Female airman charged in sex scandal
Tom sends us a link to an article from Reuters which reports that a female drill instructor at Lackland’s training facility has been charged in the huge sex scandal there;
Staff Sergeant Emily Allen admitted to having a sexual relationship with a male technical trainee, attempting to have a sexual relationship with another man, and having or trying to develop social relationships with two female and one male technical trainees.
“She pleaded guilty to having a relationships with all four of the technical school Airmen,” Lackland spokesman Brent Boller said.
I don’t what is going through these people’s minds – there is a war going on and there are other things on the planet that deserve attention more than having sex with everything wearing a reflective belt. But, apparently, the problem crosses gender lines.
Category: Air Force
Where were these chicks when I was in ait?
“attempting to have a sexual relationship with another man, and having or trying to develop social relationships with two female and one male technical trainees.”
Must be a beast if she has to try that hard to be laid. And, “two female”….Hmmm.
Where is Obama?!?
This is an outrage!
He and NOW need to get involved.
SJ: I’m guessing the “social relationship” referenced here was non-sexual fraternization. That’s also prohibited. But I could well be wrong.
Rule No. 11: Do not date or have sex with anyone you work with. It never works out.
Do these people know that they write up someone like that horny-assed silly bitch?
I thought we cleared this up with those discussions about sex in the trenches back in January. Does this mean there’s more to this that was not addressed back then?
Crikey!!! When are these blithering idiots going to grow up? Hey, stupid, your job doesn’t include boinking your subordinates!!! Got that, dumbass?
Is there a photo of this dickweeder?
“…Allen admitted to having a sexual relationship with a male technical trainee, attempting to have a sexual relationship with another man, and having or trying to develop social relationships with two female and one male technical trainees.”
I admire an overachiever as much as the next guy, but I think she was pushing it.
Mike
Rule #12:
Never get involved with military women.
Old rule of thumb.
PH2: “Hey, stupid, your job doesn’t include boinking your subordinates!!! Got that, dumbass?”
That’s not a nice way to talk to former Pres Clinton. /G/
….And here is Sergeant Allen:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/female-air-force-trainer-involved-sex-scandal-sentenced-article-1.1334284
Hard to tell from the pic, but that looks like a medical badge over her ribbons.
Mike
SJ: Heeheehee! No cigars, huh?
@9.
That CPT on the right…
Now that’s a tough, no nonsense woman.
Yikes.
Re my #2. I stand corrected after looking at her pix. Not bad at all. What’s with the AF bubbas that resisted that? Army guys would have dropped trou immediately.
“…there are other things on the planet that deserve attention more than having sex…”
Well maybe, but frankly I think that sex is more primal than discipline. Discipline has to be inculcated in a variety of ways, but sexual desire comes to most of us perfectly naturally. To the extent that discipline conflicts with sexual desire, discipline will often suffer-which is why units have to devote precious manpower to “booty duty” while deployed.
@12 – Oh, here we go!
The line for tasteless remarks, bad jokes and inappropriate stuff forms on the right. Take a number, get in line.
I guess it simply means that the Army has better taste in women than the Air Force does. And maybe those guys were gay. Waht do I know?
Would smash and call her ma’am.
I can tell you that the average army guy would pulling his trousers off and headin’ for the nearest broom closet. As a SGM of mine once said,”You could send GIs to a place where there are only rocks and dinasours and they will come back married to one of them.”
But how can a woman be charged with sexual offenses? According to all of the SHAPRP training I sat through last week (OK SLEPT through) women in the military are all victims. And all males in the military are rapists waiting for the right opportunity. At least that’s what I got from the propaganda. I mean training…….
Hey, she’s cute! Was one of the male trainees gay?
So the former dental instructor is going to jail for presumeably practicing improper oral hygeine…
In other news i found it interesting the new york daily jumped the gun and assumed it was another TI.
That reminds me of a story our DS’s told us when I was a wet-behind-the-ears “Joe” back in 91. They told us about a female DS at Ft. Sill that was busted for blowing her “Joes” at $50 a pop. They said she got reduced to E-1, confinement, and of course, a Big Chicken Dinner. The same would be good for this AF instructor!
@17 – Stacey – Obviously, the instructor is someone who is afflicted with a complete lack of understanding of women; or is a woman who has never had sex; or does not believe that women can be as sexually aggressive (horny) as men.
Whatever, the instructor should read “Sex Tips For Straight Women From a Gay Man” (lots of fun), plus a bit of Dr. Ruth and maybe send off a letter to Dear Abby. I would just love to spend some time yanking that instructor’s chain about orgasms. I mean, after all, we did have that long, several part discussion about women in combat and men in January, which I thought covered just about everything. Was there anything we left unsaid?
