US slashes UN humanitarian aid from $17 billion to $2 billion

| December 29, 2025 | 26 Comments

The United States had traditionally provided approximately $17 billion funding for UN humanitarian aid. However, President Donald Trump reduced that to $2 billion, sent to a specific UN agency, and detailing which countries get the aid. Trump’s Truth Social posts provide some hints on his justification for the move. Trump is calling for the UN to engage in reforms that would make it more effective and efficient. Some are forecasting some negative impacts that this reduction would have on certain groups of people.

From Al Jazeera:

It comes as critics have levelled sharp criticism against the US’s dramatic aid reductions under Trump, leading to deaths and hunger as millions around the world lose shelter, sustenance and other essential aid.

The $2bn will create a pool of funds that can be directed at specific countries or crises, with 17 countries — including Bangladesh, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Syria and Ukraine — initially targeted.

Afghanistan is not included on the list, nor is Palestine, which officials say will be covered by money included in Trump’s yet-to-be-completed Gaza plan.

Dire outcomes as Western countries pull back aid

Earlier this month, the UN launched a 2026 appeal for $23bn — half the amount it needs — as the extent of Western funding losses became clear.

The UN had previously warned in June it would be forced to enact substantial programme reductions amid “the deepest funding cuts ever” to the international aid sector.

Trump has effectively dismantled the US’s primary platform for foreign aid, the US Agency for International Development (USAID), as his administration has called upon UN agencies to “adapt, shrink or die” in response to its approach.

Other Western countries, including Germany, have also slashed funding.

The fallout across the Middle East, South Asia and Africa has been swift.

In July, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said more than 11 million refugees would lose access to aid. At the time, the agency had received just 23 percent of its $10.6bn budget, and expected an overall budget of only $3.5bn by the end of the year to meet the needs of 122 million people.

Basic services for Rohingya refugees living in Bangladesh were at risk of collapsing, UNHCR said, while education for more than 230,000 Rohingya children was expected to be suspended.

The same month, the UN predicted a surge in HIV/AIDS deaths by 2029 due to the funding withdrawals, while the French charity Doctors Without Borders said more than 650 children had died from malnutrition in Nigeria as a direct result of international aid cuts.

Additional Reading:

Al Jazeera Staff & News Agencies. US slashes UN humanitarian aid to $2bn, huge cut as Trump demands reforms. Al Jazeera. Link.

Category: Donald Trump, International Affairs

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RCAF-CHAIRBORNE

Hear that?
Sounds like a derailed gravy train

Anonymous

Yeah, baby!

Fyrfighter

Still not tired of winning!

The west has been supporting these countries ever since sailing vessels landed on their coasts. EVERYTHING they have beyond mud huts and spears has come from the west. These “nations” have contributed NOTHING to the advancement of mankind, and it’s LONG past time they either sort their own shit out, or go the way of the Dodo… We need to bring back Darwin!

26Limabeans

Those look like New York plates on the truck.

Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH Neanderthal

The color may be right, but they’re too long and narrow.
Out-of-country plates.

26Limabeans

Poetic license.

Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH Neanderthal

…..plate.

Forest Bondurant

Good.

No point in paying foreign countries to hate “us” when they can hate “us” for free.

The UN will issue a strongly worded letter condemning the U.S., and that’s about it.

Let them pay for it.

Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH Neanderthal

Let them pay for it.”
The UN is like all other Gooberments.
By themselves, they create nothing worthwhile to buy/sell.
The have to pilfer the pockets of the working stiff for their pulchritude.

STSC(SW/SS)

And a leftist judge will issue an injunction in 3,2,1….

Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH Neanderthal

The judge want it paid, let him/her pay for it out of his/her own pocket.

Odie

I have no doubt.

RGR 4-78

the French charity Doctors Without Borders said more than 650 children had died from malnutrition in Nigeria as a direct result of international aid cuts.”

What an absolute lie. Those children died because their country is a train wreck with no end in sight.

A lot of those people hated us even as we sacrificed to fill their bellies, now they can hate us with their bellies empty.

NHSparky

Maybe some of those long lost princes can feed the kids.

jeff LPH 3 63-66

How dare we cut the moola shmoola from countries that want to learn how to play tiddly winks and hit the penny with a spauldine if they have sidewalks….

AW1Ed

Because of bullshit like this-
Somalia takes reins of UN Security Council

Fyrfighter

Maybe the UN could move it’s headquarters to Mogadishu instead of NYC.. rent would be cheaper..

A Proud Infidel®™

S’ABOUT TIME, how many decades have we been endlessly pouring money into countries elsewhere with no result other than it being skimmed off?

Hack Stone

Are you referring to UN run charities on Gavin Newsom’s programs to “solve” the unhoused in California?

A Proud Infidel®™

Thar and MANY others that really don’t do shit other than line certain peoples’ pockets, many an NGO has longtime politicians receiving money from it.

Skivvy Stacker

I say we slash it to $20 and we call it even.

BennSue

Palestine is not on the list because IT IS NOT A COUNTRY.

MSG Eric

It should read, “The US has reduced the amount of money the UN can use fraudulently, or embezzle to $2 Billion.”

Democrats cry about “systemic racism” but never seem to have an issue with “systemic fraud” happening. Especially when it’s with taxpayer money.

Anonymous

Indeed.

Fyrfighter

If cutting these funds is racist because it disparately impacts “people of color” can someone explain to me why the countries that “need” all this aid are predominantly countries that are a vast majority “people of color”..

Old tanker

Seems to me that there are several countries closely associated with the African Continent that have a fair amount of oil income. I’d suggest that those countries step up and take care of the problems that are far far closer to them than the US is.