Obama’s ME Position(s)?
Doesn’t much matter which politician is speaking, in general. If I’m likely to be interested I ignore the talking heads and try to find a transcript. THEN I will look at what the pundits think about it if writing a post seems in order. After all, I’m old and lazy. I’ve reinvented the wheel several time already.
So for an overview I offer Ed Morriessy at Hot Air.
The Arab street is disappointed some.
The Israelis are disappointed as well.
Word for the day: Feckless.
This post is almost pointless here, among our erudite readers save for one thing. Sometimes rote learning actually works.
Category: Pointless blather, Politics
One thing I do is see which articles Drudge pairs together. With an article on the POTUS’s speech is one on the heavy outreach to secure the Dems’ Jewish campaign donors.
Follow that with a news report that the POTUS is speaking to AIPAC (speaking at AIPAC?) just before Netanyahu’s visit.
Some of the talking heads are calling the POTUS a neocon. Not seeing it.
In truth I only give Drudge a cursory look. And occasionally find a gem. Otherwise I agree. Although not this NOT the first CINC to do so… pandering seems to work.
Unless one is in the trenches? Perhaps I should say – unless one is in the real world.
So, Israel isn’t happy with having to live inside “indefensible” borders? Welcome to the world, according to Owebowma. Apparently, they didn’t give him enough money back in the day, the Pally’s did, so there you go. Simplified yes, but how else to explain the speech? Unless, the Wan wants Israel to disappear?
UpNorth #3:
If I could grasp our CINCs real agenda I might agree.
If I amplify any more Jonn may dump me as ‘one of them’?
I do get a kick out of The Bizzaro World View though. Reality is a bitch.
Yea and Obama is a *pussy*….
Not to mention his head is up Soros butt….
#6, Streetsweeper,
So your saying Obama’s Official Position on the MidEast is Rectal Defilade. Yes, I think that can be found in the Book of Political Yoga.
The POTUS’ position is absolutely clear….self preservation. This trumps all other considerations in all conditions. He is absolutely 100% consistent in this regard.
Moral relativism and not inability but the refusal to adhere to and discernible ability to honor any commitment not in his personal self-interest is his compass that guides all actions.