Most Democrats want to abolish the Supreme Court
A recent Rasmussen poll shows that most Democrats have turned sour against the Supreme Court. Many believe that it is racist and sexist. Democrats also favor packing the Supreme Court, as well adjusting the Constitution to require the Supreme Court justices to be elected rather than appointed. Naturally, most Republicans do not want to abolish the Supreme Court, they do not want to pack it, and they do not want the justice selection process to be turned over to the electorate.
From Rasmussen Reports:
In the wake of a recent string of decisions strengthening the Second Amendment, reining in the power of the Environmental Protection Agency, and ending the constitutional right to an abortion, however, Democratic voters mostly disapprove of the Supreme Court. Only 33% of Democrats view the court favorably, while 63% have an unfavorable opinion of the court, including 40% of Democrats who have a Very Unfavorable view of the Supreme Court. By contrast, 72% of Republicans and 52% of independent voters have a favorable opinion of the court.
A majority of Democrats view the Supreme Court as racist and discriminatory against women, and favor either “packing” the court by adding extra justices or replacing the existing court with democratically elected justices.
“I am shocked and dismayed by these poll results,” said Heartland Institute research fellow Donald Kendal. “How can an institution like the Supreme Court function properly when the majority of those who call themselves liberal think the Court is sexist and racist? How can our system of government continue to work as outlined by the Constitution when the majority of those who call themselves liberal advocate for the abolishment of the Supreme Court? … I know our country has been divided in recent years; I’m starting to fear that division is becoming irreparable.”
The Rasmussen article is here, and the questions used in the poll are at this link.
Category: Democrats, Liberals suck, Politics, SCOTUS
Waaah, it’s not fair– get rid of the Supreme Court! (No, make better laws and rulings, Democrats.)
Today’s History Lesson from 1937:
“A 1937 political cartoon with the caption ‘Do We Want A Ventriloquist Act In The
Supreme Court?’ which was a criticism of FDR’s New Deal, depicting President Franklin D. Roosevelt with six new judges likely to be FDR puppets.”
Some Democrats want to pack the Supreme Court. Ironically, they don’t realize how much more knowledgeable and wiser the Founding Fathers were compared to them.
Of course the Dems want to abolish the Supreme Courts.
Majority (Not All) of them are PURPOSEDLY destroying our Country.
Majority (Not All) of them do not want us to have Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
We The People can see thru the ruse of what they are REALLY trying to do.
Green New Deal.
China (can someone say “blackmail courtesy of Ole Brandon Joey Boy).
Their strategy is backfiring. Look at the polling numbers for Ole Plugs.
Inflation Numbers. Raised costs of Gas, Food, Consumer Goods. Rent. Wages.
We The People Need To Get Out and Vote. It worked in Virginia…and in Texas.
And Pray. “If My People..”
It’s also driven by the desire to make the United States a socialist country, and to sacrifice our sovereignty to a single global government. Climate change, and climate change related initiatives, are among the tools that they are using.
thebesig..
Yep.
You NAILED It.
Sounds like someone failed 8th grade social studies. I can still hear Mr. Dalley’s simple, idiot-proof explanation of our tricameral government: “The Legislative branch creates the law, the Judicial branch interprets the law, and the Executive branch enforces the law”. Yes, it’s that fookin’ simple.
That is what we learned in school. That is what the textbook taught and that is what the teachers taught. This concept was presented in history, government, civics, etc.
Democrats didn’t read the book and just scream “Racist!”
Delete a third of our government- good luck with that.
What they did in November 2020, in the US, they did in Venezuela. If they could use fraud to get enough of their people in federal and in state legislative offices, as well as in the presidential and gubernatorial offices, they would have enough votes at the federal and state level of government to change the Constitution. Something similar occurred in Venezuela.
That would be an overt attack on our system of government, a coup. Don’t think it would play real well.
They got away with it in 2020. Ever since they failed to steal Florida in 2000, they’ve been working on their fraud game. There were reports of election irregularities in every election since then.
The difference in 2020 as that they did not count on Trump’s popularity, they threw caution to the wind, they were able to leverage mob mentality, to weaponize the friendliness of Hollywood and the mainstream media, and so on.
Had this been another run of the mill Republican, the majority of us on both sides of the political isle would have dismissed election fraud. Trump won so big that they acted in desperation and made a lot of mistakes. The Democrats were confident that the country was steadily “shifting left” at the ballot box. That confidence partly based on the fraud they were committing.
This has been decades in the making and implementing.
After the first Tuesday in November I ain’t leaving the bunker until the (see image)
and the republicans helped
“Democrats also favor packing the Supreme Court, as well adjusting the Constitution to require the Supreme Court justices to be elected rather than appointed.”
That is “weapons grade plutonium in the hands of a middle east terrorist” stupid.
So, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was racist and discriminatory against women? The things you learn from Democrats.
So, how exactly would the logistics of coordinating an election of Supreme Court Justices be administered? How long would they serve? Would they all be running simultaneously? Would there be primaries to narrow the field of candidates? Would foreigners and lobbyists be able to finance candidates? What if there was a dispute in election results, who would weigh the facts and issue a ruling, the Supreme Court? Maybe they got get Michael Moore to run things, he did a bang up job with that 28th Amendment idea.
It would be all mail in ballots. After 150% of the vote is countes a winner is declared.
We’re not gonna be voting our way out of this mess. Just placed an order for another 90 day of emergency rations. Freezer and pantry are both bulging.
The demonrats have striven to make all of We, The People their subjects for decades. I hope the chains on the useful idiots rest lightly.
Buy more gold, ammo and canned food, folks!
WFTL 850AM radio mentioned this morning and a couple of other very recent times that people are buying up cartons of MRE’s and other types of long storage foods because of the “so called food shortage” that is coming.
They may have a point on the sexist thing. I hear that at least one of the Justices on the SCOTUS has no idea what a woman even is.
I don’t think there is much to the racist part. Blacks are slightly over represented in the court (22% as opposed to 13.5% of US population) but I don’t think any president ever picked anyone just because they are a member of a certain racial group. I mean maybe, but no one would openly do that… right…
Ruh Roh, sounds like Michael Moore needs to craft another constitutional amendment. The USSC is the only court in the land which MUST exist. All others however, can be abolished if Congress so decides.
Something about Art. III Sec 1, or blah, blah blah.
I reserve my opinion until some NBA coach directs what it should be.
As usual, the D-rats go *WAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!* as soon as they don’t get their way, bawling like spoiled Toddlers with soiled diapers.
Their are no longer the JFK liberals of yesteryear. You now have shitbirds that want to change the country into a socialist state.
Can you imagine any of today’s D’Rats saying something like this?
“In short, it is a paradoxical truth that … the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now. The experience of a number of European countries and Japan have borne this out. This country’s own experience with tax reduction in 1954 has borne this out. And the reason is that only full employment can balance the budget, and tax reduction can pave the way to that employment. The purpose of cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus.” ~John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962~
Sad.
Rest In Peace.
“Donald Trump’s ex-wife Ivana Trump dead at 73, former president announces
Former President Trump announced her death on Truth Social”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/donald-trumps-ex-wife-ivana-trump-dead-former-president-announces
RIP. 73 is not very old these days.