaign. Not because he’s unhappy with Obama’s policies, but because he can’t get the attention from the President that he thought he was buying according to an email from Tanden to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton;
“I told him I worked for you in the primaries and he said he’s been impressed that he can always call/meet with you on an issue of policy and said he hasn’t met with the President ever (though I thought he had),” Tanden wrote.
“He then said he regretted his decision in the primary – he likes to admit mistakes when he makes them and that was one of them,” she added.
“He then extolled his work with you from your time as First Lady on. You probably have heard this all before but on the off chance you haven’t, I thought I should let you know. Thanks again for doing the video!” she wrote.
Wong’s article continues that Soros has had private meetings with Obama, but none of the easy access to the White House and the president’s ear that Soros admits that he thought he was paying for with his donations to the Obama campaign. But, hey, Soros likes Clinton, so that’s bound to help her in the campaign.
Category: Barack Obama/Joe Biden
Darth Soros finds the Glorious Leader’s lack of faith disturbing.
An honest politician is defined as one who when purchased stays bought.
Obviously Soros thinks he didn’t get his money’s worth.
I call bull. Soros’s problem is that he was too good at ruining America. So good it cost the Dems the Senate, House, Governorships and state legislators.
Many Americans are still pissed and that means Dems could lose the White House.
I would like to Soros’s citizenship revoked and sent to some foreign country that has a warrant out for his arrest.
DITTO that!!
stsc, well I think soros has quite a few republicans on his payroll too so I doubt he is too concerned about the dems losing the house and senate…or the white house if Jeb or Rubio get it.
Good article.
One of the (many) reasons why I like Trump.
“…. but none of the easy access to the White House and the president’s ear that Soros admits that he thought he was paying for with his donations to the Obama campaign.”
George Soros is a despicable little toad.
And you just managed to insult poor little toads everywhere. What’d a toad ever do to you?
As I’ve been saying for years:
George Soros isn’t a Socialist, or a Democrat. He’s a Capitalist. He wants EVERYONE ELSE to be Socialists.
Let’s refine that a little further. Darth Soros is a CRONY capitalist.
I call BULLSHIT on Soro’s now if he like many who have opposed Obummer gets a visit from the IRS in the next 30 days then he’s telling the truth…. anybody who has spoken out publicly in the last five and a half years has gotten a visit from them it’s been his most powerful weapon with the Supreme Court, Congress, and the media… are people ever going to wake-up ?????
I don’t think so 🙁
An old rich, European Jew being dissed by a black, quasi-Muslim, anti-Semitic admirer of Louis Farrakhan.
Whooda thought?
Gee, George, it never occurred to you you might be getting played? Maybe ol’ George ain’t such a genius after all.
He’s a traitor to the Jews, too. He and his father were turning in their own, back in occupied territory.
If you had wanted to get your money’s worth out of the President, George, you should have converted to Islam.
Serious Q:
Anybody have a reliable source to describe what Soros actually is all about?
I’ve read so much about him and it just gets foggy regarding where the truth begins.
A brief but accurate read. I don’t know if there’s anybody out there who knows about all of his dark corners.
http://humanevents.com/2011/04/02/top-10-reasons-george-soros-is-dangerous/
What is Soros about? Money and control.
In the article that PN links to, this statement says it all:
He wants more power for groups such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, even while saying the U.S. role in the IMF should be “downsized.” In 1998, he wrote: “Insofar as there are collective interests that transcend state boundaries, the sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions.”
It’s money and control, nothing else.