Jesse Kelly: Type-A men needed in the military
Zachary Petrizzo took issue, on the Daily Beast, about Tucker Carlson’s nodding in agreement with his guest Jesse Kelly. They were talking about the military. Jesse Kelly provided Tucker Carlson his opinion on the type of men needed in the military. Petrizzo took aim at Tucker’s apparent lack of military service in response to Tucker’s agreeing with Kelly’s statement:
From the Daily Beast:
The Fox News host, who has never served in the military and apparently doesn’t understand the concept of pursuing multiple policies at once, seemingly agreed with the degrading remarks about women who deploy to warzones.
“That’s kind of what they’re saying,” Carlson said. “There’s a psychological term for this, and it escapes my memory at the moment, where there’s a massive real threat that you can’t deal with, so you scurry off and deal with imaginary threats to make yourself feel in control. That kind of feels like what we’re watching.”
But then, Kelly took it a step farther and said that the U.S. military should not be “woman-friendly” or “gay-friendly.”
“We don’t need a military that’s woman-friendly. We don’t need a military that’s gay-friendly, with all due respect to the Air Force. We need a military that’s flat-out hostile. We need a military full of Type-A men who want to sit on a throne of Chinese skulls, but we don’t have that now. We can’t even get women off of naval vessels,” he said. “That should be step one, but most of them are already pregnant anyway.”
The rest of Petrizzo’s article is at this link.
Category: Liberals suck
“…..pursuing multiple policies at once….”
WRONG ANSWER, SMEGMA-BREATH!
The military should have only ONE policy, to kill the enemy and break all their weapons (toys) until they’re ALL dead, or they surrender (whoever is left).
There are multiple TACTICS, but should be only ONE policy.
Military’s job is to make the other poor bastard die for his country, like Patton said in order to impose our will and interests upon our enemy.
Petrizzo….is that Italian for “little pet”?
“We need Type-A men who want to sit on a throne of Chinese skulls.”– what he said (see below):
This makes me wanna throw on my American flag shorts, cover my vessel with a light coat of oil, eat a steak cooked for 2 minutes a side, lift heavy things and put them down, all while listening to speed metal, chanting the mantra: ‘M118LR remains reliably supersonic out to 805 meters in all atmospheric conditions when fired from a M24 SWS’.
Kelly/Carlson 2024!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“Conan, what is best in life?”
Remain Crom, and crush your enemies!
And if you do not listen, to Hell with you.
A P-51 pilot said in an interview that he hated the Germans. His job was to kill Germans, and he knew his job well. Ilya Ehrenburg was one of the best war writers ever when he wrote: “If during a day you have not killed a single German, you have wasted the day. […] If you do not kill the German, he will kill you. […] If it is quiet at your section of the front and you are waiting for the battle, kill a German before the battle. If you let the German live, he will kill a Russian man and rape a Russian woman. If you have killed a German, kill another one too. […] Kill the German, thus cries your homeland.” That is the purpose for the individual soldier. What is foist upon today’s military is the same as Soviet “norms,” meeting or exceeding an official quota.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TqZIYFfm04
Yep.
His crack on the Air Force was both hilarious and established his military chops.
His real sin is being absolutely correct- the military is not a social engineering Petri dish, and nothing good will come from treating it so.
A throne of Chinese skulls meh, now a set of Enemy skulls to drink Mead from, that’s what I’d like!
Not enough mead. The bees are dying faster than the chicoms.
KILL.THEM.ALL! Let their God (or lack of one) sort them out.
It is embedded in Southern Americans DNA to defend women. That being said, it is now a learned trait to allow females to try to do anything they feel that they can…and support them in the attempt. History is replete with examples of Female Warriors that were so busy kicking ass that they did not take time to take any names of the ones they defeated. Now, with all of THAT being said, it is my opinion that the average American Female is not suited for front line close quarters combat, day in and day out. Not so much the physical demands, and there is that to be considered, but the whole mental preparedness is requires. Most have never been deprived of the comforts of home and hearth. These folks that are wanting to throw women into that situation may want to study what happened to captured female warriors in past conflicts. YMMV
The gays? If that’s your thing, have at it. Just don’t make me pay for your modifications or the drugs to maintain your adopted gender. If you can’t/won’t pull a trigger, a lanyard, or pickle off a fish, send up some sammiches and cold drinks. Or get Rosie to give you some lessons on how to please someone while she’s teaching you how to rivet.
The Amazons of Greek legend would cut off their right breasts IOT better draw their bows.
While I prefer my women fully breasted, any woman that dedicated to her profession is welcome in my formation. That should be the (figurative) line.
Beyond rigorous training and high standards, the line for any man serving in my formation should be the ability to stand beside such women without getting his ass kicked.
In my entire career, I’ve yet to meet such a woman (to be fair, I’ve never met ExPH2
KoB while most people would say your comments are outdated, myself included, it would mostly be because it is not just the women who are not suited for front line close quarters combat, day in and day out!
I have known a few women that could probably hack it, but they are the general exception not the rule. Reverse that for the men…mostly.
A fraction of a fraction, possibly, with a good tailwind and ample scoops of luck.
I’ve know heaps of dudes that shouldn’t have been hunting other men and 0.000 others.
I just scratch my head when I read articles by little cum stains like Zach who shoulda never been allowed to reach the egg. What the f@ck are they learning in school these days. I’m glad I’m old. I won’t have to watch our country be completely destroyed. I know why I wore the uniform. I just wonder what I was protecting since little turds like Zach exist in our country. For the record I find myself in agreement with Jesse Kelly and Tucker Carlson. My opinion on those would do harm to our country is, Kill ’em all, let God sort ’em out.
Name edited to protect PII, y’all.
AW1
2024!
Deja Vu Du
[Navy unveils maternity uniform pilot program for 2022]
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-navy/2021/12/17/navy-unveils-maternity-uniform-pilot-program-for-2022/
Is there a G-suit with this or is it just for show around the office while off flight status?
Up next: Army testing new T-10P parachute and harness for pregnant service members. Will accommodate a 25% larger canopy because “You’re jumping for two now.”
In a related story, he next generation of body armor will incorporate a hinged panel on the front that will allow new mothers to nurse while still protecting them from IDF.
Someone needs to get the Duffel Blog onto that one.
When did the US start testing recruits to make sure we could weed out people with certain, shall we say, tendencies? Oh yes, just yesterday….1917. Oh I want aggressive personality survivor types for sure, but people with a need to hate those they kill? I don’t think so. I’d prefer to think, it’s not just an adventure, it’s a job. Relax, take a deep breath, let it out, hold and squeeze the trigger…repeat.
Hate yer enemy, it helps. Get to know them, too; maybe they’re someone you’d like to shoot. Just sayin’.
Too raw? To not face killing up-front means PTSD/moral injury from guilt out of having done it blindly on the back end.
Hate is a valid emotion. No need to apologize.
Fuck yeah.
I want that fuckin throne.