@2 – She partied at her home with 3 airmen – the guy she slept with and 2 other women. She then attempted another sexual relationship with another airman.
MTIs are forbidden to have contact with trainees, even after they’ve graduated from BMT.
She asked to stay in the AF to be able to care for her young daughter. They sentenced her to 3 months in jail, 30 days hard time, and reduction to A1C.
http://www.airforcetimes.com/article/20130502/NEWS/305010005
Wonder what would have happened if it was a Male DS? Oh there was a case of that, they called it rape in his case.http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19970506&slug=2537610
One area where The Marine Corps had it right ( at least when I retired) Though exposed at times to classroom and field instruction at times, The Corps Maintained a strict segregation of new recruits from the opposite sex. Co-ed recruit training at close quarters is fuggin asking for trouble,
Dipping your pen in the company ink has always been a no-no.
@21-the “official” line from DoD on sexual assault/rape/harassment is that women are always the victims never perpetrators and all men are rapists waiting for their chance.
I’m soo glad I went to BCT with all dudes even if it did suck until I got to Ft. Sham, where there was just too many other things to do than mess with any female DS
@17.
Good point.
@25 – Well, I am glad to see that the Dept. of Defense is finally moving out of the 1940s, when it was simply obssessed with sex when I enlisted (1967) into the 1960s (now). That is definitely progress.
If you pass out from sheer boredom during one of the DoD’s sex ed classes, then the materials and the instructors must be even more boring than they were when some genius at the Pentagon put together a little slideshow and the Navy Photo Center to “educate” us girls and boys about sex and homosexuality and how we shouldn’t get involved in either one. That was 1968, and that lecture was so awful that it was punctuated by loud snores from the audience. And you went to sleep in a current lecture, so some things simply never change.
Good old Lackland, nothing better to do than to get in trouble, apparently.
@28.
The Obama Administration:
Hire Hooters girls, Chip n’ Dales and the local LBGT community advocate to teach it.
And give them some “rank”.
Wow.
Surprised this even makes news. This seems to happen alot of times in tech schools like in Keesler or Lackland now. Also seems to happen alot in Germany though too such as Spangdahlem incident that was pretty pathetic.
having sex with everything wearing a reflective belt.
Is it wrong that I’m trying to imagine the sex tape of the participants wearing reflective belts? With the right lighting, it might be interesting.
I guess it could be worse… I could be searching the net for the video. There are probably some out there.
I attended the 2-week SHARP certification course last year, and though I didn’t agree with some of the cases the instructor brought up, there is definitely no “official line” about women always being the victims. Or if there is, the Army hasn’t heard it. We gave some brief training sessions last week, and a CID Special Agent opened each session up with an overview of what happens in sexual assault cases. One case he talked about was that of two females who had been found guilty of assaulting a male after getting him intoxicated. Our instructor used as an example a wife who found out that her husband was cheating, and who tied him up and shoved things in his anus. She too was convicted of sexual assault. So, while I agree that in most cases a woman’s story will initially be believed more than a man’s, which is sometimes unjustly in “he said, she said” cases pertaining to vaginal sex, I cannot honestly say that I’ve ever heard anyone in the SHARP program state “women are always the victim”. Doing so would violate the military’s current opinion that we are all equally capable (as evidenced by the recent EXORD stating that women will be fully integrated into “restricted MOS'” by 1 January 2016). On a side note, that same EXPORD establishes the need to gender nonspecific physical standards. Former-SSgt Allen probably wasn’t much older than those she trained; she was an E-5, after all, and I’ve known some Sergeants in the Army who were as young as 19. The “social” relationships she had with the females seems to be evidence of a lack of maturity overcoming military bearing and discipline. She probably found a guy or two she liked, as well as some females she thought of as friends. I knew a few Recruiters like that, who were unable to distinguish between professional relationships and personal ones. If some of the stories I heard about others in my company were true, we’d have made national headlines–with married Recruiters taking girls back to the office to go at it on… Read more »
Life was so much easier when gender segregation still existed. There were plenty of ways for the willing to get together after BMT in spite of separate dorms and such.
Just saw this one http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/05/06/air-force-sexual-assault-watchdog-arrested-for-sexual-assault/2139325/ Don’t know if the link has been forwarded but I have no idea how to sugest stories so 🙂
I used the “Contact Us” to forward that story a bit ago, but from a different vendor. Might try that.
#35 & 36, Thanks, but I caught it on Fox News while you were sending us the links. I knew you guys wanted to talk about it.